Gabriel Hommel, MD - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 100
About This Presentation
Title:

Gabriel Hommel, MD

Description:

Gabriel Hommel, MD – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:155
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 101
Provided by: cambizes
Category:
Tags: gabriel | hommel | lis

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Gabriel Hommel, MD


1
Acetabular Fractures
  • Gabriel Hommel, MD
  • Louisiana State University Health Sciences
    Center, Shreveport, LA

2
Goals
  • To discuss the following 4 topics
  • Pelvic Anatomy
  • Radiographic Diagnosis
  • Decision for surgery
  • Decision for Approach

3
Palpable Bony Landmarks
  • Palpable Bony Landmarks
  • Symphysis Pubis
  • Anterior Superior Iliac Spine (ASIS)
  • Iliac Wing
  • Posterior Superior Iliac Spine (PSIS)

4
(No Transcript)
5
(No Transcript)
6
Acetabular Columns
  • Anterior (iliopubic) column
  • Extends from anterior iliac crest ? symphysis
    pubis
  • 3 segments
  • Iliac segment
  • Acetabular segment
  • Pubic segment

7
Acetabular Columns
  • Posterior (ilioischial) column
  • Extends from greater sciatic notch ? inferior
    ischium
  • Acetabular dome forms keystone of arch

8
Diagnosis
  • 5 Views of the Pelvis
  • 45 degree oblique pelvis views
  • Obterator oblique
  • Iliac oblique
  • AP pelvis
  • 35 degree cephalad and caudad projection views of
    pelvis
  • Inlet view (caudad projection)
  • Outlet view (cephalad projection)

9
(No Transcript)
10
Iliac Oblique
11
(No Transcript)
12
Obterator Oblique
13
(No Transcript)
14
(No Transcript)
15
(No Transcript)
16
(No Transcript)
17
(No Transcript)
18
(No Transcript)
19
(No Transcript)
20
(No Transcript)
21
Teardrop
  • Internal limb outer wall of obturator canal
  • External limb middle 1/3 of cotyloid fossa
  • Inferior border ischiopubic notch

22
Diagnosis
  • CT scan of the pelvis
  • 5 mm Cuts, to include both hips, make copies with
    6 images printed on each sheet.
  • Also, if possible, obtain 3-D reconstruction of
    the Pelvis.

23
(No Transcript)
24
Diagnosis
  • Classification of Acetabular Fractures
  • Letournel and Judet
  • Elementary or Simple Fractures
  • Associated or Complex Fractures

25
(No Transcript)
26
(No Transcript)
27
Diagnosis
  • Simple Fracture Patterns
  • Posterior Wall
  • Posterior Column
  • Anterior Wall
  • Anterior Column
  • Transverse

28
(No Transcript)
29
(No Transcript)
30
(No Transcript)
31
(No Transcript)
32
(No Transcript)
33
(No Transcript)
34
(No Transcript)
35
(No Transcript)
36
(No Transcript)
37
(No Transcript)
38
(No Transcript)
39
(No Transcript)
40
(No Transcript)
41
(No Transcript)
42
(No Transcript)
43
(No Transcript)
44
(No Transcript)
45
(No Transcript)
46
Transverse
  • Infratectal
  • Juxtatectal
  • Transtectal

47
(No Transcript)
48
Diagnosis
  • Associated Fracture Patterns
  • Posterior wall associated Posterior Column
  • T-Shape
  • Both Column
  • Anterior Column associated Posterior
    Hemi-Transverse
  • Transverse associated posterior wall

49
(No Transcript)
50
(No Transcript)
51
(No Transcript)
52
(No Transcript)
53
Both Column
54
(No Transcript)
55
(No Transcript)
56
Anterior Column plus Posterior Hemitransverse
57
(No Transcript)
58
(No Transcript)
59
(No Transcript)
60
(No Transcript)
61
(No Transcript)
62
(No Transcript)
63
(No Transcript)
64
Indication for Surgery
  • Displaced acetabular fractures.
  • Hip Dislocation with associated fracture of
    acetabulum.
  • Traumatic Protrusio Acetabuli.

65
What is a displaced fracture??
  • When you look at the x-ray in any of the three
    views, there is a gap of greater than 1 or 2 mm
    from one of the fracture ends to the other.

66
Roof Arc Angles
  • Measurement of roof arc angles is appropriate for
    following fracture patterns
  • Anterior Column
  • Posterior Column
  • Transverse
  • T-shape
  • Some associated patterns

67
Roof Arc Angles
  • There are three
  • 1. Medial Roof Arc (AP pelvis)
  • 2. Anterior Roof Arc (Obterator oblique)
  • 3. Posterior Roof Arc (Iliac oblique)

68
(No Transcript)
69
(No Transcript)
70
(No Transcript)
71
Non-Operative Candidate
  • Displacement less than 2 to 5 mm in dome (Some
    say roof arc angles of 45 degrees or more on all
    3 views, Matta says 45, 25, 75).
  • Distal anterior column fractures (low).
  • Distal transverse fractures (infratectal).
  • Both column fractures with secondary congruence
    and minimally displaced posterior column.

72
When not to operate????
  • Non-displaced acetabular fractures.
  • Severe osteoporosis.
  • Severe Neurological disease, uncontrolled seizure
    disorder.
  • Multiply injured patient that is medically not
    stable for a big acetabular surgery.
  • The patient with profound comorbid medical
    problems that will not tolerate surgery
    (cirrhosis, renal dialysis patients, CHF, etc).

73
When to Operate???
  • If you can measure at least 5 mm of displacement
    on any view of the pelvis or on the CT scan.
  • If all of the fracture ends on all views and CT
    scan are 4 mm or less, then do not operate.

74
Last Call
  • If the hip joint is incongruous or if the hip is
    unstable, then operative treatment is indicated.
  • Remember this point when taking exam.

75
Risks
  • 1. Injurying a major artery, nerve, vein.
  • 2. Blood loss.
  • 3. Heterotopic Ossification.
  • 4. Arthritis.
  • 5. Avascular necrosis.
  • 6. Complications from anesthesia death,
    pneumonia, DVT, PE, MI, CVA, etc

76
Timing of Surgery
  • The sooner you can get to it, the easier it is to
    reduce.
  • The sooner you operate on it, the more blood loss
    (within 2 days).
  • Fractures operated on between 0 and 14 days have
    a higher rate of anatomical reduction (70)
    compared to those operated on between 15 and 21
    days (57).

77
Surgical Approaches
  • 1. Kocher Langenbach
  • 2. Ilioinguinal
  • 3. Extended Iliofemoral

78
Use of fracture table
  • Judet or fracture table can be used for
    approaches.
  • The table will allow use of traction for
    reduction of fracture.
  • Do not use if there is a concomitant pelvis
    fracture, especially pubic rami fractures.

79
(No Transcript)
80
Indications for Kocher-Langenbeck
  • Indications for Kocher-Langenbeck
  • Posterior Wall Fractures
  • Posterior Column Fractures
  • Posterior Column / Posterior Wall Fractures
  • Juxta-tectal / Infra-tectal Transverse or
    Transverse with Posterior Wall Fractures
  • Some T-shaped Fractures

81
(No Transcript)
82
(No Transcript)
83
(No Transcript)
84
(No Transcript)
85
(No Transcript)
86
(No Transcript)
87
Indications for EIF Approach
  • Transtectal TrPW or T-shaped fractures
  • Transverse fractures with extended posterior wall
  • T-shaped fractures with wide separations of the
    vertical stem of the "T" or those with associated
    pubic symphysis dislocations.
  • Certain Associated Both Column Fractures.
  • Associated fracture patterns or transverse
    fractures which are operated greater than 21 days
    following injury.

88
(No Transcript)
89
(No Transcript)
90
(No Transcript)
91
Operative Approach per fracture
  • Transverse Post wall
  • 77 Kocher Langenbach
  • 22 Extended Iliofemoral
  • 2 Combined (KL and II)

92
Operative Approach per fracture
  • T-shaped
  • Kocher Langenbach 61
  • Ilioinguinal 13
  • Extended Iliofemoral 19
  • Combined 6

93
Operative Approach per fracture
  • Both Column
  • Kocher Langenbach 1
  • Ilioinguinal 59
  • Extended Iliofemoral 39
  • Combined 1

94
Controversy
  • The transverse fracture can be fixed thru either
    K.L., I.I., or E.I. (when do you decide which
    approach?????)
  • High anterior column fx. Then I.I.
  • O.T.W. most others are Kocher Langenbach
    approach.
  • Except for

95
Transverse Exception
  • 1. Trans Tectal
  • 2. Extended Posterior Wall Fracture
  • 3. Fracture of contralateral Pubic Ramus or a
    Symphesis Dislocation
  • 4. Injury or fracture at a S.I. Joint
  • If only 1 is present, K.L., If 2 are present,
    then K.L. vs. E.I.F., if 3 or 4 then E.I.F.

96
Assessment of Reduction
  • Post-op x-rays should be ordered and look at AP
    pelvis, 45 degrees obturator and iliac oblique
    pelvis views.
  • Anatomical 0 to 1 mm of residual displacement
  • Imperfect 2 to 3 mm
  • Poor More than 3 mm
  • Surgical Secondary Congruance

97
Results
  • Based on quality of reduction
  • If there is an anatomical reduction
  • You can expect 80 of patients to have excellent
    and good clinical results with low probability of
    developing arthritis.
  • Around 20 may still develop problems such as
    arthritis, avascular necrosis, and heterotopic
    ossification that may require re-operation.

98
Results
  • If the reduction is poor, you can expect 40 to
    have poor clinical results and 12 to have fair
    clinical results.
  • If the reduction is poor, you can expect that
    close to 100 will have poor radiographic results
    at 2 years.

99
Post Operative Care
  • Coumadin or Lovenox for 3 weeks.
  • Ted hoses, knee high, for 3 weeks.
  • 30 pounds weight bearing to surgery side for
    first 8 weeks. At 6 weeks obtain x-ray.
  • Stool softeners, H2 blockers, I.V. antibiotics
    for 24hrs.
  • Remove drains in 48 hours.
  • If E.I.F. or K.L., then on POD 1, perform 600
    rads or indomethacin 25 mg po TID for 3 weeks.

100
HO
  • Common after extensile exposure of posterior
    aspect of acetabulum. (Risk greatest with
    EIFgtKLgtIlioinguinal)
  • Necrotic or injured muscle should be removed to
    reduce risk of HO.
  • Medical prophylaxis is controversial. Somes
    studies show indomethacin to equal radiation,
    some show no effect.
  • Radiation (600cGY within 48hrs of surg) very
    effective however carries a risk of sarcoma
    formation, therefore some do not use on young
    patients. (No articles have reported this with
    acetabular fractures.)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com