Asset Building: Catholic Social Thought and a New Strategy for Helping the Poor Catholic University - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 12
About This Presentation
Title:

Asset Building: Catholic Social Thought and a New Strategy for Helping the Poor Catholic University

Description:

Asset Building: Catholic Social Thought and a. New Strategy for Helping the Poor ... Asset building policies and projects in Canada, UK, Uganda, China, Taiwan, South ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:55
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 13
Provided by: bosh4
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Asset Building: Catholic Social Thought and a New Strategy for Helping the Poor Catholic University


1
Asset BuildingCatholic Social Thought and a
New Strategy for Helping the PoorCatholic
University of AmericaFebruary 15, 2007
  • Ray Boshara
  • New America Foundation
  • Washington, DC
  • 202-986-2700
  • boshara_at_newamerica.net
  • www.newamerica.net
  • www.AssetBuilding.org

2
What is Asset Development?
  • Public and private strategies to enable
    low-income persons to save and accumulate
    long-term assets a home, post-secondary
    education, investments, land, a small business,
    and a nest-egg for retirement.
  • U.S. field has been savings-based and
    account-based like 401(k)s for all and
    savings accounts at birth for all but other
    means to asset accumulation (such as expanding
    Pell Grants) matter, too.
  • Historically, includes the Homestead Act, GI
    Bill, and various homeownership programs in the
    20th Century.
  • Informed by Amartya Sen assets as the economic
    proxy for Sens notion of capabilties

3
Why Assets?
  • Michael Sherraden, Assets and the Poor (1991)
  • Economically, assets are the key to economic
    security.
  • Asset ownership is associated with positive
    social, civic, behavioral and psychological
    effects not necessarily associated with income.
  • Lack of income means you dont get by. Lack of
    assets means you dont get ahead.
  • Assets have not been part of the solution to
    fighting poverty for adults or children.
  • Imagine your or your familys life without assets
    savings, a home, an education, a small
    business, investments, and a nest-egg for
    retirement.

4
Why Assets, continued
  • With asset lens, 4 distinct public policies
  • Asset Development
  • Asset Denial
  • Asset Discrimination
  • Asset Deprivation
  • - Public policy bundles asset ownership
    opportunities for some, not for others
  • - The key goal is inclusion
  • Who Owns America?
  • Quintile Income Wealth
  • Bottom 40 10 1
  • Bottom 60 23 4.5
  • Top 20 56 83
  • - The U.S. distributes income progressively, but
    assets regressively
  • Expand asset ownership because it is

5
What Have We Learned?
  • The poor can save and build assets.
  • Savings and asset accumulations is less of
    function of preferences and more a function of
    access to structured savings mechanisms.
  • Asset effects are in fact supported by research,
    are earlier, and are often more powerful than
    predicted.

6
Research on Asset EffectsSummarized by
Sherraden, 2005
  • Holding assets at 23 is associated with later
    positive outcomes such as better labor market
    experience, marriages, health and political
    interest. (Bynner Paxton, 2001)
  • The presence of the asset appears to matter more
    than the monetary value of the asset. (Bynner
    Paxton, 2001)
  • The presence of small wealth at critical times
    can have transformative effects on the life
    course. (Shapiro, 2004)
  • Parental wealth is positively associated with
    cognitive development, physical health, and
    socio-emotional behavior of children even in
    very poor families. (Williams, 2003)
  • Wealth seems to be a better predictor of
    well-being as children grow older, while income
    is a better predictor when they are younger.
    (Williams, 2003)
  • Low-income, single mothers assets are positively
    associated with childrens educational
    attainment. (Zahn and Sherraden, 2003)
  • Income is associated with educational achievement
    when assets are not in the model. However,
    income becomes non-significant when assets are
    included. (Zahn and Sherraden, 2003)
  • Assets lead to positive attitudes and behaviors,
    and positive attitudes and behaviors lead to
    assets may be a glimpse of a virtuous cycle
    wherein household development is a reinforcing
    feedback loop. (Yadama and Sherraden, 1996)

7
Where Are We Now?
  • 383.8 billion in budget resources for asset
    building activities in 2007, 366.9 billion are
    tax expenditures that primarily benefit families
    earning above the national median income. The
    budget includes 16.9 billion in asset building
    direct expenditures for 2007, down 608 million
    from 2006.
  • Multi-billion dollar asset-building policies have
    been introduced in the U.S. Congressbut none
    have passed. More and more Congressional leaders
    and Presidential candidates support this agenda.
  • Roughly 500 Individual Development Account and
    hundreds of other asset-building programs
  • Asset building policies and projects in Canada,
    UK, Uganda, China, Taiwan, South Korea, Mexico

8
U.S. Policy Agenda
  • Two track agenda
  • Getting defaults right, making saving easy and
    automatic
  • Federal and state
  • Accumulate and protect
  • Account-based and program-based
  • Macro trend toward individual asset accounts
    will the poor be included?
  • Must make accounts work for the poor.
  • When do risks need to be pooled?
  • Balanced portfolio of programs and accounts.

9
Detailed Policy Agenda
  • Universal KIDS Accounts at birth
  • Various Auto Save plans auto 401(k)s, Auto
    IRAs, Universal TSP, etc.
  • Matched savings for the working poor
  • Connecting tax refunds to assets / Split
    Refunds
  • Expansion of state-based 529 college savings
    plans
  • Improving access to mainstream financial services
  • Improving financial education
  • Revising asset limits in public assistance
    programs
  • Reviving Savings Bonds
  • Improving established micro-enterprise,
    post-secondary education, homeownership, and
    retirement security programs
  • Improving laws to protect assets and reduce
    consumer debt

10
Childrens Savings Accounts
  • Existing Policies
  • UK Child Trust Fund
  • Singapore Baby Bonus Child Development
    Accounts
  • Canada Education Savings Program
  • Hungary Baby Bonds
  • Proposed Policies /
  • Current Projects
  • Korea Child Development Accounts
  • U.S. Various universal CSAs policies proposed
    SEED demonstration proiect
  • New Zealand KiwiSaver Plus
  • Australia Nest Egg Accounts
  • Uganda Child Development Accounts demonstration
    project

11
Future Generations
  • Any nations economic success, and the security
    it offers for retirees, depends on the economic
    success of its children.
  • Budget deficits, aging populations, and
    ballooning entitlements greatly reduce their
    chances for economic success. Presently a
    28,000 per child birth tax, and 8 spent per
    senior on every 1 per child these numbers will
    increase. We need a birth bonus.
  • Record inequality economies are growing, but
    not everyone is sharing in that growth.
  • Great societies promote equal opportunity for
    each generation. Not equal outcomes, but equal
    opportunities.
  • With CSAs, we can help ensure that inequality of
    outcomes in one generation does not become
    inequality of opportunity in the next.

12
Assets and Economic Justice for All
  • Participation
  • We judge any economic system by what it does for
    and to people and by how it permits all to
    participate in it. (p. ix)
  • All people have a right to participate in the
    economic life of society..it is through
    employment that most individuals and families
    meet their material needs (p. x)
  • Option for the Poor
  • All members of society have a special obligation
    to the poor and vulnerable.From Scriptures and
    church teaching, we learn that justice is tested
    by the treatment of the poor. (p. x)
  • Structures
  • Time for a New American Experiment.which can
    create new structures of economic partnership and
    participation. (p. xii)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com