February, 2006 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 22
About This Presentation
Title:

February, 2006

Description:

From 1966 to 1987 combined contribution rate of 3.6 per cent ... Costs would continue to rise would require pay-as-you-go rate of over 14 per cent by 2030. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:40
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 23
Provided by: jettst
Learn more at: http://www.urban.org
Category:
Tags: cent | february

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: February, 2006


1
February, 2006
Canada Pension Plan (CPP)An examination of the
1997 reforms
Réal Bouchard International Conference on Social
Security Reform, Washington
2
Content
3
Canadas Retirement Income System
  • Old Age Security (OAS) Guaranteed Income
    Supplement (GIS)
  • Guaranteed minimum income for seniors, regardless
    of employment history publicly funded through
    taxes
  • Canada Pension Plan (CPP)
  • Public plan, partially funded, defined benefits
    and mandatory contributions based on employment
  • Tax Deferred Private Savings
  • Mixture of mandatory and optional savings, funded
    by individuals and employers

4
Proportion of pre-retirement earnings replaced by
OAS and CPP in 2005
5
Canadas Retirement Income System
Tax-assisted private savings 43
Old Age Security32
Total 80 billion for 2003
Canada Pension Plan 25
6
The Canada Pension Plan (CPP)
  • Provides all workers in Canada with a taxable
    basic earnings-related retirement pension indexed
    to prices
  • Also survivor, disability and death benefits
  • Benefit replaces 25 of average pensionable
    earnings up to the average industrial wage
  • Maximum annual benefit C10,135 (2006).
  • Financed by
  • Mandatory employer/employee contributions split
    equally ( 9.9 ) on employment earnings between
    C3,500 and C42,100 (2006)
  • Investment earnings on excess contributions in
    2022 on.

7
The CPP Unique Features
  • Decision making is joint federal and provincial
    responsibility
  • Federal legislation but changes require
    provincial agreement
  • CPP revenues, expenditures and assets are not
    part of the public accounts of the federal
    government, i.e.,
  • No impact on the financial position of the
    governments in Canada.

8
Public Pensions in Canada US (2006 figures)
Old Age Security Max C5,816
No Program Equivalent
Supplemental Security Income (SSI) Max US7,236
Income-tested benefits
Guaranteed Income Supplement Max C7,128 for
single
Old-Age Security Disability Insurance
(OASDI) Max US24,636 if started at age 65 and
8 months
Contributory public pension plan
CPP/QPP Max C10,135 if started at 65
9
Content
10
The CPP From 1966 to1996
  • Pay-as-you go system with a small reserve
  • Reserve invested solely in non-marketable
    provincial government bonds below market rates
    (with federal government as default borrower).
  • Contribution rates remained modest despite
    benefit enrichments and rising cost pressures
  • From 1966 to 1987 combined contribution rate of
    3.6 per cent
  • Rose gradually to 5.6 per cent in 1996 well
    below pay-as-you-go (PAYGO) rate (8.3 per cent).
  • Future generations were to pay far more
    contribution rates scheduled to rise to 10.1 per
    cent (2016) and projected to rise further.

11
1995 Actuarial Report Raised Concerns
  • The Actuarial Report projected
  • the Plans small contingency reserve would be
    depleted by 2015 i.e., in just 20 years.
  • By then, the CPP would be unable to pay promised
    benefits even at the scheduled 10.1 contribution
    rate.
  • Costs would continue to rise would require
    pay-as-you-go rate of over 14 per cent by 2030.

12
Main problem facing the Plan RISING COSTS
  • Shifting demographics, notably a declining ratio
    of contributors to beneficiaries
  • Slower earnings growth
  • Successive benefit enhancements since inception
    and
  • Escalating disability benefit expenditures in the
    previous decade due to looser administration and
    eligibility requirements.

13
Consultations
  • Sought Canadians views on solutions.
  • Broad consensus on
  • CPP should remain a public defined benefit
    pension plan
  • Contribution rates over 14 per cent unacceptable
    current contributors should pay a fairer
    share of Plan costs
  • Some pre-funding desirable provided assets
    invested like other pension plans
  • Avoiding significant benefit reductions
    particularly for those already receiving a
    benefit.

14
Content
15
The Reform Package
  • Three-pronged approach to restoring financial
    sustainability
  • Significantly, and quickly, increased
    contribution rates to a level sustainable over
    the long term (i.e., 9.9 per cent from 2003
    onward) and that permitted partial pre-funding
  • Adoption of a new investment policy with assets
    invested in marketable securities at arms length
    from governments
  • Changes to benefits and their administration to
    slow expenditure growth.

16
Move Towards Partial Pre-Funding
  • Increase contribution rate (from 5.6 per cent)
    to long-term sustainable level - 9.9 per cent by
    2003 - and broaden the contribution base.
  • Contribution rate to cover the actuarially fair
    cost of new entitlements plus a share of the
    unfunded burden that has built up.
  • Allow CPP to build up a reserve fund equal to 5
    years of benefits.
  • Investment earnings to help pay future benefits
    that otherwise would be financed by higher
    contributions.

17
New Investment Board and Policies
  • CPP Investment Board (CPPIB) established to
    manage assets in best interest of Plan members
  • Independent from the federal and provincial
    governments
  • Governed by a qualified board of directors.
  • Assets invested in a diversified portfolio of
    securities (instead of only bonds) to get higher
    returns
  • Subject to similar investment rules as other
    pension funds.
  • CPPIB to provide quarterly financial statements
    and annual reports on performance of the
    investments.

18
Benefits and Administration
  • No changes to benefits already in payment.
  • Measures taken to slow the growth of
    expenditures
  • Change to wage indexation of retirement benefit
    calculation
  • Administration of disability benefits tightened
  • Eligibility for disability restricted by
    requiring recent contributions and longer
    labour force attachment
  • Death benefit reduced and frozen at C2,500
  • Other.
  • By 2030, projected expenditures reduced by almost
    10.

19
Considered but Decided Against
  • Options for reducing growth in retirement
    pensions (consultation paper), i.e.,
  • Lower replacement rate (25 to 22.5 )
  • Increase in age of entitlement
  • Increase in years required for full pension
    through changes to benefit formula.
  • Move to partial indexing of pensions
    (consultations).
  • Replacing the CPP with Individual Retirement
    Accounts (post consultations).

20
Content
21
Tough changes made in part by. . .
  • The right timing
  • A sense of urgency
  • Economic and financial context buttressed reform
    resolve.
  • Public consultations framed an acceptable/balanced
    package.
  • Concrete measures built confidence that the Plan
    would be fixed for good
  • New investment policy was key
  • Measures to strengthen Plan governance/
    accountability.
  • 4) Federal-provincial decision-making held
    agreement together.

22
CPP Today
  • Financial sustainability restored
  • 9.9 contribution rate (since 2003) sustainable
    for at least the next 75 years
  • Current/future contributors will receive a
    positive return on their contributions
  • Actuarial projections reviewed by an independent
    panel of actuaries and results of their reviews
    are made public.
  • CPPIB recognized as a model internationally as a
    model of transparent, arms length and
    professional management of public pension funds
  • Assets totalled C92.5 billion (about 7 per cent
    of GDP) at end 2005 with a total annual return of
    8.5 per cent.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com