Title: PRESENTATION TO THE PARLIAMENTARY COMMITTEE ON FINANCE (PCOF) AND THE SELECT COMMITTEE ON FINANCE (SCOF)
1PRESENTATION TO THE PARLIAMENTARY COMMITTEE ON
FINANCE (PCOF) AND THE SELECT COMMITTEE ON
FINANCE (SCOF)
- National Treasury
- 8 May 2007
- Parliament, Cape Town
2AIM OF THE PRESENTATION
- Brief background on SADC
- Overview of Finance Investment Protocol (FIP)
process - Key priorities of FIP (Annexes)
- Ratification by Parliament
3HISTORICAL BACKGROUND
- Regional cooperation and integration begun with
the security initiative of the Frontline States
in the 70s (Angola, Botswana, Mozambique,
Tanzania Zambia) - Then in 1980 SADCC formed in Tanzania (Arusha
Conference) to focus on economic cooperation and
independence from South Africa - SADC replaced SADCC in 1992 in Windhoek to
strengthen regional integration through protocol
development
4KEY SADC OBJECTIVES
- List of key objectives for SADC in SADC Treaty as
amended, (Article 5) - To use regional integration as instrument for
sustainable and equitable growth for poverty
alleviation and a higher standard of living for
the region (Article 5 (1) (a)) - Encourage development through self-reliance by
and interdependence of Member States (Article 5
(1) (d)) - Achieve these main objectives through creation of
institutions and mechanisms for the mobilization
of resources and implementation of SADC
programmes (Article 5 (2) (c))
5STRUCTURE
To indicate the structures responsible for
driving the FIP
6INSTITUTIONAL REFORM
- 2001 Extra-Ordinary Summit in Windhoek approved
formation of Directorates - (Trade, Industry, Finance and Investment Food,
Agriculture, and Natural Resources
Infrastructure Services and SHDSP) - Aim to strengthen capacity to deliver on its
mandate e.g. SADC Secretariat to coordinate and
strategize - Align with African Unions regional integration
programme - Consolidated sector coordination units
- To expedite the ratification and implementation
of protocols, which are legal instrument binding
to all Member States who ratify and accede
7STRATEGIC DIRECTION
- Reform process led to the adoption of Regional
Indicative Strategic Development Plan - Highlights key targets over 15 years
- Free Trade Area (2008),
- Customs Union (2010),
- Common Market (2015),
- Diversification of industry and exports (2015),
- Single currency (2016) and
- Monetary zone (2018)
- Prioritize regions strategic imperatives e.g.
economic regional integration and its
coordination - Provide alignment with other multilateral
initiatives e.g. NEPAD, Millennium Development
Goals, etc. - Puts the region at the implementation phase
8CHALLENGES
- Deepening regional integration and accelerating
economic growth and development - Building strong infrastructure linkages (roads,
rail, energy, ports, ICT, etc) - Adopting policies to unemployment and halving the
incidence of poverty - Improving fiscal reforms and public debt
reduction - Developing regional industrial policy mechanisms
to diversify economies - Ensuring effective resource mobilization through
financial markets and donor coordination - Promoting the development of relevant skills
9SADC Protocol Process
10PROTOCOL PROCESS
- Regional integration within SADC driven by
protocols in SADC Treaty, Article 22 (1-11) - Developed for each area of cooperation
(environment, trade, movement of people, gender,
etc) - Outline objectives, scope, and institutional
requirements - Summit approves protocols
- Binding to those who ratified or acceded
- Two-thirds majority to enter into force
11NATURE OF THE PROTOCOL PROCESS
- SADC Finance Ministers responsible for FIP
- Bottom-up approach adopted driven by
subcommittees Lessons rejection of the top-down
approach used for e.g. Trade Protocol - Consensus through non-binding MOUs (voluntary)
- Vetted by SADC legal team for consistency with
international laws and agreements - Legal process of SADC signature, ratification
accession - Legal opinion from Justice, DFA and Treasury
- FIP has developed between 1998 and 2006
- Structure-wise general principles/declarations
of intent to which various annexes are affixed
12FINANCE AND INVESTMENT PROTOCOL
- Technical Committees overseeing the process and
reporting to MoFs - Committee of Senior Treasury Officials
- Committee of Central Bank Governors
- Finance Ministers approval in July 2006 first
signing in by Heads of States (August 2006) and
later South Africa (October 2006) - 10 countries signatories (Botswana, DRC, Lesotho,
Madagascar, Mauritius, Mozambique, South Africa,
Swaziland, Tanzania and Zimbabwe) - FIP to be subject to the internal processes
within member states i.e. parliament, civil
society, etc (domestification) - Cost implications indeterminate, but should be
quantified through a national budgeting process
13SADC Finance and Investment Protocol (Annexes)
14Annex 1 Cooperation on Investment (1)
- MOU objectives
- Development of a SADC Investment Zone to
attract investment - Harmonization of investment policies and laws
- Ensure fairness, equity and transparency in
treatment of investors - Support for local and regional entrepreneurs to
increase regional productive capacity - Encourage cooperation amongst investment
promotion agencies and guarantee investment
protection
15Annex 1 Cooperation on Investment(2)
- Creation support mechanisms (market access, etc)
for the least-developed countries - Adherence to international agreements e.g.
Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency (MIGA)
Convention (1985) and International Centre for
the Settlement of Investment Disputes (1965) - Other issues double taxation agreements, trade,
investment industrial policies - Action Plan adopted on 30 January 2007 under the
Investment Subcommittee
16Annex 2 Macroeconomic Convergence (1)
- MOU Objectives
- Promote stability-orientated policies
- Article 3 outlines macroeconomic convergence
indicators in terms of inflation, fiscal deficit,
public debt current account deficit in relative
terms - Establish surveillance unit (Monitoring,
Surveillance and Performance Unit) to monitor
convergence and to - develop database using data from Member States
- coordinate macroeconomic planning capacity
within Member States (technical assistance) - submit assessments on the regions convergence
status to a Peer Review Panel, (Article 7) - refine procedure for peer review mechanism
- Member states submitted annual macroeconomic
convergence programmes in Mauritius, Nov 2006 - Peer Review Panel to issue an explanatory
communique on its assessments
17Annex 2 Macroeconomic Convergence (2)
Target 2008 2012 2018
Inflation rate lt10 lt5 lt3
Budget deficit/GDP lt5 lt3 lt3
External debt/GDP lt60 lt60 lt60
Current account/GDP lt9 lt9 lt3
External reserves (imports cover) gt3 mnths gt6 mnths Sustainable
18Annex 3 Taxation Cooperation and Related Matters
Tax MoU
- Signed by SADC Committee of Ministers for Finance
Investment in August 2002 - MOU subsumed into Draft FIP as Annex 3
- Seeks to promote coordination of tax policy
admin - Underpins objectives of formulating
coordinating sound policies towards - Good tax policy design practices in support of
economic growth FDI - Improve efficiency of tax collection
- Safeguard respective Member States tax bases
(training of tax officials, treaty network,
seeking to eliminate juridical double taxation
assist in reducing fiscal evasion through robust
exchange of information) - Reduce obstacles to intra-SADC trade and
investment
19Annex 3 Taxation Cooperation and Related Matters
- Key document very ambitious in terms of
coordinating tax policies, thereby affecting
Member States fiscal sovereignty - Is the public good of an economically more
integrated region more beneficial than individual
country sovereignty? political economy debate - Just 6 substantive articles
- Art 2 Development of SADC tax database
- Art 3 Capacity building - development of
professionalism expertise of tax officers - Art 4 Cooperation to achieve common approach to
tax incentives - Art 5 Develop common approach to tax treaty
negotiation - Art 6 Coordination harmonisation of indirect
taxes - Art 7 Give consideration to introducing
mechanisms for settlement of tax disputes between
Member States
20Annex 3 Taxation Cooperation Tax Database
- Comprehensive, publicly accessible database on
SADC website - it is an essential analytical /
research tool - Provides Tax Subcommittee with tax system
information so that different tax systems can be
coordinated - Inform investor community about SADC member
states tax systems incentives - Include details of
- All direct and indirect taxes levies, including
rates, dates, exemptions allowances - All tax incentives
- All tax treaties between Member States outside
SADC - Statistics on revenue collection
- Annual update as a minimum requirement
- or current product will deteriorate into
fruitless expenditure (it was last updated in
2003) - Database was launched on SADC website in 2005
21Annex 3 Taxation Cooperation Capacity building
- Develop professionalism expertise of tax policy
officials and administrators by - Provide support for life-long training in tax
design, policy development and revenue
administration - Effectively equipping people to protect tax bases
(avoidance or evasion) - Introducing, developing, maintaining
engendering good practices - Member States undertake to
- Actively support initiatives skills best
practices, exchanges of personnel information,
mutual assistance, training workshops, seminars,
and training events - Provision of training resources
- Recognise importance of IT and digital
revolution - E-Commerce, E-Billing, or E-Customs clearance
- Impact these new media may have on tax revenue
collection and on the flow of goods services
22Annex 3 Taxation Cooperation Implementation of
tax incentive application
- Main aim is to operationalise implement FIP
Annex 3, ensuring appropriate use of tax
incentives between SADC member states, including
avoiding harmful tax competition by the following
steps - Endeavour to achieve a common approach
- Ensure tax incentives are only reflected in tax
legislation - - No discretionary tax incentives
- No investment centre tax incentives
- Little scope for specific business deals
- Part of SADC Tax Database implementation to check
how many tax incentives introduced by member
states are issued by tax legislation, are
discretionary or are issued by investment centres
23Annex 3 Taxation Cooperation Tax incentives
defined
- Tax incentives may include
- Investment allowances, full depreciation
allowances - Investment tax credit - addition to normal
depreciation - Full cost of acquisition allowed as deduction
from the taxable profits accelerated depreciation
allowances - Declining balance depreciation allowances
- Tax privileged export processing or enterprise
zones - Tax holidays
- Endeavour - To avoid harmful tax competition as
may be evidenced by - Zero or low effective rates
- Lack of transparency
- Lack of effective exchange of information
- incentives to particular tax payers especially
non-residents - Incentives as vehicles for tax minimisation
- Absence of substantial activity in the
jurisdiction
24Annex 3 Taxation Cooperation Implementation
of tax incentive coordinationWhat does it mean
for individual member states?Who will enforce
the Protocols provisions?Or is it gradualism
through moral suasion
- Endeavour to avoid introducing legislation that
prejudices other member states (!) - Develop Guidelines for SADC member states
- Assist competition policy through the fiscal
framework - Effectiveness in achieving goals
- Revenue costs
- Absence of tax sparing arrangements in DTAs that
reduce the effectiveness of incentives - Impact on costs/burden on tax administrations in
SADC - Effect on overall distribution of member states
tax burden - How to deal with disputes? Annex language
non-committal doubtful how disputes may arise
(compare to ECJ)
25Annex 3 Taxation Cooperation Implementation of
tax incentive article most problematic and
potentially divisive
- This area needs top level political guidance!
- EU example tax coordination driven by ECJ on the
back of legally binding EU competition policy,
state aid rules and code of conduct re. business
income tax - SADC has none of these institutions or framework
policies yet - Tax Subcommittee can continue to commission
reports, adopt these but to what effect? For
example ? - 2 consultancy studies were adopted or are in the
process of becoming official SADC policy
documents which strongly caution against
aggressive use of tax incentives - SADC Study on the Effectiveness Economic
Impact of Tax Incentives in the SADC Region
(Bolnick Research Report) - Ongoing consultancy on Guidelines and Tax
Expenditure Budgeting Framework Design (Ogley
Research Report) - But since 2002 there is proliferation of tax
incentives in Community
26Annex 3 Taxation Cooperation Implementation
of tax treaty policies
- Intended output Create for both direct
indirect taxes a network of SADC-specific tax
agreements to minimise on juridical double
taxation, address fiscal evasion through
facilitation of exchange of information mutual
assistance in tax administration - Note Tax Agreement are bilateral only, but a
state begins negotiation on basis of a model
treaty (OECD, UN or SADC) - Common negotiation policy both inside outside
SADC - Strive for speedy negotiation, conclusion,
ratification implementation - Comprehensive treaty network in SADC -
- Exchange of information, mutual agreement and
co-operation - Develop a model tax treaty for SADC including
guidelines for - - Effective exchange of information
- Mutual assistance and co-operation procedures
27Annex 3 Taxation Cooperation Harmonisation of
indirect taxes
- Effective co-ordination harmonisation of
administration - WTO compliance - substituting import taxes with
broad-based consumption taxes - Explore areas of co-ordination for policy
formulation administration on excise taxes
(e.g., recently released Book Excise Taxes
Admin in Southern Africa, SATI, 2006) - Tobacco products
- Alcoholic beverages
- Non-alcoholic beverages
- Fuel products
- Luxury goods
- Co-ordination co-operation on policy
administration of VAT /sales tax (minimum
standard rate, SADC VAT forum) - Minimise smuggling/counterfeiting in support of
tax base - Harmonise rates for tobacco, alcohol fuel
(long-term goal) - Provide mutual assistance in collection
- Bilateral multilateral agreements for exchange
of information on VAT
28Annex 3 Taxation Cooperation Indirect tax
harmonisation implementation
- Most advances could be made in area of mutual
assistance in tax admin, reducing compliance
burden at fiscal frontiers, etc. - Member states are agreed that there is a huge
cooperation need in areas of Administration - Tax design cooperation coordination very
problematic due to developmental diversity in
member states - To drill down into it each individual tax
instrument - Evaluate benefits cross border agreements
- Possible evaluation of excise smuggling,
especially tobacco - Possible cross-border VAT agreements on admin
assistance - VAT Study on admin design problems re VAT in
SADC ongoing - Questionnaires on administrative capacity
- Will be workshopped and hopefully adopted
- Possible workshop on tax gap
- Possible in country diagnostic and tailor made
interventions
29Annex 3 Taxation Cooperation Settlement of tax
disputes (this issue has been deferred)
- Give consideration to introducing mechanisms
procedures for settlement of tax disputes,
including a SADC body for tax dispute settlement
purposes - Given non-binding / non-committal nature of
incentive language in Annex 3, the Tax
Subcommittee would like to defer implementation
on this article - Further political guidance needed and
implementation delay will have to be reviewed on
a needs basis or if member states wish to flag
disputes
30Annex 3 Taxation Cooperation Operationalisation
of FIPs Tax Annex
- Important to remember SADC principles of variable
geometry differentiated speed of integration, - laggards do not determine speed of tax
coordination - Big question is MOU language appropriate for
Protocol? (Non-binding vs. binding) - In tax e.g.
- Endeavour to avoid harmful tax competition- or
- Shall avoid harmful tax competition This has
raised fundamental questions of commitment to
MOU, to FIP indeed to fundamental SADC aims of
integration - Some see loss of fiscal sovereignty as an
inevitable acceptable price to pay for
benefits of integrated economies - Others see it as too ambitious but MOU has been
ratified - Hence, political level must seek to inform what
variable geometry differentiated speed will
mean for tax coordination?
31Annex 9 Cooperation of Development Finance
Institutions (1)
- Objective of MOU
- Cooperating in capacity building through training
programs, management secondment and mentoring
programs - Pooling resources for the finance and risk
assessment of development projects, mainly
infrastructure e.g. water, energy, transport,
etc. - DFIs critical for achieving regional integration
through resource mobilization (SMMEs,
agriculture, financial intermediation, etc) - Strengthening governance codes and ensuring
compliance with best practice for credit risk
management and project appraisals - Offering policy research capability and advisory
services to DFIs - Promoting the development of capital markets
through issuance of long term financial
securities such as bonds - Assisting in broadening DFI mandates across
national frontiers
32Annex 9 Cooperation of Development Finance
Institutions (2)
- Articles 2 establishes a DFI Network under
subsidiarity - Article 8 creates the Development Finance
Resource Centre (DFRC) - Network consists of DFIs CEOs or representative
at general meetings - DFRC is a standalone organ with its own
management structure and Board of Trustees drawn
from CEOs of DFIs - Network will investigate the feasibility of a
regional insurance guarantee facility - Advanced development of a Project Preparation and
Development Facility
33Annex 10 Non-banking Financial Institutions and
Services
- MOU Objective
- Annex creates a general framework for cooperation
amongst CISNA regulatory authorities - Specifically, to develop financial services
industry, protect consumer rights, explore
opportunities for joint financial products,
liberalize market integration and access and
harmonize regulations and laws - Ensure compliance with international standards
i.e. IOSCO, IAIS, IOPRS) - Authorities concluded bilateral MOU on
information exchange - Implementation and monitoring framework developed
for CISNAs strategic plan - Finalizing a report on capital market integration
in SADC
34Annex 11 Cooperation in SADC Stock Exchanges
- MOU Objective
- Vision is an integrated real-time network of
national securities markets in SADC for transfer
of skills, intelligence and technologies - Improve the depth and breadth of securities
markets to enhance liquidity and tradeability of
financial instruments - Ensure fair and transparent trading rules and
operations (listing requirements, etc) - JSE provides secretariat functions
35Input by the Representative from the CCBG
36Outstanding MOUs
- Anti-money laundering
- Project preparation and development facility
(PPDF) - Accounting and Auditing Standards
- SADC Banking Association
37What is the Role of the South Africa?
38SOUTH AFRICA AND THE SADC REGION
- RSA joined SADC in 1994
- National Treasury and FISCU in 1995 (another
sector in health) - Coordinated the formulation of broad principles
as a basis for the integration of SADCs finance
and investment sector - Since restructuring, sector coordinating units
consolidated in Gaborone - Huge challenges in terms coordination due to
severe capacity constrains within the SADC
Secretariat
39Going Forward
- RSAs ratification will be signaling factor for
other SADC Member States to expedite such a
process - Continue to operate within the ambit of the RISDP
by focusing on deepening regional integration - To position ourselves as strong champions of
the FIP priorities based on viable internal
cooperation (private sector involvement
imperative) - To continuously undertake cost benefit analysis
of engaging within the region - Key process towards implementation and
enforcement - Allow RSA to embark on a communication and
information dissemination exercise to create
awareness and cooperation with local stakeholders
(workshops, targeted delivery, etc)
40CONCLUDING REMARKS
- FIP creates a cooperation framework within the
finance and investment sector - FIP is now a public document and needs
comprehensive buy-in by various stakeholders e.g.
business organizations, academics, politicians,
etc - Provides a challenge for a leadership role for
South Africa given the extent of the countrys
development in financial systems - Need for the development of a dissemination
strategy towards a country-specific
implementation plan for the Protocol
41Usuku Oluhle