Paper presented at the Council of Chief State School Officers Brain Trust Meeting November 15, 2004 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 19
About This Presentation
Title:

Paper presented at the Council of Chief State School Officers Brain Trust Meeting November 15, 2004

Description:

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION. Jack O'Connell, State ... 80-99th NPR. 60-79th NPR. 40-59th NPR. 20-39th NPR. 1-19th NPR. Gain for Move. From Next ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:60
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 20
Provided by: richard954
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Paper presented at the Council of Chief State School Officers Brain Trust Meeting November 15, 2004


1
Paper presented at the Council of Chief State
School Officers Brain Trust MeetingNovember
15, 2004
Californias Growth Model The Academic
Performance Index
2
API Reporting Cycles
Year of Testing
2002 2003 2004 2005
2002-2003 Growth
2002 API Base
2003 API Growth
2003-2004 Growth
2003 API Base
2004 API Growth
2004-2005 Growth
2004 API Base
2005 API Growth
3
Progressive Weighting
  • NRT
  • Performance
  • Bands
  • 80-99th NPR
  • 60-79th NPR
  • 40-59th NPR
  • 20-39th NPR
  • 1-19th NPR
  • Gain for Move
  • From Next
  • Lower Band
  • 125
  • 175
  • 200
  • 300
  • N/A

Weighting Factors 1000 875 700 500 200
5 4 3 2 1
4
5 Distance to Statewide Performance Target
Maximum 1000 800 700 Example
School Minimum 200 0
5 x (800-700) 5
Growth Target
5
API Indicator WeightsElementary and Middle
Schools
2004 Growth API
(SAT-9 in 1999, CAT/6 in 2003)
CSTCalifornia Standards Test NRT
Norm-referenced test Law states API is minimum of
60 test results
6
API Indicator WeightsHigh Schools
CSTCalifornia Standards Test NRT
Norm-referenced test
7
Calculating the API Step 1 Determine indicator
score for each test
8
Calculating the API Step 2 Sum weighted
indicators
9
Example Calculation2003 API Base (Gr. 2-8)
10
Changing Cohorts
Elementary Schools
Middle Schools
11
Californias Statewide Student Identifier (CSIS)
  • CSIS will, working with LEAs, assign a statewide
    Student Identifier to every K-12 student in
    California
  • CDE will convene a Committee to
  • Guide system development
  • Establish privacy and access protocols
  • Make recommendations relative to data elements

12
The Approach
  • CDE will develop a longitudinal data base to
    track student data over time, using the
    individual Student Identifier, to develop a
    system to
  • Improve District and State access to data
    required by NCLB
  • Support a better means of evaluating progress and
    investments over time
  • Supply District and School information that can
    be used to improve pupil achievement

13
Time Line
  • Every K-12 student must have a CSIS Student
    Identifier by June 2005
  • The Identifier will be required on all state
    assessments in 2005-2006
  • Fall Data Maintenance Submission to maintain
    identifiers and track dropouts and graduates
    required in 2005

14
Who Must Use CSIS Statewide Student Identifiers?
  • 1,057 LEAs in the state (213 currently)
  • 8,664 schools (Includes Charter Schools)
  • Approximately 6.5 million students (2.7 million
    already assigned)

15
The CSIS Student Identifier
  • The identifier number is created from a
    calculation method that is nearly random 
  • 10 digits  all numeric
  • 10th digit is a check digit
  • First digit is never zero
  • There are no occurrences of more than 2 repeating
    digits (e.g. 333 is not allowed, but 33 is
    acceptable)
  • Numbers are assigned evenly spread across the
    range from 1,001,001,001 to 9,989,989,989 

16
SB 257 adds
  • Requires PSAA Advisory Committee to make
    recommendations to the SSPI on the
    appropriateness and feasibility of a methodology
    for generating a measurement of academic
    performance by utilizing unique pupil identifiers
    for pupils in K-12, and annual academic
    achievement growth to provide a more accurate
    measure of a schools growth over time.

17
  • Requires recommendations by July 1, 2005
    (contingent on funding)
  • If found to be appropriate and feasible, requires
    the SSPI, with approval of the State Board, to
    implement the measurement of academic performance

18
Implementation Status Assignment of Identifiers
  • Training on the assignment of identifiers is
    ongoing
  • The goal is for all identifiers to be assigned by
    April 30, 2005
  • Student identifier required on all statewide
    assessments beginning in 2005-06

19
More Information
  • Robert Bernstein
  • EPIC Administrator
  • Policy and Evaluation Division
  • RBernste_at_cde.ca.gov
  • 916-319-0863
  • Rachel Perry
  • Evaluation, Research Analysis Unit
    Administrator
  • Policy and Evaluation Division
  • RPerry_at_cde.ca.gov
  • 916-319-0875
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com