Introducing an induction fieldtrip: did it work - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 24
About This Presentation
Title:

Introducing an induction fieldtrip: did it work

Description:

Two day fieldtrip to Shropshire during induction week i.e. pre ... Palaeobiology & Evolution (PEV) 2. In 2006 expanded to include: Environmental Science (ENS) 5 ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:77
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 25
Provided by: compu354
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Introducing an induction fieldtrip: did it work


1
Introducing an induction fieldtrip did it work?
Anne-Marie Nuttall1, Jenny Jones1 Martyn
Stewart12
  • 1 School of Biological Earth Sciences,
    Liverpool John Moores University
  • 2 JMU Learning Development Unit, LJMU

2
Introduction
  • Faculty funded project
  • To investigate the effect of an induction
    fieldtrip on retention
  • Level 1 geoscience students
  • Two day fieldtrip to Shropshire during induction
    week i.e. pre teaching
  • 40 students 6 staff in 2005
  • 50 students 9 staff in 2006

3
Context
  • Geoscience degree programmes
  • Geology (GLY) 15
  • Physical Geography (PHG) 11
  • Hazards Geoscience (HAG) 4
  • Palaeobiology Evolution (PEV) 2
  • In 2006 expanded to include
  • Environmental Science (ENS) 5
  • Wildlife Conservation (WC) 15
  • Biology Geography (BAG) 3

4
(No Transcript)
5
Rationale
  • Induction known to be a difficult transition time
  • Crucial to retention gt worth investing in?
  • 20 of our students live at home, which can be
    an isolating experience. Social integration could
    help.
  • HEA First Year Experience Survey (Yorke
    Longden, 2007) shows
  • 29 of first year students considered withdrawing
  • Best feature of first year? 45 said making new
    friends
  • Worst feature? 16 said workload, 12 said making
    friends, 4 homesickness

6
Structure of trip
  • Aims were (a) to provide a gentle introduction to
    field work and (b) to help students settle in
    socially
  • Range of subject related field activities (not
    assessed)
  • Staff were around during working day and in the
    evening
  • Social events in the evening
  • A slide show of field work on the programme to
    provide a taster of what they may experience
  • A pub quiz (with prizes) in tutorial groups
  • Self-organised events

7
(No Transcript)
8
(No Transcript)
9
Approach
  • Quantitative and qualitative approaches to
    evaluation
  • Questionnaires were completed by the students
  • (i) before starting the field work
  • (ii) after the final field location
  • (iii) at the end of the first year (after a
    one-week residential fieldwork module in Arran)
  • Retention stats analysed for cohorts before
    after fieldtrip was introduced

10
Pre tripEvidence of student expectations
11
Student views at end of trip
12
Student comments What have you enjoyed about the
trip?
  • Enjoyed getting to know everyone
  • The opportunity to work in groups
  • Meeting my tutors
  • Learning new fieldwork techniques
  • Wading in the river
  • Taking part in all aspects of science
  • Benefiting from the experiences of all the
    lecturers, its awesome being able to have people
    that can answer all your questions

13
Student comments What have you NOT enjoyed about
the trip?
  • Many did not answer this question!
  • Walking
  • Lack of sleep
  • Missing the Liverpool match
  • Losing the quiz
  • Drawing rocks
  • The talks that had nothing to do with animals
  • Sometimes feeling a little lost or left behind
    having never studied geology before (BUT now less
    worried than before, even more excited)

14
Student views at end of year
15
Staff reactions/comments
  • Overwhelmingly positive all in favour of
    continuing
  • The cohort seems socially more integrated.
  • The tutorial group 'gelled' more quickly than in
    past years
  • They seemed more confident in talking to me
  • By the end I knew more students by name
  • Attendance (at modules) was worse this year than
    last year
  • They all enjoyed the induction trip but possibly
    it encouraged friendships too soon - social
    friendships rather than study friendships
  • Coalescing into groups seems in some cases to
    drag the whole group down and into a culture of
    poor attendance/absence
  • We may have lost proportionately fewer students
    but whether this has anything to do with the
    field trip is impossible to say

16
Stats students starting degree
17
Stats students withdrawing
18
Stats students progressing to level 2
19
Conclusions
  • We know from experience that fieldwork is good
    for social bonding
  • Literature shows that worries about fitting in
    are a major factor for retention
  • Hence the plan to use fieldwork as part of
    induction
  • Did it work? Maybe, maybe not
  • Qualitative evaluation of staff and student
    comments show it was successful
  • Quantitative data show the opposite

20
Complicating factors (excuses.)
  • Small sample sizes, noisy dataset
  • Change of student database, reliability of data?
  • Students dont always tell us that they have
    withdrawn
  • Introduction of top-up fees in 2006-07
  • Many who dont complete level 1 at first attempt
    complete over the summer or continue part time
  • Change in the no. range of programmes involved
  • Only 2 years of data so far
  • 2006-07 cohort just finishing level 1 now

21
Conclusions
  • Do the data reflect the impact of the trip or
    wider factors?
  • Evaluation is inconclusive. Contradictions have
    highlighted key questions to follow up
  • Need to evaluate over longer timeframe
  • Need to triangulate against wider reference
    points, e.g. comparing with institutional data or
    other programmes that do/dont have an induction
    fieldtrip
  • If the drop in progression is real, it is
    important to get to the cause of this (i.e. is it
    the fieldtrip or other factors?)

22
Future plans..?
  • Continue to run induction trip
  • Introduce more challenging activities
    (opportunities to succeed)
  • e.g. presentations in groups on how the subjects
    interact
  • Teach them how to do group work?
  • Pep talk on expectations, taking your studies
    seriously
  • Take students from previous cohorts along to act
    as mentors dont do what I did

23
Recommendations
  • High staff-student ratio (16 or thereabouts)
  • Stay overnight
  • YHAs practical cheap (30 pppn food accom)
  • Dont charge students if at all possible
  • Mix of work-based activities social activities
  • Be ready to accommodate students with special
    needs
  • May need CRB checks (if any under 18s) takes
    ages

24
Issues for discussion
  • Is induction field work part of your programmes?
  • What kind of activities would you incorporate?
  • Any suggestions for structured group work..?
  • Yorke, M. and Longden, B. (2007) The first year
    experience in higher education in the UK, Higher
    Education Academy http//www.heacademy.ac.uk/FYEsu
    rvey.htm
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com