Plausible Fallacies - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 16
About This Presentation
Title:

Plausible Fallacies

Description:

'Plausible Fallacies' Paul P Craig. Chairman, Sierra Club National Committee on ... Paul P. Craig, Ashok Gadgil, and Jonathan G. Koomey. Annual Review of Energy and ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:83
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 17
Provided by: stephanieh1
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Plausible Fallacies


1
Plausible Fallacies
  • Paul P Craig
  • Chairman, Sierra Club National Committee on
    Global Warming and Energy
  • Professor Emeritus of Engineering
  • University of California, Davis
  • ppcraig_at_ucdavis.edu

2
Coal crisis 1865William Stanley Jevons
  • The thoughtless and selfish, indeed, who fear
    any interference with the enjoyment of the
    present, will be apt to stigmatize all reasoning
    about the future as absurd and chimerical It is
    true that at best we see dimly into the future,
    but those who acknowledge their duty to posterity
    will feel impelled to use their foresight upon
    what facts and guiding principles we do possess.
    We ought not at least to delay in dispersing a
    set of plausible fallacies about the economy of
    fuel, and the discovery of substitutes for coal,
    which at present obscure the critical nature of
    the question, and are eagerly passed about among
    those who like to believe that we have an
    indefinite period of prosperity before us.
  • Jevons, W.S., The Coal Crisis An Inquiry
    Concerning the Progress of the Nation, and the
    Probable Exhaustion of Our Coal-mines.
    reprint1965 ed. 1865, New York Augustus M
    Kelley.p4

3
Global Climate Change research comprisesScience
andSocial ScienceTheyre different
  • My comments are based on ideas in
  • What Can History Teach Us? A Retrospective
    Examination of Long-term Energy Forecasts for the
    U.S.
  • Paul P. Craig, Ashok Gadgil, and Jonathan G.
    Koomey. Annual Review of Energy and
  • Environment, 27 (83-118) 2002

4
Long-range energy forecasts arent like forecasts
based on science
  • Long-range forecasting models necessarily make
    assumptions about human behavior (including
    social, institutional and personal) and human
    innovation
  • Long-range forecasting models do not meet these
    criteria
  • Theyre useful anyway provided one doesnt
    lose track of their limitations

5
Usefulness and Accuracy are different concepts.
Long range forecasts are not validatable
US Energy forecasts for 2000(circa 1975)
2000
1975
6
Long-range Energy Forecasts are Not Validatable
  • Validate as used here is a technical term
  • Not validatable means, in essence, that the
    standard principles for testing used in science
    dont apply.
  • The term in the sense used here was
    introduced by Hodges and Dewar at RAND. their
    context was military planning
  • Is It You Or Your Model Talking? A Framework
    For Model Validation. Hodges J, Dewar J. Rep.
    ISBN 0-8330-1223-1, RAND Corporation, Santa
    Monica, CA 1992.

7
Situations described by Validatable Models
  • 1) must be observable,
  • 2) must exhibit constancy of structure in time,
  • 3) must exhibit constancy across variations in
    conditions not specified in the model,
  • 4) must permit collection of ample and accurate
    data.

8
Non-validatable forecasts can be useful
  • To understand the Bounds or Limits on the Range
    of Possible Outcomes
  • As training Aids
  • As bookkeeping devices. To condense masses of
    data and to provide incentives for improving data
    quality
  • As automatic Management Systems Whose Efficacy
    Does Not Require the Model to be a True
    Representation
  • continued

9
Seven ways in which non-validatable forecasts can
be useful (continued)
  • As aids in selling ideas or to achieve political
    ends.
  • As aids in Communication and Education
  • As aids to Thinking and Hypothesizing

10
Nixon-Project Independence Blueprint (1973)
  • Energy Independence by 1980
  • didnt happen!!!

1973
1980
11
Being right is not the same as being correct
Hans Landsbergs RFF (Resources For the Future)
example of being fortuitously correct (1960
forecast, reviewed by Landsberg in 1980)
12
Forecasting requires extrapolation
History shows that accepted assumptions sometimes
failed badly
13
Lessonsdeer in the headlights
  • Keep reminding yourself that the uncertainties
    are huge
  • There are few fundamental principles of human
    behavior
  • Avoid hubris
  • Assess both upside and downside risk in the
    global warming arena its now clear (to the
    Sierra Club, at least) that the risks dominate,
    and the risk of the business as usual approach
    is enormous.
  • Research supported by the US Climate Change
    Program is critically important in significant
    part because it may show the consequences of
    inaction.
  • Sometimes success occurs because the forecast
    leads to behavioral change. failure is success

14
A comment from 1905
  • Modern life concentrates its attention with
    ever increasing earnestness upon care for the
    future. ..In strong contrast to this dominance of
    forethought stands that apathy concerning the
    morrow, into which a few of our unfortunates
    slip, but which is essentially characteristic of
    the savage.
  • Jevons, H.S., Essays on Economics. 1905, NY
    McMillan. pp280. p66

15
(No Transcript)
16
When we try to pick out anything by itself, we
find it hitched to everything else in the
universe
Paul Craig Chairman, Sierra Club National Global
Warming and Energy Committee Professor Emeritus,
UC Davis ppcraig_at_ucdavis.edu www.sierraclub.org/
globalwarming
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com