Title: ASSESSING THE FEASIBILITY OF ANTIBIOTIC MANAGEMENT SERVICES THROUGH PROSPECTIVE EVALUATION
1ASSESSING THE FEASIBILITY OF ANTIBIOTIC
MANAGEMENT SERVICES THROUGH PROSPECTIVE
EVALUATION
Kevin D. Mills, Pharm D1 Corstiaan Brass, MD2
Marisa Rahn, Pharm D, BCPS3 James Fenner, B.
Sc., Pharm D, BCPS4 Salvi Parpia, B. Sc., Pharm
D, MRCF5 1Clinical Pharmacy Coordinator, Kaleida
Health/DeGraff Memorial Hospital 2Clinical
Associate Professor, SUNY at Buffalo School of
Medicine 3Assistant Professor of Pharmacy
Practice, Albany College of Pharmacy 4Clinical
Pharmacy Coordinator, Kaleida Health/Millard
Fillmore Suburban Hospital 5Clinical Assistant
Professor, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences,
University of British Columbia
METHODS
RESULTS
RESULTS
- ABSTRACT
- PURPOSE The inappropriate and unnecessary use of
antibiotics is an important problem in the
hospital setting. The goal of this assessment was
to prospectively evaluate the extent of
antibiotic misuse at a community hospital, and to
realistically quantify the potential reduction of
direct and indirect hospital costs if an
antibiotic management service were employed. - METHODS A 3-week prospective evaluation was
performed at a 100 bed private hospital facility.
During the evaluation period, all antibiotic use
at the facility was captured by a
residency-trained antibiotic streamlining
pharmacist. Appropriateness of antibiotic therapy
was assessed based on infection diagnosis and
supporting evidence for the presence of active
infection. The extent of inappropriate antibiotic
use, as well as the potential direct and indirect
hospital cost of non-focused antibiotic
utilization, was estimated using a customized
database. - RESULTS Of a total of 149 patients who received
antibiotic therapy during the evaluation period,
116 were evaluated and actively followed by the
streamliner. A total of 137 potential
interventions were identified. Seventy-four of
the potential interventions involved antibiotic
change or discontinuation, while 44 involved
change from IV to oral therapy. An estimated
8,354 in potential drug cost savings was
identified (144,807 annually). If an antibiotic
management program were employed, the initial
acceptance rate of recommendations would likely
be around 85 percent. Thus, a realistically
achievable estimate of drug cost savings from
antibiotic management is 7,100 over three weeks,
or 123,000 annually. A minimum cumulative
reduction of 23 patient days could have been
achieved by earlier conversion to oral therapy,
accounting for an additional 5,750 in potential
cost savings to the facility (99,750 annually). - DISCUSSION The annual cost savings for the
facility that could be achieved through focusing
of antibiotic therapy is approximately 223,000.
Based on the results of this observational
evaluation, there is sufficient inappropriate and
non-focused antibiotic use to justify the
presence of an antibiotic management service at
MSM. We intend to initiate an antibiotic
management program at this facility beginning in
2005. Once this program has been established, we
will be able to evaluate the accuracy of our
methods for determining the potential cost
savings of antibiotic management services. - INTRODUCTION
- Antimicrobial stewardship initiatives have
consistently been associated with significant
reductions in antibiotic use, improved bacterial
susceptibility patterns, and reduced inpatient
LOS of infected patients - Many facilities continue to operate without
such programs - - One likely reason is the perceived lack of
financial resources needed for the development
and implementation of these programs - The relationship between sub-optimal antibiotic
use and potential cost savings to a facility has
not been clearly established - A valid means of prospectively evaluating the
potential impact of antibiotic management
initiatives would be useful
- The Facility
- Mount St Marys Hospital (MSM) is a 100 bed
secondary care facility - A member of the Ascension Catholic hospital
network - 11 bed intensive care unit
- Non-teaching facility
- At the time of this evaluation, no significant
measures to improve cost-effectiveness of
antibiotic therapy were employed
Antibiotic Regimen Details Over 3-week Study
Period (prescribed vs. focused)
- Evaluation dates May 3rd through May 24th, 2004
- Total No. of patients who received antibiotic
therapy during study period 149
Patient Demographics
- Data collection and Analysis
- A prospective, observational evaluation was
conducted at MSM over a three week period - All antibiotic use at the facility was captured
along with patient demographic data, details
of infection and concomitant diagnosis, and
relevant laboratory and culture data - Data collection and antibiotic regimen
assessment were performed by a residency trained
clinical pharmacist (KM) - Antibiotic selection, dosing, and duration of
therapy were evaluated based on evidence-based
practice standards and guidelines - The definitions used when determining the
appropriateness, redundancy, and focus of
prescribed antibiotic regimens are stated below - A physician specialist in infectious diseases
(CB) was consulted for further insight into the
appropriateness and/or focus of a given regimen
when necessary - Each IV antibiotic regimen was assessed daily
for potential conversion to oral therapy based on
the stated criteria
Potential Impact of an Antibiotic Management
Program on Antibiotic Spending
- If an antibiotic management program were
employed, the initial acceptance rate of
recommendations would likely be around 85 - - Thus, a realistically achievable estimate of
drug cost savings from antibiotic management is
7,100 over three weeks, or 123,000 annually
Potential Therapy Interventions
Estimated (minimum) LOS Impact of IV to Oral
Conversions
44 (32.1)
60 (43.8)
DISCUSSION
- The minimum expected annual cost savings for
the facility from drug cost savings and decreased
inpatient LOS is approx. 223,000 - The potential decrease in LOS of 23 days over 3
weeks was meant to be a conservative estimate - - In the literature, the impact of early IV to
PO conversion on inpatient LOS has been
suggested to be much greater (from 1 to 2.5 days
per conversion) - Limitations
- Short observation period
- Method for evaluating the prescribed antibiotic
regimens was superficial (info. obtained
from patient records, no direct patient
assessment) - Conclusion
- There is sufficient inappropriate and
non-focused antibiotic use to justify the
presence of an antibiotic management service at
MSM - Our intent is to establish an antibiotic
management program at this facility beginning in
2005 - Once this program has been established, we will
be able to draw conclusions as to the accuracy of
our methods for determining the potential cost
savings of antibiotic management services
19 (13.9)
14 (10.2)
- Estimating potential impact on antibiotic cost
- When an antibiotic regimen was deemed
inappropriate or non-focused, a potential
intervention was recorded and a focused regimen
was formulated - Patients actual antibiotic regimen and the
focused regimen were tracked until patient
discharge or discontinuation of therapy - Estimated drug cost savings Cost of
prescribed regimen(s) - Cost of focused
regimen(s) - Estimating impact on inpatient length of stay
(LOS) - If a patient (as a result of IV to oral
conversion) would subsequently be off all IV
medications and had no other unresolved medical
issues, a potential LOS decrease of 1 (one) day
was recorded. - Mean cost per day of inpatient stay was
obtained from the facility
Potential Therapy Interventions (Cont.)
- All data were collected and analyzed using a
customized Access database. - Cost of antibiotic therapy was determined using
purchasing data obtained from the facilitys
Department of Pharmacy