Promises and Pitfalls STHS Hospital System Network November 12, 2003 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 148
About This Presentation
Title:

Promises and Pitfalls STHS Hospital System Network November 12, 2003

Description:

Promises and Pitfalls STHS Hospital System Network November 12, 2003 – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:123
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 149
Provided by: rchit8
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Promises and Pitfalls STHS Hospital System Network November 12, 2003


1
Promises and PitfallsSTHS Hospital System
NetworkNovember 12, 2003
  • Rural and Community Health Institute
  • Texas AM University System Health Science Center
  • Josie R. Williams, MD, MMM

2
Weve Come a Long Wayin Medicine
3
and in Nursing and Hospitals
4
Tools, Techniques, and Knowledge Have Changed
5
Are we, being human, being slow to adapt our ways
to change healthcare delivery???
6
MetanoiaA Shift of mind
  • The most accurate word in Western culture to
    describe what happens in a learning organization
  • -P Senge

7
Metanonias deeper meaning is to grasp the
meaning of learningLearning is used to be
synonymous with taking in information-----yet
taking in information is only remotely related to
real learning
  • P Senge-In Serach of Excellence

8
First Do No HarmBasic premise for all
quality of care.It maybe possible to mitigate
harm but it is not possible to be error
free.Lucian Leape
9
Did or do you ever wonder why it always feels
like it is NOT as bad as they say??
10
Ever Wonder What 99.9 Meant?
  • 1 Hour of unsafe drinking water every month.
  • 2 Unsafe plane landings per day at OHare
    Airport in
  • Chicago.
  • 16,000 Pieces of mail lost by the U.S. Post
    Office
  • every hour.
  • 500 Incorrect operations each week.
  • 50 Babies dropped at birth every day.
  • 22,000 Checks deducted from the wrong bank
  • account each hour.
  • 32,000 Missed heart beats per person each year.

11
Is 99.9 Were Good Enough
  • A major plane crash every three days.
  • 12 babies to the wrong parents every day.
  • 37,000 ATM errors hourly.
  • 20,000 incorrect prescriptions annually.
  • The IRS would lose two million documents this
    year.
  • 107 erroneous medical procedures every day.
  • (Source InSight, Syncrude Canada Ltd,
    Communications Division)

12
Lehigh Clinic
  • Since we started using FEMA analysis and
    reporting of Near Misses we have so many
    errors, we can only focus on those most likely to
    cause harm.

13
HFEMATom Bigley, RPh, MS,Upper Valley Medical
Center, OH
14
(No Transcript)
15
Tyranny of Small Numbers
  • Prescriptions 3,000,000,000
  • X 5 error rate
    150,000,000
  • X 20 are serious
    15,000,000
  • X 10 cause ADE 1,500,000
  • X ? 1 are fatal 15,000
  • 45,000 Texas physicians wed see one only ever 3
    years
  • Adapted from Dr
    Lucian Leape

16
(No Transcript)
17
Iceberg Model of Accidents and Errors
Actually Occurred
Misadventure Death\severe harm
Actual Harm
No Harm Event Potential for harm is present
Near Miss Unwanted consequences were prevented
because of recovery
Recovery
18
Heinreichs Ratio1
It has been proposed that reporting systems could
be evaluated on the proportion of minor to more
serious incidents reported. 2
1
  • 1 major injury
  • 29 minor injuries
  • 300 no-injury accidents

29
300
1. Heinreich HW Industrial Accident Prevention,
NY And London 1941.
2. An Organization With a Memory, A report of an
expert group on learning from adverse events in
the NHS chaired by the Chief Medical Officer, The
Stationary Office, London 2000.
19
Ways to Improve a Process
  • Reduce the number of steps involved or
  • Improve the reliability of individual steps.
  • Improvement Tip Only Two Ways To Improve a
    Process,Victoria Minden, IHI, 25,May, 2003.

20
Hypothetical ProcessImprovement Tip Only Two
Ways To Improve a Process,Victoria Minden, IHI,
25,May, 2003.
  • Probability of succeeding only 78
  • Step Reliability 
  • Step 1 99  
  • Step 2 95 
  • Step 3 99  
  • Step 4 98  
  • Step 5 90  
  • Step 6 95
  • This entire six-step process has a probability of
    succeeding only 78 of the time (0.99 x 0.95 x
    0.99 x 0.98 x 0.90 x 0.95). Or, stated another
    way, the process fails (is defective) 22 of the
    time.
  • Probability 87
  • Step Reliability 
  • Step 1 99  
  • Step 2 95  
  • Step 3 99  
  • Step 4 98  
  • Step 6 95

21
Improve the Probability of Success by Improving
the Reliability of Individual StepsImprovement
Tip Only Two Ways To Improve a Process,Victoria
Minden, IHI, 25,May, 2003.
  • Improve steps 2 and 6, bringing both up to 98
    reliability.
  • The overall process would now perform at 83
    reliability much improved from the original 78.

22
Combine the Two Improvement Methods Improvement
Tip Only Two Ways To Improve a Process,Victoria
Minden, IHI, 25,May, 2003.
  • Remove unnecessary steps AND enhance the
    reliability of individual steps.
  • Now the system succeeds 92 of the time, with
    defects only 8 of the time. A leap of 14 from
    our original performance of 78.

23
Given the Implications of Tolerating Unreliable
System Performance
  • Organizations/individuals seeking quality must
    ask
  • What steps could be removed?
  • How could each step be made more reliable?
  • These simple questions are paramount in the drive
    toward perfection.
  • Improvement Tip Only Two Ways To Improve a
    Process,Victoria Minden, IHI, 25,May, 2003.

24
Complexity and Performance
  • Number of steps
  • 1
  • 10
  • 20
  • 50
  • 100
  • 1000
  • Defect - free
  • .99
  • .90
  • .82
  • .49
  • .36
  • .0004

25
B James
26
(No Transcript)
27
  • Its not what we know to do.
  • Its not what we try to do.
  • Its not what we think we do.
  • Its what we know to do that for whatever the
    reason doesnt get done.
  • Its what we know to do that we think we do
    doesnt get done.

28
Patient Safety The Old Look
  • Clinicians are Supposed to be Infallible.
  • Bad Things Happen Only when People Make Mistakes.
  • People/Organizations that Fail are Bad.
  • Blame Punishment Sufficiently Motivate
    Carefulness.

29
Judgment vsLearning
Judgment - Based approaches ask WHO? Learning -
Based approached ask WHY? or
WHAT? or
HOW? (The Japanese Five Whys) (Concept of
Drill Down)
B James
30
Vigilance is Necessary but not Sufficient
Condition for Appropriate Clinical Decision
Making
  • David Gaba, M.D., Assistant Professor, Department
    of Anesthesiology, Stanford University,
    emphasized that

31
Vigilance
  • Vigilance is sustained tension toward the
    occurrence of a signal to which one is expected
    to respond.
  • A signal is an event to which one is to respond.
  • "Vigilance" Discussed by ASA Panel,by David W.
    Edsall, M.D., Vol 8 No. 1, Spring, 1993.

32
Vigilance Decrement Example
  • Repetitive vital signs would be events.
  • A vital sign in an unsafe range would be a
    signal.
  • The ability to sustain attention toward the
    signal decreases with time and is called the
    vigilance decrement.
  • Decrement completes itself in about 30 minutes
    with ½ the decrement in about 15 minutes.
  • "Vigilance" Discussed by ASA Panel,by David W.
    Edsall, M.D., Vol 8 No. 1, Spring, 1993.

33
Classic Vigilance Paradigm
  • Classic vigilance paradigm occurs when
  • (1) The task is prolonged and continuous
  • (2) The signal is infrequent and aperiodic
  • (3) The signal is easily recognizable
  • (4) The observer's response cannot affect

    the future signal rate.
  • Vigilance" Discussed by ASA Panel,by David W.
    Edsall, M.D., Vol 8 No. 1, Spring, 1993

34
P f (M,S,U,B,C)
  • Where P Performance
  • M Sensory Modality (i.e., visual vs. auditory
    signals)
  • S Signal Salience (i.e., volume of auditory
    signal)
  • U Stimulus Uncertainty (i.e., where or when a
    signal will appear during the watch)
  • B Background Event Rate (i.e., frequency of
    vital signs, background noise levels, etc. The
    more one has to look for signals, the less likely
    one is to detect them)
  • C Signal Complexity (the task can be either too
    complex or too simple, either of which will
    result in an increased vigilance decrement).
  • Vigilance" Discussed by ASA Panel,by David W.
    Edsall, M.D., Vol 8 No. 1, Spring, 1993

35
Negative Vigilance Factors
  • Stress.
  • Fatigue.
  • High or low work load.
  • Emotional depression.
  • Noise.
  • Extreme temperatures.
  • Many other stress inducing task environments
    which have been shown to increase the vigilance
    decrement.
  • Vigilance" Discussed by ASA Panel,by David W.
    Edsall, M.D., Vol 8 No. 1, Spring, 1993

36
Negative Vigilance Factors
  • Human short-term memory capacity is quite small.
  • Five to ten items maximum lasting 15 to 20
    seconds.
  • Automation can help reduce the stress of
    overloaded short-term memory or excessive
    short-term to long-term memory consolidation.
  • Trend displays, if appropriately used, can reduce
    short-term memory workload and increase
    vigilance.
  • Vigilance" Discussed by ASA Panel,by David W.
    Edsall, M.D., Vol 8 No. 1, Spring, 1993

37
Automation and Vigilance
  • Negative issues resulting from automation are
  • (1) Decreased manual skills for the operator.
  • (2) Decreased human-to-human communication if the
    work situation requires a team approach.
  • (3) Increased complacency as the automated system
    continues to enhance its performance.
  • As reliability of an automated system
    increases, complacency increases.
  • Vigilance Discussed by ASA Panel,by David W.
    Edsall, M.D., Vol 8 No. 1, Spring, 1993

38
Solutions
  • The solution may be to incorporate an
    unreliability factor in a controlled and safe
    manner.
  • In other words, keep the human being in the loop
    with a certain frequency of manual and problem
    solving tasks.
  • These tasks could be real or simulated events.
  • Vigilance Discussed by ASA Panel,by David W.
    Edsall, M.D., Vol 8 No. 1, Spring, 1993

39
Example
  • It was suggested that an anesthetist may be
    awake and alert but because of signal complexity,
    high work load, distractions, or inappropriate
    signal display, the anesthetist may not address
    the correct problem.
  • Similarly, a problem may be detected but the
    response time may be slowed because of difficulty
    in deciding what to do about the problem.
  • The use of an anesthesia simulator, as in the
    aviation industry, has been invaluable in
    identifying some of these issues.
  • Beyond vigilance issues of leadership, education,
    action planning, resource allocation, and
    communication are other conditions required of
    the anesthetist in order to provide good patient
    care.
  • David Gaba, M.D., Assistant Professor, Department
    of Anesthesiology, Stanford University,
    emphasized that

40
Health Care Systems
  • Were more than 2000 percent more complex than
    their general business counterparts.
  • 31 percent of hospital workers reported wasting
    inordinate amounts of time and productivity
    overcoming system roadblocks.
  • Where there was downsizing without addressing
    this time and productivity concern, there was
    increased morbidity and mortality.
  • Physician buy-in during this time of change was
    also a big challenge.
  • Steven Kairys cited a study by E.C. Murphy, Ltd.,
    in 1993, Chaos and Complexity CyberForum, ACPE
    Webpage, Leader Roy E. Gilbreath, M.D. Tampa,
    Fla., Abstractor Philip J. Aliotta, MD, MSHA
    Main Urology Associates, P.C. Williamsville, N.Y.

41
Challenge of Redesign
  • Retaining the best of all theories and avoiding
    the pitfalls.
  • Change in healthcare works only when clinical
    teams own lead the process.
  • Incremental testing of improvements, with lateral
    thinking that looks beyond existing processes and
    addresses system wide issues.
  • Early successes gain interest acceptance.
  • Use common sense redesign.
  • Adapted from Healthcare redesign meaning origins
    application,L Locock, Quality Safety in
    Health Care,V 12, 1, February, 2003

42
BUILDING A CLINICAL LAB
. . . how does one structure a health system so
that every patient treated routinely contributes
to valid safe clinical knowledge . . .
B James
43
ICU at Baptist Memorial Hospital-DeSoto in
Southaven, Mississippi46 Decrease VAP in 6
Months IHI Newsletter, October 30,2003
44
Compelling Improvement Results
  • Dramatic improvements in ICU outcomes by
  • Consistently applying systematic methodologies.
  • Teams participating in Critical Care.
  • Compulsive adherence to formulaic standards.
  • Bundle Up, mechanical ventilationIHI
    Newsletter, October 30,2003

45
Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia (VAP)IHI
Newsletter, October 30,2003
  • A leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the
    ICU.
  • Estimates 30- 50 mortality rate higher when
    virulent strain of infection.
  • LOS 13 days on ave.
  • 3,000 to 6,000/episode.

46
Five Basic Precautionary Steps Rigidly Applied
IHI Newsletter, October 30,2003
  • Most hospitals likely follow some of the steps
    some of the time.
  • Critical care consumes some 30 of a hospitals
    expenses, for just 8 of its population.

47
Forcing Function For TeamworkIHI Newsletter,
October 30,2003
  • Over-stressed providers often accept poor
    outcomes and high costs of treating ICU patients
    on mechanical ventilation as inevitable.
  • A number of effective strategies are not
    consistently followed in most institutions.
  • Hence the design, honing and embracing of the
    ventilator bundle.

48
Five Basic Precautionary Steps Rigidly Applied
IHI Newsletter, October 30,2003
  • Elevating the head of the patients bed (HOB) to
    30 degrees or higher.
  • Prophylactic treatment for deep venous thrombosis
    (DVT).
  • Prophylactic treatment for peptic ulcer disease
    (PUD).
  • Conducting a daily sedation vacation.
  • Daily screening of respiratory function, followed
    by trials of spontaneous breathing.

49
What is New? IHI Newsletter, October 30,2003
  • No dazzling new research or technical wizardry
    but a system to ensure that each of the best
    treatment steps is taken for every patient on a
    unit.
  • These interventions, when executed at the same
    time and place, bring better results than when
    performed separately. Through them one by one and
    check them off Yes or No.
  • The package itself!

50
Manoj Jain, MD, MPHBaptist Memorial Health
Center IHI Newsletter, October 30,2003
  • These are things that every physician and nurse
    knows need to be done the problem is that we
    werent doing them consistently.
  • Having a system that forces you to do the steps
    100 of the time, to follow up on the details and
    constantly evaluate the data this is whats
    new.
  • Its not rocket science, but it makes a huge
    difference.

51
Health Care Facilities Attribute Medication
Errors to Multiple Causes
  • Source Medmarx 2001.

52
Average Medication Error
53
BALANCING THE CORE VALUES AND TENSIONS IN CYCLES
  • KNOWLEDGE

54
Easing the Burden of Input
55
What I Want
  • Not to have to wade through papers.
  • Not to have to go on line with Medline.
  • To have an index of the strength of evidence.
  • To have a one word answer.
  • To see questions that already have answers.
  • 15 seconds to medical knowledge.

56
Arent We Doing OK Anyway?
  • In 1994 17 of family Practitioners thought that
    aspirin had no effect on the survival of patients
    having an MI (evidence 1988).
  • Variation in prescribing, diagnostic tests,
    supervision of chronic conditions.
  • Dr Martin Dawes,University of Oxford,June 2001.

57
(No Transcript)
58
Increasing KnowledgeDr Martin Dawes,University
of Oxford,June 2001.
59
Where do we get knowledge?
  • Reported Observed
  • Print Source 62 27
  • General/speciality textbooks 25 3
  • Pharmaceutical textbooks 14 9
  • Journals 18 7
  • Drug Company Information 1 1
  • Self Made Compendia 4 7
  • Human Sources 33 53
  • Gorman P et al. Bull Med Libr Assoc 1994 82(2)
    140-6

60
How Much Do We Read in Clinical Practice?
  • 1/2 hour or less/week 3
  • 1 hour 46
  • 1 1/2 hours 23
  • 2 hours 20
  • 3 hours or more 8
  • Dr Martin Dawes,University of Oxford,June 2001.

61
How Many Do We See
  • 100 - 200 consultations a week.
  • 5,000 - 10,000 per year.
  • It is difficult to be sure that one is doing the
    right thing for all these cases.
  • One relies on experience.
  • Use 2 million pieces of information - stored in
    your memory.
  • Dr Martin Dawes,University of Oxford,June 2001.

62
Why Evidence Based Health Care?
  • Too many patients.
  • Too many problems.
  • Too many journals.
  • Information overload.
  • No time to read.
  • Read what I am familiar with.
  • Avoid difficult issues
  • Dr Martin Dawes,University of Oxford,June 2001.

63
Structured Question - Why Bother?
  • What do you think about ACE inhibitors and heart
    disease.
  • You know about EBHC - can you look it up?
  • ACE Heart Disease 2,755 articles on Medline
    through PubMed.
  • Need structure to my question.
  • Dr Martin Dawes,University of Oxford,June 2001.

64
Foreground Questions
Background Questions
Experience with Condition
65
How Can You Recognize and Formulate Clinical
Questions as they Occur?
  • Pay careful attention to the questions that
    spontaneously occur to you.
  • Listen for the question behind the question
  • What can I use for a sprain.
  • Might become.
  • Is a topical NSAID like aspirin more effective
    than paracetamol at enabling resumption of sport
    at 1 week?
  • Dr Martin Dawes,University of Oxford,June 2001.

66
What is the Best Evidence?
  • Friend once told me.
  • Group of old Professors.
  • Case series.
  • Systematic Review.
  • RCT.
  • Case control trial.
  • Case.
  • http//cebm.jr2.ox.ac.uk/docs/levels.html

67
Appraise using JAMA Guide Evidence-Based
Medicine Working Group
  • Are the results valid?
  • What are the results?
  • Will the results help me in patient care?
  • http//medicine.ucsf.edu/resources/guidelines/user
    s.html

68
Current Information
  • Source Access Quality
  • Experiential Fast Fast Dubious
  • Colleagues Variable Fast Unclear
  • Patients Fast Fast hmmm
  • Guidelines Lost Buried Good
  • Books Fast Lengthy Variable
  • Research Slow Lengthy Variable

69
Types of Health Care Professional
Evidence Generator
Evidence Users
Evidence Finders
Evidence Ignorer
70
Analysis By Paralysis
71
Modified Reason Error Model
72
Richard Cooks Hindsight Bias
73
BIG PICTURE
BIG PICTURE
PRACTICE
74
Bridging the Quality Chasm
Where
Where We We Are
Want To Be
Implementation
Innovation
Education
Diffusion
Adoption
TRIP
Partners for Quality,Carolyn Clancy, M.D.,
Director, Agency for Healthcare Research and
Quality, March 20, 2003
75
Metanoia Understanding
  • Culture.
  • Communication.
  • Change Management.
  • Proactive Adaptation.

76
Patient Safety - Human ErrorProcess Design
Organizational Change
  • Process Design
  • Reduce Reliance on Memory Vigilance
  • Simplify
  • Standardize
  • Checklists
  • Forcing Functions
  • Eliminate Look and
  • Sound-alikes
  • Organizational
  • Increase Feedback
  • Teamwork
  • Drive Out Fear
  • Leadership Commitment
  • Improve Direct
  • Communication

77
Systems Approach to Patient SafetyThe New Look
  • Risk of Failure is Inherent in Complex Systems.
  • Risk is always Emerging.
  • Not All Risk is Foreseeable.
  • People are Fallible No Matter How Hard They Try
    Not to Be.
  • Systems are Fallible.
  • Alert, Well-trained Clinicians are Crucial.

78
Three Types of Measures
  • Outcome Measures (voice of the customer or
    patient).
  • Process Measures (voice of the workings of the
    system).
  • Balancing Measures (looking at a system from
    different directions/dimensions) Measures,
    QualityHealthCare.org

79
System Accidents The Operating Model
Three sets of factors are typically implicated
when organizations have accidents or incidents
  • Human factors.

2. Technical factors.
3. Organizational factors.
Adapted from Managing the Risk of Organizational
Accidents, J. Reason, 1997
80
Systems Approach to Patient SafetyThe New Look
  • Risk of Failure is Inherent in Complex Systems.
  • Risk is always Emerging.
  • Not All Risk is Foreseeable.
  • People are Fallible No Matter How Hard They
  • Try Not to Be.
  • Systems are Fallible.
  • Alert, Well-trained Clinicians are Crucial.
  • Reports Should Emphasize Narratives.
  • Interdisciplinary Review Teams.
  • About Identifying Vulnerabilities NOT
  • Statistics.
  • Prompt Feedback.
  • Open to All Comers.

81
Error in Medicine
  • Wus Definition
  • A Medical Error is a commission or omission
    with potentially negative consequences for the
    patient that would have been judged wrong by
    skilled and knowledgeable peers at the time it
    occurred, independent of whether there were any
    negative consequences.
  • (Wu, 1997)

New York Medical College Department of Family
Medicine
82
Error in Medicine
  • An Adverse Event
  • An injury caused by medical management rather
    than the underlying condition of the patient. An
    adverse event attributable to error is a
    preventable adverse event.

New York Medical College Department of Family
Medicine
83
Error in Medicine
  • Why Errors Occur
  • Lack of Standardization.
  • Failure to design with error in mind.
  • A medical culture that resists admitting to error
    and so cannot work to prevent error.
  • Reference Schenkel S. 2000 Promoting safety and
    preventing medical error in emergency
    departments. Academic Emergency Medicine, Nov 7
    11, 1204-1222.

New York Medical College Department of Family
Medicine
84
Error in Medicine
  • Who Makes Errors?
  • The reality is that most errors are made by good
    people with good training, skills, and intentions
    who inadvertently commit errors despite their
    best efforts because of an unfortunate confluence
    of individual, workplace, communication,
    technologic, psychological, and organizational
    factors.
  • Reference Annals of Emergency Medicine, July
    2000, 59

New York Medical College Department of Family
Medicine
85
James Reason in Human Error
  • Two kinds of failures
  • Error of Execution - Correct action does not
    proceed as intended.
  • Error of planning - Original intended action is
    not correct.

86
Skill-based Performance Failures
  • Inattention
    Overattention
  • Double - capture slips Omissions
  • Omissions p interruptions Repetitions
  • Reduced intentionality Reversals
  • Perceptual confusions
  • Interference errors

87
Rule-Based Performance Failures
  • Misapplication of Good Rules Application
    of Bad Rules
  • First exceptions
    Encoding deficiencies
  • Countersigns and non-signs Action
    deficiencies
  • Informational overload Wrong rules
  • Rule strength
    Inelegant rules
  • General rules
    Inadvisable rules
  • Redundancy
  • Rigidity

88
Knowledge-Based Performance Failures
  • - Selectivity -
    Overconfidence
  • - Workspace limitations - Biased
    reviewing
  • - Out of sight out of mind - Halo
    effects
  • - Confirmation bias -
    Illusory correlation
  • - Problems w causality - Delayed feed-back
  • - Problems with complexity
  • - Insufficient consideration of processes in time
  • - Difficulties with exponential developments
  • - Thinking in causal series not causal nets
  • - Thematic vagabonding
  • - Encysting

89
Definitions
  • Slips--errors that occur during actions governed
    by familiar impulses.
  • Mistakes--errors of judgment.
  • Rules and the familiar patterns of habit do not
    apply.
  • Near misses--Stopped in the process.
  • We know what to do, but do it wrong or poorly.
  • In unfamiliar situations we must make a decision
    on inadequate information.
  • Adapted from
  • First Do No Harm A Practical Guide to
    Medication Safety and JCAHO Compliance,1999 Opus
    Communications

90
Causes of slips
  • Anger
  • Anxiety
  • Boredom
  • Fear
  • Habit
  • Interruptions
  • Hurry
  • Fatigue

91
Model of Error Process
  • Should aid identification of
  • Types of errors committed.
  • Deficiencies in training and knowledge.
  • Ineffective, lacking or potential error
    detection strategies.
  • Effective error mitigation or management
    strategies.
  • Threat detection and management strategies.
  • Systemic threats.
  • The University of Texas Threat and Error
    Management Model Components and Examples, Robert
    L. Helmreich, PhD, David M Musson, MD,BMJ
    WebSite(www.BMJ.com) At www.bmj.com/misc/bmj
    320.7237.781/

92
Denial
  • Is my decision making as good during medical
    emergencies as during routine situations?
  • 70
  • Error, stress, teamwork in medicine and
    aviationcross sectional surveys, JBryan Sexton,
    Eric J Thomas, Robert L Helmreich, BMJ 320, 18
    March 2000, www.bmj.com

93
Indignant Rejection
  • What definitions are you using-----!
  • Where did you get this---!
  • Youre comparing apples and oranges.
  • You need to make this a level playing field.
  • This isnt fair!
  • My/our patients are sicker!
  • I dont believe the data..!

94
  • Error, stress, teamwork in medicine and
    aviationcross sectional surveys, JBryan Sexton,
    Eric J Thomas, Robert L Helmreich, BMJ 320, 18
    March 2000, www.bmj.com

95
Error, stress, teamwork in medicine and
aviationcross sectional surveys, JBryan Sexton,
Eric J Thomas, Robert L Helmreich, BMJ 320, 18
March 2000, www.bmj.com
96
The most common recommendation for improving
patient safety --- in the operating theatre was
to improve communication.
  • Error, stress, teamwork in medicine and
    aviationcross sectional surveys, JBryan Sexton,
    Eric J Thomas, Robert L Helmreich, BMJ 320, 18
    March 2000, www.bmj.com

97
The Gold Standard
98
Many Errors are Never Acknowledged or Discussed
Because
Error, stress, teamwork in medicine and
aviationcross sectional surveys, JBryan Sexton,
Eric J Thomas, Robert L Helmreich, BMJ 320, 18
March 2000, www.bmj.com
99
Deny Fatigue Effects Performance
100
Believe True Professionals Leave Personal
Problems Behind When Working
Error, stress, teamwork in medicine and
aviationcross sectional surveys, JBryan Sexton,
Eric J Thomas, Robert L Helmreich, BMJ 320, 18
March 2000, www.bmj.com
101
Junior Team Members Should Not Question The
Decisions Made By Senior Team Members
Error, stress, teamwork in medicine and
aviationcross sectional surveys, JBryan Sexton,
Eric J Thomas, Robert L Helmreich, BMJ 320, 18
March 2000, www.bmj.com
102
  • Paradigms change when anomalies between existing
    theory and observation occur,
  • When an alternative paradigm is available, and
  • When a critical mass of people have changed their
    beliefs.
  • New paradigms represent a change in a collective
    world view.
  • Chaos and Complexity CyberForum, ACPE Webpage,
    LeaderRoy E. Gilbreath, M.D. Tampa, Fla.,
    Abstractor Philip J. Aliotta, MD, MSHA Main
    Urology Associates, P.C. Williamsville, N.Y.

103
Hierarchy of Research Impact
IMPROVES ACCESS, OUTCOMES, EFFICIENCY
Level 4
IMPROVES DELIVERY AND PRACTICE
Level 3
Level 2
IMPROVES PROCESSES AND POLICIES
Level 1
IMPROVES OTHER RESEARCH
Partners for Quality,Carolyn Clancy, M.D.,
Director, Agency for Healthcare Research and
Quality, March 20, 2003
104
Implementation of Research Findings Debunked
Assumption
Question
Hypothesis
Study
Publications
Changes in Practice
Partners for Quality,Carolyn Clancy, M.D.,
Director, Agency for Healthcare Research and
Quality, March 20, 2003
105
--Innovation is real workDrucker
  • Essential ingredients
  • Takes talent.
  • Ingenuity.
  • Knowledge.
  • Diligence.
  • Persistence.
  • Commitment.

106
Beyond Blame The System
  • Its impossible to separate the chance of good
    from the risk of ill.
  • -David Hume
  • Healthcare is a high risk industry.
  • Errors/potential errors are everywhere.

107
Beyond Blame The System
  • Borrow from others disciplines and industries.
  • High Reliability Organizations Risk can be
    controlled and system can be made safer.

108
Attributes ofHigh Reliability Organizations (1
OF 2)
  • Acknowledgement of Risk.
  • Auditing Risk.
  • Process Control.
  • Leadership.
  • Appropriate Rewards.

109
Attributes of High Reliability Organizations (2
OF 2)
  • Process Control
  • Rules Procedures
  • Training, Training, Training
  • Strategic Redundancies
  • Teamwork Development
  • Migrating Decision-Making

110
Strength of Changes (in rank order)
  • 1. Forcing function
  • 2. Automation, computerization
  • 3. Protocols and preprinted orders
  • 4. Checklists
  • 5. Rules and double-checking
  • 6. Education
  • 7. Information

111
Some New Terms
  • Authority gradient.
  • Work-around.
  • Diffusion of responsibility.
  • Sharp end.
  • Force function.
  • HROs.

112
Surgical care revolves around a predictable event
(the surgical operation) with an expected outcome
  • Jennifer Daly,Institute for Health Policy
    MGH/Partners HealthCare System and the Department
    of Veteran Affairs

113
Clinicians Begin to Accept Credibility of the
NSQIP Information
  • Slow gradual process of testing reliability and
    validity of the data.
  • Exploring best practices and opportunities for
    improvement.
  • Sharing blinded data with each other.
  • Threatened by release of data to administrative
    and senior clinical leaders.
  • Experiments in improvement.
    Jennifer Daly

114
  • Jennifer Daly

115
VA National Surgical Quality Improvement Program
(1991-1999)
  • 27 decline in post-operative mortality.
  • 55 decline in post-operative morbidity.
  • Median post-operative LOS declined from 13 days
    to 4 days.
  • Volume and complexity of surgery unchanged.
  • Risk profiles of patients unchanged.
  • Patient satisfaction improved.


  • Jennifer Daly

116
What Makes the NSQIP Possible?
  • Commitment and participation of VA surgeons.
  • VHAs informatics infrastructure.
  • Trained dedicated clinical nurse reviewers.
  • Standard definitions of risk factors and
    outcomes.
  • Commitment from the top (clinical and
    administrative).

117
Reflections on Risk Adjustmentand Performance
Improvement
  • The road to improvement is slow and gradual.
  • Reliable clinically credible information is
    necessary but not sufficient for improvement.
  • Sustained improvement requires continuous
    education and reinforcement.
  • Dont lose sight of the goalimprovement, not
    risk adjustment!


  • Jennifer Daly

118
NSQIP Lessons Learned From Site Visits to
Centers of Concern
  • Poor coordination of care across the entire
    surgical episode.
  • Poor or conflicted relationships with the
    affiliated university and/or teaching program.
  • Poor monitoring of quality.
  • Lack of state-of-the-art equipment/ technology.
  • Failure of surgical leadership to create a sense
    of team work and to marshal the support and
    attention of senior clinical and administrative
    leadership.
  • Jennifer Daly

119
What This Means
  • This is not the end. This is not the beginning
    of the end. It is, however, the end of the
    beginning.
  • Winston Churchill

120
IF WE DO NOT CHANGE OUR DIRECTION, WE ARE VERY
LIKELY TO END UP EXACTLY WHERE WE ARE
HEADED.Anonymous
121
8 STEPS TO TRANSFORMATIONAL CHANGE
  • Establish a Sense of Urgency.
  • Form Powerful Guiding Coalitions.
  • Create a Vision.
  • Communicate the Vision.
  • Empower Others to Act on the Vision (Remove the
    barriers).
  • Plan for and Create Short-Term Wins.
  • Consolidate Improvements Produce still more
    Change. (Dont declare victory too soon)
  • Institutionalizing New Approaches. (CULTURE)
  • John P. Kotter, Leading Change Why
    Transformation Efforts Fail, HBR, March-April
    1995

122
Put Aside Ego-
  • One of the hardest things about innovation is
    getting people to accept that the way they work
    just might not be the best.
  • Thomas Fogarty, Cardiovascular Surgeon,Stanford

123
DEEP CHANGE OR SLOW DEATH ??
  • DO WE HAVE THE COURAGE TO WALK NAKED INTO THE
    LAND OF UNCERTAINITY??
  • Robert Quinn----Deep Change

124
The Culture of Safety
New Leadership Challenges
How Each of us adds value Knowledge Networking
New Types of Information
125
BALANCING THE CORE VALUES AND TENSIONS IN CYCLES
  • COMMUNICATION

126
Communications
  • All problems tend to be attributed to bad
    communications
  • Considerable complexity lies behind this
    seemingly universal assumption.
  • What specifically, causes communications to go
    badly?

127
Communications Blocking Presumptions
  • Our beliefs are the truth.
  • The truth is obvious.
  • Our beliefs are based on real data.
  • The data we select are the real data.
  • Richard D Hayes, Oct, 1997, EMMM 635

128
Three Primary Communication Skills
  • Recognizing - leaps of abstraction (jumps from
    observation to generalization).
  • Exposing - articulation of our actual meaning
    more often of things we do not normally say.
  • Inquiring - about the assumptions and motivations
    of others for better understanding.
  • Richard D Hayes, Oct, 1997, EMMM 635

129
Mary, If I die I will die making an
impactLessonLet the patient guide your
listening and learning and meet them at their
need.
130
Large family practice residency
  • 35 Physicians of four clinics of a large
    University-affiliated, multi-specialty group
    practice.
  • Patients aged 65 and older.
  • Compared their medical records with the way they
    reported taking their medications at home.
  • Overall medication discrepancy prevalence of 87.
  • Survey response rate of 92.

131
Root Cause Analysis JCAHO Sentential Event
  • 1----Communication Failure (over 70 of root
    cause).
  • 2----Inadequate Orientation (over 50 of root
    cause).

132
I dont understand why you dont understand. I
speak perfect English. You must be listening in
dingbat. Archie Bunker
133
BALANCING THE CORE VALUES AND TENSIONS IN CYCLES
  • CULTURE

134
"The culture is an impediment to acknowledging
error. Peer group pressure is the biggest
impediment to talking about itwhat your peers
will think of you for making a mistake. You are
taught that losing your credibility is the worst
thing that can happen to you". K Kizer,
Trustee, Feb, 2000
135
  • The medical profession demands perfection and
    punishes imperfection. In such a culture of
    blame, then, who will step forth to admit a
    mistake? And without full knowledge of what the
    mistakes are, how can we learn to stop making
    them?
  • K Kizer, Trustee, Feb, 2000

136
Percentage of Pilots and Doctors Endorsing
Unrealistic Attitudes about Personal Capabilities
  • Decision making the same in
  • emergencies.
  • Effective pilot/doctor leaves behind
  • personal problems.
  • Performance same with
  • inexperienced team.
  • Dont make more errors in
  • emergency.
  • Perform effectively when
  • Fatigued.
  • Helmreich Merritt,
  • Culture at Work in Aviation and medicine

137
CULTURE EATS STRATEGY FOR BREAKFAST EVERY
MORNINGAuthor Unknown- at AHSR June 2000
138
Virginia Mason
  • Western Washington State
  • 336 Beds
  • gt 1 million outpatients/yr
  • 1600 inpatients/yr
  • STOP THE LINE

139
ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGE
  • More historical failures than successes.
  • A difficult process requiring solid insight,
    planning, multiple tools, exceptional skill,
  • But, a good technology of change exists.
  • Richard D Hayes, Oct, 1997, EMMM 635

140
The Change Continuum
  • Developmental Change incremental, improves on
    the present state, tends to preserve the status
    quo-1970s.
  • Strategic Change moves organization from one
    state to a new state. Produces marked change,
    involves altered organizational structures and
    directions. 1980s.
  • Transformational Change forces organizational
    reemergence from period of chaos into a new state
    not known during the initial phase of the change
    process. 1990s beyond.
  • V. Cocowitch,The Turnaround Imperative

141
MAIN REASONS FOR FAILURES
  • The need to change not felt strongly enough.
  • Understanding of the existing situation is too
    shallow.
  • Attempting a tuning fix when only a
    transformational change will succeed.
  • Insufficient time effort spent in unfreezing
    the old ways.
  • Insufficient solidification (refreezing)
    following the change.
  • Richard D Hayes, Oct, 1997, EMMM 635

142
External Environment Factors
  • Knowledge of the entire situation
  • Knowledge tools to improve safety
  • Strong visible professional leadership
  • Legislative regulatory initiatives
  • Actions of purchasers consumers

143
Bake Knowledge into Knowledge Work
  • Keys to success Brigham Womens - Partners
    Healthcare-
  • Develop a system.
  • Develop support of knowledge workers ie Docs,
    Nurses, Pharmacists, etc.
  • Expert and Up-to-date Knowledge Base.
  • Prioritized Processes Knowledge Domains.
  • Final Decisions by Experts.
  • A Culture of Measurement.
  • Just in Time Delivery Comes to Knowledge
    ManagementThomas H Davenport, John Glaser,
    Best Practice July 2000

144
THE SAFE HEALTHCARE DELIVERY SYSTEM
  • The System
  • WHICH ACKNOWLEDGES AND MEASURES NUMBER OF
    COMMISSIONS OR OMMISSIONS
  • WHICH HAS A PROCESS TO EVALUATE, CATEGORIZE, AND
    ELIMINATE THOSE COMMISSIONS OR OMMISSIONS
  • WHICH MINIMIZES NUMBER OF COMMISSIONS OR
    OMMISSIONS OR THEIR IMPACT ON PATIENTS AND STAFF

145
Make It Meaningful Daniel Vasella, Physician,
CEO, Novartis
  • People do a better job when they believe in what
    they do and in how the company behaves, when they
    see that their work does more than enrich
    shareholders.

146
Tell the Stories!In Memory of Cari Jo
147
In Expectation of Improved Care For Sam, Nichole,
and Michayla
148
Helpful Websites
  • http//webmm.ahrq.gov
  • http//ahrq.gov
  • http//npsf.org
  • http//ismp.org
  • http//ihi.org
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com