Navigating the IRB Process Nancy A. Olson Executive Director Institutional Review Board - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 21
About This Presentation
Title:

Navigating the IRB Process Nancy A. Olson Executive Director Institutional Review Board

Description:

... studies of drugs and medical devices that do not require investigational new ... Research on individual or group characteristics or behavior (including, but not ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:118
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 22
Provided by: nol34
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Navigating the IRB Process Nancy A. Olson Executive Director Institutional Review Board


1
Navigating the IRB ProcessNancy A.
OlsonExecutive DirectorInstitutional Review
Board
2
Navigating the IRB Process?
3
(No Transcript)
4
(No Transcript)
5
What is an IRB? The Institutional Review Board
(IRB) is a federally mandated committee charged
with overseeing all research projects involving
human participants. The IRB fulfills this
charge by reviewing all proposed research
involving human participants, to protect the
rights and welfare of research participants, and
ensure compliance with Federal, State, and
University requirements.
6
Why What How
  • Why is IRB review needed?
  • What needs IRB review?
  • How do you get IRB review?

7
Why is IRB review needed?
  • No one can be objective about their own work
  • People underestimate the risks involved in things
    familiar to them
  • People overestimate the benefit of things that
    are important to them

8
What needs IRB review?
  • All research involving human participants
  • Research
  • Human participants

9
  • Is it research?
  • Research is a systematic investigation designed
    to develop or contribute to generalizable
    knowledge.
  • Is it research that involves human participants?
  • Yes and Yes IRB review

10
How do you get IRB review?
  • What type of IRB review do you need?
  • Three levels of review
  • Exempt
  • Expedited
  • Convened

11
  • Categories of research exempt from further IRB
    review
  • Research conducted in established or commonly
    accepted educational settings, involving normal
    educational practices. This category may include
    children.
  • Research involving the use of educational tests
    (cognitive, diagnostic, aptitude, achievement),
    survey procedures, interview procedures, or
    observation of public behavior in which
    participants cannot be identified directly or
    through coded identifiers, or, if they can be
    identified, release of the information would not
    be harmful1 to the participant.
  • A) Research involving the use of educational
    tests (cognitive, diagnostic, aptitude,
    achievement) in which participants cannot be
    identified, or release of the information would
    not be harmful to the participant. This category
    may include children.
  • B) Research involving the use of survey
    procedures, interview procedures, or observation
    of public behavior in which participants cannot
    be identified, or release of the information
    would not be harmful to the participant. This
    category may not include children.
  • 3. Survey, interview, or testing of public
    officials, elected or appointed, or candidates
    for public office.
  • 4. Research involving the collection or study of
    existing data2, documents, records,
    pathological specimens, or diagnostic specimens,
    if these sources are publicly available or if the
    information is recorded by the investigator in
    such a manner that participants cannot be
    identified, directly or through identifiers
    linked to participants. This category may include
    children.
  • 5. Research and demonstration projects that are
    conducted by or subject to the approval of
    Federal Department or Agency heads, and which are
    designed to study or evaluate public benefits or
    services. (e.g. evaluation of public benefits
    programs such as Medicare, Public Assistance).
    This category may include children.
  • Taste and food quality evaluation and consumer
    acceptance studies. This category may include
    children.
  • If your research involves only the procedures
    listed in one or more of the categories, it may
    be reviewed as exempt.

1 Harm to participants means that any
disclosure of the participants responses outside
the research could reasonably place the
participant at risk of criminal or civil
liability or could be damaging to the
participants financial standing, employability,
or reputation. 2 Existing data means that the
data, documents, records, or specimens are in
existence prior to IRB review. Specimens
obtained prospectively from future discarded
clinical samples do not qualify for exemption.
12
Exempt Research
  • Claim of Exemption form
  • HIPAA Disclosure form
  • Research protocol
  • All questionnaires, survey instruments, interview
    questions, discussion guides and/or data
    collection instruments

13
  • CATEGORIES OF RESEARCH THAT MAY BE REVIEWED BY
    EXPEDITED PROCEDURES
  • If your research meets the definition of minimal
    risk1 and involves only procedures listed in
    one or more of the categories below it may be
    reviewed by expedited review.
  • Clinical studies of drugs and medical devices
    that do not require investigational new drug or
    I investigational exemption
    application.
  • Collection of blood samples by finger stick,
    heel stick, or venipuncture.
  • Prospective collection of biological specimens
    for research purposes by noninvasive means (e.g.,
    hair and nail clippings, sputum specimen
    collected after saline mist nebulization, to name
    a few).
  • Collection of data through noninvasive
    procedures (not involving general anesthesia or
    sedation) routinely employed in clinical
    practice, excluding procedures involving X-rays
    or microwaves (e.g., body weight,
    electrocardiograph, ultrasound, moderate exercise
    when appropriate).
  • Research involving materials (data, documents,
    records, or specimens) that have been collected
    or will be collected solely for non-research
    purposes (such as for medical treatment or
    diagnosis). Note some research in this
    category may be exempt from HHS regulations for
    the protection of human research participants
    45CFR 46.101 (b) (4). This listing refers only to
    research that is not exempt.
  • Collection of data from voice, video, digital,
    or image recordings made for research.
  • Research on individual or group characteristics
    or behavior (including, but not limited to,
    research on perception, cognition, motivation,
    identity, language, communication, cultural
    beliefs or practices, and social behavior),
    research employing survey, interview, oral
    history, focus group, program evaluation, human
    factors evaluation, or quality assurance
    methodologies. Note some research in this
    category may be exempt from the HHS regulations
    for the protection of human research participants
    45CFR 46.101 (b) (4). This listing refers only
    to research that is not exempt.

1 MINIMAL RISK means that the probability and
magnitude of harm or discomfort anticipated in
the research are not greater than those
ordinarily encountered in daily life or during
the performance of routine physical or
psychological examinations or tests.
14
Expedited Review
  • IRB Initial Application, including appendices,
    questionnaires, interview guides, recruitment
    letters and advertisements
  • HIPAA Disclosure form
  • Consent document(s)
  • Complete research proposal/protocol.

15
Convened Review
  • 15 collated packages containing
  • IRB Initial Application, including appendices,
    questionnaires, interview guides, recruitment
    letters and advertisements
  • HIPAA Disclosure form
  • Consent documents(s)
  • Complete research proposal/protocol and
  • 1 copy of the Investigators Brochure, if
    applicable.

16
(No Transcript)
17
The IRB review process
  • Submission logged into database and assigned IRB
    file number
  • If qualifies for exemption or expedited review,
    reviewed by IRB Chairman, or designee
  • May request additional information or revisions
  • May approve or disapprove

18
The IRB review process
  • Submission logged into database and assigned IRB
    file number
  • If requires convened board review, study added to
    meeting agenda, materials sent to board members 2
    weeks before each meeting
  • May approve, disapprove, or request additional
    information and/or revisions

19
Investigators, IRBs the Review Process
  • The research protocol and/application forms
    should provide the information the IRB needs to
    make decisions.
  • The IRB must be
  • thorough and inquisitive
  • sometimes even overly inquisitive.

20
Investigators, IRBs the Review Process
  • Investigators have the burden of proof when
    submitting research for IRB review.
  • IRBs have the burden of making decisions based
    on the evidence (research protocol and
    supporting documents).
  • When investigators do not provide, or IRBs do not
    require, sufficient information, the IRBs
    decision-making ability may be delayed.

21
Contact Information
  • IRB office 601 984-2815
  • Facsimile 601 984-2961
  • Location U-020
  • Lower level Learning Resources building
  • http//research.umc.edu/irb.html
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com