Simulation for determining initial system effect for coordination in multiagent systems Murat Aydin - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 18
About This Presentation
Title:

Simulation for determining initial system effect for coordination in multiagent systems Murat Aydin

Description:

Coordination is a central issue in ... Example 1: Some physical jobs i.e. Pollen collection by bee agents ... Knowledge (Kn), Choice (Ch) and knowledge sharing ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:43
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 19
Provided by: cmpeBo
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Simulation for determining initial system effect for coordination in multiagent systems Murat Aydin


1
Simulation for determining initial system effect
for coordinationin multiagent systems Murat
Aydin
2
What is coordination
  • Coordination is a central issue in multiagent
    systems. It is globally coherent behavior of the
    agents.,
  • Coordination is required to achieve a goal in
    multiagent systems

3
Problem
  • Initial system status means number of agents,
    number of resources, distribution of agent on
    resources and distribution of resources on
    locations.
  • initial system state must have some effects on
    coordination effort which is not explored very
    well in literature

4
Problem cont.
  • Resource change effect is the same with initial
    system status effect. Because adding resources
    makes the system uncoordinated and some
    coordination is needed. System prior to
    coordination is initial system.

5
Motivation
  • Identifying effects of initial system on
    coordination allows system designer to change
    resources in a manner in which coordination can
    take less time. Also knowing effect of initial
    system status allows feasibility researches i.e.
    the system will complete the or the system will
    always be in a challenge with coordination.

6
Aim
  • how coordination is affected by an increase in
    number of resources per agent.
  • how resource change patterns affect coordination

7
Examples
  • Example 1 Some physical jobs i.e. Pollen
    collection by bee agents
  • Example 2 Nonhomogeneous resources
  • Example 3 Service selection where quality of
    service is dependent on number of clients and
    coordination is getting best service.

8
DefinitionsResource Change Distribution

Figure 1.a Before change Figure 1.b After
change
9
Before and after coordination
Number of Agents per resource

Figure 2.a before change Figure 2.b after
change, after coordination
10
DefinitionsRelative Resource Change Distribution
  • resource changes are relative to agent
    distribution over resources.

After, a second resource change (3,9,15,21,12) is
applied. The resource change viewed by agents

Figure 3.a second resource change Figure 3.b
resource change viewed by agents
11
Experimental setup
Experimental setup
Knowledge (Kn), Choice (Ch) and knowledge sharing
of agents at resources i and j Singh and
Rustogi
12
DefinitionsKey factors of coordination
  • Knowledge
  • Choice
  • Shared Knowledge
  • Inertia
  • Tolerance to imprecision

13
DefinitionsDecision Protocol
Decision Protocol from Singh and Rustogi
14
SimulationPerformance Metric
  • Distance from coordination Number of movements
    required to coordinate

15
Simulation
  • control and test systems with the same initial
    status
  • For test system experimentally or normally
    distributed resource change will be applied.
  • For the control system, same number of resource
    change will be applied with a uniform
    distribution.

16
Evaluation
  • apply statistical analysis to test whether the
    difference in mean number of steps to coord for
    each group is significant or not.
  • If different,analyze results to come up with an
    explanation about this difference
  • try to conclude with a formula which lets to
    predict number of movements

17
References
  • Singh and Rustogi Sudhir K. Rustogi and
    Munindar P. Singh. Be Patient and Tolerate
    Imprecision How Autonomous Agents can Coordinate
    Effectively.
  • Candale and Sen Teddy Candale and Sandip Sen.
    Fast convergence to satisfying distributions.

18
THANKS
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com