Soy Transportation Coalition - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Soy Transportation Coalition

Description:

Wireless Telecommunications Bureau ... Wireless Telecommunications Bureau. The Mobile ... Source: Cellular Telecommunications & Internet Association; FCC. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:55
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 19
Provided by: MikeSte
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Soy Transportation Coalition


1
Soy Transportation Coalition
2
Overview
  • The Transportation Challenge
  • Establishing the Soy Transportation Coalition
  • Action Steps
  • Questions/Feedback

3
The Transportation Challenge
  • The U.S. transportation infrastructure
    heretofore a facilitator of economic growth a
    source of competitive advantage in both the
    domestic international marketplace is
    increasingly an obstacle to profitability for the
    agricultural sector, in general, the soybean
    industry, in particular.
  • Rail transportation is of particular concern

4
Why Should the U.S. Soybean Industry Be Concerned
About Transportation?
  • Export markets are becoming less favorable for
    U.S. soybean products
  • Reduced prices for farmers at original point of
    sale increasingly due to domestic
    transportation costs

5
The Transportation Challenge Escalating Rates
Costs
  • National Grain Feed Association (NGFA)
    estimates that over the last 3 years, 43 of
    grain oilseed shipments 28 of soybean meal
    oil were moved at rates exceeding 180 of
    variable costs of the rail companies.
  • (BNSFs) earnings were up more than 25 last
    year (2006), thanks in part to a 15 boost in
    freight revenue 2/3 of which came from price
    increases. CSX revenue grew 8 last year, the
    company estimates that 60 of that came from
    price increases. (MSN Money)
  • No accessible, cost-effective option for shippers
    to challenge excessive rates (Surface
    Transportation Board established an excessive
    threshold)
  • In addition to rates, costs are increasingly
    shifted onto rail shippers
  • Tonnage carried by railcar ownership 1987 2004
  • Privately owned 40 60
  • Railroad owned 60 40

6
The Transportation Challenge Declining Service
  • Soybean producing regions are experiencing an
    abundance of rail traffic, but a scarcity of rail
    service.
  • Growing percentage of rail transit occurs via
    100 car unit trains from the West Coast to urban
    centers with few stops en route increasingly
    difficult for rural areas to access service
  • Due to inherent challenges facing agriculture
    (i.e. - seasonality of demand, high volume/low
    value shipping, diverse points of origin), rail
    companies are less enthused to service the
    industry

7
The Transportation Challenge Infrastructure
Limitations
  • Freight demand expected to increase 67 over
    next decade (Source Informa Economics)
  • Railroads in the U.S. are primarily funded via
    private investments. Highways waterways are
    funded with public funds
  • Stock market discourages rail infrastructure
    investments encourages rate increases

8
The Transportation Challenge
  • Railroads understand are taking advantage of
    their elevated negotiating position resulting
    from
  • Trade with China India increasing volume of
    goods to be shipped from West Coast ports to rest
    of the country
  • High oil prices greater use transportation of
    coal
  • Lack of investment in nations interior
    waterways
  • Trucking (main competitor) hurt by high fuel
    costs, driver shortages, limits on amount of time
    behind the wheel, weight thresholds, limits on
    highway road construction

9
The Transportation Challenge
  • Question If our nations highway county road
    system was developed maintained according to
    the same guidelines as our freight rail system,
    how many soybean crushers, elevators, biodiesel
    plants would have access to quality roads?

10
Establishing the Soy Transportation Coalition
  • As transportation concerns continued to become
    more acute, a group of soy industry leaders
    (QSSBs, USB, ASA, NOPA, NGFA) decided to discuss
    how to address them (August 2006 December
    2006)
  • Decision was made to establish a formal
    organization Soy Transportation Coalition (STC)
    - hire an Executive Director (February 2007)

11
Establishing the Soy Transportation Coalition
  • The STC has been established as a legal entity
    (bylaws, articles of incorporation, etc.)
  • Board of Directors 10-15 members from
    participating QSSBs ASA 5 ex-officio members
    from USB NGFA NOPA leadership ex-officio
    members
  • Goal of STC Position soybean industry
    stakeholders to benefit from a transportation
    system that delivers cost effective, reliable,
    competitive service.

12
Action Steps To be a credible voice on the
transportation debate, the STC needs to
  • Wrap our arms around the issue/Be a respected
    source of information
  • Accumulate data from processors, biodiesel
    plants, etc. in order to quantify increasingly
    document both problems (rates, service, etc.)
    attitudes about transportation issues. Be able
    to sort by state , possibly, by congressional
    district.
  • Continue to assemble specific anecdotes
    experiences of transportation concerns
    hardships from each state (processors, biodiesel,
    elevators, etc.)
  • Assemble U.S. vs. overseas transportation
    infrastructure data anecdotes illustrating
    how U.S. agricultures competitive advantage is
    decreasing with time.
  • Translate transportation concerns constraints
    into tangible per bushel costs for farmers lost
    revenue for a rural community. Farmers are the
    only ones who cant pass the buck.

13
Action Steps To be a credible voice on the
transportation debate, the STC needs to
  • Educate our membership
  • Soybean industry publications
  • Agricultural transportation focused media
    outlets
  • In person visits to each state (board meetings,
    local chambers of commerce, local media, etc.)
  • Collaborate with other agricultural groups
    industries (including railroads when
    appropriate)
  • Develop relationships with Congress, Surface
    Transportation Board, USDA, etc. ensuring that
    STCs positions messages are increasingly
    penetrating the overall transportation debate
    (education, not lobbying)

14
Potential Questions
  • Why establish a group specific to soybeans? Are
    we reinventing the wheel?
  • For any significant change to occur, the
    farmer/producer community must be educated,
    engaged, motivated (no longer solely relegated
    to industry). Agricultural groups are either the
    best of advocates or the worst of advocates
    completely a function of how engaged the
    membership is.
  • Network of producers extensive relationships
    with other industries puts the soybean industry
    in a unique position to shape the overall debate
    affect positive change.

15
Potential Questions
  • Why establish a group specific to soybeans? Are
    we reinventing the wheel? (contd)
  • Other industries are engaged (sources of
    collaboration), but their prescribed
    transportation system may not mirror ours.
  • Improving our transportation infrastructure will
    not result from one single champion on behalf of
    all industries. It will result from a
    collaboration of many actively engaged
    organizations.
  • Neglecting the issue would be a disservice to the
    farmers/producers. Our organizations have a
    track record of being advocates for those issues
    that are important to members (farm bills,
    exports, etc.). Given the importance of
    transportation issues our organizations cannot
    respond by being passive or deferring to other
    groups.

16
Potential Questions
  • Can anything of significance be accomplished to
    improve the transportation climate for the
    soybean industry? Yes!
  • By the end of 2007, the STC will have
  • Identified on a more comprehensive level the rate
    service challenges facing the soybean industry
  • Raised the awareness level of transportation
    issues among our producer community throughout
    the country
  • Developed collaborative relationships with other
    agricultural groups effected industries
  • Developed relationships with transportation
    decision makers (Congress, Surface Transportation
    Board, USDA)
  • Will provide the foundation for the STC to move
    forward leverage our voice for needed change.

17
Conclusion
  • Our political leaders, the national media, the
    general public regularly articulate many goals
    objectives that involve the soybean industry
  • Decreasing reliance on Middle East oil
  • Decreasing our foreign trade imbalance
  • Revitalizing rural America
  • Transportation is a linchpin to each of these
    goals. Without an coherent, integrated
    transportation system, these intentions will
    never become outcomes.
  • The Soy Transportation Coalition can greatly
    assist this effort , in the process, provide a
    valuable service to our industry.

18
Thank you!
  • Mike Steenhoek, Executive Director
  • Soy Transportation Coalition
  • 4554 114th Street
  • Urbandale, Iowa 50322
  • 515-727-0665
  • 515-251-8657 (fax)
  • msteenhoek_at_soytransportation.org
  • www.soytransportation.org
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com