Title: Biomass and CHP: Opportunities not only for central and eastern Europe
1Biomass and CHP Opportunities not only for
central and eastern Europe
- Dr. H. Kopetz
- Berlin
- 5. Oktober 2007
2Content
- Some facts of the European energy system
- District heating (DH)-The situation in central
and eastern Europe - Efficiency, District heating and biomass
European opportunities - Source The used data are taken from the
Statistical pocketbook 2006, EU Commission and
from EUROPEAN BIOMASS STATISTICS 2007, AEBIOM.
Association Européenne pour la BIOMasse
3AEBIOMEuropean Biomass Statistics 2007
- AEBIOM, the European Biomass Association, has
published a comprehensive report, in September
2007, on the contribution of biomass to the
energy system in the EU 27. - The report includes all relevant statistical data
on biomass and serves as an important reference
for every person employed or interested in the
bioenergy sector. - A statistical report on the contribution of
biomass to the energy system in the EU 27 - Price 40,- (excl. postal charges)
- Copies of the report can be ordered via e-mail to
vagonyte_at_aebiom.org - Some table of contents-headlines
- Biomass energy content, transformation
coefficients, conversion factors - Biomass in the European Energy System
- Land ressources and biomass potential
- Biomass for heat and electricity
- Biogas
- Biofuels for transport
4Introduction
-
- Global warming is the biggest threat to our
societies and the economic wellbeing of future
generations. Therefore the energy policy has to
contribute to the reduction of C0² emissions. The
decisions of the European council of March 2007
set the targets they are very ambitious as the
following table demonstrates
5Climate change and greenhouse gas emissions
- A succesful strategy against climate change
requires a strong reduction of the greenhouse gas
emissions minus 831 Mt until 2020 to comply
with the council of 9.3.2007
C02 emissions, EU-25, Million tonnes CO2
Association Européenne pour la BIOMasse
6Where come the C0² emissions from?
- The main source of the C0² emissions is the
burning of fossil fuels. Given the European
energy mix 1Mtoe of fossil fuels releases - 2.88Mt C0².
- This means the use of fossil fuels has to be
reduced until 2020 by - 300Mtoe
- to comply with the decisions of the council.
7What does 300 Mtoe mean in relation to the energy
system and the potential of RES?
- As the following tables show
- the losses in the energy system are much bigger
than the required reduction of fossil fuels, and
the additional amount of RES from 2004 to 2020 is
not enough to replace 300 Mtoe fossil fuels. - Therefore the question How can the losses be
reduced and what can biomass contribute to the
reduction of greenhouse gases?
8Primary energy consumption and transformation
losses, EU 25, 2005Losses occur mainly in
thermal power plants without heat use!
9The potential of RES as compared to the
transformation losses, Mtoe
10Heat in all forms 50 of the final energy demand
- If we now turn to the final energy, we can see
that ca 50 of the final energy is used as heat - Heat for warm water, for space heating in the
residential, tertiary and industry sector and for
industrial processes.
11Final energy consumption, EU 25, 2004, Mtoe
12First conclusions
- The transformation losses are much higher than
the potential of the RES - One main reason for these losses the separation
of heat supply and electricity production in
thermal power plants - Traditional thermal power plants have an
efficiency of 35 40 this share of the primary
energy is converted to electricity, 65 60 is
wasted as heat, released to the environenment - Heat is the biggest market within the energy
sector! To supply this market with the waste heat
from power plants you need DH-grids!
13Content
- Some facts of the European energy system
- The situation in central and eastern Europe
- Efficiency, DH and biomass
- Opportunities for a decentralised heatpower
production
Association Européenne pour la BIOMasse
14District heating (DH) in Europe
- In 2003 the total heat demand/capita was ca
- 13 400kWh (total heat heat for industry,
tertiary and residential sector). - In some member states 40 of the needed heat was
delivered by DH, in the average only 8, in some
countries less than 4 . - As the following table shows, the nordic and
baltic countries are leading in DH. But also the
Eastern European countries are well positioned.
In these countries DH is 100 above the EU
average. - A well developed DH grid is a prerequisite for an
efficient power production in thermal power
plants. - In many cases natural gas grids are the main
competitors for DH!
15District heating in Europe, kWh/capitaEU 27, 2003
16One source of losses
- The lack of sufficient district heating systems
in many countries is one main source for the huge
losses of energy in the thermal power plants. - If we try to use 20 of these losses to heat our
cities and industries we could save - 120 Mtoe!
- This is already a big share of the necessary
300 Mtoe reduction of fossil fuels in the frame
of the C0² reduction policy.
17A closer look to Eastern Europe
- As the following tables show, between 1992 and
2003 the amount of heat sold in DH systems has
been reduced substantially, in some countries by
50 - 70 Bulgaria, Romania, Poland). - But still, at present DH is much more developed
than in most West European countries.
- DH in these countries is very.
18A closer look to Eastern Europeheat sold via DH
in Mtoe rapid decline!
19Biomass in DH in Europa
- As the following graph shows, the use of biomass
in DH in Europe is very low in the average
only 1 of total heat used. There are only a few
exemptions like Sweden where they sell 3000 kWh
heat/capita in biomass DH systems. - In some Eastern European countries they use an
increasing amount of biomass for cofiring in coal
fired power plants with an efficiency around 30
to comply with the EU directive on
RES-electricity and switched from DH to natural
gas, which they import from Russia.
20Biomass heat via district heating kWh/capita,
2003Heat demand EU 27 ca 560 Mtoe, here of DH
45.5 Mtoe, hereof biomass 5.24 Mtoe
EU 25 average 132
Association Européenne pour la BIOMasse
21Biomass in DH in EE countries(EE East Europe)
- The following table shows the situation more in
detail. As you can see, in Sweden more than 50
of DH comes from biomass, in Austria almost one
third, in EE countries less than 5. - This analysis demonstrates that there is a
considerable potential for C0² reduction by
substituting fossil fuels by biomass in
DH-systems in EE-countries
- Amazingly the share of biomass in
22District heat(DH) and Biomass District heat(BDH)
in selected countries and EU average kWh per
capita
23A switch from fossil to biomass fuels means
possible C0² reduction up to 85 Mt (13!)lower
operating costsbut high investment costs to
change the systems
- The 7 new member states in central and Eastern
Europe released 656 Mt C0² in the year 2004. By
substituting fossil fuels by biomass in the
present DH systems they would need 16 Mtoe
biomass equivalent and could save 45 Mt C02, ca
7 of the present emissions. - If they rebuild their not used systems to the
level of 1993 and switch to biomass they would
need 29 Mtoe biomass and could save 85 Mt C0² or
13 of their total emissions. - The potential to deliver and produce this biomass
exists yet it has to be developed. - The price of primary energy in woody biomass is
cheaper than in natural gas, given the fact that
gas prices increased by 50 in the last 2 years. - The lack of capital, of know how, of knowledga
and of government support is the main reason for
not using these huge potentials for emission
reduction so far.
24Biomass in DH heating
- From 48 Mtoe biomass for heat only 5 Mtoe are
used in DH, mainly in SW, Fl, DK, the baltic
countries and Austria! - Central and Eastern European countries do have DH
networks but so far they dont use biomass, they
offer a huge potential for biomass to heat. - Many other countries only have small DH networks
and barely use biomass. They need new DH networks
and then they also could use biomass.
25Content
- Some facts of the European energy system
- The situation in central and eastern Europe
- Efficiency, District heating (DH),
biomassEuropean opportunities
Association Européenne pour la BIOMasse
26Biomass to energy chains big differences in
efficiency and yields/ha
- The following 3 tables demonstrate the various
possibilities of biomass and the big differences
in efficiency and yields/ha between various
biomass-to-energy chains. - They explain, why AEBIOM is in favor to use more
than 80 of the available biomass for heat
production and CHP plants, which should be
operated heat-driven to maximise the total
efficiency. - As is shown the efficiency varies from 25 to 90
and the energy output per ha from 1 toe up to 5
toe.
- These facts, based on natural
27The versatility of biomass
Association Européenne pour la BIOMasse
28Efficiency and conversion technologyefficiency
final energy output in GJ/input inGJ without
considering the additional energy needed for the
process and the energy in by-products
29Final energy/ha based on average yields 2002
-2004, EU 25
30Bioenergy Targets for heat, electricity and
fuels, 2020 share of biomass from 4.1 in 2004
to 12 14 in 2020!
Association Européenne pour la BIOMasse
31The so far developed facts are integrated into
aHeat scenario 2020 (EU 27)
- If we seriously want to reduce the C0² emissions
by 831Mt, we only can succeed if we use the
wasted heat and if we promote the most efficient
biomass to energy chains- that is biomass to
heat. What does this mean in figures? - We follow the council decisions 20 less heat
demand by efficiency gains and better isolation,
20 use of the heat losses of the power
generation, efficient use of biomass potential
according AEBIOM, substitution of electrical and
fossil fuel driven heating systems - and get the
following figures
32Heat scenario 2020 changes in the heat supply
between 2004 and 2020 in Mtoe based on the
decisions of the council spring 2007
33The effects of such a programm on C0² reduction
- Implementing such a programm would help to save
306 Mtoe of fossil fuels just the amount we need
to attain a 20 reduction of C0² emissions. - To better evaluate the importance of this issue
we compare it with the community goals in the
transporation sector and the electricity sector - 10 biofuels means ca 33 Mtoe substituted
- An increase of electricity production from 15 to
21 means ca 52 Mtoe substituted. - As the following table shows only the heat market
offers the potential for a substantial decrease
of emissions
34Scenario C0² reduction 2004 - 2020
35C0² reduction in Mt 2004 - 2020
- The EU- heat market offers the biggest potential
for C0² reduction by replacing fossil fuels by
RES and wasted heat yet, a new structure of DH
in many places is necessary!
36Some explanations and consequences
- The realization of our scenario would require to
push ca 200 Mtoe renewable or derived heat into
the market this corresponds to ca 100 Million
appartments or houses or 50 Million appartments
and a similar heat quantity in tertiary
buildings. - Experiences show that the replacement of a fossil
driven heating system by a RES system or the
construction of a new district heating system
costs ca 10.000 /unit. - This means 1000 Bn would be necessary for this
restructuring of the European heating system. In
comparison the annual Budget of the Union is
around 100 Bn .
37The obstacles for such a takeoff
- Renewable electricity, blended biofuels can be
used in the existing energy infratructure and
dont need new appliances, cars or what ever. - On the contrary, pellets cannot be burned in a
oil burner and district heat cannot be used in a
gas burner. - Therefore the introduction of RES heat is a
question of available capital, of laws or of such
high taxes on fossil combustibles that the low
operating costs help to overcome the investment
burden. - Therefore a new European fund for RES heat and
retrofitting of buildings is proposed to support
the member states and the individuals in
financing the huge investments to restructure the
European heating system.
38Additional biomass for heat
- So far biomass for heat comes mainly from the
European forests. But this supply is limited and
in some regions not available. Therefore new
perennial crops are neccessary such as SRC,
miscanthus, with high energy yields/ha to produce
enough biomass. - These crops are unknown to the European farmers.
They need a 10 to 20 year commitment and dont
allow annual crop rotation. New schemes have to
be developed that make these crops attractive for
farmers
39What Instruments can be proposed for this change?
- Higher taxation on fossil combustibles example
SW,DK ca 200 Euro/1000l heating oil and also on
electricity for heat - An European fund for renewable heat and isolation
of buildings, that cofinances national and
regional programs 10 bn Euro to build DH grids
and DH plants based on biomass, to invest in
pellets and chip boilers, to save energy in
buildings - New incentives to grow perennial crops
- Information, awareness building, training
40RES-heat What are the expectations of the sector
concerning the new RES directive ?
- No trading systems for RES obligations
- Indicative target for RES heat of 25 on EU level
- Provisions for national action plans
- - sectoral targets for biomass heat, for DH
deployment - -for solar thermal and geothermal heat, for
biomass to electricity, to fuels, supply
concept, - - measures how to reach the targets, monitoring.
- Priority for biomass-to-energy chains with high
energy output/ha - Sustainable biomass production
- A new fund for Renewable heat and energy saving
in buildings
41A new structure for heat and electricity supply
- To meet the targets of the spring council 2007
Europe needs a new structure for the heat supply
and the electricity production. - A more decentralised production electricity
production has to follow the heat demand. - RES and derived heat has to replace fossil
combustibles and electricity in the heating
sector. - DH networks, chip and pellets boilers, solar
thermal installation should be in the center of
the new heating supply. - Goverment policies are necessary to steer the
market forces towards a sustainable heating
system.
42Summary
- The reduction of fossil fuels in the heating
sector is a key issue in a policy against global
warming and for better security of energy supply. - This restructuring requires huge amounts of
capital, it also offers many new jobs. - Therefore an European fund for renewable heat and
DH networks is proposed.
43Danke für die Aufmerksamkeit! Thank you for the
attention!
Association Européenne pour la BIOMasse