Course Development Tools for the Web: Do They Make a Difference - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 28
About This Presentation
Title:

Course Development Tools for the Web: Do They Make a Difference

Description:

Drivers for Selection of a Courseware Development Tool ... Archipelago (Harcourt Higher Learning) WW Norton. Houghton Mifflin. Course Info: Demo ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:73
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 29
Provided by: ltip8
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Course Development Tools for the Web: Do They Make a Difference


1
  • Course Development Tools for the Web Do They
    Make a Difference?

Presentation to ADETA October 29, 1999

Norm Vaughan Jim Zimmer Mount Royal College
2
Overview
  • Drivers for Selection of a Course Development
    Tool
  • Connected Education
  • Assessment Process
  • Background CourseInfo and Blackboard Inc.
  • CourseInfo Proof of Concept
  • Demonstration
  • Instructor and Student Feedback
  • Questions, Comments, Discussion

3
Drivers for Selection of a Courseware Development
Tool
  • requests from instructors for courseware
    development tool
  • sustainability issues with centralized courseware
    production model
  • distance delivery
  • Classroom PlusTM

4
Classroom Plus?
use of learning technologies to augment, enhance
and extend face-to-face instruction.
5
Promoting student connectedness with...
  • their course materials (any place, any time)
  • their classmates
  • their instructors
  • groups of students in the class
  • experts in the field
  • previous learning
  • online information
  • one another, upon course/program completion

6
Assessment of Courseware Development Tools (fall
1998)
  • Assessment criteria
  • Literature review
  • Survey of existing practice
  • Identification of contenders
  • Assessments
  • Proof-of-concept

7
Proof-of-Concept
  • Winter/Spring / Summer / Fall 99
  • 25 courses
  • 23 instructors
  • gt800 students
  • approx. 80,000 hits since August 28/99

8
Assessment criteria
  • Flexibility
  • Functionality
  • Simplicity
  • Reliability
  • Service, Support and Responsiveness
  • Company Stability and Trends in the Field

9
Blackboards CourseInfo Background
  • Blackboard Inc. headquartered in Washington DC
  • CourseInfo developed at Cornell University, 1997
  • Blackboard selected as primary technical
    consultant to the EDUCAUSE-IMS Project
  • Recently secured 12.2 million second round
    venture funding (June 99)
  • Version 3.0 release August 99

10
Current CourseInfo Use
  • Used by faculty at gt 1100 institutions in 68
    countries
  • Currently gt 330 institutional licenses
  • Adding 40 institutions/month fastest growth in
    field
  • Among leading course development tools, claim to
    have largest number of faculty users and courses
    built

11
Sample Current Users
  • Cornell
  • Yale
  • Princeton
  • Harvard
  • Johns Hopkins
  • USC
  • William and Mary
  • U of Toronto
  • Georgetown U
  • U of Pittsburgh
  • Oregon State U
  • Maricopa CC System
  • Wake Forest U
  • Arizona State U
  • UNC--Chapel Hill

12
Blackboards Current Partnerships
  • AAHE--TLT Group
  • Educause-IMS (primary technical consultants)
  • Corporation for Research and Education Networking
  • Microsoft
  • Publishers
  • International Thompson Publishing
  • Archipelago (Harcourt Higher Learning)
  • WW Norton
  • Houghton Mifflin

13
Course Info Demo
  • Computers in Education
  • courseinfo.mtroyal.ab.ca/courses/EDUC3325
  • username adeta
  • password learner

14
(No Transcript)
15
(No Transcript)
16
(No Transcript)
17
(No Transcript)
18
(No Transcript)
19
(No Transcript)
20
Instructor Feedback
  • 87 of instructors would use CourseInfo again
  • 85 of instructors indicated that CourseInfo
    made it easier to put my course material online
  • 77 of instructors indicated that they were able
    to use CourseInfo without a need or commitment to
    entirely overhaul or change my course
  • 71 of instructors indicated that CourseInfo
    offered advantages over the way that they had
    previously taught their courses

21
Instructor Feedback
  • An extremely easy and intuitive tool to use.
  • I believe that CourseInfo is easy enough that
    instructors who have little computer experience
    would be able to learn how to use it in a very
    short period of time.
  • I will use CourseInfo every time I give a course
    in the future. I really like using it and the
    students are absolutely crazy about it.

22
Student feedback.
Our class CourseInfo web site allowed me to keep
track of my marks throughout the semester which
was really valuable. I am also learning a lot
about how to use computers because of our
CourseInfo site and I think this is really
valuable.
23
Student feedback (contd)...
Our class only met once each week but by using
the discussion forum and group pages section of
CourseInfo our class was able to stay connected
all week
24
Student feedback (contd)...
I think that our CourseInfo web site really
contributed to my learning by being such a
valuable resource for assignments, tutorials,
students finished work, and of course my own
home page.
25
Bibliography
  • Blackboard CourseInfo
  • www.blackboard.com
  • Complete information about the CourseInfo tool
    combined with an opportunity to pilot the
    courseware.
  • Fredrickson, S. (1999). Untangling a tangled
    web An overview of web-based instruction
    programs.
  • www.thejournal.com/magazine/current/edeval.html
  • Reviews 10 leading contenders in this field.
  • University of Pittsburgh
  • http//www.pitt.edu/washburn/ccs.htm
  • Full assessment report of web based course
    development tools.

26
Bibliography
  • Campus Computing Project
  • www.campuscomputing.net
  • Begun in 1990, the Campus Computing Project
    focuses on the use of information technology in
    higher education.
  • Marchese, T. (1998). The new conversations about
    learning.
  • www.aahe.org/pubs/TM-essay.htm
  • Learning-related insights from neuroscience,
    anthropology, cognitive science and workplace
    studies, and their implications for teaching and
    assessment.
  • Chickering, A. Ehrmann, S. Implementing the
    seven principles Technology as a Lever.
  • www.aahe.org/technology/ehrmann.htm
  • Cost-effective and appropriate ways to use
    technology to advance the seven principles.

27
Bibliography
  • Boettcher, J. Conrad, R. (1999). Moving
    teaching and learning to the web.
  • League for Innovation publication --provides an
    overview of issues and practicalities, including
    a summary of courseware development tools.
  • Cross, K. (1999). Learning is about making
    connections.
  • Summarizes recent findings related to neurologic,
    cognitive, social and experiential connections
    and their impact on learning.

28
Questions, Comments, Discussion
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com