Heterogeneous Hadean Hafnium: Evidence of Continental Crust at 4.4 to 4.5 Ga - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 16
About This Presentation
Title:

Heterogeneous Hadean Hafnium: Evidence of Continental Crust at 4.4 to 4.5 Ga

Description:

T.M Harrison, J. Blichert-Toft, W. M ller, F. Albarede, P. Holden, S.J. Mojzsis. Science 2005 ... Heterogeneous Hadean Hafnium: Evidence of Continental Crust at ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:92
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 17
Provided by: stephani187
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Heterogeneous Hadean Hafnium: Evidence of Continental Crust at 4.4 to 4.5 Ga


1
A Tale of Early Earth Told in Zircons
Yuri Amelin Science, 2005
2
Heterogeneous Hadean Hafnium Evidence of
Continental Crust at 4.4 to 4.5 Ga
  • T.M Harrison, J. Blichert-Toft, W. Müller, F.
    Albarede, P. Holden, S.J. Mojzsis
  • Science 2005

A Tale of Early Earth Told in Zircons
Yuri Amelin Science, 2005
3
What Are Zircons and Why are They Important to
Astrobiology?
  • Rocks contain samples of zircons (250µm wide),
    which can be removed and radioactively dated
  • Zircons are highly resistant to high
    temperatures and pressures, thus allowing them to
    survive periods of heavy bombardment without
    alteration
  • Evidence that the Earth had water and continents
    4.34.4 G a (Mojzsis et al., Peck et al.)
  • 400 Myr earlier than previously thought

4
  • When did the continental crust form?
  • It formed 4 billion years ago and slowly grew
    over time
  • No rocks older than 4Gyr expected
  • It formed very shortly after the Earth, making
    continental crust prevalent during the Hadean
    Eon.
  • Several remixing events expected

5
Testing the Hypotheses
  • Use zircons to trace early conditions
  • Hf in zircons remains roughly constant since
    there is very little Lu in grain
  • Radioactive dating using U-Pb isotopic
    compositions
  • Study the Lu/Hf in grains as old as 4.37 Gyr to
    find out whether
  • There was a Lu/Hf reservoir that matches that of
    the continental crust today
  • OR
  • There was a widespread depletion event together
    with a recycled mantle

6
The Experiment
  • Deviation from bulk Earth, ?HF
  • ?HF Source(Hf) - Earth(Hf)
  • Bulk Earth represented by chondritic values
  • High Resolution Ion Microprobe II
  • 50,000 zircons from JH992
  • Dated by U-Pb for time of crystallization
  • Zircons with ages between 4.01-4.37 Ga analyzed
    for Lu/Hf and the Hf abundances
  • Zircons that showed significant deviation from
    the bulk Earth isotopic composition were
    re-tested for different generations

7
The Experiment
  • Deviation from bulk Earth, ?HF
  • ?HF Source(Hf) - Earth(Hf)
  • Bulk Earth represented by chondritic values
  • Measured 104 zircons and obtained Hf ratios
  • 44 measured by solution mass spectrometry
  • Measures bulk Hf isotope composition
  • Entire sample ruined during experiment
  • 60 measured by laser ablation spectrometry
  • Spatially resolved regions on the zircon can be
    measured
  • Useful for zoned zircons
  • Subsequent measurements are possible

8
Possible Contamination
  • Lasar ablation for Hf isotope analysis taken from
    core
  • If age from the rim entered into the age of the
    ablation pit, the Hf isotope analysis would be
    wrong
  • Measuring the wrong age can lead to
  • an incorrect Hf isotope composition
  • an incorrect estimate of ?HF

9
Possible Contamination
  • U-Pb age from the core
  • Hf ratio from the entire grain
  • Incorrect derivation of Hf are represented by
    these trajectories

10
The Results
Lu/Hf 0 is a forbidden region 0.01
enriched reservoir by 4.4-4.5 Ga
11
The Results
Lu/Hf 0.1 leads to quite a large deviation
today that has not been observed Possible that
continental crust recycling erased such
compositions
12
Interpretation
  • Continental crust formed 4.5 Ga
  • Major differentiation at 4.54.4 Ga
  • Continental crust
  • Depleted and enriched mantle reservoir
  • Recycling of continental crust into the mantle
    occurred less than 4Ga

13
  • Review of Harrison et al.
  • Main result from Harrison et al. is interpreted
    global differentiation of the mantle 4.5-4.4 Ga

14
  • New questions raised
  • Is the time range for mantle differentiation
    inferred from ? correct?
  • Layers of material making up the zircons may be
    from different generations, making ? too high or
    low
  • Zircon Hf-ratio remains constant over time, while
    the U and Pb do not
  • This causes the incorrect reference value in the
    primitive mantle to be assumed

15
  • New questions raised
  • Can the primitive mantle be represented by
    chondritic meteorites?
  • Lu/Hf varies in chondrites, making the reference
    value for the primitive mantle ambiguous

16
  • New questions raised
  • Could the signatures of differentiation have been
    erased?
  • Lunar record of heavy bombardment suggests that
    the mantle and crust of the Earth likely
    homogenized on a large scale
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com