SYSTEMWIDE IMPROVEMENT PLANNING AND BUILDING CAPACITY FOR SCHOOL SUPPORT Tennessee Comprehensive Sys

1
SYSTEMWIDE IMPROVEMENT PLANNING AND BUILDING
CAPACITYFOR SCHOOL SUPPORTTennessee
Comprehensive Systemwide Planning Process (TCSPP)

• February 2007
• Connie J. Smith, Executive DirectorJean E.
  Sharp, Associate Executive DirectorGwendolyn
  Watson, Urban SpecialistOffice of Innovation,
  Improvement, and Accountability

2
TCSPP NEXT STEPS

• Using Reviewer Comments and Most Current Data
• Update Plan
• Component 1 update to include any new data
  sources
• Component 2 evaluate and update if necessary
• Component 3 analyze most current data
• Component 4 evaluate and update if necessary
• Component 5 evaluate and update if necessary
• Component 6 complete evaluation
• Compliance Matrix evaluate and update if
  necessary
• Submit Full Plan with Matrix Two (2) Copies
• March 15, 2007 through May 15, 2007

3
Changes to Your Plan

• HOW TO IDENTIFY CHANGES
• BOLD the changes
• Underline the changes
• Italicize the changes
• Tabs on pages
• Color print for changes
• Color paper for pages with changes

4
TCSPP OVERVIEW
Component 6 Evaluation of Process Development,
Implementation of Plan, and Achieved Results

• The purpose of the process is to positively
  impact student achievement by asking the
  following questions of central office personnel
• Are we being effective as administrators in
  supporting our schools and how do we know?
• Are we building capacity in our schools and
  closing achievement gaps for all students and how
  do we know?

5
TCSPP OVERVIEW
Component 6 Evaluation of Process Development,
Implementation of Plan, and Achieved Results

• Component 6 focuses on four objectives
• the review of the TCSPP process,
• the implementation of the TCSPP action steps,
• a projected plan for monitoring and adjusting
  that includes reflection on the prior two
  questions, and
• the ongoing monitoring and adjusting of the
  system plan.

6
Component 6TCSPP Template 6.1
TCSPP PROCESS EVALUATION
7
Component 6TCSPP Template 6.2
TCSPP IMPLEMENTATION EVALUATION
8
Component 6TCSPP Template 6.3
TCSPP MONITORING AND ADJUSTING EVALUATION
9
Component 6TCSPP Template 6.3
TCSPP MONITORING AND ADJUSTING EVALUATION
10
Component 6TCSPP Template 6.4
TCSPP EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
DO NOT SUBMIT
11
Component 6TCSPP Template 6.5
EVALUATION OF IMPLEMENTATION RESULTS
12
RUBRICIndicator 6.1

13
RUBRICIndicator 6.2

14
TCSPP OVERVIEW
Component 1 School System Profile Development
andCollaborative Process Identification

• Using Reviewer Comments and Most Current Data,
  Update to include any new data sources.
• Who was involved in the collaboration in
  developing TCSPP? Was the process inclusive?
  Have we included everyone?
• As we transition into year two for the purpose of
  rubric review, to receive a 4, the system must
  have all central office representatives and 5
  additional stakeholders included on the
  systemwide leadership team. For each of the
  component leadership teams, the system may
  include some or all of the central office
  representatives.
• What are the data sources for the Tennessee
  County Schools? Provide the list of all academic
  and nonacademic data.
• Reference new data sources
• Ensure the collection and organization of data
  includes the most current data available.

15
TCSPP OVERVIEW
Component 2 Beliefs, Mission, Vision

• Using Reviewer Comments and Most Current Data,
  Evaluate and update if necessary.
• What are the Beliefs, Mission, and Vision for the
  Tennessee County Schools? (Developed by the Board
  of Education)
• Are these linked to high performing school
  systems? (Measurement Rubrics)

16
TCSPP OVERVIEW
Component 3 Academic and Non-Academic Data
Analysis and Synthesis Developing Inferences for
Improving Schools

• Using Reviewer Comments,
• Analyze most current data.
• What are the data driven performance targets for
  the Tennessee County Schools?
• Review current data
• What are the priority goals for the Tennessee
  County Schools?

17
TCSPP OVERVIEW
Component 4 Curricular, Instructional,
Assessment, and Organizational Effectiveness

• Using Reviewer Comments and Most Current Data,
  Evaluate and update if necessary.
• What current curricular, instructional,
  organizational, and assessment practices are
  being used in the Tennessee County Schools?
• Evidence of Current Practice
• Evidence of Effectiveness
• Identified Strengths / Challenges
• Are the Tennessee County Schools closing the gap
  for all subgroups, all students?
• What do we need to change, do differently in
  order to improve?
• What effective practice is currently working and
  we need to keep?
• Are we providing equity (opportunity) and
  adequacy (sufficiency) for all students in the
  Tennessee County Schools

18
TCSPP OVERVIEW
Component 5 Comprehensive Systemwide Action Plan
Development

• Using Reviewer Comments and Most Current Data,
  Evaluate and update if necessary.
• Develop the Action Plan.
• Who will be responsible?
• Central Office Personnel, not school level
  personnel
• What is our timeline?
• Reasonable
• How much will it cost?
• Include specific amounts
• How will we know we have been effective?
  (Evaluation of Success)
• What are our next steps?

19
TCSPP OVERVIEW
Component 5 Compliance Matrix
20
RUBRIC

Indicator 1.1 - Collaboration / Professional
Learning Community Development Indicator 2.1 -
Understands the attributes of High Performing
School Systems Beliefs, Mission and Shared
Vision Indicator 3.1 - Variety of Academic and
Non-Academic Assessment Measures Indicator 4.1 -
Curriculum Process Indicator 5.1
Goals Indicator 6.1 Evaluation of TCSPP
21
CONSENSUS REVIEW TCSPP STATUS OPTIONS

• The following status options will be available
  for TCSPP Reviewers noted per Rubric Ratings or a
  combination of Rubric Ratings
• APPROVED
• Contains Consensus Reviewer Ratings of 4 and 3
• APPROVED WITH STIPULATIONS
• Contains Combinations of Consensus Reviewer
  Ratings of 4, 3, 2, and 1
• NOT APPROVED (IF ANY OF THE FOLLOWING ARE
  PRESENT)
• Did not submit ALL Six Component Templates
• Did not submit required Compliance Matrix- (Not
  for review, only submitted)
• Contains Consensus Reviewer Ratings of 1

22
TDOE LEA Collaboration
Tennessee Department of Education
HelpingTeachers Teachand Children Learn