Pharmacokinetics and safety of etravirine administered once and twice daily and following two weeks treatment with efavirenz in healthy volunteers - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Pharmacokinetics and safety of etravirine administered once and twice daily and following two weeks treatment with efavirenz in healthy volunteers

Description:

... 3, David Back2, Victoria Watson2, Jessica Taylor1, Laura Waters1, David Asboe1, ... Stephen's Centre, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, London, ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:185
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 20
Provided by: tem6133
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Pharmacokinetics and safety of etravirine administered once and twice daily and following two weeks treatment with efavirenz in healthy volunteers


1
Pharmacokinetics and safety of etravirine
administered once and twice daily and following
two weeks treatment with efavirenz in healthy
volunteers
  • Marta Boffito1, Akil Jackson1, Mohammed
    Lamorde1,3, David Back2, Victoria Watson2,
    Jessica Taylor1, Laura Waters1, David Asboe1,
    Brian Gazzard1, Anton Pozniak1
  • 1St. Stephens Centre, Chelsea and Westminster
    Hospital, London,
  • 2Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics,
    University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
  • 3Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics,
    Trinity College Dublin, Ireland

2
Background
  • NNRTI are widely used in combination with other
    ARVs in the management of HIV infection
  • First generation NNRTIs have low genetic barrier
    to resistance and single mutations in the HIV
    reverse transcriptase lead to class-wide
    resistance 1
  • Following treatment failure or toxicity, NNRTIs
    are replaced by RTV boosted PIs. However, as new
    ARVs with efficacy against resistant virus and
    improved safety profiles are introduced,
    switching from NNRTIs to newer ARVs including
    second generation NNRTIs will occur

3
  • Efavirenz has long and variable half-life (40-55
    h) at steady state 2
  • Therapeutic concentrations measured up to several
    weeks after drug intake cessation in some
    patients 3
  • Efavirenz is an inducer of CYP450 4, leading to
    reductions in concentrations of co-administered
    drugs
  • Efavirenz is primarily metabolized by CYP3A4 and
    CYP2B6
  • Racially distributed pharmacogenetic differences
    in CYP2B6 activity appear to contribute to the
    high inter-individual variability in efavirenz
    exposure 5

4
  • Etravirine retains efficacy in the presence of
    some common NNRTI associated resistance mutations
  • A 40 decrease in etravirine concentrations was
    observed when co-administered with efavirenz 6
  • This appears to be mediated by the inductive
    effect of efavirenz on CYP3A4, involved in
    etravirine metabolism
  • Switching from efavirenz to etravirine appears
    feasible because of development of resistance or
    toxicity 7,8
  • The effect of efavirenz on CYP3A4 may last longer
    than the drug half-life and etravirine
    sub-therapeutic concentrations are at risk after
    the switch
  • PK evidence demonstrating adequate etravirine
    exposure after the switch from efavirenz is
    lacking and the duration of CYP3A4 induction and
    its impact on etravirine concentrations in this
    scenario is unclear

5
Objective
  • To assess the PKs of etravirine administered once
    or twice daily following a 2-week treatment
    period with efavirenz in healthy volunteers
  • HIV negative healthy volunteers were selected to
    minimize the potential for development of
    resistance and preserve treatment options for
    HIV-infected patients

6
Study design
PK day Efavirenz and etravirine daily
concentration measurement
ETR 400 mg OD
WASH OUT
EFV 600 mg OD
ETR 400 mg OD
Arm 1
Day 1 Day 14 Day 15 Day 28
Day 29 Day 42 Day 43 Day 56
ETR 200 mg BD
WASH OUT
EFV 600 mg OD
ETR 200 mg BD
Arm 2
  • All subjects had serial blood samples for
    estimation of etravirine concentration collected
    on days 1, 14, 43 and 56 at the following times
    pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12 h
    post-dose
  • Arm 1 subjects also provided blood 24 h
    post-dose for etravirine Ctrough determination
  • Samples for the determination of etravirine were
    collected daily from days 2 to 13 and from days
    44 to 55
  • Samples for the determination of efavirenz
    concentrations were collected on days 42 and 43,
    12 hours post-dosing and daily at the same time
    every day until day 56

7
Pharmacokinetic and statistical analysis
  • Concentrations of etravirine in plasma were
    measured using a validated high performance
    liquid chromatography (HPLC)-tandem mass
    spectrometry method. Intra-assay and inter assay
    coefficient of variation at the low, medium and
    high quality controls were lt11
  • Concentrations of efavirenz were determined using
    a validated HPLC method as previously described
    9
  • Cmax, Tmax, Ctrough and half-life (t½) were
    derived for etravirine and efavirenz. Area under
    the curve from 0 to 24 hours (AUC0-24) for once
    daily and 0 to 12 hours (AUC0-12) for twice daily
    etravirine were calculated using WinNonLin
    version 4.01a (Mountain View, California, USA)
  • Inter individual variability in plasma
    concentrations during drug intake and following
    drug cessation was assessed by measuring the
    coefficient of variation (CV standard deviation
    / mean X100)
  • Within-subject changes for etravirine (prior to
    and after 14-day efavirenz intake period) were
    assessed by calculating geometric means (GM) and
    ratios (GMR) and 90 confidence intervals (CIs)
  • The CIs were first determined using logarithms of
    the individual GMR values and then expressed as
    linear values. The changes in PK parameters were
    considered significant when the CI for the GMR
    did not cross the value of 1
  • Relationships between weight and BMI and
    efavirenz daily concentrations or etravirine
    exposure (expressed as the ratio between AUC
    prior to and after 14-day efavirenz intake
    period) were assessed by Pearsons correlation
    (the groups were separated into halves by median
    weight and BMI)
  • Gender differences in drug exposure were
    calculated using analysis of variance (ANOVA)
  • P values ? 0.05 were considered statistically
    significant (SPSS, version 16.0, SPSS Inc.
    Headquarters)

8
Results
  • Demographic and clinical characteristics
  • 25 subjects (12 in arm 1 and 13 in arm 2)
    completed the study
  • 9 subjects were females, median (range) age,
    weight and BMI were 43 (20-59) years, 83 (54-116)
    kg and 26 (1833) kg/m2
  • 18 were Caucasian, 4 were of Asian origin and 3
    were black
  • The study drugs were well tolerated and no grade
    ¾ adverse events were reported

9
Etravirine pharmacokinetics
  • Etravirine PK parameters before and after the
    efavirenz intake period, at initiation (day 1 and
    day 42) and at steady-state (day 14 and day 56)
    are shown in Table 1
  • Arm 1 and arm 2 steady-state etravirine
    concentrations before and after the efavirenz
    intake period are shown in Figure 1
  • Daily etravirine Ctrough after efavirenz intake
    are shown in Figure 2
  • While weight and BMI did not correlate with the
    ratio (beforeafter efavirenz) of etravirine AUC,
    Ctrough or Cmax, a significant effect of gender
    on the ratio of etravirine AUC and Ctrough was
    observed
  • A decrease in AUC of 26.5 in males, versus
    -7.5 in females (p0.050) and 35 decrease in
    Ctrough in males versus -2.4 in females
    (p0.017) was apparent

10
Etravirine 400 mg once daily (arm 1)
  • Steady-state etravirine Cmax, Ctrough and AUC0-24
    22, 33, 29 lower after the efavirenz intake
    period
  • Median (range) etravirine t½ was 16 (10-28) hours
    on both days 14/15 (no efavirenz) and 56/57
    (after efavirenz)
  • Steady-state etravirine CV for Cmax, Ctrough and
    AUC0-24 were 23, 53 and 41 prior to efavirenz
    intake, and 37, 80 and 62 after the efavirenz
    intake period

11
Etravirine 200 mg twice daily (arm 2)
  • Steady-state etravirine Cmax, Ctrough and AUC0-12
    were 21, 37, 28 lower after the efavirenz
    intake period
  • Median (range) etravirine t½ was 13 (11-18) hours
    on day 14 and 8 (7-9) hours (43 lower) on day 56
  • Steady state etravirine CV for Cmax, Ctrough and
    AUC0-12 were 35, 42 and 38 prior to efavirenz
    intake, and 27, 36 and 29 after the efavirenz
    intake period

12
Efavirenz pharmacokinetics
  • Efavirenz intake was stopped on day 42 after a 14
    day treatment period
  • t1/2 (median, range) for subjects enrolled in arm
    1 was 83 (45183) hours and 64 (30185) hours for
    subjects in arm 2
  • All subjects had detectable efavirenz
    concentrations 7 days after stopping efavirenz
    intake (day 50)
  • In 5 subjects (3 in arm 1), concentrations gt 1000
    ng/mL on day 50
  • 2 participants (1 in each arm) weighed less than
    60 kg. Of the 3 subjects in arm 1 (1 female), 2
    were of Asian origin and 1 was Caucasian
  • Both subjects in arm 2 were Caucasian females
  • Median (range) efavirenz concentrations 3, 7 and
    10 days after stopping efavirenz (days 46, 50,
    and 53) in male subjects (n16) were 672
    (398-4736), 339 (109-3020) and 166 (109-1982)
    ng/mL

13
  • In female subjects, they were 1349 (403-6580),
    454 (131-3857) and 292 (109-3411) ng/mL
  • After adjusting for age, BMI, height and
    treatment arm there was no significant effect of
    gender on efavirenz concentrations
  • Inter individual variability of efavirenz
    concentrations after drug withholding was wide
    CV was 97, 127, and 159 on study days 46, 50,
    and 53
  • Efavirenz concentrations were negatively
    correlated with etravirine AUC and Ctrough ratios
    on corresponding days after / before efavirenz
  • Correlation coefficients (p values) for efavirenz
    concentrations on day 50 and day 56 and
    etravirine AUC ratio at initiation (AUC day 43 /
    AUC day 1) were -0.60 (p0.005), -0.62
    (p0.004), respectively
  • Correlations coefficients for efavirenz
    concentrations on day 50 and 56 and etravirine
    AUC ratio at steady state (AUC day 56 / AUC day
    14) were -0.48 (p0.032) and -0.45 (p0.049),
    respectively
  • For Ctrough ratios, they were -0.54 (p0.013) and
    -0.53 (p0.017) at initiation, and -0.39
    (p0.089) and -0.393 (p0.086) at steady state

14
Conclusions
  • Efavirenz inducing effect persists after stopping
    drug intake
  • The decrease in etravirine is comparable to that
    determined in the presence of darunavir/ritonavir
    and is not considered clinically significant
  • Clinical studies in HIV-infected patients are
    ongoing

15
References
  • 1. Wainberg MA. HIV resistance to nevirapine and
    other non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase
    inhibitors. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2003,34
    Suppl 1S2-7.
  • 2. Smith PF, DiCenzo R, Morse GD. Clinical
    pharmacokinetics of non-nucleoside reverse
    transcriptase inhibitors. Clinical
    pharmacokinetics 2001,40893-905.
  • 3. Taylor S, Boffito M, Khoo S, Smit E, Back D.
    Stopping antiretroviral therapy. AIDS
    2007,211673-1682.
  • 4. Hariparsad N, Nallani SC, Sane RS, Buckley DJ,
    Buckley AR, Desai PB. Induction of CYP3A4 by
    efavirenz in primary human hepatocytes
    comparison with rifampin and phenobarbital. J
    Clin Pharmacol 2004,441273-1281.
  • 5. Haas DW, Ribaudo HJ, Kim RB, Tierney C,
    Wilkinson GR, Gulick RM, et al. Pharmacogenetics
    of efavirenz and central nervous system side
    effects an Adult AIDS Clinical Trials Group
    study. AIDS 2004,182391-2400.
  • 6. Kakuda TN, Scholler-Gyure M, Woodfall B, De
    Smedt G, Peeters M, Vandermeulen K. TMC125 in
    combination with other medications summary of
    drug-drug interaction studies. In Program and
    abstracts of the 8th International Congress on
    Drug Therapy in HIV infection, Glasgow, Scotland
    2006.
  • 7. Scott C, Grover D, Nelson M. Is there a role
    for etravirine in patients with Nonnucleoside
    reverse transcriptase inhibitor resistance? AIDS
    2008,22989-990.
  • 8. Lapadula G, Calabresi A, Castelnuovo F,
    Costarelli S, Quiros-Roldan E, Paraninfo G, et
    al. Prevalence and risk factors for etravirine
    resistance among patients failing on
    non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors.
    Antivir. Ther. (Lond.) 2008,13601-605.
  • 9. Almond LM, Hoggard PG, Edirisinghe D, Khoo SH,
    Back DJ. Intracellular and plasma
    pharmacokinetics of efavirenz in HIV-infected
    individuals. J Antimicrob Chemother
    2005,56738-744.

16
Figure 1 Mean steady-state etravirine plasma
concentrations before (day 14) and after (day 56)
efavirenz intake periodBars indicate standard
deviation (SD)
Arm 1 etravirine 400 mg once daily, n 12
17
(No Transcript)
18
Figure 2 Etravirine ( twice daily once
daily) trough concentrations and efavirenz ( )
daily concentrations after stopping efavirenz
intake and restarting etravirine
19
Table 1 Etravirine pharmacokinetic parameters
measured before (days 1 and 14) and after (days
43 and 56) the efavirenz intake period

  Etravirine PK parameter Before EFV GM (90 CI) Day 1/2 After EFV GM (90 CI) Day 43/44 GMR (90 CI) Before EFV GM (90 CI) Day 14/15 After EFV GM (90 CI) Day 56/57 GMR (90 CI)
Arm 1 400 mg OD AUC0-24h (ng.h/mL) 2996 (2626-4070) 2245 (1899-3171) 0.74 (0.66-0.83) 11064 (9741-14077) 7677 (6373-11134) 0.71 (0.62-0.81)
Arm 1 400 mg OD Cmax (ng/mL) 385 (345-476) 293 (246-405) 0.78 (0.76-0.90) 863 (796-972) 676 (597-832) 0.78 (0.70-0.86)
Arm 1 400 mg OD Ctrough (ng/mL) 41 (36-67) 31 (26-55) 0.71 (0.59-0.85) 270 (243-389) 175 (142-296) 0.67 (0.49-0.91)
  Day 1 Day 43 Day 14 Day 56
Arm 2 200 mg BID AUC0-12h (ng.h/mL) 1399 (1259-1777) 1090 (930-1452) 0.78 (0.66-0.92) 8756 (7755-10848) 6481 (5881-7615) 0.72 (0.63-0.81)
Arm 2 200 mg BID Cmax (ng/mL) 286 (250-372) 201 (168-277) 0.70 (0.57-0.86) 1001 (892-1219) 816 (744-949) 0.79 (0.70-0.90)
Arm 2 200 mg BID Ctrough (ng/mL) 52 (48-74) 34 (30-51) 0.66 (0.51-0.85) 596 (528-769) 395 (354-486) 0.63 (0.54-0.73)
EFV efavirenz, OD once daily, BID twice
daily, AUC area under the plasma
concentration-time curve, Cmax maximal
concentration, Ctrough pre-dose concentration,
GM geometric mean, GMR geometric mean ratio,
CI confidence interval
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com