Remote Sensing Forest Fires: Before and After Rob Gaboy - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Remote Sensing Forest Fires: Before and After Rob Gaboy

Description:

... Sensing Techniques to Assess Active Fire Characteristics and Post-Fire Effects. Lentile, Leigh B. et al., International Journal of Wildland Fire, 2006, 15, 319-345 ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:179
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 21
Provided by: alt136
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Remote Sensing Forest Fires: Before and After Rob Gaboy


1
Remote Sensing Forest FiresBefore and
AfterRob Gaboy Aimee Treutlein
2
Outline
  • Why remote sensing is useful
  • Current methods problems with them
  • Future of remote sensing
  • LIDAR
  • Landsat
  • AVHRR
  • ASTER
  • Hyperspectral satellites

3
Why?
  • Human population
  • Environmental planning
  • More cost/time efficient than current methods
  • Better understanding
  • Detailed mapping
  • Improved accuracy

4
Current Methods
  • Aerial photography
  • Field measurements and mapping
  • Passive remote sensing
  • Medium spatial resolution multi-spectral satellite

5
Aerial Photography Problems
  • Limited number of bands
  • Limited coverage
  • Time consuming
  • Cant take photos as often
  • Development cost
  • Difficulty assessing fuel
  • subjective

6
Problems in the Field
  • Time consuming
  • Accessibility issues
  • Subjective
  • Costly
  • Human and instrument
  • Low updating frequency

7
Passive Sensors
  • Effectiveness
  • Cant see understory
  • Depends on intended application

8
Medium Resolution
  • Superficial observations
  • Reflectance
  • Rely on field obs

9
LIDAR
  • Light Detection and Ranging
  • Penetrability
  • Accuracy
  • Data computed
  • Applications

10
Landsat
  • Multispectral
  • visible and mid-infrared
  • High resolution
  • Surface/Canopy characteristics
  • Vegetation categories
  • Recalibrate

11
(No Transcript)
12
AVHRR
  • Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer
  • Originally Met. Satellite
  • Multispectral
  • visible and thermal infrared
  • Long-term monitoring
  • Remote and isolated areas
  • Restricted

13
(No Transcript)
14
(No Transcript)
15
ASTER
  • Multispectral
  • visible and near-infrared telescope
  • Vegetation
  • Mapping fuel characteristics
  • Quantitative accuracy

16
(No Transcript)
17
Hyperspectral
  • Directly related analysis
  • Map vegetation
  • Species mapping
  • Vegetation classification
  • Preventative measure
  • Limited spatial coverage

18
(No Transcript)
19
Conclusions
  • Better than aerial/ground obs
  • Dont use alone
  • Need for surface info
  • Most cost efficient
  • Helpful in mapping and analyzing
  • both before and after
  • Dont generalize, need to know underlying process

20
References
  • Remote Sensing Techniques to Assess Active Fire
    Characteristics and Post-Fire Effects. Lentile,
    Leigh B. et al., International Journal of
    Wildland Fire, 2006, 15, 319-345
  • Evaluating ASTER Satellite Imagery and Gradient
    Modeling for Mapping and Characterizing Wildland
    Fire Fuels. Falkowski, Michael J. et al., ASPRS
    Annual Conference Proceedings, May 2004
  • Assessing Fuel Loads using Remote Sensing
    Technical Report Summary. Roff, A. et al., The
    University of New South Wales, 2005
  • http//earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Library/GlobalFir
    e/fire_5.html
  • http//www.eduspace.esa.int/subdocument/default.as
    p?document353
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com