Sustaining success Submission on Bill B242006 to Portfolio Committee on Health - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Sustaining success Submission on Bill B242006 to Portfolio Committee on Health

Description:

To promote health and reduce the death and disease caused by ... Benzo[a]pyrene. 2-Napthylamine. 4- Aminobiphenyl. Benzene. Vinyl chloride. Arsenic. Chromium ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:59
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 62
Provided by: yussufs
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Sustaining success Submission on Bill B242006 to Portfolio Committee on Health


1
Sustaining successSubmission on Bill B24-2006
to Portfolio Committee on Health
  • Dr Yussuf Saloojee
  • National Council Against Smoking

2
NCAS mission
  • To promote health and reduce the death and
    disease caused by the use of tobacco products

3
Unique treatment for a unique product
  • Tobacco is a uniquely dangerous consumer product.
    It is the only legal product that kills the user
    when used exactly as intended by the
    manufacturer.

4
Global cause of death
  • There are only two major causes of death that are
    increasing rapidly worldwide - HIV and tobacco.

5
Smoking-Caused Diseases
6
Smoking causes spontaneous abortion
Smoking during pregnancy poses special risks to
the developing foetus and is an important cause
of low birthweight and infant mortality. US
Surgeon Generals Report, 1989
7
Lung cancer has overtaken breast cancer as a
cause of death in several countries
8
Trends in SA
  • The number of smokers dropped from 8.3 million in
    1993 to 5 million in 2005.
  • There are 3 million fewer smokers.
  • Between a 1/4 to 1/2 of these people would have
    died from a disease caused by smoking.
  • Parliament has saved over a million South
    Africans from early deaths due to cancer, heart
    attacks and lung diseases

9
Policy Makers Concerns about Controlling Tobacco
Use
  • Job losses
  • Loss of excise tax revenues
  • Increased smuggling

World Bank, 1999
10
  • Tobacco control policies will not harm the
    economy or cause job losses.
  • The World Bank, 1999

SAA
11
Taxes
  • Smokers pay taxes.
  • Tobacco companies collect money from smokers and
    pass it on to the government. They are simply tax
    collectors.

12
Smuggling
  • What drives smuggling? High taxes or the tobacco
    industry?
  • The difference in duty levels between
    neighbouring states is a MINOR cause of
    smuggling.
  • Smuggling, is driven by the commercial activities
    of the tobacco companies

13
Industry participation in smuggling
  • The International Consortium of Investigative
    Journalists found
  • British American Tobacco had for decades
    secretly encouraged tax evasion and cigarette
    smuggling in a global effort to secure market
    share and lure generations of new smokers.

14
  • In Industry sued
  • Canada, Ecuador, the European Community filed
    lawsuits against international tobacco companies
    for smuggling.
  • Philip Morris settled the EU lawsuit for 1.25
    billion.

15
(No Transcript)
16
Tobacco companies - an organized crime syndicate
  • Cigarette makers lied to the public about the
    dangers of smoking and passive smoking
  • marketed cigarettes to underage teenagers while
    falsely claiming that they had not done so
  • manipulated nicotine levels to keep smokers
    hooked, while denying nicotine was addictive
  • promoted the health benefits of light or
    low-tar cigarettes knowing these were no safer
    than ordinary cigarettes and
  • destroyed and concealed documents to hide their
    illegal activities.
  • US Judge Gladys Kessler, 2006.

17
Section 2 Control over smoking of tobacco
products
  • Aims
  • To protect children from passive smoking
  • To guarantee the constitutional right to an
    environment that is not harmful to health

18
Background
  • Cigarette smoke contains over 4500 chemicals,
    including over 200 known poisons (arsenic,
    cadmium, cyanide, nicotine, etc) and 60 chemicals
    that cause cancer.
  • In some outdoor areas levels of tobacco smoke can
    be as high as in indoor areas.

19
  • Over 900 scientific studies have linked passive
    smoking and ill health.
  • It is a cause of lung cancer and heart disease in
    adult non-smokers.
  • In children it increases the risk of sudden
    infant death syndrome (SIDS), acute respiratory
    infections (brobnchitis and pneumonia), ear
    problems and asthma attacks.

20
Short-term and long-term exposures can cause harm.
  • Breathing tobacco smoke for as little as 30
    minutes can increase the risk of a heart attack
    in those with heart problems.
  • Children, people with asthma, bronchitis, and
    heart disease are especially vulnerable.

21
Total bans
  • Countries with complete bans on smoking in indoor
    public places Ireland, Norway, Bhutan, New
    Zealand and Scotland.

22
  • Advantages of a total ban on smoking in indoor
    public places
  • More effective than a partial ban in reducing
    pollution
  • Fairer. Currently, those who work in smoking
    areas are still exposed to harm and
  • Simpler, more consistent and easier to enforce.

23
South Africa
  • The 1999 Act prohibited smoking in all enclosed
    public places and workplaces, except in areas set
    aside for smokers.
  • Overnight, social norms changed.
  • Hospitals, clinics, schools, buses, taxis,
    offices, shopping malls rapidly became smokeless.

24
  • With the exception of some in the hospitality
    industry, the law is working well.
  • The public (including smokers and non smokers)
    have welcomed the law.
  • Ordinary people made the law work. They stood up
    for their right to clean air and most smokers
    respected that right.
  • The law is self-enforcing. The police do not have
    to sit in every cinema, café, and office waiting
    to arrest offenders.

25
The Proposed Amendments
26
Restrictions on smoking near entrances to
enclosed public places
  • Smoking near entrances to buildings is a problem.
    Smoke can drift into indoor areas though open
    doors, windows and ventilation inlets. People
    entering and exiting the building are also
    exposed to this pollution.
  • In coffee shops and restaurants indoor diners are
    exposed to smoke from those smoking outside.
  • The problem can be fairly easily solved by
    prohibiting smoking within 3 metres of any
    non-domestic building.
  • Signs at entrances and moving ashtrays away from
    doorways help make the policy work.

27
Smoking in day care centres and the entry of
minors into smoking sections.
  • Young children are especially vulnerable to
    second-hand smoke because they breathe more air
    relative to body weight than adults and so absorb
    more tobacco smoke toxins.
  • They are also less able to complain or move away
    from smoke-filled rooms.
  • It is not possible to confine smoke to one area
    in a house. Even if smoking is restricted to a
    single room in the house, smoke will still drift
    throughout the home.

28
  • In smoking areas, where many people smoke, high
    levels of tobacco smoke toxins can build up, To
    take children into these places is recklessly
    exposing them to harm.

29
Smoking in sports stadia and other crowded
facilities
  • Smoking should be controlled in outdoor areas in
    which exposure cannot be easily avoided such as
    at railway platforms and sports stadia.
  • In stadia exposure to tobacco smoke is likely to
    be sustained (from a few hours to the whole day
    for cricket lovers) and significant.
  • Vulnerable people, who are very sensitive to
    smoke, can have their health put at risk.

30
Protecting the constitutional rights of workers
  • The Constitution guarantees everyone the right
    to an environment that is not harmful to their
    health or well-being.
  • Employers must respect employees rights to a
    clean environment and protect them from the harms
    caused by tobacco smoke pollution.
  • Most people do not want to be exposed to tobacco
    smoke, but suffer in silence at work because they
    fear upsetting their employers.

31
  • They instead phone local authorities, the health
    department and non-governmental organizations
    seeking help while wishing to remain anonymous.
  • The Bill proposes making it possible for people
    to voice their concerns without fear of
    repercussions.
  • The Bill also places an obligation on employers
    to respect an employees right not to be forced
    to work in a smoking section against their
    wishes. People should not be required to pay with
    their health for the opportunity to work.
  • Business owners cannot contract with their
    workers to relax workplace safety standards.

32
The special case of domestic workers
  • The 1999 Act allows smoking in private homes.
    Private homes can be a workplace for domestic
    workers. They are not protected from tobacco
    smoke in smokers homes.
  • The Act has created the discriminatory situation
    where domestic workers are given less protection
    than other workers.
  • Domestic workers health must be protected from
    pollution by tobacco smoke.

33
Smoking in cars with child passengers
  • There is strong public support for a ban on
    smoking in cars while children are passengers.
  • Smoking in cars can produce high concentrations
    of smoke, especially if windows are closed
  • A case can be made for banning smoking in any
    vehicle while driving like not using cell
    phones.
  • Please prohibit smoking in cars while children
    are present. Public support for the ban is
    sufficient to ensure that enforcement will not be
    a problem.

34
  • SECTON 3A STANDARDS FOR MANUFACTURING AND EXPORT
    OF TOBACCO PRODUCTS

35
Policy goals
  • To require tobacco manufacturers to produce the
    least harmful product technically possible by
    regulating
  • the substances that the manufacturers can put
    into tobacco products (its constituents)
  • the chemicals that may be produced when
    tobacco products are used (its emissions) and
  • the physical design of tobacco products.

36
Background
  • Despite their toxicity, tobacco products are
    currently subject to little regulation regarding
    their content, design and manufacture.
  • New tobacco products can be introduced and the
    design of currently available products can be
    changed with almost no regulatory oversight.

37
  • Paradoxically, medications to help people quit
    smoking are strictly regulated by the Medicines
    Control Council. These have to meet the same
    safety and product standards as any other
    scheduled medicine and can only be sold through
    pharmacies.
  • Not regulating nicotine in its deadliest form
    (cigarettes), while strictly regulating it in its
    safest form (medications) is not rational.

38
  • The cigarette is more than just dried tobacco
    wrapped in paper, and snuff is not simply
    powdered tobacco leaf.
  • Enormous research has been done on the design and
    manufacture of tobacco products.
  • The key goal is to deliver nicotine rapidly and
    in sufficient quantities to feed a smokers
    craving.

39
Neurotransmitters Released by Nicotine in the
Brain
Benowitz, 1999
40
 
41
The Manufactured Cigarette
42
Cigarettes
  • Designed to
  • Maximize addiction,
  • facilitate initiation and
  • undermine cessation.

43
  • Ventilated filters provide cooler and more dilute
    smoke. Larger quantities of smoke can be more
    deeply inhaled into the lungs.
  • Chemical are added to the tobacco, filter, and/or
    paper during the manufacture of cigarettes or
    snuff. These additives serve many purposes.

44
Additives
  • Up to 1400 chemicals can be added to tobacco.
    These
  • Mask the irritating taste of smoke.
  • Increase nicotine delivery.
  • Keep the product fresh (anti-fungal).
  • Control the rate at which cigarettes burn
    (nitrates).
  • Produce a white ash (chalk).
  • Give brands their special flavour (cocoa,
    chocolate).

45
Additives
  • There are no legal restrictions on what may be
    added to tobacco products
  • Only the tobacco manufacturers know the additives
    used in each brand

46
Additives make it easier for children to start
47
Making it easier for children to start
  • Chocolate, licorice, honey, sugars, menthol, and
    other flavourings help hide the unpleasant taste
    of tobacco.
  • Menthol numbs the throat and reduces coughing.
  • In October, a tobacco company agreed to stop
    marketing candy and alcohol flavored cigarettes
    in the U.S, because of its appeal to children.
    The brands had names like Twista Lime and
    Mocha Mint.

48
Making it more difficult to quit
  • Ammonia changes the pH of smoke so increasing
    free nicotine levels. Free nicotine, passes
    more rapidly and completely through the lungs
    and has a faster effect on the brain.
  • This makes it more difficult for smokers to quit,
    and so is deliberately increasing harm to the
    public.

49
Emissions
  • A lit cigarette produces over 4500 chemicals in
    the smoke.
  • About half are found naturally in the tobacco
    leaf and half are created by chemical reactions
    when tobacco is burned.

50
(No Transcript)
51
What does smoke contain?
  • Irritants and Toxicants
  • Ammonia
  • Formaldehyde
  • Carbon monoxide
  • Nicotine
  • Toluene
  • Nitrogen dioxide
  • Hydrogen cyanide
  • Acrolein
  • Acetaldehyde
  • Carcinogens
  • Benzoapyrene
  • 2-Napthylamine
  • 4- Aminobiphenyl
  • Benzene
  • Vinyl chloride
  • Arsenic
  • Chromium
  • Polonium-210

52
Regulatory Approach
  • While it is impossible to make a cigarette safe,
    it is reasonable to prevent manufacturers doing
    anything that increases the harm caused by
    tobacco smoke.

53
Regulatory Approach
  • The Bill should
  • Require manufacturers to disclose all additives
    used in tobacco products, by brand, to the
    government.
  • Also require them to disclose the purpose of an
    additive and its biological effects, if any, when
    inhaled
  • Enable government to order the removal of
    additives which increase harm.
  • Only allow new additives if its safety can be
    demonstrated
  • Permit additives necessary for the manufacturing
    and storage of tobacco products provided these
    are safe, but bar all additives that may
    influence smoking behavior.

54
  • The WHO FCTCs is developing guidelines for
    product regulation and testing.
  • The Bill proposes providing legal authority to
    the Minister to develop standards for
    constituents, emissions, product design, and
    testing methods, once there are clear
    international guidelines for doing so.

55
Reducing the fire-risks from cigarettes
  • Policy goal
  • To reduce deaths, injuries and property damages
    resulting from fires started by manufactured
    cigarettes.
  • Background
  • Cigarettes are a major cause of fires.
  • About 1,400 fires (or 4) were caused by smoking
    in South Africa in 2004
  • R45 million of property was destroyed.
  • Falling asleep while smoking in bed, smoking
    while under the influence of alcohol, or the
    tossing away of a lit cigarette, can all start
    fires.

56
  • It is possible to reduce the likelihood that a
    lit cigarette will start a fire by altering its
    design.
  • So cigarettes, if not puffed upon for a while,
    will self-extinguish.
  • New York State introduced Fire Safety Standards
    for Cigarettes 2004. Canada also has such laws.
  • Self-extinguishing does not mean fire-safe. It
    is impossible to make a burning object completely
    fire-safe.

57
Regulatory approach
  • The Minister to set a performance standard that
    all cigarettes sold in South Africa must meet.
  • This will require cigarettes to stop burning
    after a few minutes, if not puffed upon.
  • Manufacturers may use a technical design of
    their choosing to achieve it.

58
Conclusion
  • The Bill will protect
  • children
  • workers and
  • smokers.
  • It is fair, reasonable and workable.

59
Thank you
60
Particle Size Determinant of Tar Nicotine Lung
Penetration
Too Large
.5 - 2 microns
Too Small
61
Philip Morris (1950s)
  • Insofar as particle size is a determinant of
    lung absorption of smoke, we should explore this
    as a way to reduce lung exposure to smoke (e.g.,
    1957, idea no. 99)
  • History shows they did the opposite to
    increase efficiency of nicotine absorption as the
    priority concern over potentially increased lung
    cancer
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com