The Comparative Effects of Position and Cordless Phone Equipment on Upper Trapezius and Cervical Par - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 36
About This Presentation
Title:

The Comparative Effects of Position and Cordless Phone Equipment on Upper Trapezius and Cervical Par

Description:

Fred Shaffer, Ph.D., Logan Banks, Adam Lipps, Frederick Franken, ... a phone to the ear resembles the pattern Shaffer et al. (2000) observed with ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:102
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 37
Provided by: www2T
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Comparative Effects of Position and Cordless Phone Equipment on Upper Trapezius and Cervical Par


1
The Comparative Effects of Position and Cordless
Phone Equipment on Upper Trapezius and Cervical
Paraspinal Surface EMG
  • Fred Shaffer, Ph.D., Logan Banks, Adam Lipps,
    Frederick Franken, Lynn Giddings, Ashley Burden,
    and Jennifer Schwyhart
  •  
  • Truman State University
  •  

2
Introduction
  • Shaffer, Malone, Sippely, and Callahan (2000)
    examined the effects of three book bag conditions
    (backpack, shoulder bag-same side, and shoulder
    bag-opposite side) on upper trapezius and
    cervical paraspinal sEMG

3
Introduction
Backpack
Shoulder-bag same-side
Shoulder-bag opposite-side
4
Introduction
  • The shoulder bag-same side condition produced
    higher preferred-shoulder sEMG levels and sEMG
    asymmetry than the initial baseline, opposite
    side, or backpack conditions

5
Purpose
  • Holding a cordless phone against the ear might
    recruit upper trapezius and cervical paraspinal
    muscles on that side to stabilize the phone
  • This could produce sEMG asymmetry in these
    muscles, like that produced by a single-strap
    book bag worn on the same side

6
Purpose
  • Since talking with a headset eliminates the need
    to hold the phone because it is attached to
    clothing, sEMG asymmetry should be significantly
    lower

7
Purpose
  • We examined the effects of position (sitting or
    standing) and equipment (phone or headset) on
    upper trapezius and cervical paraspinal sEMG
  • This study has clinical relevance because chronic
    muscle over-use can produce myofascial pain
    (Cram, 1990)

8
Participants
  • Forty-three undergraduate students (9 men and 34
    women)
  • Ages ranged from 18 to 23 years
  • Participants volunteered for academic credit

9
Apparatus
  • A J J I-330 Physiological Monitoring System
    measured sEMG using
  • M-501 module (25-1000 Hz bandpass)
  • 10-mm silver/silver-chloride surface
    electrodes placed over the upper trapezius
    and cervical paraspinal muscles

10
Apparatus
  • Active electrodes separately monitored left and
    right upper trapezius muscles and left and right
    cervical paraspinal muscles as described by Cram
    (1990)
  • Skin-electrode impedance was maintained under 20
    Kohms and within 5 Kohms for each
    active-reference pair

11
Apparatus
  • Phone equipment included
  • Panasonic 2.4 GHz cordless phone, which weighs
    240.97 g and can be attached by its belt clip
  • Plantronics headset (model 1-01 M145), which
    features a speaker that fits inside one ear and a
    microphone on an integrated arm

12
Apparatus
Phone
Headset
13
Procedure
  • Participants stabilized for 15 min in a 23.9 oC
    room
  • The left and right upper trapezius muscles and
    left and right cervical paraspinal muscles were
    monitored throughout this experiment with eyes
    open

14
Trapezius placement
  • The active electrodes were centered between C7
    and the angle of the acromion

15
Cervical paraspinal placement
The active electrodes were placed ½ inch lateral
to the spine over the muscle belly at C4
16
Procedure
  • The two within-subjects variables were position
    (sitting or standing) and equipment (cordless
    phone or headset)
  • Participants were randomly assigned using a
    balanced Latin square to five, 5-minute treatment
    conditions, separated by 3-minute buffer periods

17
Procedure
  • These conditions included baseline,
    sitting-phone, sitting-headset, standing-phone,
    and standing-headset
  • During the remaining four conditions,
    participants completed actual phone conversations
    on the same general topic with the same
    individual

18
Procedure
  • In the sitting-phone condition, subjects
    conversed while sitting upright and holding the
    phone on their preferred side
  • In the sitting-headset condition, subjects
    conversed while sitting upright and using the
    headset on their preferred side

19
Procedure
  • In the standing-phone condition, subjects
    conversed while standing and holding the phone
    on their preferred side
  • In the standing-headset condition, subjects
    conversed while standing and using the headset on
    their preferred side

20
Statistical analysis
  • We normalized sEMG values using a natural
    logarithmic transformation
  • We analyzed trapezius and cervical paraspinal
    asymmetry measurements using a General Linear
    Model Repeated Measures procedure with a
    Greenhouse-Geisser correction when sphericity
    could not be assumed

21
Statistical analysis
  • We calculated eta2 (h2) to measure the proportion
    of variability in the dependent variable
    explained by the independent variable
  • eta2 indexes the strength of the relationship
    between the independent and dependent variables
    and ranges from 0 - 1

22
Results Position
  • Trapezius asymmetry was significantly greater
    when conversing during standing than sitting,
    F(1, 42) 30.18, p .0001, h2 .42
  • Position did not significantly affect cervical
    paraspinal sEMG asymmetry

23
Results Equipment
  • Talking on a cordless phone resulted in
    significantly higher trapezius sEMG asymmetry
    than conversing on a headset, F(1, 42) 22.65, p
    .0001, h2 .35

24
Trapezius sEMG asymmetry in microvolts RMS
25
Trapezius sEMG asymmetry in microvolts RMS

26
Results Equipment
  • Talking on a cordless phone also resulted in
    significantly higher cervical paraspinal sEMG
    asymmetry than conversing on a headset, F(1, 42)
    9.91, p .00013, h2 .19

27
Cervical paraspinal sEMG asymmetry in microvolts
RMS
28
Cervical paraspinal sEMG asymmetry in microvolts
RMS

29
Discussion
  • Position and equipment independently influenced
    trapezius sEMG asymmetry
  • Asymmetry was greater while standing than sitting
    during a cordless phone conversation and when
    using a phone instead of a headset

30
Discussion
  • Equipment also affected cervical paraspinal sEMG
    asymmetry
  • Asymmetry was greater when using a cordless phone
    instead of a headset

31
Discussion
  • The sEMG asymmetry produced when holding a phone
    to the ear resembles the pattern Shaffer et al.
    (2000) observed with a single-strap book bag
    worn on the same side

32
Discussion
  • We recommend that future researchers study older
    subjects and obtain comparable numbers of men and
    women to investigate the generality of these
    findings

33
Discussion
  • This study should be replicated with cellular
    phones, which are typically lighter, to see if
    position and equipment also produce trapezius and
    cervical paraspinal sEMG asymmetry when using
    these devices

34
Discussion
  • These findings support the recommendation that
    consumers should sit and use headsets during
    cordless phone conversations to minimize
    trapezius and cervical paraspinal sEMG imbalance

35
Discussion
  • These precautions might help individuals who
    extensively use cordless phones to reduce the
    incidence and severity of myofascial pain due to
    prolonged muscle contraction

36
The Truman State University Research Team
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com