Ecological effects of wildfire foams and retardants in Australia James Stewart - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 18
About This Presentation
Title:

Ecological effects of wildfire foams and retardants in Australia James Stewart

Description:

Bell, T, L., 2003, 'Effects of fire retardant on vegetation in eastern Australia ... Specht, R, L., 1963, 'Dark Island Heath (Ninety-Mile Plain, South Australia) VII. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:318
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 19
Provided by: www2F
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Ecological effects of wildfire foams and retardants in Australia James Stewart


1
Ecological effects of wildfire foams and
retardants in AustraliaJames Stewart
2
Summary
  • Introduction
  • Australian soil characteristics and floristic
    adaptations
  • Fire fighting chemical types
  • Australian Studies
  • Conclusion

3
Introduction
  • Fire fighting chemicals have been used in Aus for
    approx 30 yrs, worldwide 35yrs
  • Environmental effects of fire retardants have
    been of concern since the 1970s
  • Average of 120,000 l/yr of fire retardant
    chemicals used in Vic, Aus

4
Introduction
  • Firefighting chemicals used in Australia have
    been tested and approved by the United States
    Department of Agriculture for effects on the
    environment.
  • As a result, no separate or further toxicological
    assessment is required for registration in
    Australia, therefore, it is endorsed by the
    Australasian Fire Authorities Council
  • In Australia, large numbers of species are
    endemic, many are rare.
  • Many of the sclerophyllous plant families such as
    Epacridaceae, Proteaceous, and Myrtaceae are not
    represented in the North American flora

5
Australian soil characteristics and floristic
adaptations
  • Most Aus soils are based upon sedimentary rock
  • Naturally low in P along with N
  • P determines flora spp. distribution
  • Aus flora able redistribute P
  • Aus flora respond negatively to extra P

6
Fire fighting chemicals
  • Two general types of fire control chemicals
  • Long-term fire retardants
  • Remain effective after the water has evaporated
  • Short-term fire retardants
  • Depend on the water they contain to suppress the
    fire

7
Fire fightingchemicals
  • Long-Term Fire Retardants
  • Are typically fertilizer salts which are mixed
    with water to ensure uniform dispersal.
  • Commonly used long-term retardants are mixtures
    of diammonium sulphate, diammonium phosphate,
    monoammonium phosphate-gum thickeners, iron
    oxide-colouring agent, and preservatives
  • Usually by aerial application

8
Fire fighting chemicals
  • Particularly useful in slowing the spread of
    fires in remote, inaccessible terrain as well as
    in controlling spot fires, allowing time for the
    construction of control lines
  • Form a non-combustible barrier after the
    evaporation of the water
  • The ammonium salts chemically combine with
    cellulose as the fuels are heated, effectively
    removing the fuel from combustion

9
Fire fighting chemicals
  • Short-Term Retardants
  • Injected into the water as it is pumped out, the
    nozzle aerates it, forming a frothy mixture.
  • Contain surfactants, foaming, and wetting agents,
    which
  • Reduce surface tension
  • Increases the ability of water to spread over the
    fuel and penetrate into the fuel
  • Reduce the rate of water evaporation and drainage
  • Insulated from fuels from heat
  • Reduced contact from air

10
Australian Studies
  • Long term retardant tested on Euc vegetation in
    Blue Mountains, NSW
  • Resulted in Euc leaf death within a week of
    treatment, which continued for many months, but
    no tree mortality
  • Understorey shrubs
  • Mortality in two spp.
  • Decreases in cover for 19 of 45 spp.
  • Ability to survive and recover is probably a
    function of individual spp. characteristics

Dodonaea triquetra (Large-leaf hop-bush)
Acacia longifolia (Sallow Wattle)
11
Australian Studies
  • DSE, VIC, applied Phos-Chek D75-R to 2 heathland
    communities which are naturally low in soil
    nutrients, esp. P
  • To determine on the effect on vegetation,
    surface-active invertebrates, and soil chemistry
  • Soil chemistry
  • pH decreased by up to 0.5 units
  • N and S content increased and decreased back to
    normal levels within 12 months
  • After 12 months, the P content was still 5 times
    above normal levels

12
Australian Studies
  • Vegetation
  • No significantly change species composition or
    projected foliage
  • Caused whole plant or shoot death in some and
    increased the shoot growth within other
    Allocasuarina, Banksia and Leptospermum spp.
  • Provided an environment more conducive to weed
    invasion
  • May potentially increased the growth rates of
    native grasses and sedge
  • Surface-active invertebrates
  • Normally recover within two or three years to
    pre-fire levels
  • There were no detectable retardant-related
    changes in the short-term

13
Australian Studies
  • Unintentional aerial application of long-term
    fire-fighting chemicals onto two small streams
    during a natural wildfire event on Kangaroo
    Island, SA,
  • Provided an opportunity to study the short-term
    effects on water chemistry and aquatic
    invertebrates.
  • 2 weeks, samples of water and macroinvertebrates
    were collected upstream, within and below
    application site
  • Three sites on a reference stream in the same
    sub-catchment that had been burned by the same
    fire but without application of fire-suppressants
    were also sampled.
  • All sites were resampled three months later

14
Australian Studies
  • Each stream differed in taxon richness and
    composition
  • Taxon richness was often higher at the middle and
    lower sites on the two impacted streams
  • Whereas there was no significant difference among
    sites on the reference stream
  • Reasoning for this could be environmental
    conditions in the isolated pools of Australian
    temporary streams are often severe especially
    where high salinity reduces the amount of
    dissolved oxygen available.
  • Lack of effect of fire-suppressant foams on
    macroinvertebrates may partly result from their
    inherent high tolerance to the harsh physical and
    chemical conditions of these streams

15
Conclusion
  • All projects acknowledged the limitations, short
    comings of individual projects involved and
    validity of results, these include
  • Increasing studies to more long-term (2 3
    years)
  • Well-defined experimental design and rigorous
    sample techniques to provide more ecologically
    and physiologically meaningful data sets
  • Sample size
  • Further glasshouse trails to investigate specific
    response of flora to fighting chemicals

16
Conclusion
  • External influences may have been factor in the
    outcome of results such as
  • Seasonal conditions
  • Salinity
  • Insect herbivory
  • Rainfall
  • Safety measures denied immediate access to fire
    impact site

17
  • References
  • Adams, R., Simmons, D., 1999a, Ecological
    effects of fire fighting foams and retardants,
    In, Proceedings of Australian Bushfire
    Conference, Albury, http//life.csu.edu.au/bushfi
    re99
  • Adams, R., Simmons, D., 1999b, Ecological
    effects of fire fighting foams and retardants a
    summary, Australian Forestry 62, 307 314.
  • Angus Fire Armour., 1997, Chemwatch Material
    Safety Data Sheet Angus ForExpan S Class A Foam
    Concentrate, Angus Fire Armour.
  • Ansul., 1998, Material Safety Data Sheet
    Silv-Ex Foam Concentrate, Ansul Fire Protection.
  • Ashton, D, H., 1976, Studies on mycorrhizae of
    Eucalyptus regnans F. Muell, Australian Journal
    of Botany 24, 723 - 741.
  • Attiwill, P, M., 1981, Energy, nutrient flow and
    biomass, In., Proceedings Australian Forest
    Nutrition Workshop, Productivity in Perpetuity,
    pp. 131 144, CSIRO, Melbourne.
  • Attiwill, P, M., Guthrie, H, B., Leuning, R.,
    1978, Nutrient cycling in a Eucalyptus
  • obliqua (L'Herit.) forest. I.
    Litter production and nutrient return,
    Australian Journal of Botany, 26, 79 - 91.
  • Attiwill, P, M., Leeper, G, W., 1987, Forest
    Soils and Nutrient Cycles, Melbourne
  • University Press, Melbourne.
  • Attiwill, P, M., 1991, Nutritional resilience of
    wet sclerophyll forest Recovery after
  • Disturbance, In., Third
    Australian Forest Soils and Nutrition
    Conference, pp. 172 -179, Forestry Commission of
    NSW, Sydney.
  • Beadle, N, C, W., 1962 An alternative hypothesis
    to account for the generally low phosphate
    content of Australian soils, Australian Journal
    of Agricultural Research 13, 434 - 442.
  • Bell, T, L., 2003, Effects of fire retardant on
    vegetation in eastern Australia heathlands
    preliminary investigation Research Report No.
    68, Fire Management, Department of Sustainability
    and Environment, Victoria. http//www.dse.vic.gov.
    au/DSE/nrenfoe.nsf/93a98744f6ec41bd4a256c8e00013aa
    9/ad45c166e91d6ac2ca256ecf00021167/FILE/_qa1k6usp
    dcdk6aqp04og7cpb79k_.pdf
  • Bradstock, R., Sanders, J., Tegart, A., 1987,
    Short-term effects on the foliage of a eucalypt
    forest after aerial application of a chemical
    fire retardant, Australian Forestry, 50 (2), 71
    80
  • Bevege, D, I., 1978, Biomass and nutrient
    distribution in indigenous forest ecosystems,
    Queensland Dept Forestry Technical Paper No. 6.
  • Boulton, T, J., Moss, G, L., Smithyman, D., 2003,
    Short-term effects of aerially-applied
    fire-suppressant foams on water chemistry and
    macroinvertebrates in streams after natural
    wild-fire on Kangaroo Island, South Australia,
    Hyrobiologia, 498, 177 189.

18
  • Heddle, E, M., Specht, R, L., 1975, Dark
    Island Heath (Ninety-Mile Plain, South
  • Australia) VIII. The effect of
    fertilizers on composition and growth, 1950
    1972, Australian Journal of Botany, 23, 151 -
    164.
  • Hopmans, P., Bickford, R., 2003, Effects of fire
    retardant on soils of heathland in Victoria
    Research Report No. 70, Fire Management,
    Department of Sustainability and Environment,
    Victoria. http//www.dse.vic.gov.au/dse/nrenfoe.ns
    f/93a98744f6ec41bd4a256c8e00013aa9/2b38514d68a5fb9
    cca256ecc00234fb3/FILE/_qa1k6uspdcdk6aqp04og76rr9
    dhpkq_.pdf
  • Kalabokidis, K, D., 2000, Effects of wildfire
    suppression chemicals on people and the
    environment A review, Global Nest The
    International Journal 2 (2), 129 137.
  • Larson, J, R., Duncan, D, A., 1982, Annual
    grassland response to fire retardant and
    wildfire, Journal of Range Management, 35, 700
    703.
  • Larson, D, L., Newton, W, E., Anderson, P.,
    Stein, S, J., 1999, Effects of fire retardant
    chemical and fire suppression foam on scrub
    steppe vegetation in northern Nevada,
    International Journal of Wildland Fire, 9 (2) 115
    127.
  • Lewis, M, A., Suprenant, D., 1983. Comparative
    acute toxicities of surfactants to aquatic
    invertebrates, Ecotoxicology and Environmental
    Safety, 7, 313322.
  • 3M., 1997, Material Safety Data Sheet 3M Brand
    FB100 Firebreak Forestry Foam Concentrate, 3M
    Center, St Paul, Minnesota.
  • McDonald, S, F., Hamilton, S, J., Buhl, K, J.,
    Heisinger, J, F., 1996, Acute toxicity of fire
    control chemicals to Daphnia magna (Straus) and
    Selenastrum capricornutum (Printz),
    Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 33,
    62-72.
  • McDonald, S, F., Hamilton, S, J., Buhl, K, J.,
    Heisinger, J, F., 1997 Acute toxicity of
    fire-retardant and foam-suppressant chemicals to
    Hyalella azteca (Saussure), Environmental
    Toxicology and Chemistry, 16, 13701376.
  • Monsanto., 1993, Phos-Chek WD-881 Fire
    Suppressant Foam Fact Sheet, Monsanto Wildfire
    Division, Ontario, California.
  • Ozanne, P, G., Specht, R, L., 1981, Mineral
    nutrition of heathlands Phosphorus toxicity,
    In. Ecosystems of the World, Vol 9A. Heathlands
    and Related Shrublands. Descriptive Studies,
    (Ed. R. L. Specht.), pp. 209 213, Elsevier
    Scientific, Amsterdam.
  • Pate, J, S., Dell, B., 1984 Economy of mineral
    nutrients in sandplain species, In.
  • Kwongan Plant Life of the
    Sandplain, (Eds J. S. Pate and J. S. Beard.),
    pp. 227 252, University of Western Australia
    Press, Perth.
  • Paul, K, I., Polglase, P, J., OConnell, A, M.,
    Carlyle, J, C., Smethurst, P, J., 2002, Soil
    nitrogen availability predictor (SNAP) a simple
    model for predicting mineralisation of nitrogen
    in forest soils, Australian Journal of Soil
    Research, 40, 1011 1026.
  • Raison, R, J., Khanna, P, K., Woods, P, V.,
    1985a, Mechanisms of element transfer to the
    atmosphere during vegetation fires, Canadian
    Journal of Forest Research, 15, 132 - 140.
  • Raison, R, J., Khanna, P, K., Woods, P, V.,
    1985b, Transfer of elements to the atmosphere
    during low-intensity prescribed fires in three
    Australian subalpine eucalypt forests, Canadian
    Journal of Forest Research, 15, 657 -664.
  • Rawet, D., Smith, R., Kravainis, G., 1996, A
    comparison of water additives for mopping-up
    after forest fires, International Journal of
    Wildland Fire, 6, 37-43.
  • Robinson, K., Fogarty, L., Webb, S., 1997,
    Firebombing effectiveness where to from
    here?, Fire Technology Transfer Note, No. 11,
    CHH Forests Ltd, Central Region, New Zealand
    National Rural Fire Authority. nrfa.fire.org.nz/re
    search/ _docs/Fttn11-aircraft-dropeffect.PDF
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com