Working the A to Z List enhance journal access in the OPAC - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Working the A to Z List enhance journal access in the OPAC

Description:

Working the A to Z List. enhance journal access in the OPAC. Janet Yanosko, Patrick Armatis ... ( Just kidding...sorta) Convince librarians they're wrong. Cost. 9/2/09 ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:35
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 28
Provided by: janety1
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Working the A to Z List enhance journal access in the OPAC


1
Working the A to Z Listenhance journal access in
the OPAC
  • Janet Yanosko, Patrick Armatis
  • http//library.umd.umich.edu

2
Working the A to Z List
  • The problem with finding journals
  • Context
  • Previous solutionlots of work
  • What we came up with and how we did it
  • Caveats
  • Why its a good solution

3
Finding Journals is Hard
  • Article databases are difficult to begin with
  • We dont make it much easier by requiring
    multiple searches to find the source journals
  • Article linker for some databases
  • Search the catalog
  • Ok, now search the Online Journals List

4
How UM-Dearborn handles multiple formats for
Journals
  • One journal, one bib record (mostly)
  • Decision was made long ago
  • Librarians feel strongly about this
  • Our students and faculty are used to it

5
Consequently
  • Importing large sets of MARC records
    iscomplicated
  • Deduplicating is a problem
  • Limits on staff time

6
Why not changeuse multiple bibs for each format?
  • Change? Whats that? (Just kiddingsorta)
  • Convince librarians theyre wrong
  • Cost

7
Previous Solution
  • Maintain web locations in OPAC for online
    access (mainly ProQuest, JSTOR)
    http//wizard.umd.umich.edu/search/i?SEARCH0014-1
    704
  • Try to get patrons to search twice for every
    journal title, once in the catalog, and again in
    the A-Z List

8
(No Transcript)
9
Why this solution isnt ideal
  • Screens are confusing
  • Time consuming for cataloging staff
  • Out of date quickly
  • Has never been comprehensive
  • Does not provide information about journals that
    do not already have records in the catalog
  • Duplicates work done by Serials Solutions

10
Our Solution
  • Looked around for a model !
  • Can we do something similar in the catalog for
    the Journal Title level of access?
  • Can we quickly update all 856 fields each with
    slightly different links?

11
(No Transcript)
12
(No Transcript)
13
(No Transcript)
14
(No Transcript)
15
How gather export data
  • Create a list of records to which an 856 will be
    added
  • Export OCLC numbers and 245a fields

16
How manipulate data (MS Access)
  • Replace punctuation and non-alpha characters with
    URL Encoded versions (e.g., 26)
    http//www.albionresearch.com/misc/urlencode.php
  • Add generic LDR
  • Insert OCLC into 001
  • Insert title into 245
  • Insert modified title into URL, replacing spaces
    between words in title with signs

17
Sample record
LDR 01467cam 2200349La 45'0 001 ocm
10024072 245 10aIEEE design 26 test of
computers 856 4\uhttp//search.serialssolution
s.com/?V1.0N100LBL7GJ4YV9NST_MC
IEEEdesign26testofcomputerszCheck for U of
M Dearborn online access
18
How convert data
  • Use Terry Reeses MarcEdit 4.5 to convert text
    records to MARC recordshttp//oregonstate.edu/re
    eset/marcedit/html/index.html

19
How load data
  • Create Serials Solutions load table
  • Protect all fields
  • Match on OCLC
  • Insert Serials Solutions URL
  • Load file into catalog

20
Gotchas
  • Load caused all headings to show up in heading
    reports
  • A to Z search sometimes required the word
    equivalent of punctuation symbols (e.g., and
    instead of )

21
Gotchas
  • Some extra cleanup needed for titles with the
    same base name but different sub names
  • Physical Review A, B, C, D, E. 245a for titles
    is simply Physical Review. A, B, C, etc is
    stored in subfield n. Used MS Access to list
    duplicate titles, then manually adjusted them

22
What our solution gets us
  • Screens are will be less confusing
  • Time consuming for cataloging staff
  • Out of date quickly
  • Has never been comprehensive
  • Does not provide information about journals that
    do not already have records in the catalog
  • Duplicates work done by Serials Solutions

23
Next phase
  • Cleaning out old info from database
  • 856 links to specific databases, publisher sites
  • Check-in records, 850 holdings, database-specific
    web locations
  • Item records? Were not sure yet.
  • Add physical journal holdings to Serials
    Solutions profile

24
(No Transcript)
25
(No Transcript)
26
Why is this a good solution?
  • Patrons like it
  • Reduction in work for
  • Serials
  • Reference
  • Systems
  • Can avoid changing our record structure
  • Inexpensive

27
Why might this be good for you?
  • Its fast, easy, and has low overhead
  • Even if you employ some other solution, putting a
    Serials Solutions search in the 856 for
    print/microfilm records is a win-win
  • Its something that can be done while considering
    other options
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com