designing easily learnable eyesfree interaction - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

designing easily learnable eyesfree interaction

Description:

designing easily learnable eyesfree interaction – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:58
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 63
Provided by: Kev883
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: designing easily learnable eyesfree interaction


1
(No Transcript)
2
Tapping and Rubbing Exploring New Dimensions of
Tactile Feedback with Voice Coil Motors
Kevin A. Li, Patrick Baudisch, William G.
Griswold, James D. Hollan University of
California, San Diego Microsoft Research
3
tapping
4
rubbing
5
contributions
  • two new types of tactile feedback based on
    human-human communication tapping and rubbing
  • perceived as tapping and rubbing
  • people can distinguish a wide range of tapping
    and rubbing frequencies and amplitudes

6
human-to-human interaction
7
(No Transcript)
8
(No Transcript)
9
(No Transcript)
10
people dont vibrate each other
11
related work
12
multidimensional tactons
Brown et al. MobileHCI06
13
haptic pen
Lee et al. UIST04
14
tactile handheld miniature bimodal
Luk et al. CHI06
15
phantom
Massie and Salisbury 94
16
applications
17
eyes-free messaging
18
in-car navigation
19
gaming
20
prototypes
21
(No Transcript)
22

voice coil motor
arm
head
23
soundTouch
24
hard disk voice coil motors
25
what feels like a finger?
plastic shell
teflon tape
26
user studies
27
tapping user study
28
hypotheses
  • users will report the device feels like tapping
    and has human qualities to it
  • users can distinguish and identify a range of
    taps

29
study setup
  • 16 participants
  • tap generated with 250ms square wave
  • exposed users to taps of different strength and
    speed

30
questionnaire
how would you describe the tactile sensations
you just experienced to someone who has not
experienced them? which aspects of the
experience felt natural and which aspects did
not? if your phone could generate these types
of sensations, what would you like to use them
for?
31
tapping mimics the real thing
  • tapping has a human quality
  • 13 of 16 participants used the word tap
  • drumming fingers, tickling
  • fast and slow are perceptually different
  • ? slow feel more human, fast feel like
    vibrations

32
task distinguish taps (strength)
  • given two taps of different strength, which one
    feels stronger?
  • 7 different amplitudes, evenly spaced from 0 to
    1.0N

33
stimulus pairs
tap of level 2, pause, then a tap of level 4
pairs differed by 1 or 2 levels
Level of 2nd Tap
Level of 1st Tap
34
error rates () for amplitude
Strength of 2nd Tap
Strength of 1st Tap
35
task distinguish taps (speed)
  • given two taps of different speed, which one
    feels faster?
  • 7 different speeds, evenly spaced from 5Hz to
    29Hz
  • 2 conditions ConstantDuration and ConstantNumber

36
stimulus pairs
tap of speed 4, pause, then a tap of speed 2
pairs differed by 1 or 2 levels
Speed of 2nd Tap
Speed of 1st Tap
37
error rates() for speed
ConstantDuration
Speed of 2nd Tap
Speed of 1st Tap
ConstantNumber
Speed of 2nd Tap
Speed of 1st Tap
ConstantDuration ? all sequences have the same
duration ConstantNumber ? all sequences have the
same number of taps
38
task identify taps
  • Given a tap, rate its strength on a scale of
    1-7.

39
  • Given a tap sequence, rate its speed on a scale
    of 1-7.

User Reported Level
Stimulus Level
User Reported Level
ConstantDuration ? all sequences have the same
duration ConstantNumber ? all sequences have the
same number of taps
Stimulus Level
40
rubbing user study
41
study setup
  • 8 participants, within-subjects
  • no amplitude condition
  • ConstantNumber used 2 rubs instead of 3 taps

42
rubbing feels like
  • half of the participants thought it felt like
    rubbing
  • others said it felt like grazing, light
    sweeping
  • rubbing your hands together
  • It felt strangely comfortable, almost like the
    touch of someone else. It was more like a finger
    touching my skin than an object.

43
number of rubs
  • number of rubs can cause perceptual differences
  • ConstantNumber feels like rubbing an object
  • ConstantDuration feels like touching a moving
    object
  • ConstantNumber felt more like Im shaking,
    whereas ConstantDuration seemed more like Im
    holding onto something thats shaking.

44
task distinguish rubs(speed)
  • given two rubs of different speed, which one
    feels faster?
  • 7 different speeds, evenly spaced from 5Hz to
    29Hz
  • 2 conditions ConstantDuration and ConstantNumber

45
error rates() for speed
ConstantDuration
Speed of 2nd Rub
Speed of 1st Rub
ConstantNumber
Speed of 2nd Rub
Speed of 1st Rub
ConstantDuration ? all sequences have the same
duration ConstantNumber ? all sequences have the
same number of taps
46
task identify rubs
  • Given a rub, rate its speed on a scale of 1-7

ConstantDuration ? all sequences have the same
duration ConstantNumber ? all sequences have the
same number of taps
47
final lessons
  • we can re-create tapping and rubbing with human
    qualities
  • as our users pointed out, rubbing and tapping
    can feel like other things, depending on
    materials used, speed, amplitude, etc

48
tapping and rubbing are just two examples from
a larger design space of pre-learned tactile
interaction that draws from human-human
interaction and experiences
49
(No Transcript)
50
Tapping and Rubbing Exploring New Dimensions of
Tactile Feedback with Voice Coil Motors
Kevin A. Li, Patrick Baudisch, William G.
Griswold, James D. Hollan University of
California, San Diego Microsoft Research
51
EXTRA SLIDES
52
tapping/rubbing input
Olwal et al. CHI08
53
loud environments
54
walking around
55
in a meeting
56
environment
57
(No Transcript)
58
(No Transcript)
59
(No Transcript)
60
(No Transcript)
61
body locations
shoulder
hand
wrist
pocket
62
stimulus levels
  • 7 different amplitudes, evenly spaced from 0 to
    1.0N
  • 7 different speeds, evenly spaced from 5Hz to
    29Hz
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com