Title: The Impact of Student Learning Through Wisconsin School Library Media Centers
1The Impact of Student Learning Through Wisconsin
School Library Media Centers
- WEMA-Brainstorm Presentation
- Kate Bugher, Educational Consultant
- Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction
- March 2006
2The Impact of Student Learning Through Wisconsin
School Library Media Centers
- COLAND Presentation
- Kate Bugher, Educational Consultant
- Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction
- March 10, 2006
3Study Objectives
- Examine the leadership and instructional role of
library media specialists in a robust information
and technology literacy program - Measure their impact on and contribution to
student achievement
4Study Methodology
- Three sections or mini-studies
- Survey of students and teachers
- how students benefit from library media programs
- Survey of library media specialists
- library media program structure, resources, and
operations - Case Studies of best practice programs
5Data Collection
- Online surveys of teachers, students, library
media specialists (May June 2005) - Responses from 107 teachers and 3,957 students in
randomly selected 51 schools - Obtained data on 1,043 school library media
centers from 855 Library Media Specialists - Case studies conducted five schools (October -
November 2005) - Extracted WINSS school and student data for
responding school libraries (November 2005)
6Library Media Program FindingsStaffing
- significant gaps between recommended staffing
levels defined by the School Information and
Technology Staffing Guidelines in and actual
staffing levels. (page 2)
7Library Media Program Findings Staffing
- In comparison to the guidelines, schools with 800
or more students were understaffed with regard to
certified Library Media Specialists in - 1 of elementary schools,
- 18 of middle schools, and
- 35.8 of high schools. (page 2-3)
8Library Media Program Findings Staffing
- Library Media programs also did not meet the
recommended staffing levels for aides (page 3) - 40-51 of ALL schools with student levels up to
299 did not meet recommended level - More than 80 of ALL schools with 300 or more
students did not meet recommended level
9Library Media Program FindingsStaffing
10Library Media Program Findings Staff Activities
per Week
11Library Media Program Findings Hours
- LMS hours per week increase by grade level from
27.7 (E) to 35.5 (H) - Hours of aide per week also increase by grade
level from 28.4 (E) to 37.7 (H) - Libraries are open for 38 hours (E), 41 hours
(M), 44 hours a week (H) - On average, libraries are open for 2 hours a week
before school and 2 (E) to 3.7 hours (H) after
school
12Library Media Program Findings Resources
- Technology has permeated library media centers
- 58-67 have laptops
- 70 have scanners
- 80 have data projectors and digital cameras
- An average library media center has
- 26 (E) to 35 (H) computers
- 10-15 laptops
- 1 scanner
- 3-4 printers
- 2-3 LCDs
- 3 digital cameras
13Library Media Program FindingsResources
- Tremendous access to online databases
- 85 of classrooms
- 70-80 of all school computers and
- 60-74 from home computers
- About 80 of Library Media Centers have some form
of OPAC - 60-64 can access it from all school computers
14Library Media Program Profile Resources (Cont.)
- Library facility size ranges from 2,285 SF (E),
3,693 (M), 5,152 (H) - Libraries can seat 49 (E), 72 (M), 82 (H) people
- Operating budget varies from 15,034 (E), 24,511
(M), 37,798 (H) - Operating budget per student ranges from 43 (E,
M) to 51 (H)
15KEY FindingsLibrary Media Specialist Survey
- Higher WKCE performance across all educational
levels - in schools with higher levels of library media
program staffing - where the Library Media Specialist spent more
time on instructionally-related student and
teacher activities - Schools with greater library resources
(collection, technology, )
16KEY FindingsLibrary Media Specialist Survey
- WKCE performance was higher in programs
- with full-time Library Media Specialist than
part-time or no Library Media Specialist - full-time aides than part-time or no aides
- Socio-economic and school variables had the
greatest impact on student performance - Library variables explained 3 (E), 9 (M),
8-19 (H) of WCKE performance
17Teacher Student Surveys
- Teachers and student surveys examined library
media program helpfulness in seven areas - Getting information students need
- Using information to complete school work
- School work in general (knowledge acquisition)
- Using technology
- General reading interests
- Interests and activities outside of school
(Independent Skills) - Academic Achievement
- (Five-point scale 1-very helpful, 2-helpful,
3-somewhat helpful, 4-of little help, 5-not at
all helpful)
18KEY FindingsTeacher Student Surveys
- Teachers overall considered the library media
center - helpful in ALL 7 areas (using mean scores)
- most helpful as a source for
- Getting Information
- Using Technology
- Reading
- Using Information
19KEY FindingsTeacher Student Surveys
- High school teachers considered library more
helpful to students in 5 of 7 areas - Elementary teachers rated Reading and Using
Information the highest
20KEY FindingsTeacher Student Surveys
- Rural teachers, compared to suburban and urban,
found school library media programs more helpful
for - Getting Information
- Knowledge Acquisition
- Using Technology
- Independent Skills
- Academic Achievement
- Urban teachers, compared to suburban and rural,
found school library media programs more helpful
for - Reading
- Using Information
21KEY FindingsTeacher Student Surveys
- Teachers, overall, who aligned the WMAS for
Information and Technology Literacy to their
lessons considered the school library media
program MORE HELPFUL in all seven areas than
teachers who did not implement such an alignment.
(Page 2)
22KEY FindingsTeacher Student Surveys
- Students mean ratings of helpfulness were lower
than teachers in all areas - Students most helpful areas
- Using Technology
- Getting Information
- Using Information
- Elementary students considered the library media
program more helpful than secondary students in
all areas
23KEY FindingsOverall Conclusions
- Library Media Center is a central and vital
component of schools instructional program - The heart of a school
- Library media program staff (LMS and aides) are
the most critical program component - Programs having less impact on student
performance have - low staffing levels
- fewer resources (collection, technology, )
24KEY FindingsOverall Conclusions
- Library media specialists
- contribute directly to quality instructional
programs and to quality teaching - help students acquire unique skills not taught
in classroom - Library media program provides information skills
and technology literacy essential for
students/learners in 21st Century in and outside
of school
25KEY FindingsOverall Conclusions
- Role of Library Media Specialist is morphing more
towards three distinct areas as educators and
students see the Library Media Specialist as - A teacher librarian
- An agent of change
- An technology integrator
26Areas for Further Examination
- Staffing guidelines and levels, both for Library
Media Specialist and aides - Amount of time Library Media Specialists spend on
instructional-related activities
27Areas for Further Examination
- Teacher and student views of the library, its
services, and benefits with particular attention
to areas students and teachers perceive
little/low benefit - Collecting reliable and consistent School Library
Media program data
28Contact Information
- Kate Bugher
- Education Consultant
- Wisconsin DPI
- Instructional Media Technology
- 125 South Webster Street - PO Box 7841
- Madison, WI 53707-7841
- kathryn.bugher_at_dpi.state.wi.us
- Voice 608-267-9287
- Fax 608-267-1052
- http//dpi.wi.gov/imt/
29Researcher Information
- Esther G. Smith, Ph.D.
- EGS Research Consulting
- 6106 Ledge Mountain
- Austin, Texas 78731
- egs_at_io.com
- Voice 512-467-8807
- Fax 512-467-8801
-