Integrated Waste Management Its role in a LifeCycle Economy Guido Sonnemann United Nations Environme - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 26
About This Presentation
Title:

Integrated Waste Management Its role in a LifeCycle Economy Guido Sonnemann United Nations Environme

Description:

... and the waste manager in an optimisation of the overall system of energy, ... closely linked in an overall optimisation of energy, materials and waste flows? ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:80
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 27
Provided by: annesolgaa
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Integrated Waste Management Its role in a LifeCycle Economy Guido Sonnemann United Nations Environme


1
Integrated Waste Management -Its role in a
Life-Cycle EconomyGuido SonnemannUnited
Nations Environment ProgrammeDivision of
Technology, Industry and EconomicsProduction and
Consumption BranchStrategy Unit
Conference on Integrated Waste Management Life
Cycle Assessment Prague, 13-16 April, 2004
2
Overview
  • UNEP who we are and what we do
  • 10-year framework of programmes on sustainable
    consumption and production
  • Life Cycle Initiative
  • Integrated approach to resources and waste
  • Invitation to further discussion

3
UNEP - Mission
  • To provide leadership and encourage partnership
    in caring for the environment by inspiring,
    informing, and enabling nations and peoples to
    improve their quality of life without
    compromising that of future generations.
  • Environment for Development

4
UNEP 3 roles
  • Assess the State of the Worlds Environment
    Understand Env. Challenges (GEO)
  • Stimulate solutions to environmental problems
  • Promoting International Environmental Law
  • Voluntary Initiatives
  • Build capacity and networks to enable
    implementing solutions

5
Current situation a quick assessment
  • Productivity/efficiency gains being overtaken by
    production increases (rebound effects)
  • Problems of production process understood but
    those of the use and disposal of a product still
    largely unknown
  • Emerging global consumer class
  • Environmental concerns not integrated into
    economic and social programmes
  • De-linking of economic growth from environmental
    damage needed

6
Malmö Declaration
We have at our disposal the human and material
resources to achieve sustainable development, not
as an abstract concept, but as a concrete
reality. Our efforts must be linked to the
development of cleaner and more resource
efficient technologies for a life-cycle
economy. (Ministers of Environment, First
Ministerial Environment Forum 31st May 2000)
7
World Summit on SD in Johannesburg
  • Plan of implementation Chapter III, paragraph
    14
  • promote the development of a 10 year framework
    of programmes in support of regional and national
    initiatives to accelerate the shift towards SD
  • improve the products and services provided,
    while reducing environmental and health impacts,
    using, where appropriate, science-based
    approaches, such as life-cycle analysis

8
Main lessons learnt since Rio
  • Instruments (regulatory framework, voluntary
    measures and economic instruments).
  • Integrated life-cycle based tools to promote
    changes in the unsustainable patterns of
    consumption and production.
  • Sectoral approach and integration of
    environmental considerations into sectoral
    policies.

9
The 10-year framework has to make a difference by
...
  • Focusing on concrete outputs and by avoiding SCP
    Flying Circus
  • Moving to implementation by means of pilot
    projects in the following two areas
  • meeting basic needs of the poor (following the
    thematic cycle of CSD)
  • resource efficiency in selected industry sectors
    and for selected areas,
  • Establishing partnerships for voluntary
    initiatives
  • Setting a legislative framework on product
    information

10
The world behind the product
  • Life cycle based product considerations
  • multi-criteria design - eco-efficiency, product
    safety, dematerialisation and recyclability
  • embedded resources and impacts
  • end-of-life conversion/reuse/recycling/disposal
  • design for recycling systems, not just
    recyclability
  • reverse manufacturing reverse distribution
  • residue disposal

11
What are the management tools?
  • Changing operations towards sustainable
    development by
  • life-cycle management of products , incl.
    recycling
  • industrial ecology - collective management of
    issues
  • assessment tools - LCA, EnTA, EIA, env. auditing
  • programmes as CP, SC, PSS, EMAS
  • performance-based regulations, international
    conventions
  • public reporting - CER (GRI), GEO
  • ?Relevance to waste industry

12
Europe and the world
  • Advanced vrs. (often) Ad.Hoc.
  • Europe eco-efficiency, IPP, LC thinking
  • South lack of data, methodology, financing.
  • NOT ENOUGH!
  • TRADE globalisation makes for an interdependent
    world...

13
UNEPs focus of work on LCA
  • Translate life cycle thinking into practice
  • Reach out to those unfamiliar with LCA,
    especially in developing countries
  • Report on level of acceptance and adoption of LCA
  • Make the tool reliable and its results comparable
  • Keep it simple and user-friendly

14
UNEP SETAC
International Life Cycle Partnership to put life
cycle approaches into practice
http//www.uneptie.org/sustain/lcinitiative
15
Mission andoverall goals
  • Develop and disseminate practical tools for
    evaluating the opportunities, risks, and
    trade-offs, associated with products and services
    over their whole life cycle.
  • -----------
  • Facilitate the access to knowledge and datafor
    SMEs and developing countries
  • in order to foster the use in Consumers,
  • Governments and Industry decisions"
  • ------------
  • Implement the ISO framework

16
LCIn Overview
  • ILCP International Life Cycle Panel Involve the
    relevant stakeholders
  • LCM Life Cycle Management Integrate LC
    thinking into decision making
  • LCI Life Cycle Inventory Get the right data to
    the users
  • LCIA Life Cycle Impact Assessment Provide the
    best available indicators
  • LCR Life Cycle activities in Regions Create
    capacity in all regions

17
LCIn Partners
  • Sponsoring
  • ACE
  • APME
  • Canada
  • EcoRecycle Victoria
  • GM
  • Germany
  • ICMM
  • Netherlands
  • Quebec
  • Switzerland
  • Supporting
  • AIST, Japan
  • Brazilian LC Association
  • CI
  • Eco Global, Costa Rica
  • Indian Society of LCA
  • ISO
  • US EPA

18
LCIn Ongoing work
  • Surveys on user needs, data availability and
    other relevant issues
  • Workshops to share experiences and acquire
    knowledge
  • Publications to promote life cycle approaches
  • WGs with task forces peer review groups
  • Website as central contact point to access
    information provided by the Initiative
  • Quarterly LC.net bulletin and communicationby
    SETAC Globe, ISIE news and Int J LCA.

19
Exploration Group Integrated Resource and Waste
Management (IRWM)
  • With a focus on life cycle of materials rather
    than of products IRWM was identified as issue for
    a potential crosscutting Task Force whose aim
    would be
  • to increase the linkages of existing integrated
    resource and waste management strategies with the
    work on life cycle approaches for products and
    services within the Initiative
  • to provide an overview and international forum
    for the sharing of experiences with IRWM
  • to identify further key partners and target
    groups and establish adequate network,
  • to give guidance on IRWM strategies for different
    target groups in a global context.

20
Integrated approach toresources and waste
  • to include resources and waste issues as integral
    part of SCP programmes
  • to encourage industry to embrace corporate
    responsibility, performance instruments and
    industry codes for resource use and waste
    management
  • to promote performance-based regulations by
    governments
  • to foster evaluation where recycling (and other
    waste treatment options) is beneficial for
    society overall
  • to consider in this assessments local aspects as
    for instance the demographic situation that
    determines transport distances
  • to ensure that recycling itself does not lead to
    secondary impacts
  • To result in practical outcomes, management
    decisions taken as a result of such assessments
    need to be greatly enhanced

21
UNEPs message on IWM
  • Based on lessons learned from LCA
  • The notion of waste management needs to
    eventually evolve beyond simply devising the best
    technology for this and that waste
  • Proper assessment can show which of several
    technical and material options is environmentally
    and socially preferable (as well as being
    economic)
  • To demonstrate how such assessments can be
    undertaken, UNEP is promoting the use of several
    instruments, mainly EnTA and LCA

22
Key task ahead
  • to promote a life-chain approach to materials
    management
  • to more closely link the manufacturer and the
    waste manager in an optimisation of the overall
    system of energy, materials and waste flow.
  • to take a more integrated product life-cycle
    approach, in particular for manufacturing
    industry to avoid that design for recyclability
    remain theoretical and products now labeled
    recyclable in the waste stream because
    collection/ recycling system is not in place
  • to create stronger links between waste management
    operations and the manufacturing and marketing
    phases of a product and how the organisations
    concerned with waste management can be more
    closely linked with both industry and consumers.

23
Invitation to further discussion I
  • How can we support a chain management approach
    to materials where the manufacturer and the
    recycler are more closely linked in an overall
    optimisation of energy, materials and waste
    flows?
  • What is necessary to create bigger manufacturing
    systems where an integrated, collective approach
    to production and consumption is designed that
    allows synergies and improved recycling?

24
Invitation to further discussion II
  • Which tools and methodologies have to be used for
    a systematic evaluation process and which
    concepts we might to integrate?
  • In which way the UNEP/ SETAC Life Cycle
    initiative can support this discussion? Is there
    any need for further activities by UNEP?

25
Next steps?
  • This workshop and the conference are a starting
    point
  • Tell us what you want and what you are missing
    for better shaping the work of the exploration
    group!
  • Who are potential partners to contact?
  • ?Participate in the exploration group/ task force
    on IRWM!
  • First meeting
  • in reception hall of hotel after todays
    sessions of the conference

26
Please contact us!
For more information and to find out how you can
get involved. United Nations Environment
Programme Division of Technology, Industry
Economics Production and Consumption Unit 39-43
Quai André Citroën 75739 Paris, Cedex 15,
France Tel 33 1 4437 1450 Fax 33 1 4437
1474 E-mail sc_at_unep.fr http//www.uneptie.org/sus
tain/lcinitiative
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com