Decision Support Building Analytical Skills - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 42
About This Presentation
Title:

Decision Support Building Analytical Skills

Description:

Every morning in Africa, a gazelle wakes up. ... outrun the slowest gazelle, or it will starve to death. It doesn't matter whether you are a lion or a gazelle. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:102
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 43
Provided by: Macca1
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Decision Support Building Analytical Skills


1
Decision SupportBuilding Analytical Skills
  • ASMC PDI
  • San Antonio, TX
  • May 28, 2009
  • Ron Maccaroni
  • rmaccaroni_at_cox.net

2
Decision Support
  • Definition
  • Enabling decision makers to make informed
    decisions that wisely and better utilize
    resources, and improve program and operational
    effectiveness.
  • Why is this important?

3
Why Should We Care About Better Decision Support?
  • Huge annual deficits contributing to an 11
    trillion debt.
  • Trillions in unfunded liabilities.
  • Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security cist will
    increase dramatically.
  • Uncertain world climate can lead to future
    unexpected events that increase financial burden.
  • Growing financial burden on the States and
    Localities.

4
Objectives of Presentation
  • Emphasize the need for relevant, data-driven
    analysis to support decision making.
  • Demonstrate the need and benefits of using a
    structured approach to analysis.
  • Discuss a 5-step analytical approach.
  • Show that while analysis can be challenging and
    complex, using the 5-step approach is not
    difficult.

5
The New Watchwords
  • Accountability and Transparency
  • GAO changed its name from General Accounting
    Office to Government Accountability Office.
  • Accounting and auditing professions are now
    referred to as the accountability professions.
  • Many politicians, academicians, private sector
    leaders, and citizen intermediaries refer to
    both terms.
  • Laws passed that call for either or both.

6
The New Playing Field Whats Different Today?
  • Focus on achieving and measuring
  • results!
  • Agencies must demonstrate they are getting
    results when preparing budgets and reporting
    annually.
  • Citizens are more interested in seeing results of
    public expenditures and meeting their
    expectations.
  • Greater use of the Internet for public access to
    information on government operations.

7
  • In every program, and in every agency, we are
    measuring success not by good intentions or by
    dollars spent, but rather by results achieved.
  • The Budget Message of the President
  • February 2006

8
Drivers Of Stronger Analysis To Support
Decision-making
9
Management Reform Legislation
  • Numerous laws have revolutionized federal
    management and accountability.
  • Mandates for planning, evaluating and reporting
    results.
  • Key legislation on reform and accountability
  • 1950 Accounting and Auditing Procedures Act
  • 1970 Legislative Reform Act
  • 1978 Inspector General Act
  • 1982 Federal Managers Financial Integrity Act
  • 1990 Chief Financial Officers Act
  • 1993 Government Performance and Results Act
  • 1994 Government Management and Reform Act
  • 1996 Federal Financial Management Improvement
    Act
  • 2002 Sarbanes Oxley Act

10
Presidential Initiatives
  • Virtually each President in recent history has
    implemented initiatives to improve federal
    government management.
  • Johnson Planning, Programming, and Budgeting
    System.
  • Nixon Management by Objective.
  • Carter Zero-Based Budgeting.
  • Clinton National Performance Review.
  • Bush Presidents Management Agenda.

11
Federal Management Process Has Changed
12
Where is Analysis Needed to Support Decisions
  • Problem/Issue
  • Budgetary Resources
  • Financial Condition
  • Business Processes
  • Cost/Benefit
  • Policy/Program Delivery Alternatives
  • Program Operations and Impact

13
How Was the Analysis Done?
  • A decision-maker should always know how an
    analysis was done in order to
  • Know how solid it is.
  • Be comfortable with and be able to defend any
    decision made based on the analysis.

14
So . . . Whats in YOUR Analysis?
  • A question on which your future may depend
  • In conducting analysis, how do you know how
    reliable, verifiable, relevant, sufficient, and
    consistent the data you depend on are?
  • Are you at risk if you dont know?

15
Keys to Decision Support
  • Critical Thinking
  • Creativity
  • Broad Perspective
  • Analysis
  • Qualitative
  • Quantitative
  • Communications Skills

16
Guidelines
  • Ask questions be willing to wonder.
  • Define the problem/concern/question/need.
  • Examine the evidence.
  • Analyze assumptions and biases.
  • Avoid emotional reasoning.
  • Dont use either/or thinking or over generalize.
  • Consider other interpretations.
  • Tolerate uncertainty/questions.

17
What it Means to YOU!
  • Today there are challenges in all areas of
    government.
  • But!
  • There are also opportunities for those who are
    prepared.

18
Remember . . .
  • African Proverb
  • Every morning in Africa, a gazelle wakes up.
    It knows it must run faster than the fastest lion
    or it will be killed. Every morning a lion wakes
    up. It knows it must outrun the slowest gazelle,
    or it will starve to death. It doesnt matter
    whether you are a lion or a gazelle. When the
    sun comes up, youd better start running!

19
Structured Approach to Conducting Analysis
  • Objective and systematic way of collecting,
    examining and reporting information to support
    decision-making.
  • Conceptual way of thinking.
  • Applies to all aspects of managing programs,
    finances, and operations.
  • A logical, comprehensive, structured approach
    contributes to completeness and effectiveness of
    analysis.

20
Structured Approach to Conducting Analysis
(contd)
  • To be effective, analysts must
  • Understand organizations business.
  • Understand how analytic need relates to the
    business.
  • Apply sound, thorough analytical methods
    specifically tied to the need.
  • Provide useful information to support
    decision-making.
  • Analysis for decision-making
  • leads to continual line of questioning.

21
Five Step Structured Analytic Approach
Step 1 - Define Questions
Step 2 - Identify Data Sources
Step 3 - Collect Data
Step 4 Conduct Analysis
Step 5 Present Results
22
Step 1Defining Questions
  • Question will drive the entire analysis.
  • Analysis must zero in on users need.
  • Critical considerations
  • The users business and role in it.
  • What the user needs to know and why.
  • How the results will be used for decision-making.
  • Thoroughness requires asking 6 key questions
    what, where, when, who, how, and why

23
Getting the Question Right
  • How effective is the highway patrol at increasing
    safety?

24
Refining the Question(Getting at the real
question)
  • How effective is the highway patrol . . .
  • Do resources used give adequate security?
  • Are fatalities per 100,000 miles going down?
  • Is ratio of convictions/violations going up?
  • . . . at increasing safety?
  • Is the number o accidents going down?
  • Are there fewer safety-related incidents?
  • Is there less crime on the roads?

25
Step 2Identifying Data Required
  • Key question What data do you need to answer
    the question?
  • Data collected from
  • Primary sources you collect
  • Secondary sources others collected
  • Sources and quantity of data gather depend on
  • The questions to be answered.
  • The availability of data.
  • The time allowed for the analysis.
  • If data doesnt exist, revisit questions.

26
Consider Three Data Categories
  • Budgetary
  • Prospective
  • Retrospective
  • Program
  • Strategic and annual plans
  • Program design, operation, and results
  • Financial
  • Cost of operation and financial position (assets,
    liabilities, net worth)
  • Cost data by office, program, function, output,
    or outcome

27
Assessing Data Quality
  • Assumption All decision are data driven.
  • The Quality Axiom
  • The quality of the decision
  • can be no better than
  • the quality of the data supporting the decision!

28
Step 3Collecting the Data
  • (Sounds like the easy step?)
  • Key questions in deciding how to collect data
  • Where are you going to get the data?
  • How will you use it to answer the questions?
  • How are you going to get it?
  • Common data sources
  • Records reports, manual/automated files.
  • People within and outside the organization.
  • Time available key to source and amount.
  • Verification important reliability,
    completeness, accuracy, relevancy.

29
Data Collection Hierarchy
  • TIME REQUIREMENT
  • Standard Agency Reports Low
  • Automated Systems
  • Manual Files
  • Personal Interviews
  • Focus Groups
  • Surveys High

30
Step 4Analyzing the Data
  • Analytic method steps taken to understand,
    display, or interpret data.
  • Methodology dependent on question(s).
  • Methods numerous and varied.
  • Important to know purpose/function of each and
    when to use them.
  • Review results of analysis
  • Did it address question(s)?
  • How sensitive is it to internal/external
    influences?

31
Step 4 Axiom
  • The rigor of the analysis must reflect the risk
    of the potential impact of the decision!

32
Conduct Analysis Methods Screening
  • There Categories - Which fits question(s)?
  • Descriptive what exists
  • How was the high-tech training program
    implemented?
  • Normative what exists compared to what was
    expected
  • Were job-placement goals of the high-tech
    training program met?
  • Impact did the initiative have achieve the
    intended results
  • Did the high-tech training program have an effect
    on job-placement rates?

33
Determining the Type of Analysis
  • Primary Data Analysis
  • You collect, assemble, and analyze data.
  • Secondary Data Analysis
  • You use data gathered and in some cases analyzed
    prior to your own analysis.
  • Evaluation Synthesis
  • You use the combined results from two or more
    previous analysis.

34
Analytical Methods and Their Uses
35
Document Analytic Design
  • Written plan can serve as guide and control steps
    in the structured analytic approach.
  • Several factors drive need to document plan
  • Complexity of analysis.
  • Number of analysts involved.
  • Requirements of user/organization.
  • An analytic design matrix could help.

36
Step 5Reporting Analytic Results
  • Important phase of process -- impact
    decision-making bring about change.
  • Reporting methods have different advantages
  • Written report
  • Communicate results to user as well as others.
  • Results less susceptible to misunderstanding.
  • Facilitate follow-up.
  • Oral report
  • Timely support to user.
  • Reduce misunderstanding.
  • Help reach agreement.
  • Goal convince audience that work done and
    results reported is reasonable, appropriate, and
    actionable.

37
Reporting Analysis Results (contd)
  • Remember what drove the analysis
  • Who is the user/customer and what is their role?
  • In what subject/issue is the user interested?
  • What does the user want to know?
  • What does the user plan to do with the results?
  • Be timely, complete, accurate, objective,
    convincing, clear, and concise.
  • Ensure analytic results are sufficient, relevant,
    and competent.
  • Answering analytic objective, i.e. question, is
    most critical goal.

38
Structured Approach Steps Interactive and
Overlapping
  • Each step dependent upon the successful
    completion of previous step.
  • Recheck step plans for and results of each step
    to ensure synchronization with previous steps.
  • As complexity/comprehensiveness of one step
    grows, so grows complexity/comprehensiveness of
    succeeding steps, and time required.

39
Structured Approach Steps Interactive and
Overlapping (contd)
40
Revalidating Questions(Continuous throughout
analysis!)
  • Regularly re-check and validate questions.
  • Questions may need to be modified, dropped,
    redefined or added.

Analysis Feedback Loop
Define Questions
Identify Data Sources
Collect Data
Conduct Analysis
Report Results
41
Key Points to Remember
  • Accountability expectations drive need for
    critical analysis.
  • Structured approach objective/systematic way of
    collecting, examining, and reporting information.
  • Five step structured approach
  • Identify question(s)
  • Identify data
  • Collect data
  • Analyze data
  • Report results
  • Steps highly interrelated drives need to
    revisit results of each step throughout process.

42
Summary
  • Analysis
  • Growing need support difficult decisions.
  • Growing importance support performance and
    financial accountability.
  • Best if
  • Follows a structured approach.
  • Based on users/customers questions/need.
  • Impacts decision-making/results.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com