Diagnostic - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 36
About This Presentation
Title:

Diagnostic

Description:

post facto, of course.... Power & Partnerships Seminar. Review of Forest ... UNHS, NFA, LG, MWLE, districts, NAADs. Institutions. UBOS, MWLE, URA, MTTI, NARO . – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:42
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 37
Provided by: XXX100
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Diagnostic


1
Diagnostic Planning Tools addressing power
conflicts in NFPsScott GellerPower
Partnerships Seminar27 September 2004
2
Todays interactive session
  • Power aspect of NFP processes
  • General overview of the Uganda NFP process
    (1999-2004)
  • A 6-step process or tool to help address power
    issues in Uganda

3
The power context of NFPs.
  • Macro-policy building
  • Forest sector planning
  • Public expenditure budgeting
  • where the national forest programme (NFP)
    influences the poverty reduction strategy (PRS)

4
The power play often found in NFP processes.
  • Forestry is an integral part of national
    development everyday life issues for ordinary
    people high development importance.but.
  • Is a land issue, politically hot, and rarely
    gains positive press in developing countries
    poor public image..plus
  • Forest authorities are often marginalised and /
    or corrupted inefficiency..so

5
.the implications for forestry advocates.
  • The forest sector struggles to show its real
    economic contribution to wider society
    ineffective advocacy .and therefore
  • Is horrifically under funded SUSTAINABILITY
    ISSUE
  • Forests disappear at faster rates than we can
    afford

6
The power players in an NFP.
  • Forest governors (policy builders, nfp
    convenors, technocrats in high places, civil
    society)
  • Lead public agencies (ministers, boards,
    planners, budget holders)
  • Fiscal reformers (finance ministries, World Bank)
  • Development strategists (macro-economic planners,
    aid agencies)
  • Data managers (poverty units, statistical
    departments)
  • Politicians (representatives, parliamentary
    members)

7
Uganda NFP background
  • There was a recognised need for a sector-wide
    strategy between GoU and interested donors
  • The NFP concept was developed by GoU in 1997/8

8
Uganda NFP purpose
  • - to create a positive, effective and sustainable
    policy and institutional environment for the
    forest sector in Uganda

9
Uganda NFP context
  • Forest resources
  • decline in forest cover
  • demand exceeds supply
  • loss of agricultural productivity
  • Poverty
  • dependence on forests by the poor
  • lack of poverty focus in the sector
  • poor understanding of forestry livelihoods

10
.more context.
  • Forestry in the economy
  • 6 of GDP
  • employment for 1 million
  • 95 of energy requirements
  • substantial potential for economic growth

11
(No Transcript)
12
Planning Diagnostic Tool
  • A 6-step process that provides a mixed bag of
    ideas
  • Strategies
  • Methodologies
  • Tactics
  • Tips
  • Checklists
  • Questionnaires
  • Indicators

13
IIED Power Tool SeriesMarshalling Evidence to
Raise the Poverty-Forestry Profile
  • Step 1. Inventory pro-poor forestry initiatives
  • Step 2. Establish forestry-poverty linkages
  • Step 3. Define data collection requirements
  • Step 4. Develop forestry indicators
  • Step 5. Harmonise PRSP/NFPs frameworks
  • Step 6. Sell forestry

14
Step 1. Inventory pro-poor forestry initiatives
  • Review of initiatives build on field
    activities, views of the less powerful, tangible
    evidence for politicians, establish foundation
    for indicators, action based
  • Analysis - what are the initiatives, problems
    being addressed, purpose, impact, outputs,
    activities, SWOT

15
Step 2. Establish forestry-poverty linkages
  • Livelihood issues / strategies ask the poor
    and maybe use the livelihoods framework
  • Knowledge awareness and attitude survey
    techniques
  • Service provision available or not, adequate
  • Potential opportunities what are they

16
Step 3. Define data collection requirements
  • Types of data economic/social, environmental,
    policy/institutional
  • Methods aggregated adminstrative, sample
    survey, register, remote sensing, inventories,
    etc.
  • Responsibilities various tiers

17
Step 4. Develop forestry indicators
  • Be participatory get the right institutions
    involved who are they?
  • Good indicators WB sourcebook
  • Direct and unambiguous
  • Measures factors that deal with objectives
  • Various across groups, time and is sensitive to
    changes
  • Can be tracked, not too costly
  • Geared toward the strategic objective

18
Step 5. Harmonise PRSP/NFP frameworks
  • NFP ME strategy should be developed within
    national policies frameworks for ME
  • Communicate the PRSP/NFP linkages in one ME
    framework

19
Step 6. Sell forestry
  • Identify entry points where decisions are being
    made
  • High-level x-sectoral committees (eg, PRSC,
    agric/energy, decentralistion), Sector Working
    Groups (eg, ENR), etc.
  • Prepare for your audience
  • Analyse cross-sectoral problems, objectives,
    strategies, actions, etc.

20
  • A look back on what was used and worked.
  • ..post facto, of course.

21

Outputs from the process
Forest Sector
Review (FSR)
New Forest
Regulations
National
Review of Forest
Forest Plan
Initiatives
Process
Implementa
tion of NFP
New Forestry
New Forest
Policy
Act
NFA Launch
National Forestry
Authority (NFA)
Planning
22
Step 1. Inventory pro-poor forestry initiatives
  • Some attributes
  • Forest sector review process lots of studies
  • Masterlist of forestry-related initiatives was
    produced
  • Demonstrates forestry extends beyond FD
  • Geographic coverage, motivations and needs,
    livelihood links

23
Review of Initiatives
24
Step 2. Establish forestry-poverty linkages
  • Forests provide income employment sale of
    products
  • Fuelwood energy 90 of consumption
  • Forest products - free goods
  • Safety nets - against food shortages
  • Cultural and spiritual values

25
Step 3. Define data requirements
  • Types of data
  • Economic/social (employment, income generation,
    consumption, production, trade, market prices,
    investments, tree planting, access, firewood
    collection, biomass energy
  • Environmental (forest cover, deforestation,
    inventory, growth, protected areas)
  • Policy/institutional (GoU budget,
    ownership/management, civil society, districts,
    advisory services, research, training, awareness)

26
Data (2)
  • Methods
  • UNHS, NFA, LG, MWLE, districts, NAADs
  • Institutions
  • UBOS, MWLE, URA, MTTI, NARO ..

27
Institutional delivery framework
28
Step 4. Develop forestry indicators
  • Participating in Uganda Participatory Poverty
    Assessment Project
  • Drafting indicators with Poverty Monitoring
    Analysis Unit
  • Integrating forestry into UBOS Integrated
    Household Survey

29
Evidence for finance Average distance to
collect fuelwood (.06 km in 1992 to .73 km in
2000)
30
Step 5. Harmonise PRSP/NFP frameworks
  • See table in paper.

31
Step 6. Sell forestry
  • Forest Sector Co-ordination Secretariat -
    high-level inter-ministerial steering (1999-2001)
  • Poverty Eradication Action Plan
  • ENR Sector Working Group
  • PMA NAADs

Sub-Committees that Count!
32
Challenges faced.
  • Poor information
  • Not seeing the wood for the trees
  • Slow committees
  • Immediate needs vs longterm benefits
  • Political support

33
The clear message we used.
  • Forestry is not just about trees, it is only
    trees in so far as trees serve the needs of the
    people
  • Does this make sense?

34
Leveraging power to our advantage.
  • Sound intelligence knowledge management systems
  • Active participation, networking, consultation
  • Lobbying, selling, advocacy
  • Disseminating lessons - communications
  • Finding political space, instilling ownership
  • Being tactful
  • Are foresters good at this?

35
Final thoughts.
  • Understand and fully engage with the political
    and economic realities in a broad public dialogue
  • Facilitate agreement on a viable path of linking
    forestry poverty, rather than simply listing
    what change is needed

36
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com