Measuring Sustainability - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 28
About This Presentation
Title:

Measuring Sustainability

Description:

Unless we start to make real progress toward reconciling these contradictions, ... The Sustainable Development Commission have set up a database of case studies. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:406
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 29
Provided by: asba5
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Measuring Sustainability


1
Measuring Sustainability
  • Dr Keith Jones
  • Reader in Sustainable Buildings

2
Scope of the Problem
  • The following slides outline the UK Government's
    approach to Sustainable Development - delivering
    UK sustainable development together.
  • http//www.sustainable-development.gov.uk/index.h
    tm
  • The past 20 years have seen a growing realisation
    that the current model of development is
    unsustainable. In other words we are living
    beyond our means. From the loss of biodiversity
    with the felling of rainforest's or over fishing
    to the negative effect our consumption patterns
    are having on the environment and the climate.
    Our way of life is placing an increasing burden
    on the planet - this cannot be sustained.

3
Scope of the Problem
  • The increasing stress we put on resources and
    environmental systems such as water, land and air
    cannot go on for ever. Especially as the world's
    population continues to increase and we already
    see a world where over a billion people live on
    less than a dollar a day, more than 800 million
    are malnourished, and over two and a half billion
    lack access to adequate sanitation.
  • A widely-used and accepted international
    definition of sustainable development is
    'development which meets the needs of the present
    without compromising the ability of future
    generations to meet their own needs' - Globally
    we are not even meeting the needs of the present
    let alone considering the needs of future
    generations.

4
Scope of the Problem
  • Unless we start to make real progress toward
    reconciling these contradictions, we all,
    wherever we live, face a future that is less
    certain and less secure than we in the UK have
    enjoyed over the past fifty years. We need to
    make a decisive move toward more sustainable
    development both because it is the right thing to
    do - and because it is in our own long-term best
    interests. It offers the best hope for securing
    the future.
  • The UK Government, Scottish Executive, Welsh
    Assembly Government and the Northern Ireland
    Administration have agreed upon a set of shared
    UK principles that provide a basis for
    sustainable development policy in the UK.

5
UK priorities
  • The UK has four priority areas for immediate
    action, shared across the UK, these are
  • Sustainable Consumption and Production
  • Climate Change and Energy
  • Natural Resource Protection and Environmental
    Enhancement
  • Sustainable Communities
  • The Government also recognises that changing
    behaviour is a cross cutting theme closely linked
    to all of these priorities.
  • The principles and approaches are covered in more
    detail in and the UK Strategic Securing the
    Future - the UK Government's sustainable
    development strategy Framework

6
Shared UK principles of sustainable development
7
What can be done?
  • Sustainable development can not be delivered by
    Government alone. People can all help to deliver
    it by making even the smallest changes in our
    lives.
  • http//www.wearewhatwedo.org/
  • http//www.globalactionplan.org.uk/
  • http//www.sustainable-development.gov.uk/delivery
    /global-local/Whatcancommunitiesdo.htm
  • http//www.tuc.org.uk/theme/index.cfm?themesustai
    nableworkplace
  • http//www.swapxchange.org/
  • http//www.greenchoices.org/
  • http//www.btcv.org/
  • http//www.yearofthevolunteer.org/
  • http//www.roughguide-betterworld.com/

8
Policy tools for delivery
  • Sustainable development needs to be built into
    policy making at all levels. The Government
    provides a revised set of shared UK principles in
    the new Strategic Framework. There are also a
    number of tool kits to support policy makers in
    delivery, these are set out below
  • http//www.sustainable-development.gov.uk/what/too
    ls.htm

9
Examples of Best Practice
  • The Sustainable Development Commission have set
    up a database of case studies. http//www.sustaina
    ble-development.gov.uk/what/best-practice.htm
  • Business
  • World Business Council for Sustainable
    Development
  • Environment
  • Envirowise
  • Commission for Architecture and the Built
    Environment - Parks and Public Spaces
  • Energy Saving Trust
  • Housing and Planning
  • Office of the Deputy Prime Minister - Planning
    Guidance
  • Design for homes
  • Commission for Architecture and the Built
    Environment
  • Regeneration
  • Renewal.net
  • Crimereduction.gov.uk

10
Key priority areas
  • As a result of the 2004 consultation to develop
    new UK sustainable development strategy the
    following issues have been highlighted as the
    main priority areas for immediate action.
  • Sustainable consumption and production - working
    towards achieving more with less.
  • Natural resource protection and environmental
    enhancement - protecting the natural resources on
    which we depend.
  • From local to global building sustainable
    communities creating places where people want to
    live and work, now and in the future.
  • Climate change and energy - confronting the
    greatest threat.
  • In addition to these four priorities changing
    behaviour also forms a large part of the
    Governments thinking on sustainable development.

11
UK Government Sustainable Development Strategy
indicators
  • The UK Government has established a new set of
    high-level indicators the UK Framework
    Indicators to give an overview of sustainable
    development and the priority areas shared across
    the UK.
  • In addition to the shared UK Framework Indicators
    there are indicators, targets and performance
    measures in the individual strategies for the UK
    Government, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland.
    These will underpin the shared framework
    priorities while reflecting the respective
    priorities of each administration.
  • Indicators for the UK Government Strategy include
    all 20 of the UK Framework Indicators and a
    further 48 indicators related to the priority
    areas.

12
UK Government Sustainable Development Framework
indicators
  • The link gives a summary of assessments for the
    20 UK sustainable development strategy Framework
    indicators. These give an overview of sustainable
    development and highlight priority areas shared
    across the UK. http//www.sustainable-developmen
    t.gov.uk/performance/framework.htm
  • The link below gives a summary of assessments for
    the other 48 (non-Framework) indicators
    supporting the UK Government Sustainable
    Development Strategy. http//www.sustainable-devel
    opment.gov.uk/performance/otherinds.htm

13
Sustainable Construction Indicators
  • Sustainable construction is monitored through
    Constructing Excellence. www.constructingexcellenc
    e.org.uk
  • The demonstrations programme is at the heart of
    Constructing Excellence. This provides the
    opportunity for leading edge organisations, from
    every part of construction, to bring forward
    exemplars that demonstrate innovation and change,
    which can be measured, evaluated and shared.
    These can be site-based or organisational-change
    projects. There are more than 400 projects in the
    programme, with a total value of over 7bn. They
    examples of off-site construction,
    standardisation, the use of new technology,
    respect for people activities, partnering and
    supply chain integration, and other areas of
    process improvement. The demonstrations have
    developed a culture of performance measurement as
    the primary way to verify innovation and
    improvement.

14
Sustainable Construction Indicators
  • Constructing Excellence has a commitment to
    sustainability. The Housing Forum formed a
    Sustainability Working Group in 2000 and produced
    a report in 2001. The Best Practice Knowledge
    stream (previously Movement for Innovation (M4I))
    also formed a Sustainability Working Group and a
    spreadsheet tool called the Sustainability Index
    was created, covering social, economic and
    environmental factors. However, with the industry
    grappling with the changes initiated its use was
    limited. The Sustainability Working Group next
    published an initial set of benchmarks for
    environmental performance indicators (EPIs) in
    2001 and these have been developed into the
    Environment Key Performance Indicators which were
    first published in 2003.

15
Sustainable Construction Indicators
  • Work for the Local Government Task Force (LGTF)
    on a Sustainable Construction Action Plan
    highlighted the many roles and responsibilities
    local government can utilise to encourage,
    procure and produce more sustainable
    construction. More sustainable construction
    becomes a tangible prospect now that
  • industry has become comfortable with using key
    performance measures
  • Environment Key Performance Indicators are
    becoming mainstream, through incorporation in the
    DTI annual surveys and client specification
  • Respect for People toolkits and Design Quality
    Indicator (DQI) have been launched.

16
Sustainable Construction Indicators
  • To embed and mainstream sustainability into
    Constructing Excellence's own demonstrations, a
    checklist was compiled in late 2002. The
    checklist is based upon the Sustainable
    Construction Action Plan and the Sustainability
    Index, utilising the outputs of all the
    sustainability working groups, and considering
    the latest thinking and practice of sustainable
    construction. This checklist is being made
    available to all new demonstrations through the
    National Strategy Panel, to provoke thought and
    further innovation.

17
Sustainable Construction Indicators
  • Many of the past and current demonstrations
    address aspects of sustainability included in the
    checklist. Constructing Excellence wish to
    celebrate the innovations, and prove that the
    checklist provides an achievable framework, that
    future demonstrations and the whole industry can
    aspire to.
  • This website examines each section and criterion
    of the checklist in the context of a construction
    project moving from
  • planning
  • design
  • construction process
  • finished product

18
Sustainable Construction Indicators
  • Each stage looks at economic, social and
    environmental issues and uses past and current
    demonstrations to show how the criteria can be
    met. This website does not feature every
    demonstration that has tackled sustainability,
    but the full range of such projects can be
    accessed in the Demonstrations' area of the
    website. Some of the demonstrations prove many of
    the checklist criteria, but to enable this report
    to show the breadth of achievement by the
    demonstrations, each demonstration is used to
    highlight only one criterion from the checklist,
    with a couple of exceptions. This structure helps
    users find the areas of interest to them, and it
    must be stressed that all areas are
    interconnected and impact upon each other.

19
Review of Toolkits
  • A research group led by the University of Dundee
    has been evaluating the usefulness of a range of
    sustainability toolkits.
  • Environmental
  • Social
  • The researchers also held a series of workshops
    to

20
Environmental Toolkits
  • 147 environmental toolkits were identified.
  • 41 were partially evaluated
  • Problems with accessing information
  • 25 were fully evaluated.
  • Urban planning tools
  • Macro level
  • Design tools
  • Building level
  • Assessment tools
  • LCA approach
  • Infrastructure tools
  • CEEQUAL project based

21
Environmental Toolkits
  • Each toolkit was assessed against a range of
    characteristics
  • Flexibility adaptability to situation
  • Upgrading longevity
  • Compatibility input/output to other toolkits
  • Aggregation/Disaggregation score breakdown
  • Holistic does it cover whole building life
    cycle
  • Multidimensional triple bottom line
  • Inclusive range of stakeholders
  • Scaleable from building through neighbourhood
    to city and beyond.
  • The toolkits were also assessed for data issues
  • Type quantitative/qualitataive
  • Source calculated, estimated, secondary (eg
    location)

22
Environmental Toolkits
  • Findings (derived from the report)
  • Urban planning and rating systems are the most
    developed.
  • Very few toolkits covered all aspects of
    sustainability effectively.
  • Input data is critical if the outputs are to be
    defensible.
  • A full analysis of each toolkit can be found at
    http//www.sue-mot.org.uk/

23
Social Toolkits
  • Over 100 tookits identified
  • 78 evaluated
  • Clustered in broad categories
  • Analysed according to
  • What situations they applied to
  • Scale site to international
  • Stage of life cycle
  • Sector public/private
  • Issues education, crime etc
  • Data quantitative/qualitative
  • Analysis reductionist (eg reduces to money)
  • Outputs descriptive/predictive, comparative etc
  • Skills needed expert/non expert
  • Presentation invisible, visible

24
Social Toolkits
  • Three main categories were identified

Describing and monitoring the status of
sustainability
Predicting and evaluating sustainability impacts
Modifying peoples perceptions and actions
towards sustainability
25
Social Toolkits
  • General findings
  • There is no such thing as a good toolkit
  • Must be considered in context/purpose
  • Toolkits do not seem to be converging
  • Approach, data, presentation
  • Dealing with uncertainty
  • Tools that require full detailed data do not
    necessarily produce more certain results but
    merely mask uncertainty.
  • This causes problems with mathematical based
    models
  • Few existing toolkits come close to assessing
    sustainability
  • Inclusive, holistic, multi-dimensional, triple
    bottom line, political, technical legal etc

26
Social Toolkits
  • General findings cont
  • Sustainability involves judgement about
    integration
  • It may be impossible to develop a true
    sustainability toolkit.
  • Social toolkits are the poor relation in the
    triple bottom line.
  • Toolkits need to be useable and robust
  • These are not always compatible
  • Several toolkits required so much data and
    expertise to use that they were essentially
    unusable in practice.
  • Again further details can be found at
    http//www.sue-mot.org.uk/

27
SPeAR
  • One toolkit that both groups studies was Arups
    SPeAR approach.

28
Summary
  • Measuring sustainability is not straight forward.
  • Tools need to be holistic, flexible, robust,
    multi-dimensional, scaleable, appropriate,
    useable, practicable etc.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com