Title: Consumer Acceptance and Willingness to Pay for Genetically Modified Foods: A MultiCountry Assessment
1Consumer Acceptance and Willingness to Pay for
Genetically Modified Foods A Multi-Country
Assessment
- Wen S. Chern
- Department of Agricultural, Environmental and
Development Economics - The Ohio State University
2This Presentation Addresses a Multi-Country
Survey on GM Foods
- Adoption of GM Varieties
- Review of GMO Labeling Regulations
- Student surveys in Norway, Japan, Taiwan, and the
U.S. - Public telephone surveys Norway and the U.S.
- Survey results
- Estimated willingness to pay (WTP) for Vegetable
oil and salmon - Implications
3Adoption of GM Crops Has Been the Most Noted
Advancement in Biotechnology for Agricultural
Production
- Adoption Rates in of Planted Acreage, U.S.
- 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001
- GM Soybeans
- HT 7.4 17 42 51 54
68 - GM Corn
- Total 4.4 12 28 34 24
23 - Bt 1.4 7.6 19.1 30
18 18 - HT 3.0 4.3 18.4 8
6 7 - GM Cotton
- Total NA 25.5 43.0 65 61
69 - Bt 14.6 15.0 16.8 27
15 13 - HT NA 10.5 26.2 38
26 32
4GM Foods Have Been Controversial
- In 1997, EU imposed mandatory labeling of GM
foods. - - 1 of GM content
- In 2001, Japan imposed mandatory labeling of GM
foods. - - 5 of GM content
- On March 20, 2002, China enacted Ag GMO
Implementation Measures - GMO has become one of the most contested issues
in agricultural trade.
5On July 3, 2002, European Parliament Backed Two
New Proposals Submitted by European Commission
- Extending labeling regulations to feed products
- Products such as soybean and rapeseed oils
previously exempted due to the lack of presence
of transgenic DNA are subject to proposed
labeling regulations. - But, products such as meats and eggs produced
with GM feeds will still be exempted.
6Consumer Acceptance of GM Foods Has Become a
Major Factor Affecting the Future of Biotech in
Agriculture
- Importance of understanding factors affecting
consumer acceptance - Little has been done in estimating WTP for GM vs.
non-GM foods - A joint research project was initiated to conduct
a multi-Country survey on GM foods
7Our Survey Project is Aimed at International
Comparison
- Investigate and compare consumer attitudes and
acceptance toward GM foods in Norway, Japan, and
Taiwan, and the U.S. - Estimate consumer WTP for non-GM foods
8Our Survey Methodology is Based on the Contingent
Valuation (CV)
- Survey Design
- -Knowledge and awareness of GM foods
- -Attitude and acceptance toward GM foods
- -Attitude toward GM food labeling
- -Willingness to consume GM foods
- -Closed-ended contingent valuation of WTP for
vegetable oil, salmon, tofu, and corn flake
breakfast cereal - -Demographic characteristics
-
-
9Four Student Surveys were Conducted in 2000-2001
- The same survey questionnaire initially written
in English was translated into Norwegian,
Japanese, and Chinese. - A college student survey in Japan (Tsukuba
University), Norway (Agricultural University of
Norway), Taiwan (National Taiwan University), and
the U.S. (The Ohio State University) (n 710)
10Figure 1 Awareness of GM Foods and GMOs from
Student Surveys.
11Figure 2 Testing of Knowledge on GMOs
12Figure 3 Risk Perception of GM Foods on Human
Health
13Figure 4Consumer Willingness to Consume GM Foods
14Figure 5Consumer Willingness to Purchase GM
Products with Reduced Use of Pesticides
15Figure 6Consumer Support for Labeling Type
16Figure 7Consumer Willingness to Pay a Premium
for Foods Labeled as GM-Free
17Student Respondents are Willing to Pay a High
Premium to Avoid GM Foods
- Estimated WTP for Premiums of Non-GM Vegetable
oil - Norway U.S. Japan Taiwan
- Reference size Liter 32Fl oz Standard
600g - WTP in US 1.51 1.13 0.88
0.45 - of Premium 55-69 50-62 33-40 17-21
18Two Public Telephone Surveys Were Later Conducted
in 2002
- Norway - 200 respondents in Oslo and Nordland
- U.S. - 250 respondents nationwide
- Conducted during March and April, 2002
- Similar questions as in the student surveys
- Soybean oil (non GM and GM)
- Salmon (non GM, GM-fed, and GM)
- Corn flake cereal (non GM and GM)
19How well informed are you on GM foods or GMO?
- About 10 of Norwegians and 15 of Americans
consider themselves very well informed. - The low awareness corresponds well with the
knowledge results (see below).
20Statement Non-GM soybeans do not contain genes
while GM soybeans do.
- Around 40 in both economies answers correctly
(false). - More correct (and wrong) answers in the U.S.
- Young people know more. Students in the student
survey knew even more.
21Statement By eating GM foods, a person's genes
can be altered.
- More than 60 of Americans and around 35 of
Norwegians answer correctly (false) while more
Norwegians dont know. - Students know more.
22Risk Perception of GM Foods on Human Health
- Half of Americans and 60 of Norwegians believe
that GM foods are risky. A third of Norwegians
considered them extremely risky. - A bit more than 20 found them safe.
23How Willing Are You to Consume Foods Produced
with GM Ingredients?
- Only 30 of Norwegians and 43 of Americans claim
to be willing to consume GM foods. - A larger share of Norwegians are extremely
unwilling (45) (and also extremely willing). - Opposition reduced when explicit benefits are
introduced.
24Benefits How Willing Would You Be to Consume
GM foods if They Reduced the Use of Pesticides?
- Around 40 of Norwegians and 70 of Americans
were willing to consume GM foods. - Similar results with improved nutritional quality
or reduced price. - Reduced use of pesticides ranked as the most
important benefit and price reductions as the
least important benefit.
25Concerns How Willing Would You Be to Purchase
GM Foods Given a Risk for allergicc Reactions?
- gt80 of Norwegians and 40 of Americans extremely
unwilling. - Ethical and religious concerns important for 30
of Norwegians and 36 of Americans.
26How Important is it to You that Food Products are
Specifically Labeled as GM?
- The majority (98 in Norway and 87 in the U.S.)
demand labeling. - 55 of Norwegians support labeling even if prices
are increased by 5 or more.
27Knowledge Matters! Distribution of Responses to
the Question How risky would you say GM foods
are in terms of risk for human health? by Answer
(True, False, or Dont Know) to Non-GM soybeans
do not contain genes while genetically modified
soybeans do.
28Distribution of Responses to the Question How
willing are you to consume foods produced with GM
ingredients? by Answer (True, False, or Dont
Know) to Non-GM soybeans do not contain genes
while genetically modified soybeans do.
29We Used Salmon in the Survey Beause Salmon is a
Very Interesting CaseWorld Production of
Salmon, 1980-2000
30Norwegian Exports of Salmon by Destination
31Composition of Feed in Salmon Farming
32Three Stated Choice Experiments(i) Non-GM and
GM-Fed Salmon(ii) Non-GM and GM Salmon(iii)
Non-GM and GM Soybean Oil (Skipped)
33Stated Choices at Identical Prices (Step 1),
Percentage Distribution for Each Choice
34WTP to Avoid Alternative GM Salmon
- Alternative
- GM-fed Salmon GM Salmon
- U.S. Mean WTP 1.5 2.52
- of Premium 25 42
- Norway
- Mean WTP, NOK 43.42 53.96
- Mean WTP, US 5.43 6.75
- of Premium 54 67
- Note Base price 6.00 in U.S., NOK 80 in Norway
35In Conclusion, the Attitudes, Perception, and WTP
for GM Foods Vary from Country to Country
- Americans and Taiwanese are more willing to
consume GM foods than Norwegians and Japanese - However, opinions in the U.S. are also quite
mixed. - The opposition is reduced when potential benefits
associated with GM foods are introduced. - Support for mandatory labeling.
- Consumers and students are willing to pay
substantial premiums to avoid GM foods. - Norwegians are willing to pay more than
Americans. - Is there a hypothetical bias (no real payments)?
36The Survey Results and Estimated WTPs Have
Important Implications
- The attitude and perception of GM foods vary from
Country to Country. One Country should not simply
fellow what other economies are doing regarding
GMO regulation. - If the WTP for premium is high, the benefit of
labeling regulation would be high also. - Knowledge on GMOs matters We can change the
perception by more public education.
37We are Continuing to Expand our Research Efforts
- Our collaborators in Japan and Taiwan will soon
conduct their pilot national surveys soon. - Spain has joined our project.
- We will conduct a full scaled telephone survey
with a much larger sample size. - We will compute WTPs by demographic groups.