Primary Prevention of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus K.M.Venkat Narayan - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 27
About This Presentation
Title:

Primary Prevention of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus K.M.Venkat Narayan

Description:

... in fasting glucose ... Fasting Hyperglycemia Study II; UK, France, 1997. Pittsburgh, PA, 1998 ... Adjusted for BMI and fasting glucose. Pan et al. Diabetes ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:769
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 28
Provided by: Edels
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Primary Prevention of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus K.M.Venkat Narayan


1
Primary Prevention of Type 2 Diabetes
MellitusK.M.Venkat Narayan
2
Burden of Diabetes in the U.S.
  • Affects more than 16 million persons
  • Increases the risk of heart attack and stroke by
    at least 3-fold
  • The leading cause of new blindness, end stage
    renal disease, and amputation
  • Accounts for 17 of all deaths after age 25
  • Costs 100 billion per year

3
GLUCOSE INTOLERANCE IN THE U.S.
AGE 20-74
NORMAL 81
DIABETES 8
IGT 11
NHANES III
4
Rationale for a Prevention Trial
  • The incidence of type 2 of diabetes is increasing
    in epidemic proportions throughout the world.
  • Once type 2 diabetes develops, it is difficult to
    treat.
  • Prevention of type 2 diabetes would result in a
    significant reduction in social and economic
    costs.

5
Feasibility of Prevention
  • Prevention of type 2 diabetes should be feasible
    since
  • There is a long asymptomatic period in the
    natural history
  • Screening tests can identify high risk
    persons
  • There are safe, potentially effective
    interventions

6
Weight gain
Each unit increase in BMI (about 2.7 - 3.6 kg)
increases Type 2 diabetes risk by 12.1 percent !
68 - 72 of diabetes risk in the U.S. is
attributable to or associated with excess weight
For every kilogram increase in weight over 10
years, Type 2 diabetes risk increases 4.5
Ford et al. Amer J Epidemiol 146214,1997
7
Studies of Physical Activity and Type 2 Diabetes
Risk
  • US Nurses 27
  • U Penn Alumni 31
  • Malta 51
  • US Physicians 30
  • Jap-Amer Hawaii 51
  • E Boston elderly 23
  • England 60
  • San Antonio, M 59
  • San Antonio, F 43
  • Sweden, men 49
  • Jap-Amer LA 40
  • Jap-Amer Hawaii 25
  • Finland, M 54
  • Harvard alumni, M 28
  • Finland, M 21
  • Finland, F 53

Hamman RF, Evidence Base for Diabetes, Wiley,
2000, In Press
8
Risk of type 2 diabetes associated with level of
physical activity
Relative Risk
U.S. Nurses Health Study
Adjusted for age, smoking. hypertension, family
history, menopause, high cholesterol
8 year follow-up
Quartile of physical activity vs Q1
Hu et al., JAMA 2821433, 1999
9
Type 2 Diabetes Prevention Randomized Controlled
Trials of Drugs
  • Sulfonylureas
  • Seattle, WA, 1967
  • Humble Oil, 1967
  • New York, 1967
  • Kaiser Permanente, 1967
  • Bedford, UK, 1968-1982
  • Karolinska, Sweden, 1970
  • Joslin Clinic, Boston, 1977
  • Malmöhus, Sweden, 1980
  • Oxford pilot, UK, 1993
  • Fasting Hyperglycemia Study II, UK, France 1997
  • Acarbose
  • Montreal, CA, 1996
  • Biguanides
  • Hotel Dieu, France, 1978
  • Whitehall, London, 1979
  • Warsaw, Poland, 1986
  • BIGPRO1, France, 1996
  • BIGPRO 1.2, France,1999
  • Bejing, China, 1999
  • Thiazolidendiones
  • San Diego, CA 1994
  • Los Angeles, GDM, 1996
  • US multicenter IGT, 1997
  • ACE inhibitors
  • Captopril Prevention Project (CAPPP), 1999
  • Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation (HOPE), 1999

10
BIGuanides and Prevention of the Risks in Obesity
(BIGPRO1) Trial
  • Metformin treated group vs Placebo
  • 457 subjects - over 30 dropped out at 1 year
  • 2 kg weight loss
  • Less rise in fasting glucose (p 0.05)
  • Only in subjects with abnormal glucose tolerance
    at baseline
  • Lower 2 hr insulin level (p 0.06)
  • Lower t-PA antigen (p 0.02)
  • No change in Total-, HDL-, LDL-cholesterol,
    triglycerides, blood pressure or 2 hour glucose
    level
  • No cases of diabetes in metformin group vs 5 in
    placebo group (p0.06)

Fontbonne, et al. Diabetes Care 1996 19920-926
11
Primary prevention trial among Chinese persons
with IGT
RR 0.51 (0.14-1.91)
N42 N43
Li, et al., Diabetic Medicine, 16477-481,1999
12
Captopril Prevention Project (CAPPP)
  • 10,985 patients in 536 centers in Sweden, Finland
  • Aged 25-66 at entry
  • BP gt 100 mm Hg x 2
  • Randomized to Captopril (ACE inhibitor) vs
    conventional therapy (diuretics, beta-blockers)
  • 10,410 non-diabetic persons at entry
  • Average follow-up 6.1 years
  • RR for incident diabetes 0.86 (0.74-0.99) p
    0.039
  • On treatment RR 0.79 (0.67-0.94)

Hansson et al., Lancet 353 611 1999
13
Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation (HOPE)
  • 9,297 patients in 267 centers in Europe, Americas
  • Aged 55 at entry
  • History of CVD or stroke or PVD or diabetes and 1
    other risk factor
  • Randomized to Ramipril (ACE inhibitor) or Vitamin
    E (2 x 2 factorial) (No effect of Vitamin E)
  • 5,720 non-diabetic persons at entry
  • Average follow-up 5 years
  • RR for incident diabetes 0.66 (0.51-0.85) p lt
    0.001

New Engl J Med 342145-153, 2000
14
Type 2 Diabetes Prevention Randomized Controlled
Trials of Lifestyle
  • Uppsala, Sweden 1985
  • Dalby, Sweden, 1992
  • Oxford, UK pilot 1992
  • Indian Diet Heart, 1993
  • Baltimore, MD, 1995
  • Sollentuna, Sweden, 1995
  • Baltimore, MD, 1995
  • Oslo Diet and Exercise Study (ODES), 1996
  • DaQing IGT and Diabetes Study, 1997
  • Fasting Hyperglycemia Study II UK, France, 1997
  • Pittsburgh, PA, 1998
  • Pima Indian pilot, 1998
  • Syracuse, NY, 1998
  • Womens Healthy Lifestyle Project, Pittsburgh,
    PA, 1998
  • Community Diabetes Prevention Project, Minnesota,
    1998

15
Stages in the natural history of Type 2 diabetes
Disability Death
Normal
IGT
NIDDM
Complications
Genetic predisposition
Preclinical state
Clinical disease
Disability Death
Complications
Primary Secondary
Tertiary prevention prevention
prevention
16
Impaired Glucose Tolerance
  • Risk factor for type 2 diabetes
  • Increases risk of type 2 diabetes 5 - 8 fold
  • 1-5 per year develop type 2 diabetes
  • Risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD)
  • IGT may be optimal time for intervention
  • Asymptomatic
  • Few, if any complications present
  • Potentially reversible

17
Da Qing IGT and Diabetes Study
  • Screened 110,660 persons in Da Qing, China for
    IGT
  • Randomized 577 persons with IGT at 33 local
    health centers
  • Four arm study over 6 years
  • Diet
  • Exercise
  • Diet Exercise
  • Control

Pan et al. Diabetes Care 20 537, 1997
18
Da Qing IGT and Diabetes Study
a Adjusted for BMI and fasting glucose
Pan et al. Diabetes Care 20 537, 1997
19
Type 2 Diabetes Primary Prevention Randomized
Controlled Trials Underway as of 2000
  • Diabetes Prevention Study (DPS) Start
    Finish
  • Finland 523 MF IGT Lifestyle
    1993 - 2002-03
  • Community Diabetes Prevention Project
  • Minneapolis, MN 418 MF Limited
    lifestyle 1995 - 2000-01
  • TRIPOD (Troglitazone in the Prevention of
    Diabetes)
  • Los Angeles, CA 150 F with GDM
    Troglitazone 1996 - 2000
  • EDIT (Early Diabetes Intervention Trial)
  • 9 centers in UK 631 MF FPG 5.5-7.0 mmol/L
    acarbose and metformin 2 x 2 factorial design
    with placebo 1994 - 2002

20
Type 2 Diabetes Primary Prevention Randomized
Controlled Trials Underway as of 2000
  • DPP (Diabetes Prevention Program)
    Start Finish
  • 27 centers 3,234 MF IGT Lifestyle,
    Metformin/PLBO

    1996 - 2002
  • STOP-NIDDM
  • Europe, Canada 1,418 MF IGT Acarbose/PLBO

    1996 - 2001-02
  • DAISI (Dutch Acarbose Trial)
  • Hoorn, Netherlands 150 MF IGT Acarbose/PLBO

    1998 - 2002
  • NANSY
  • Sweden, Norway 2,224 MF IFG
    Glimepiride/PLBO

    2000 - 2007

21
Finnish Diabetes Prevention Study
  • 4-year, multi-center (5 clinics), randomized
    controlled trial of lifestyle (diet activity)
  • 523 persons with IGT (? 55 yrs, BMI 31, 33
    men)
  • Two arm study
  • Lifestyle wt loss, reduce kcal, total/sat.
    fat increase fiber, physical activity 1st year
    intensive, thereafter maintenance 7 sessions
    1st year, and quarterly thereafter 2-yr wt.
    change -7.7 lbs.
  • Control general advice re diet/activity
    annually. 2-yr wt. change -1.7 lbs.

Tuomilehto et al. 60th Scientific Sessions, ADA
2000, San Antonio, TX June, 2000 (LB-12).
22
Changes after a 2-year intervention - DPS
Intervention Control
p for change Weight (kg) -3.5 -0.8
Waist circumference
(cm) -4.2 -1.3 fP-glucose
(mmol/l) -0.1 0.2 2h-P-glucose
(mmol/l) -0.8 0.0 fS-insulin
(µU/ml) -2 -1 ns 2h-S-insulin
(µU/ml) -29 -12 HbA1c
() -0.2 0.1 Systolic BP
(mmHg) -5 0 Diastolic BP
(mmHg) -5 -3 Total
cholesterol -0.09 -0.00 ns HDL
cholesterol 0.10 0.07
ns Triglycerides -0.20 0.00

23
Development of diabetes - DPS

Risk reduction 57
24
Success in achieving the lifestyle targets at
1-year examination
TARGET Intervention
Control () () Weight
reduction gt 5 43 13 Fat intake
lt 30E 47 26 Saturated fat intake lt 10
E 26 11 Fiber intake gt 15 g/1000
kcal 25 12 Exercise gt 4 hours/week
86 71
All plt0.0001
25
Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP)
  • 27 center randomized controlled trial
  • 3,234 people with IGT 45 minorities 25-85
    years average BMI 34 kg/msq
  • Three groups
  • Standard lifestyle
  • Intensive lifestyle 7 weight loss through
    low-fat diet and 150 mins exercise per week
  • Metformin

26
Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP)
  • Conversion to diabetes att 3 years of follow-up
  • Standard lifetsyle 29
  • Intensive lifestyle 14 (-58)
  • Metformin22 (-31)
  • Intensive lifestyle participants achieved 7 (15
    lbs) weight loss in first year and sustained 5
    total loss during 3 years

27
Implications for Public Health?
  • Identification of Those at Risk?
  • Screening for Impaired Glucose Tolerance?
  • Those with poor access to health care?
  • Ethics of just screening without follow-up?
  • Translation of Intervention(s)?
  • What dose (frequency, intensity, duration) can
    be achieved in the real world
  • What is minimally necessary compliance?
  • Role of extra-clinical interventions?
  • Environmental change to support lifestyle
  • Community-level activities vs. go-it-alone
    lifestyle
  • Evaluation of Overall Efforts
  • Time-Place-Person Trends in Type-2 Diabetes
  • e.g. population Surveillance
  • Adequacy of the Intervention(s) Process
  • e.g., population surveys of exposure
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com