Municipal Waste-To-Energy Mrs Almitra H Patel, Member, Supreme Court Committee for Solid Waste Management - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Municipal Waste-To-Energy Mrs Almitra H Patel, Member, Supreme Court Committee for Solid Waste Management

Description:

Tipping Fees unviable if only 40% pay property-tax. ... 20-seater Kanpur toilet runs a dual-fuel. pump to provide 24-hour bore-well water. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:684
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 13
Provided by: snva
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Municipal Waste-To-Energy Mrs Almitra H Patel, Member, Supreme Court Committee for Solid Waste Management


1
Municipal Waste-To-EnergyMrs Almitra H Patel,
Member, Supreme Court Committee for Solid Waste
Management
  • City Waste Management Options
  • Presently, open dumping outside city limits, with
    fires and leachate, dogs and pests.
  • Municipal Solid Waste Rules 2000 require
  • BIOLOGICAL STABILISATION of
  • organic wastes, by Composting, Vermi-
  • composting, Biomethanation, etc, to
  • restore Indias degraded depleted soils.

2
Options in the West for Municipal Waste-To-energy
  • LANDFILL GAS capture methane-rich
  • vapours from airless heaps for heat or power
  • BURN Technologies like Incineration, Plasma,
  • Pyrolysis need high-calorie waste, unlike Indias
  • BIOMETHANATION by Anaerobic Digestion
  • (like gobar-gas) for heating or power plants

3
Landfill Gas
  • At best, only 55 gas capture. The 45 released
    to air
  • contains methane, a greenhouse gas to be phased
    out.
  • Waste-producing cities must pay Tipping Fees to
  • landfill operators, _at_ US 80-100 per ton of
    waste.
  • Tipping Fees unviable if only 40 pay
    property-tax.
  • Our depleted soils need recycling of organics to
    land.
  • Unviable for land-starved country with very high
    land prices near cities.

4
Burn Technologies are opposed world-wide now
  • Very deadly cancer-causing Dioxins form when PVC
    or electronic waste burns.
  • Dioxin-control costs 35-50 of full capital cost.
    (India has no dioxin-testing at all).
  • No new plants in Canada since 1988, in US
  • since 1995. Burn bans in many countries.
  • Hence huge foreign and aid pressure on
  • SAARC countries to go for burn plants.

5
Biomethanation
  • Most suitable for homogeneous wet finely-
  • divided wastes like sewage sludge.
  • Manageable for on-site use, e.g. NEDAs
  • 20-seater Kanpur toilet runs a dual-fuel
  • pump to provide 24-hour bore-well water.
  • BEL uses its biogas from canteen waste for
  • Cooking. Best for small food-waste units.

6
Bio-meth costs and dangers
  • 5.33 methane in air is a very explosive mix.
  • So such plants must have 500m no-dwellings
  • Buffer Zone around gas tanks, but Lucknow is
  • planning a housing colony nearby instead!
  • Viability depends on gas yields per ton of
  • waste. Cowdung gives 37 cubic m gas / ton.
  • Lucknow hopes for an unrealistic 100 cu m/t.

7
Comparative Costs of Options
  • Rs 1.5-2 crore to compost 100 tons of city waste
  • Rs 16 crore for biometh of same 100 tpd waste.
  • Rs 4-5 cr per MW for thermal or hydel power, vs
  • Rs 16-43 cr per MW for Waste-To-Energy.
  • Rs 41 crore Swedish incinerator at Timarpur
  • in Delhi ran for just 6 days in 1991 as waste
  • had too much sand ash. This has not changed.

8
Value of Energy Produced
  • One cubic meter of biogas has 5400 kcal,
  • 0.5 kg of LPG cooking gas, worth Rs 10.
  • At max 30 conversion efficiency, this one
  • cu. m of gas 1.3 kwh, worth only Rs 3.90
  • (_at_ Rs 3 per kwh).
  • So biometh can be viable where heat is
  • used directly, not for power production.

9
All MWTE is currently unviable
  • MNES subsidies of Rs 10 cr IREDA
  • subsidy of Rs 15 cr can fund conventional
  • power generation with NO extra investment.
  • It does not justify promoting 4 times costlier
  • power-generation or 8 times costlier waste mgt.
  • MNES has done NO COST-BENEFIT
  • ANALYSES on any proposed or funded
  • projects even of Rs 80-242 crore, since 1995 !

10
Hidden Costs to Society
  • MNES wants power purchase at overly-high
  • rates to support inherently-inefficient projects.
  • MNES seeks 5 Annual increases ( rate-
  • doubling in 14 yrs), vs Malaysias 5 rise
  • every 3 years, that too performance-based,
  • rate-doubling in 44 years, as we may now see.
  • 6-8-year gestation period for projects makes
  • cities complacent about improving waste mgt.

11
MWTE Progress to Date
  • MNES funded 33 feasibility reports.
  • MoUs, all but 2 withdrew after 3-5 years,
  • leaving cities without waste-mgt solutions.
  • 4 scams, 2 convictions. Lawsuits bankruptcies
  • Only 40 tpd of Lucknows 1250 tpd waste is
    acceptable to plant which needs 600 tpd.
  • Hyderabads Refuse-Derived-Fuel plant is
    virtually non-functional since 3 years.
  • DSTs RDF plant failed as wastes are v low-calorie

12
Policy Recommendations
  • IDFC advised MERC to observe performance
  • of 80-crore 5 MW Lucknow biometh plant
  • before clearing PPA of any more projects.
  • STOP massive subsidies to allow small viable
  • on-site solutions to evolve and grow.
  • Focus on source-separation of wet dry
  • wastes at source for good waste-mgt options
  • Concentrate on heat or power from sewage.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com