Atorvastatin: Effective Therapy for a Broad Range of Dyslipidemias - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 27
About This Presentation
Title:

Atorvastatin: Effective Therapy for a Broad Range of Dyslipidemias

Description:

Marais AD et al. Atherosclerosis. 1994;109:316. Percent Change ... Marais AD et al. 12th DALM Symposium; Nov 7-10, 1995; Houston, Tex. Receptor Negative (N=2) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:382
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 28
Provided by: marcg6
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Atorvastatin: Effective Therapy for a Broad Range of Dyslipidemias


1
Atorvastatin Effective Therapy fora Broad Range
of Dyslipidemias
2
NCEP Guidelines for LDL Cholesterol
NCEP. Circulation. 1994891329-1445.
3
Major Studies Showing Relationship Between
Cholesterol Levels and CHD Risk
(Pre-Statin Studies)
  • Study type
  • Size of cohort
  • Conclusions

Epidemiologic 5127 (original) 1 ? in cholesterol
2 ? in CHD risk
Observational 361,662 Continuous,
gradedassociation betweencholesterol level and
CHDrisk starting at 180 mg/dL
Castelli WP. Can J Cardiol. 19884(suppl
A)5A-10A. Neaton JD, Wentworth D. Arch Intern
Med. 199215256-64.
4
Major Studies Showing a Beneficial Effect of
Lipid-Lowering Therapy on CHD Risk
(Pre-Statin Studies)
Lipid Research Clinics Program. JAMA.
1984251351-364. Frick MH et al. N Engl J Med.
19873171237-1245.
5
4S Results
  • 30 ? in risk of total (all-cause) mortality
  • 34 ? in risk of major coronary events
  • 42 ? in risk of definite and suspected CHD death
  • Changes in lipids
  • 25 ? in Total-C 8 ??in HDL-C
  • 35 ? in LDL-C
  • 10 ? in TG

P0.0003 Plt0.00001.
Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study Group.
Lancet. 19943441383-1389.
6
WOSCOPS Results
  • 31 ? in risk of nonfatal MI or CHD death
  • 33 ? in risk of definite and suspected CHD
    death
  • 22 ? in risk of all-cause mortality
  • Changes in lipids
  • 20 ? in Total-C 5 ? in HDL-C
  • 26 ? in LDL-C
  • 12 ? in TG

Plt0.001 P0.042 P0.051.
Shepherd J et al. N Engl J Med.
19953331301-1307.
7
CARE Preliminary Results
  • 24 ? in risk of fatal CHD or nonfatal MI
  • 25 ? in risk of fatal or nonfatal MI
  • 27 ? in need for coronary revascularization
  • Changes in lipids
  • 20 ? in Total-C 5 ? in HDL-C
  • 28 ? in LDL-C
  • 14 ? in TG

P0.002 P0.007 P0.0001.
Braunwald E, Pfeffer MA, Sacks FM. Presented at
the 45th ACC March 26, 1996 Orlando Fla.
8
Benefits of Hypolipidemic Treatment
0
20
LRC-CPPT
Reduction inRisk ofCardiac End Points
WOSCOPS
40
4S
?
70
10
13
26
35
60
LDL-C Reduction
9
Chemical Structure of Atorvastatin
10
Cholesterol Biosynthesis Pathway
HMG-CoA reductase
Squalene synthase
Dolichol
Acetyl CoA
HMG- CoA
Farnesyl pyrophosphate
Mevalonate
Squalene
Cholesterol
Ras protein
Farnesyl- transferase
E,E,E-Geranylgeranyl pyrophosphate
Farnesylated proteins
Geranylgeranylated proteins
Ubiquinones
11
Mechanism of Action of Atorvastatin
Conclusions Based on Animal Studies
Atorvastatin inhibits hepatic production of major
apo B-containing lipoproteins as shown in these
animal models
  • EH rabbits LDL production
  • EHT rats VLDL production
  • Guinea pigs LDL production

Auerbach BJ et al. Atherosclerosis.
1995115173-180.Krause BR. Newton RS.
Atherosclerosis. 1995117237-244.
12
Atorvastatin Clinical Development
13
Atorvastatin Dose-Response Study
Mean Percent Change in LDL-C at 6 Weeks
7.6

41
44
50



61

Placebo
10 mg
20 mg
40 mg
80 mg
Plt0.05 vs placebo.
Nawrocki JW et al. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol.
199515678-682.
14
Atorvastatin in Hypertriglyceridemia
Design and Baseline Lipids
  • 56 hypertriglyceridemic patients, 26-74 y/o
  • 4-week, randomized, double-blind,
    placebo-controlled, parallel
  • Atorvastatin 5, 20, 80 mg
  • Mean baseline LDL-C 119 mg/dL (3.1 mmol/L)
  • Mean baseline TG 603 mg/dL (6.8 mmol/L)
  • Mean baseline HDL-C 32 mg/dL (0.8 mmol/L)

Bakker-Arkema RG et al. JAMA. 1996275128-133,
and data on file, Parke-Davis (981-38).
15
Atorvastatin in Hypertriglyceridemia
Mean Percent Change in Lipids at 4 Weeks
20

10
13
12
9
4
0
1
9
-10
Placebo Atorvastatin 5 mg Atorvastatin 20
mg Atorvastatin 80 mg
17


-20
26
32
-30
33


41
-40
46


-50
TG
LDL-C
HDL-C
Plt0.05 vs placebo Plt0.05 vs 5-mg dose.
Bakker-Arkema RG et al. JAMA. 1996275128-133.
16
Atorvastatin vs Lovastatin
Mean Percent Change in Lipids at 16 Weeks





7
7

1
1
4
4
1
3
5
6


Placebo Atorvastatin 10 mg Lovastatin 20 mg
17
17
19
20


27
27
28

36
VLDL-C
TG
LDL-C
Total-C
HDL-C
Apo B
P0.05 vs atorvastatin.
Bakker-Arkema RG et al. Atherosclerosis. 1996,
and data on file, Parke-Davis (981-08).
17
Atorvastatin vs Pravastatin
Mean Percent Change in Lipids at 16 Weeks
Atorvastatin 10 mg Pravastatin 20 mg




HDL-C
Total-C
LDL-C
Apo B
TG
P0.05.
Egros F et al. Atherosclerosis. 1996, and data
on file, Parke-Davis (981-09).
18
Atorvastatin vs Simvastatin
Mean Percent Change in Lipids at 16 Weeks
7
7
Atorvastatin 10 mg Simvastatin 10 mg
15
23
-23
24

29
30
30
34

37


HDL-C
Total-C
Apo B
LDL-C
TG
P0.05.
Bracs P et al. Atherosclerosis. 1996, and data on
file, Parke-Davis (981-37).
19
Mean Percent Reduction in LDL-C in Fredrickson
Type II Patients in Five Clinical Trials
981-04
981-04
981-07
981-04
981-13
981-43
981-04
981-44
Reduction in LDL-C
35
39
41
45
44
50
57
61
40 mg
20 mg
10 mg
80 mg
Atorvastatin Dose
Black DM. Intl Congress Series No. 1066.
1995307-310, and data on file, Parke-Davis.
20
Atorvastatin LDL-C Reduction vs Other Statins
Adapted from Black DM. Intl Congress Series No.
1066. 1995307-310.
21
Atorvastatin in Heterozygous FH Patients
Percent Change in Lipids at 6 Weeks

25




34
45
57
Total-C
LDL-C
HDL-C
TG
Plt0.001 Plt0.01.
Marais AD et al. Atherosclerosis. 1994109316.
22
Atorvastatin Efficacy in Homozygous FH
Receptor Negative (N2) Baseline LDL-C 498 mg/dL
(12.9 mmol/L)
Receptor Defective (N6) Baseline LDL-C 521
mg/dL(13.5 mmol/L)
3
Percent Reduction in LDL-C
17
22
Atorvastatin Simvastatin
35
Marais AD et al. 12th DALM Symposium Nov 7-10,
1995 Houston, Tex.
23
Atorvastatin in Postmenopausal Women
Mean Percent Change in Lipids at 12 Weeks

16
11
4
9
2
1
7
5
7
9
3
Placebo Atorvastatin 10 mg Placebo Estradiol 1
mg Atorvastatin 10 mg Estradiol 1 mg

30
31

43
46

LDL-C
Total-C
HDL-C
TG
Plt0.05 vs estradiol.
Heinonen T et al. Atherosclerosis. 1996.
24
Atorvastatin vs Simvastatin in NIDDM
Effects on Lipids at 4 Weeks
Plt0.01.
Best JD et al. Atherosclerosis. 1994109312, and
data on file, Parke-Davis (981-13).
25
Atorvastatin Medical Therapy vs Recanalization
(AVERT)
Patient Population (N320)
RecanalizationProcedure
Usual Care
  • LDL-C 130 mg/dL (3.4 mmol/L)
  • TG 400 mg/dL (4.5 mmol/L)
  • Asymptomatic tomoderately symptomatic
  • 1 lesion 50-90stenosis


Titrate to LDL-C 100 mg/dL 2.6 mmol/L
Atorvastatin 80 mg/d
0
18
Month
Efficacy Parameters
  • Primary incidence rate of ischemic events, time
    to ischemic event
  • Secondary all-cause mortality, lipid profile,
    angina classification, QOL
  • Economic assessment of outcomes

McCormick L et al. Atherosclerosis. 1996, and
data on file, Parke-Davis (981-68).
26
Atorvastatin Safety Summary
  • Administered to gt3000 participants in clinical
    trials worldwide
  • 3 serious adverse events possibly attributable to
    atorvastatin have been reported
  • ALT elevations gt3x ULN lt1 overall
  • No incidence of myopathy
  • lt2 withdrawn due to associated adverse events

Data on file, Parke-Davis.
27
Atorvastatin Conclusions
  • Atorvastatin has a positive dose-response
    relationship over the range of 10-80 mg
  • LDL-C reductions from 40 to 60
  • Effective in the broadest range of patients,
    including hypercholesterolemia, mixed
    dyslipidemia, hypertriglyceridemia, and
    homozygous FH
  • Safe and well tolerated in studies up to 2 years
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com