Why Asset Managers Fear Investment Banks - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 13
About This Presentation
Title:

Why Asset Managers Fear Investment Banks

Description:

AUM EUR 26.5 billions - world leading managed account platform ... AUM EUR 27 billions - number 2 in Europe. Each business is developing with a lot of innovation ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:116
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 14
Provided by: nle9
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Why Asset Managers Fear Investment Banks


1
Why Asset Managers Fear Investment Banks?
Alain Dubois Chairman of Lyxor AM
2
SG CIB, first Investment bank to createits own
asset manager
  • In 1998, SGCIB decided to create its own Asset
    Management Company
  • It was a new concept coming from an Investment
    Bank
  • Lyxor has been created, separated from the
    existing Asset Manager of the Group
  • As an Asset Manager, regulated in France
    according to the UCITS Directive
  • The business was initially very limited
    Structured Funds. There was no reason to be
    afraid.
  • But ...

SG CIB Investment Bank
Investment Bank
Created in 1998
3
Lyxor AM, a success story
  • After 10 years Lyxor AM manages more than 100 bn
    USD

4
Lyxor AM an Asset Manager recognized by the
market
Pioneer and leader for ETFs in Europe
Lyxor AM and SG CIB Structuring expertise
recognized several times
A recognized Hedge Funds specialist
5
Lyxor AM a Specific Business Model
  • 3 businesses
  • Structured asset management and quantitative
    strategies
  • - AUM EUR 20.5 billions
  • Alternative Investments
  • - AUM EUR 26.5 billions
  • - world leading managed account platform
  • - 7th in global Ranking of Fund of Hedge Funds
    asset managers
  • ETF
  • - AUM EUR 27 billions
  • - number 2 in Europe
  • Each business is developing with a lot of
    innovation

InvestHedge Ranking Dec. 2006
6
However, Lyxor is an Asset Manager, not an
Investment Bank
  • We see ourselves as Asset Managers not as an
    Investment Bank
  • We have strong Chinese Walls with the Investment
    Bank
  • We are closer to the world of Asset Management
  • But we try - like all Asset Managers - to
    benefit from the environment and ideas provided
    by Capital Markets

7
Investment Banks and Asset Managers are both
providing Investment Solutions
Investment Banks may provide
  • warrants
  • certificates
  • structured products
  • indexed products
  • advisory
  • managed accounts

8
The World of Asset Management offers plenty of
Opportunities
Advanced financial techniques options, stock
lending, risk control
  • Structured Asset Management
  • Alternative Investments

"INVESTMENT BANK INTRUSIONS"
Discretionary approach
Systematic approach
Passive Asset Management (Trackers)
"INVESTMENT BANK INTRUSIONS"
Active Asset Management
 long only  portfolio allocations
9
Investment Banks are also Active Managers
  • Proprietary Trading is similar to Hedge Funds
  • Structured Products are Dynamic allocations. This
    dynamic allocation can be achieved
  • directly CPPIs etc.
  • or by buying a pay-off (Structured Products)
  • From Passive to Active
  • structured Products can be "managed"
  • indices can also be managed
  • This stays however very limited

10
The Legal Distinction between the two is being
blurred
  • MIFID knows only "Investment Firms"
  • investment Banks and Asset Managers are
    Investment Firms
  • both can render the service of "Portfolio
    Management"
  • MIFID creates a level playing field between the
    two
  • same regulations for marketing, inducements etc.
  • The only Asset Management-specific Directive is
    the UCITS Directive
  • but a recent interpretation by the EU Commission
    is that management of a UCITS by delegation is a
    service of Portfolio Management

11
Keeping Chinese Walls is key
  • Blurring the distinctions may be ok, but
  • There is a fundamental difference between
  • managing with a discretionary mandate
  • or subscribing to Products that provide
    pre-determined returns
  • This is often forgotten in the "level playing
    field" arguments
  • different products should be regulated
    differently
  • there is nothing wrong in regulating differently
    Structured Products and discretionary mandates
  • It is important to keep appropriate Chinese Walls
    between different businesses, where they are
    necessary.

12
Asset Managers can also enter the business of
Investment Banks
  • Asset Managers have a broad mandate, and can
    enters the traditional business of Investment
    Banks
  • and this is the future
  • Hedge Funds have been doing just that
  • investment bank traders creating new Asset
    Management businesses
  • Structured Funds is a way for Asset Managers to
    enter the Structured Products business
  • ETF can also be seen as a way for Asset Managers
    to enter the "listed products" business
  • We are happy Asset Managers

13
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com