Dialogue and how to avoid it - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 46
About This Presentation
Title:

Dialogue and how to avoid it

Description:

Part I: eSystems FdSc and Moore's theory of transactional distance ... A great equaliser (including the tutor) Conversations become a resource visible history ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:67
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 47
Provided by: gabriell74
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Dialogue and how to avoid it


1
Dialogue and how to avoid it
  • Jon Dron (School of Computing, Mathematical
    Information Sciences)
  • 27th February 2004

2
Rough plan
  • Introduction
  • Part I eSystems FdSc and Moores theory of
    transactional distance
  • Part II Discussing discussions
  • Coffee and sticky notes
  • Part III Do something impossible
  • Plenary

3
Part I eSystems and transactional distance
  • Theory and experience

4
eSystems Design Technology FdSc
  • Blended learning Foundation Degree
  • Run mainly online via a custom-built VLE for 2
    years,
  • Running on StudentCentral since the start of this
    academic year

5
Why we went online
  • Demographic issues
  • Part-time, working students, studying Internet
    computing
  • Pragmatic issues
  • Coordinating 3 (now 2) colleges and the
    University of Brighton
  • StudentCentral was a gleam in Stans eye so we
    built our own VLE

6
How we intended to do it
  • Central ethos build a learning community
  • Learning is constructed by learners through
    dialogue with tutors and other learners
  • Dialogue is mainly through asynchronous
    discussion forums
  • Static web pages provide content and some
    structure
  • Course administration and development handled
    through the same environment

7
Why communication?
  • Michael Moores theory of transactional distance
    it is not physical distance that matters
  • Dialogue vs. Structure
  • As structure increases, dialogue decreases and
    vice versa
  • The eSystems degree was designed with a strong
    emphasis on dialogue

8
Dialogue and structure
  • A low threshold approach to development
  • HoweverRequires time and a strong ongoing
    commitment to maintaining dialogue

Structure
Development time
Dialogue
Delivery time
9
Moore on transactional distance
  • Three dimensions dialogue, structure and learner
    autonomy
  • Autonomous learners can cope better with more
    structure (self-guiding plan, implement and
    evaluate instruction)

10
Structure, dialogue and autonomy
  • A continuous relationship the more structure,
    the less dialogue
  • Autonomous learners can handle greater
    transactional distance (though might also exert
    more control through dialogue)

dialogue
autonomy
structure
11
What we wanted
  • Any time, any place (asynchronous, asyntopic) for
    students and tutors
  • Time to reflect more thoughtful conversations
  • A great equaliser (including the tutor)
  • Conversations become a resource visible history
  • Low threshold technology (not a time saver but
    easy to do)
  • Caters for different learning styles

12
Trying to get there
  • Learning technologist employed
  • Instructional designer employed to assist with
    module development
  • Tutors tutored using Gilly Salmons 5 step model

13
Salmons model
Moderating
Providing links outside closed conference
  • Development

Supporting, responding
Facilitating process
  • Knowledge construction

Conferencing
Facilitating tasks and supporting use of learning
materials
Searching, personalising software
  • Information exchange
  • Online socialisation

Familiarising and providing bridges
Sending and receiving messages
Technical
  • Access and motivation

Setting up system and accessing
Welcoming and encouraging
14
What actually happened
  • Dependence on structure rather than dialogue
  • Tutor unfamiliarity with method rapid staff
    turnover
  • Lack of time (FE tutors)
  • Lack of time (working students)
  • Student expectations (to be given information)

15
Systemic failures
  • The greater the structure, the lesser the
    dialogue
  • Dialogue begets dialogue, structure begets
    structure
  • Insufficient dialogue to sustain community
  • Increasing dependency on infrequent face-to-face
    gatherings
  • The result 50 dropout rate

16
Trying again
  • We lost our learning technologist
  • StudentCentral was the only game in town
  • Revisiting Salmon getting to step 5 and staying
    there
  • Embedding dialogue

17
Embedding dialogue a change in emphasis
  • Learners have to start in Discussion board
  • Week 1 used for dialogue only
  • Tutor uses forum to initiate and monitor
    activities
  • Schedule is flexible topics often last more
    than 1 week
  • Material is provided when needed
  • Activities designed to fit experiential learning
    cycle

18
Early results
  • Little increase in dialogue (though slightly
    more among first year students)
  • More evenly spread
  • Tutors still learning a lot of structured
    dialogue
  • Less than 10 dropout rate (so far!)

19
Part II Discussing discussions
  • If dialogue is so important then we need to know
    how not to do it

20
How not to start dialogue?
21
How did that start?
Some leading questions but limited potential
for discussion
  • You will find search engines extremely useful
    whilst on this course. Most of you will be
    familiar with using at least one of the many 'out
    there'.
  • Some search engines are better than others for
    certain subjects and some are better as
    directories of services.
  • Have a look at Using the Internet and Email at
    the exercise in the 'Search Engines' section.
  • Do you have a favourite search engine? Why?
  • Is it quick to return results?
  • Are they clearly displayed?
  • Are the results accurate?
  • Let me have your thoughts as a reply to this
    posting.

22
Responses what next?
  • Lets start with the exercise. I was looking for
    two completely different things "pet shop" and
    "british embassy".The number of results was the
    highest in Google and the searchnever took more
    then 0.2 sec. Yahoo performed almost as good,it
    was slightly slower and had 2 less number of
    results. Both search engines displayed their
    results clearly and informationpresented was
    relevant. AltaVista gave the smallest number of
    results for both searches but information was
    straight forward,plus "pet shop" search results
    had an additional refining function which was
    very useful for further search of
    specificinformation related to "pet shop" such
    as "pet foods","uk pet shops" etc.I will say my
    favourite search engine is Google,it's quick
    andaccurate.

Factual response little scope for further
discussion
23
Responses What next?
  • my preferred search engine is google.co.uk, it is
    usually very accurate and produces the most
    results,(when i searched for 'David Blaine')
    although too much information can be a bad
    thing.for both searches carried out (Busted being
    the other one)yahoo and google came up with the
    same results which were accurate, i think the
    third best search engine i tried was Netscape,
    this didn't produce as many results as the other
    2 but it was accurate and the presentation was
    better than the others, reading that back i think
    Netscape was probable best, but i use google all
    the time so im use to it which is why i think it
    was best, i found another one, Mightycrawler.com
    - it was rubbish, it didn't find anything even
    relating to it.

Strong opinion potential for further discussion?
24
However
  • This was the first weeks exercise
  • Learners getting used to online socialisation
  • Safe information exchanges

25
Good practice Increasing socialisation
26
Building communities
  • Subject Saw this and thought of you all ...
  • ...but not relevent here.This is for those of
    you that remember the internet enabled
    fridge!No, it's not April 1st but here is
    the-Internet Enabled Toilet Roll-Internet
    Enabled Chopping Boardhttp//news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/
    technology/2917739.stmhttp//www.idealhomeshow.co
    .uk/content/attractions/content.asp?location32M
    y hat off to the researchers at Brunel
    University!!

27
Closing it down
  • Subject And the winner is ...
  • ..."It works with brown, but best with white,"
    said Mr Southgate.http//news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/
    tech/1264205.stm

28
Good practice setting the ground rules
friendly
  • The Welcome to FD143 (Networking) Forum  
  • A welcome to both our Crawley and SDC students to
    the fruity world of Networking and Network
    Technology - hope you like the buttons
  • Over the course of this module, we will revisit
    some of the topics in ETs 1 2 as well as
    covering new material.
  • We hope you will enjoy this module and (if you
    haven't already) start to really understand the
    "bigger networking " picture.
  • The first task is to have a look through the
    Course Information to get an idea of what we will
    be looking at and to identify two important
    dates....
  • This is also an opportunity for you to post up
    your thoughts, suggestions, questions for the
    fortcoming module...
  • In an attempt to make these discussions more
    focused and interesting I will always post a
    closing date as followsThis FORUM will close on
    Wed 11th Feb

Clear tasks and goals
Clear limits and constraints
29
Good practice clarifying and negotiating goals
  • Preliminary discussion
  • Sorting out misconceptions
  • Fixing access problems
  • Agreeing formats
  • Socialising
  • The scene was set for a perfect discussion then

30
What happened next
  • The first piece of work Disaster!
  • 8 messages posted over two weeks
  • 5 of those were posted by the tutor

31
What went wrong 1
  • Tutor opens it up with a question or two
  • Subject Have Networks Changed Your Life?
  • Do you think they have? If you do, then say why
    and how and if you don't then why not?
  • And how much is a network worth?

32
What went wrong 2
  • A student gives a very lengthy response
  • Hi all,My only experience with networks has
    been through employment. for years I have always
    avoided being a part of a network and have always
    preferred a stand alone computer! The main
    reason for this has been no real need in my job
    to need to access shared programs or files. The
    only real benefit for being 'connected' was for
    accessing additional storage space and giving
    someone else the responsibility for ensuring back
    ups were carried out.When the advantage was
    weighed up against the benefits the problems
    associated with network failure out weighed the
    benefits.However, about 6 months ago I finally
    gave in and now access my files and programs via
    a network server and have the benefits outlined
    above. So far there have only been a few
    occasions where network administration and
    failures have prevented me from carrying out my
    job. I do however still use a laptop and tend to
    copy some things that I work on to the 'C' drive
    to enusre I have full access.So as far as work
    is concerned my 'life' has changed very
    little.BUTAs far as study is concerned, this
    is great! I don't have to physically go somewhere
    to learn and communicate, I can access (most of
    the time) resources that I need and submit
    assignments without having to find a large brown
    envelope, go to the post office to get it weighed
    and pay for postage.It has however, I feel a
    downside, and this is the reduced social
    interaction with fellow students. On many
    previous courses that required physical
    attendance I have made many friends and have
    remained in contact with these people for years.
    I also feel that the way that people use
    English and grammar in all forms of writing has
    been impacted by the use of networks for written
    communication. This response is written in a very
    informal way because it is easier and quicker
    than having to think about how to express an
    opinion in formal terms and this 'habit' can
    overflow into scenarios where a more formal
    approach is needed. I also have the benefit of
    being a trained touch typist and will go back
    (most of the time!) and correct punctuation,
    spelling and grammar whereas other people who may
    take longer to 'type' a message for communication
    may produce text with errors and mislead the
    receiver into thinking it was rushed or fail to
    clearly express what they are trying to say.Do
    you think we will start to judge people by the
    way they write in the same way that we do from
    first appearances and body language and
    communication? It is difficult to 'interrupt'
    someone speaking when communicating across a
    network.Anyway in conclusion, I imagine being
    able to carry out tasks (eg shopping on the
    Internet) with less effort has changed many
    people's lives for the better. In work scenarios
    the time and effort saved by not having to travel
    is also of benefit but in home life and work I
    still feel that we have lost opportunities to
    meet new people and develop our social
    interaction skills.Regards

33
What went wrong 3
  • Tutor responds with what looks like a question,
    but
  • Lots of interesting issues raised here. When I
    posed the question I had in mind "networks" other
    than our immediate data ones - as they are truly
    ubiquiteous. The "double edged" nature of this
    technology (and all other of course) is
    significant. Perhaps this might be worth
    considering in relation to VB ?
  • At this point conversation stopped

34
What went wrong 4
  • The final straw a return to structure. The
    titles of the remaining five postings
  • Weeks materials   
  •    Re Weeks materials     
  •    Re Weeks materials    
  • Re Weeks materials-Partially Fixed    
  • Re Week 2 materials OK

35
Stopping and starting questions and answers
36
Student A opens it up
  • My doubt is, if that kind of human interaction is
    the best for learning. Can we interact in the
    same way as we do in the face to face
    interaction?Is it right to erase the
    communication that people have when they are
    together? For example when we were in school
    except for learning how to count and read we also
    learnt how to act and behave with our classmates
    and our teachers.In a way we learnt how to behave
    in a small society. And that kind of learning i
    think that it is very important.Isn't it?

Great leading questions
37
Student B closes it down
  • i think i know your concern.you are afraid that
    in delving into new ways of learning, our
    socialization process is at stake.I think we move
    along with time,because the world that we live in
    is creating our identity.We can refuse not to go
    with the flow.Yet, we will find that we will be
    left behind.And no man is an island. The only way
    is to crate a program where the old and young can
    communicate online and build a communitywhere you
    can meet and socialize just like face to face
    interaction.Then, we will preserve the cultural
    values and socializing ethics could be learned at
    the same time

stoppers
38
Tutor steps in
  • Some very interesting points raised here. Even
    were we to achieve something like Star Trek
    holo-decks, with space, texture, smell and so on
    duplicated so that it could not be distinguished
    from reality, would it be the same? My suspicion
    is that it wouldn't. Would it be as valuable? Why
    not?

starters
39
Student C closes it again
  • I agree with you I don't think online
    communication could ever be like a face to face
    communication as you would always be talking to a
    machine even if it has your mother face and
    smells like her it is not her it is a virtuale
    image of her. Face to face communication make you
    able to express feelings in a completely
    different way it is not just talking but seeing
    perceiving, listening.

40
So what happens next?
  • Open?
  • Leave closed?
  • Start afresh?
  • Summarise?
  • You decide!

41
Building on experience
  • Make sure early tasks are not too
    challenging/exposing
  • State the rules of engagement, e.g. when you are
    available
  • If no-one is contributing ask direct questions
  • Always finish a posting with a question
  • Discussions seem to work best in groups of about
    4
  • Dont interrupt unless asked or you need to
    redirect
  • Provide opportunities to reflect
  • Say when to stop

42
Intermission
43
Part III do something impossible
  • Could this work for you?

44
Two tasks
  • Think of something you teach/have been taught/can
    imagine being taught that could not possibly in a
    million years work via a discussion forum
  • Now work out how it could

45
Plenary
46
References
  • Moore, M. G. and Kearsley, G. (1996) Distance
    Education A Systems View, Wadsworth, Belmont.
  • Salmon, G. (2000) E-moderating The Key to
    Teaching and Learning Online, Kogan Page, London.

47
More interesting reading
  • Simpson, O. (2002) Supporting Students in Online,
    Open and Distance Learning, Kogan Page, London.

48
Thank you
  • jon.dron_at_brighton.ac.uk
  • http//www.cmis.brighton.ac.uk/staff/jd29/
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com