Trademark Examples - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 10
About This Presentation
Title:

Trademark Examples

Description:

Parties may obtain discovery regarding any matter, not privileged, that is ... the discovery sought is unreasonably cumulative or duplicative, or is obtainable ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:55
Avg rating:3.0/5.0

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Trademark Examples


1

Where Does Your Data Live?
2

Where Does Your Data Live?
3
FRCP Rule 26(a)(1) Initial Disclosures
  • a party must, without awaiting a discovery
    request, provide to other parties
  • (A) the name of each individual likely to have
    discoverable information that the disclosing
    party may use to support its claims or defenses
  • (B) a copy of, or a description by category and
    location of, all documents, data compilations,
    and tangible things that are in the possession,
    custody, or control of the party and that the
    disclosing party may use to support its claims or
    defenses, unless solely for impeachment.

4
FRCP Rule 26(b)(1) Scope of Discovery
  • Parties may obtain discovery regarding any
    matter, not privileged, that is relevant to the
    claim or defense of any party, including the
    existence, description, nature, custody,
    condition, and location of any books, documents,
    or other tangible things and the identity and
    location of persons having knowledge of any
    discoverable matter.

5
FRCP Rule 26(b)(2) Limitations on Scope of
Discovery
  • use of the discovery methods shall be limited
    by the court if it determines that
  • the discovery sought is unreasonably cumulative
    or duplicative, or is obtainable from some other
    source that is more convenient, less burdensome,
    or less expensive
  • the party seeking discovery has had ample
    opportunity by discovery in the action to obtain
    the information sought or
  • the burden or expense of the proposed discovery
    outweighs its likely benefit, taking into account
    the needs of the case, the amount in controversy,
    the parties' resources, the importance of the
    issues at stake in the litigation, and the
    importance of the proposed discovery in resolving
    the issues.

6
FRCP Rule 34 Production of Documents
  • Any party may serve on any other party a request
    (1) to produce and permit the party making the
    request, or someone acting on the requestor's
    behalf, to inspect and copy, any designated
    documents (including writings, drawings, graphs,
    charts, photographs, phonorecords, and other data
    compilations from which information can be
    obtained, translated, if necessary, by the
    respondent through detection devices into
    reasonably usable form)within the scope of Rule
    26(b) .

7
FRCP Rule 30(b)(6)Deposition Upon Oral
Examination
  • A party may name as the deponent a public or
    private corporation or a partnership or
    association or governmental agency and describe
    with reasonable particularity the matters on
    which examination is requested. In that event,
    the organization shall designate one or more
    officers, directors, or managing agents, or other
    persons who consent to testify on its behalf, and
    may set forth, for each person designated, the
    matters on which the person will testify.

8
E-Discovery Fundamentals
  • Consider policies concerning
  • retention and destruction of documents and
    records
  • actions in the event of impending litigation
  • Litigation Hold
  • When a party reasonably anticipates litigation,
    it must suspend its normal document
    retention/destruction policies and preserve
    relevant documents
  • Generally does not apply to inaccessible backup
    tapes devoted to disaster recovery
  • If content of backup tapes is identifiable,
    should maintain for key players

9
E-Discovery Fundamentals
  • Effective Communications
  • counsel needs to communicate with client
    especially KEY PLAYERS when litigation is
    reasonably foreseeable
  • educate as to litigation hold policies
  • See Zubulake IV 220 FRD 212
  • communicate upon discovery request
  • continue to communicate throughout process

10
E-Discovery Fundamentals
  • Counsel needs to understand IT systems
  • Education in advance of problems with IT support
    staff to know the design and limitations of
    system
  • Consider involvement of counsel in the design or
    selection and implementation of backup systems
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com