Students Use of Scientific Knowledge and Practices When Making Decisions in Citizens Roles - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 1
About This Presentation
Title:

Students Use of Scientific Knowledge and Practices When Making Decisions in Citizens Roles

Description:

... practices of students we interviewed about two socio-environmental issues. One socio-environmental issue related to food purchasing, the other related to ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:77
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 2
Provided by: francis139
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Students Use of Scientific Knowledge and Practices When Making Decisions in Citizens Roles


1
Students Use of Scientific Knowledge and
Practices When Making Decisions in Citizens Roles
Beth A. Covitt, Edna Tan, Blakely K. Tsurusaki,
Charles W. Anderson
Introduction
Findings
  • A fundamental challenge for science education in
    a democratic country is preparing its citizens to
    make informed socio-environmental decisions. In
    this poster, we propose a framework for analyzing
    how students approach public and private
    environmental decisions and we use the framework
    to analyze decision-making practices of students
    we interviewed about two socio-environmental
    issues. One socio-environmental issue related to
    food purchasing, the other related to water use.
    We explore the following questions
  • When presented with a socio-environmental issue,
    how did students investigate and explain the
    issue?
  • What consequences did they predict for their
    possible actions?
  • 2. What decisions did the students make and how
    did they justify those decisions?
  • 3. Given their understanding, what values and
    other resources did they draw on as they made
    their
  • decisions?
  •  

Methods
We developed two interview scenarios, one about
purchasing strawberries and one about a proposed
water bottling business. We conducted 22
interviews with elementary, middle and high
school students. Interviews were transcribed and
analyzed through a grounded theory approach
(Strauss Corbin, 1997). We then used an
iterative approach to connect the analysis to the
creation of the decision-making
framework.   Making Decisions about Purchasing
Strawberries Students were asked to complete 2
ordering tasks of 8 different strawberry
products. First they were asked to order various
food products from what they deemed most to least
nutritious. This task positioned students as
consumers. Next, they were asked to order the
products from what they thought was most to least
environmentally friendly. In both tasks, they
were asked to explain their reasoning for the
ordering.   Making Decisions about a Proposed
Water Bottling Venture Students were introduced
to a scenario about a company that would like to
drill a well near a trout stream to enlarge their
water bottling business. In the interviews, the
students were introduced to the scenario, asked
to explain the science around the issue, and
asked about how they would respond to the issue.
During the interview, students were presented
with additional information from stakeholders
that they could use to inform their reasoning and
decisions. Decision-making framework Our
framework emphasizes that decision-making is
guided by students Discourses (Gee, 1990, 1991).
Students come to school with primary Discourses
that reflect their communities of practice,
identities, values and funds of knowledge (e.g.,
Moje, et al., 2004 Wenger, 1998). In school and
through other experiences, students may acquire
secondary Discourses, such as scientific
Discourse. Discourses influence how students
engage with issues and make decisions. Students
practices of investigating, explaining,
predicting and deciding are embedded within their
Discourses. The extent and ways in which students
engage in these practices impacts how informed
their decisions will be. While we would not
advocate for a student to make one decision or
another with regard to a socio-environmental
issue, we do place a high value on using science
as a tool to inform decisions. To the extent that
science is relevant, we suggest that an informed
decision makes use of scientific understanding.
Discussion and Implications
  • Reliance on out-of-school funds of knowledge and
    salient identities.
  • Our data show the prominent role that factors
    other than school science played in students
    decision-making practices. Students funds of
    knowledge and identities provided entry points
    that influenced how the students engaged in a
    scenario. The students who had everyday
    practices, such as being a fisherman or an
    athlete, had an interest in the scenarios and
    usually drew on knowledge from these practices
    more than school science.
  • What is the role of school science?
  • There was very limited use of school science in
    students decision-making practices. Water
    scenario students tended to invoke school science
    more than the strawberry-scenario students. This
    may be due partly to the way the two Think-Aloud
    scenarios were structured. Water students were
    asked to construct a narrative of watersheds
    before they were presented with questions, while
    strawberry students constructed narratives after
    they had ordered the products as explanations for
    their decisions. In addition, while students
    learn about the water cycle and about concepts
    such as food webs and food chains in school,
    teaching about food supply chains and waste
    disposal chains and the impact of these on
    natural systems are not a salient part of the
    K-12 curriculum.
  • Questions our research raises
  • How can school science help students think
    critically about socio-environmental issues?
  • What sort of science content should be taught in
    school that is relevant to the everyday
    socio-environmental decisions students have to
    make?
  • How should the content be taught so that it
    resonates with students out-of-school identities
    and funds of knowledge?

References Gee (1990). Social linguistics and
literacies Ideology in Discourse. London
Falmer. Gee, J. P. (1991). What is literacy? In
C. Mitchell K. Weiler (Eds.), Rewriting
literacy Culture and Discourse of the other (pp.
3-11). Westport, CT Bergin Garvey. Moje, E.,
Ciechanowski, K. M., Kramer, K., Ellis, L.,
Carrillo, R., Collazo, T. (2004). Working
toward third space in content area literacy An
examination of everyday funds of knowledge and
Discourse. Reading Research Quarterly, 39(1),
38-70. Strauss, A., Corbin, J. (eds.) (1997)
Grounded Theory in Practice. London Sage
Publications. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of
practice Learning, meaning, and identity.
Cambridge Cambridge University Press.
Figure 1. Framework for analyzing students
decision-making Discourses and practices
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com