Title: Integrated Waste Management Its role in a LifeCycle Economy Guido Sonnemann United Nations Environme
1Integrated Waste Management -Its role in a
Life-Cycle EconomyGuido SonnemannUnited
Nations Environment ProgrammeDivision of
Technology, Industry and EconomicsProduction and
Consumption BranchStrategy Unit
Conference on Integrated Waste Management Life
Cycle Assessment Prague, 13-16 April, 2004
2Overview
- UNEP who we are and what we do
- 10-year framework of programmes on sustainable
consumption and production - Life Cycle Initiative
- Integrated approach to resources and waste
- Invitation to further discussion
3 UNEP - Mission
- To provide leadership and encourage partnership
in caring for the environment by inspiring,
informing, and enabling nations and peoples to
improve their quality of life without
compromising that of future generations. - Environment for Development
4 UNEP 3 roles
- Assess the State of the Worlds Environment
Understand Env. Challenges (GEO) - Stimulate solutions to environmental problems
- Promoting International Environmental Law
- Voluntary Initiatives
- Build capacity and networks to enable
implementing solutions
5Current situation a quick assessment
- Productivity/efficiency gains being overtaken by
production increases (rebound effects) - Problems of production process understood but
those of the use and disposal of a product still
largely unknown - Emerging global consumer class
- Environmental concerns not integrated into
economic and social programmes - De-linking of economic growth from environmental
damage needed
6Malmö Declaration
We have at our disposal the human and material
resources to achieve sustainable development, not
as an abstract concept, but as a concrete
reality. Our efforts must be linked to the
development of cleaner and more resource
efficient technologies for a life-cycle
economy. (Ministers of Environment, First
Ministerial Environment Forum 31st May 2000)
7World Summit on SD in Johannesburg
- Plan of implementation Chapter III, paragraph
14 - promote the development of a 10 year framework
of programmes in support of regional and national
initiatives to accelerate the shift towards SD - improve the products and services provided,
while reducing environmental and health impacts,
using, where appropriate, science-based
approaches, such as life-cycle analysis
8Main lessons learnt since Rio
- Instruments (regulatory framework, voluntary
measures and economic instruments). - Integrated life-cycle based tools to promote
changes in the unsustainable patterns of
consumption and production. - Sectoral approach and integration of
environmental considerations into sectoral
policies.
9The 10-year framework has to make a difference by
...
- Focusing on concrete outputs and by avoiding SCP
Flying Circus - Moving to implementation by means of pilot
projects in the following two areas - meeting basic needs of the poor (following the
thematic cycle of CSD) - resource efficiency in selected industry sectors
and for selected areas, - Establishing partnerships for voluntary
initiatives - Setting a legislative framework on product
information
10The world behind the product
- Life cycle based product considerations
- multi-criteria design - eco-efficiency, product
safety, dematerialisation and recyclability - embedded resources and impacts
- end-of-life conversion/reuse/recycling/disposal
- design for recycling systems, not just
recyclability - reverse manufacturing reverse distribution
- residue disposal
11What are the management tools?
- Changing operations towards sustainable
development by - life-cycle management of products , incl.
recycling - industrial ecology - collective management of
issues - assessment tools - LCA, EnTA, EIA, env. auditing
- programmes as CP, SC, PSS, EMAS
- performance-based regulations, international
conventions - public reporting - CER (GRI), GEO
- ?Relevance to waste industry
12Europe and the world
- Advanced vrs. (often) Ad.Hoc.
- Europe eco-efficiency, IPP, LC thinking
- South lack of data, methodology, financing.
- NOT ENOUGH!
- TRADE globalisation makes for an interdependent
world...
13UNEPs focus of work on LCA
- Translate life cycle thinking into practice
- Reach out to those unfamiliar with LCA,
especially in developing countries - Report on level of acceptance and adoption of LCA
- Make the tool reliable and its results comparable
- Keep it simple and user-friendly
14UNEP SETAC
International Life Cycle Partnership to put life
cycle approaches into practice
http//www.uneptie.org/sustain/lcinitiative
15Mission andoverall goals
- Develop and disseminate practical tools for
evaluating the opportunities, risks, and
trade-offs, associated with products and services
over their whole life cycle. - -----------
- Facilitate the access to knowledge and datafor
SMEs and developing countries - in order to foster the use in Consumers,
- Governments and Industry decisions"
- ------------
- Implement the ISO framework
16LCIn Overview
- ILCP International Life Cycle Panel Involve the
relevant stakeholders - LCM Life Cycle Management Integrate LC
thinking into decision making - LCI Life Cycle Inventory Get the right data to
the users - LCIA Life Cycle Impact Assessment Provide the
best available indicators - LCR Life Cycle activities in Regions Create
capacity in all regions
17LCIn Partners
- Sponsoring
- ACE
- APME
- Canada
- EcoRecycle Victoria
- GM
- Germany
- ICMM
- Netherlands
- Quebec
- Switzerland
- Supporting
- AIST, Japan
- Brazilian LC Association
- CI
- Eco Global, Costa Rica
- Indian Society of LCA
- ISO
- US EPA
18LCIn Ongoing work
- Surveys on user needs, data availability and
other relevant issues - Workshops to share experiences and acquire
knowledge - Publications to promote life cycle approaches
- WGs with task forces peer review groups
- Website as central contact point to access
information provided by the Initiative - Quarterly LC.net bulletin and communicationby
SETAC Globe, ISIE news and Int J LCA.
19Exploration Group Integrated Resource and Waste
Management (IRWM)
- With a focus on life cycle of materials rather
than of products IRWM was identified as issue for
a potential crosscutting Task Force whose aim
would be - to increase the linkages of existing integrated
resource and waste management strategies with the
work on life cycle approaches for products and
services within the Initiative - to provide an overview and international forum
for the sharing of experiences with IRWM - to identify further key partners and target
groups and establish adequate network, - to give guidance on IRWM strategies for different
target groups in a global context.
20Integrated approach toresources and waste
- to include resources and waste issues as integral
part of SCP programmes - to encourage industry to embrace corporate
responsibility, performance instruments and
industry codes for resource use and waste
management - to promote performance-based regulations by
governments - to foster evaluation where recycling (and other
waste treatment options) is beneficial for
society overall - to consider in this assessments local aspects as
for instance the demographic situation that
determines transport distances - to ensure that recycling itself does not lead to
secondary impacts - To result in practical outcomes, management
decisions taken as a result of such assessments
need to be greatly enhanced
21UNEPs message on IWM
- Based on lessons learned from LCA
- The notion of waste management needs to
eventually evolve beyond simply devising the best
technology for this and that waste - Proper assessment can show which of several
technical and material options is environmentally
and socially preferable (as well as being
economic) - To demonstrate how such assessments can be
undertaken, UNEP is promoting the use of several
instruments, mainly EnTA and LCA
22Key task ahead
- to promote a life-chain approach to materials
management - to more closely link the manufacturer and the
waste manager in an optimisation of the overall
system of energy, materials and waste flow. - to take a more integrated product life-cycle
approach, in particular for manufacturing
industry to avoid that design for recyclability
remain theoretical and products now labeled
recyclable in the waste stream because
collection/ recycling system is not in place - to create stronger links between waste management
operations and the manufacturing and marketing
phases of a product and how the organisations
concerned with waste management can be more
closely linked with both industry and consumers.
23Invitation to further discussion I
- How can we support a chain management approach
to materials where the manufacturer and the
recycler are more closely linked in an overall
optimisation of energy, materials and waste
flows? - What is necessary to create bigger manufacturing
systems where an integrated, collective approach
to production and consumption is designed that
allows synergies and improved recycling?
24Invitation to further discussion II
- Which tools and methodologies have to be used for
a systematic evaluation process and which
concepts we might to integrate? - In which way the UNEP/ SETAC Life Cycle
initiative can support this discussion? Is there
any need for further activities by UNEP?
25Next steps?
- This workshop and the conference are a starting
point - Tell us what you want and what you are missing
for better shaping the work of the exploration
group! - Who are potential partners to contact?
- ?Participate in the exploration group/ task force
on IRWM! - First meeting
- in reception hall of hotel after todays
sessions of the conference
26Please contact us!
For more information and to find out how you can
get involved. United Nations Environment
Programme Division of Technology, Industry
Economics Production and Consumption Unit 39-43
Quai André Citroën 75739 Paris, Cedex 15,
France Tel 33 1 4437 1450 Fax 33 1 4437
1474 E-mail sc_at_unep.fr http//www.uneptie.org/sus
tain/lcinitiative