AMARTA intervention for Improving Competitiveness of Horticulture Value Chain in Karo district, Nort - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 15
About This Presentation
Title:

AMARTA intervention for Improving Competitiveness of Horticulture Value Chain in Karo district, Nort

Description:

AMARTA intervention for Improving Competitiveness of ... Insecticide/fungicide/herbicide selection. Understanding label. Sprayer design and selection ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:72
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 16
Provided by: ama91
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: AMARTA intervention for Improving Competitiveness of Horticulture Value Chain in Karo district, Nort


1
  • AMARTA intervention for Improving Competitiveness
    of Horticulture Value Chain in Karo district,
    North Sumatera
  • Safe and Judicisious use of Pesticide

A Presentation for the AMARTA Interventions for
Improving Competitiveness of Horticultural Value
Chains Work in Progress, Achievements, and
Lessons Learned for Replication By Erik
Meliala Horticulture Competitiveness
Specialist AMARTA
2
Rationale
  • Farmers Dependency on Pesticides
  • Factors contibuting to unproper use of pesticides
  • Good Pesticide Practices
  • Farmer Needs Training

3
1. Farmers Dependency on Pesticides
  • Protecting crops from insects, weeds and diseases
  • Most farmers consider that pesticides are the
    most practical, economical and effective
    substances for pest control compared to other
    pest control techniques.
  • The use of pesticide at farmer level tends to be
    very intensive, excessive, improper and unsafe
  • The improper practices would raise problem in
    workers health, community and consumers,
    environmental pollution, losses of wildlife and
    other beneficial organisms, as well as life of
    pesticides

4
Factors contibuting to unproper use of pesticides
  • Level of knowledge and skills of farmers on
    proper use of pesticides are very limited.
  • The farmers mostly apply pesticides based on
    experience or partial information provided by
    government, pesticides company field workers or
    retailers.
  • Risks associated with the use of pesticide are
    poorly understood by most users, particularly the
    impacts of long term exposure for workers,
    consumers, and public
  • The awareness and desire to comply with the
    recommendations are not sufficient

5
Good Pesticide Practices
  • Pesticide usage must comply with the regulation
    issued by the Govermnet. The enforcement on the
    implementation of regulations are supervised and
    managed by the national pesticides authority.
  • All stages of pesticide use, starting from
    purchase, field use, storage, and disposal, have
    to be documented.
  • Farmers as operators have to have practical
    knowledge and skills about pestidices and proper
    application of pesticides.
  • Farmers have to follow the instruction and
    recommendation of pesticide application as
    written in the label.
  • Pesticides must be used based on principles and
    concept of IPM, taking into account the impact on
    environment and non target / beneficial
    organisms.

6
Farmer Needs Training
  • The globalization and consumers awareness, demand
    of consuming green products that are safe for
    human health and environment.
  • Agriculture commodities should be cultivated and
    processed using environmental friendly
    technologies
  • In Indonesia, more than 25 million farmers work
    in food and horticulture crops, and more than 15
    million farmers work in estate crops.
  • A comprehensive training is seriously needed
    using a more effective approach

7
TRAINING OBJECTIVES
  • Enpowering farmers in using pesticides properly
    and safely for health and environment.
  • Improving farmers income due to of effective and
    efficient use of pesticide for better quality
    production.
  • Enabling farmers seeking certificate and label
    for their products based on the standard
    requirement of Good Agriculture Practices (GAP).

8
Training and Evaluation activities
  • Training for the Trainers
  • Training for the farmers
  • Monitoring and Evaluation.

9
Training for the Trainers
  • Design
  • - 7 field staff of CropLife company member.
  • - 7 staff of Horticulture Plant Protection
    Agency.
  • - 9 leading farmers.
  • Trainers
  • - 4 Trainer Experts (TE) from CropLife
    organization

10
Topics
  • Pesticide classification
  • Pest/weed/disease identification
  • Insecticide/fungicide/herbicide selection
  • Understanding label.
  • Sprayer design and selection
  • Nozzle selection.
  • Sprayer calibration.
  • Sprayer care and maintenance.
  • Pesticide Toxicity.
  • Protective clothing.
  • Safe and effective spraying.
  • Emergency procedures.
  • Visual aids.

11
2. Training for the farmers
  • - 25 villages in 4 sub district Karo
  • - 30 farmers of each group participating
  • - Total farmers 623 trained.
  • Duration.
  • 4 days each group

12
Training the trainers
13
Training the farmers
14
Monitoring and Evaluation (On the Progress).
  • Plant Protection Agency (BPTPH) of North Sumatra
    conducted evaluation pesticide residue test in
    citrus, cabbage and potato before and after
    training.
  • Indonesian Agency for Agricultural Research and
    Development (BPTP) conducted evaluation of
    farmers behavior change before and after
    training

15
TERIMA KASIH
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com