Strength of Association - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 13
About This Presentation
Title:

Strength of Association

Description:

'Strength of Association. What is the difference between a ... Others available: Kendall's tau (t); Somer's d (less frequently used) Rank-order statistics: ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:62
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 14
Provided by: edwe3
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Strength of Association


1
Strength of Association
  • What is the difference between a significance
    test statistic and a measure of association
  • What does each one tell us about a bivariate
    relationship?
  • How are they related?
  • How can we measure the Strength of Association
    between two variables?
  • Coefficient should range between .0 1
  • Coefficient should not be affected by N
  • Coefficient should not be affected by a
    variables metric or scale of measurement
  • Coefficient values should be interpretable or
    meaningful

2
Strength of Association (cont.)
  • What does bivariate association mean?
    Generally reflects two distinct ideas
  • Covariance or co-occurrence between variables
    (versus independence)
  • Measures of agreement or covariance
  • Predictability of one variable from the other
    (versus randomness)
  • Proportional Reduction of Error (PRE) Measures
  • A number of different measures of association
  • Based on different levels of measurement
  • Based on different logical models criteria

3
Strength of Association (continued)
  • Association between 2 numerical variables ?
    Covariance Correlation
  • Coefficient of Association Pearsons r
  • r-squared proportion of variance in common
  • May use Spearmans r if data are ranked
  • Association between 1 categoric variable and 1
    numeric variable ? ANOVA mean differences
    (F-tests and t-tests)
  • Coefficient of Association eta (?)
  • eta-squared proportion of variance between
    groups

4
Strength of Association (continued)
  • Association between 2 categoric variables ?
    Ordinal or Nominal
  • Approaches to nonparametric measures of
    association ? (a) Chi-square-based (b) PRE (c)
    Concordance/agreement
  • Nominal (unordered) variables
  • Chi-square-derived
  • Contingency coefficient, C
  • Cramers V coefficient ? use this for 2x3 or
    larger
  • Phi coefficient, F ? use this for 2x2 tables
  • PRE-derived
  • Lambda (asymmetric)

5
Strength of Association (continued)
  • Association between 2 categoric variables
    (continued)
  • Ordinal (ordered) variables
  • Concordance-based statistics
  • Gamma, ? ? most commonly used
  • Others available Kendalls tau (t) Somers d
    (less frequently used)
  • Rank-order statistics
  • Use only if many categories few ties (i.e.,
    cases with the same value on a variable)
  • Can also use Chi-square-based measures

6
Strength of Association (continued)
  • Categoric Measures A Summary
  • Nominal variables
  • Phi, F for 2x2 tables
  • Kramers V for larger than 2x2 tables
  • Ordinal variables
  • Gamma, ? ? most commonly used
  • Yules Q ? same statistic in a 2x2 table
  • Use rank-order statistics (Spearmans r) only if
    many values few ties
  • Can also use Phi and Kramers V

7
Strength of Association (continued)
  • Categoric measures of association
  • Different coefficients will generally not yield
    the same values on the same crosstab
  • Gamma ( Yules Q) will almost always compute
    higher values than Kramers V ( Phi) on the same
    tables

8
Strength of Association (continued)
  • Categoric measures of association
  • How to Compute them?
  • By Hand see formulas in the textbook
  • Chi-square-based easiest to compute
  • Note special computing formulas for 2x2 tables
  • Note X Y variables in crosstab must be
    formatted in the same direction for ordinal-level
    statistics (e.g., Gamma)
  • In SPSS Click statistics box in Crosstabs
    pop-up menu, then select appropriate coefficients
    (do not select them all)

9
(No Transcript)
10
(No Transcript)
11
Strength of Association (continued)
  • Going beyond bivariate analysis to multivariate
    analyses
  • We often wish to consider more than two variables
    at a time because other variables may be involved
    in more complex patterns
  • Termed Partialling or controlling ?
    statistically consider the confounding influence
    of additional variables (3rd variable problem)
  • This invokes the concept of Ceteris paribus
    (holding everything else equal)

12
Strength of Association (continued)
  • Going beyond bivariate analysis to multivariate
    analyses
  • Partialling or controlling ? statistically
    consider the confounding influence of additional
    variables (3rd variable problem)
  • In cross-tabulations, this means nesting the
    crosstabs within the 3rd variable
  • i.e., compute separate sub-crosstabs within
    levels of the 3rd variable
  • See the example on the handout

13
Strength of Association (continued)
  • Going beyond bivariate analysis to multivariate
    analyses
  • Partialling or controlling ? statistically
    consider the confounding influence of additional
    variables (3rd variable problem)
  • In cross-tabulations, this means nesting the
    crosstabs within the 3rd variable
  • i.e., compute separate sub-crosstabs within
    levels of the 3rd variable
  • See the example on the handout
  • Only useful when 3rd variable is associated with
    both X and Y variables.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com