On the Coverage Problem in Video-based Wireless Sensor Networks - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

On the Coverage Problem in Video-based Wireless Sensor Networks

Description:

Capturing images of objects that are not necessarily in camera's vicinity ... area should be covered by at least one camera ... DAPR in camera-based WSNs (II) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:121
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 19
Provided by: Stani4
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: On the Coverage Problem in Video-based Wireless Sensor Networks


1
On the Coverage Problem in Video-based Wireless
Sensor Networks
  • Stanislava Soro Wendi Heinzelman
  • University of Rochester

2
Outline
  • Motivation
  • Problem statement
  • Overview of DAPR
  • DAPR in video-based WSNs
  • Simulation results
  • Conclusions

3
Motivation
  • Telepresence application for VWSN
  • enables user to experience being fully present at
    a physically remote location
  • network consists of wireless nodes equipped with
    very low-power cameras
  • user can navigate and virtually move around in
    the monitored space

4
Motivation (II)
  • Distinct features of video-based WSN over
    traditional WSN
  • Very large amount of highly correlated data
  • Capturing images of objects that are not
    necessarily in cameras vicinity
  • Sensing range is replaced with FoV (field of
    view)

5
Problem of interest
  • Coverage preservation in WSNs
  • PEAS, DAPR, CCP.
  • How do already existing coverage protocols for
    WSNs behave in video-based WSNs?
  • We assume floorplan monitoring monitoring of
    scene in one plane
  • Each point of monitored area should be covered by
    at least one camera
  • We analyze how an application-aware routing
    protocol (DAPR) behaves in this design space

6
Overview of DAPR in WSN
  • DAPR-Distributed Activation based on
    Predetermined Routes
  • Coverage preserving protocol that avoids the data
    routing through critical nodes
  • Proposes application-aware approach each nodes
    importance for sensing application is evaluated
  • C(Sj) area monitored by sensor Sj
  • Monitored area is divided into grid, where the
    center of each grid cell is given as (x,y)
  • Total energy for monitoring location (x,y)

7
Overview of DAPR in WSN (II)
Application cost of node S1
8
Overview of DAPR in WSN (III)
  • Application cost
  • Link cost between two nodes
  • Cost of a route from node to sink

9
DAPR in camera-based WSNs
  • Two planes
  • Cameras plane location of point given as (x,y)
  • Cameras FoV plane location of point given as
    (xc,yc)

10
DAPR in camera-based WSNs (II)
  • Every location (xc,yc) on monitoring plane
    characterized by total energy
  • Final application cost
  • Total routing cost for every camera

11
Traditional energy-aware routing
  • Willingness of every node to route data
  • This cost does not consider the importance of a
    node for sensing application

12
Comparison of application-aware routing in WSN
and video-based WSN
Traditional wireless sensor network
Video-based wireless sensor network
13
Application-aware routing in wireless sensor
networks
  • Requested part of the scene determines the
    locations of all potentially active sensor nodes
  • The application cost tells us
  • how redundantly the node is covered
  • how important node is as a router

14
Application-aware routing in video-based WSNs
  • Mismatch between cameras physical positions and
    cameras FoV
  • Here, the application cost evaluates the node
  • only from the coverage perspective
  • but NOT from the routing perspective
  • Example a node can be well covered (small
    application cost), but located in scarcely
    deployed area makes it important as a router

15
Application-aware routing in video-based WSN (II)
  • Hotspot problem appears more easily
  • Potentially active nodes can be far from each
    other
  • Select to be active a node with smallest
    cumulative path cost usually node closest to
    the base station
  • Energy-aware cost outperforms application-aware
    cost
  • Balanced energy spent among the nodes prolongs
    the lifetime of each node
  • The loss of nodes is more uniform over the area

16
Combined application and routing cost
  • Every camera node validated through two separate
    cost functions

17
Combined application and routing cost
  • Reduces the energy consumption, compared to
    application-aware routing
  • With a change in number of nodes, the same
    relation between three protocols persist

CEA(Sj) CAA(Sj) Ctotal(Sj)
Average power/path (mW) 0.1091 0.1251 0.1121
18
Conclusions
  • Application-aware routing protocol gives
    different results in traditional and video-based
    WSNs
  • Found that coverage and routing problem exist as
    two separate problems in video-based WSNs
  • Further study of this problem
  • Explore further combined cost function
  • Explore how other coverage preserving protocols
    behaves in video WSNs
  • Three dimensional coverage problem
  • Consider collaboration of cameras
  • Consider the ability of cameras to capture image
    with different resolution
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com