Workplace Conflict Resolution - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 32
About This Presentation
Title:

Workplace Conflict Resolution

Description:

Workplace Conflict Resolution Jim Wohl, DVM, MPA University Ombuds Office Quad Center, Suite 005 Auburn University, AL 36849-5274 TEL: (334) 844-7170 – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:4527
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 33
Provided by: gradAubu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Workplace Conflict Resolution


1
Workplace Conflict Resolution
  • Jim Wohl, DVM, MPA

University Ombuds Office Quad Center, Suite
005 Auburn University, AL 36849-5274 TEL (334)
844-7170 FAX (334) 844-7089 ombuds_at_auburn.edu www
.auburn.edu/ombuds
2
What Is Conflict?
  • Competition between perceived or actual
    compatible needs, goals, desires, ideas, or
    resources.

3
Conflict Styles
Assertiveness
Competing
Collaborating
Compromising
Avoiding
Accommodating
Cooperativeness
- Brinkert, Thomas Killman Inventory
4
Which styles when?
  • 1. Competing
  • Emergencies
  • Being right matters more than relationship
  • Trivial matters

5
Which styles when?
  • 2. Avoiding
  • Trivial matters
  • Insignificant relationship
  • Time is short
  • Powerless but want to block

6
Which styles when?
  • 3. Collaborating
  • Issues and relationship are both significant
  • Cooperation is important
  • Addressing all concerns is possible
  • Creative end is important

7
Which styles when?
  • 4. Accommodating
  • Dont care
  • Powerless but no desire to block
  • Realized youre wrong

8
Which styles when?
  • 5. Compromising
  • Cooperation important but time is short
  • Finding some solution is better than stalemate
  • Efforts to collaborate would be misunderstood as
    forcing

9
Points To Ponder
  • Choosing a conflict style is situational The
    type of conflict and external environment provide
    the context
  • But.most people gravitate (specialize?) toward a
    particular conflict style

10
(No Transcript)
11
Goals Objectives During Conflict
  • Content Goals/Issues
  • Who wants what?
  • Contending over the same things (e.g. fixed
    resources)
  • Parties want different things?
  • Usually, easiest issues to identify
  • Often, the presenting issues

- Willmort Hocker
12
Goals Objectives During Conflict
  • Relational Issues
  • Who are we to each other?
  • Concerning value, purpose, and expectation of the
    relationship
  • How interdependent are parties?
  • Is there a shared understanding of the
    relationship?

- Willmort Hocker
13
Goals Objectives During Conflict
  • Identity Issues
  • Who am I in this interaction?
  • Affect of the conflict on the individual
  • Disrespected, attacked, shamed ?
  • Defensiveness, retaliation?
  • Has adequate time elapsed to recover from assault
    on identity or self-esteem?

- Willmort Hocker
14
Goals Objectives During Conflict
  • Process Issues
  • Will a fair process be used in resolving the
    conflict?
  • Present in all conflicts but may be latent
  • Related to procedural justice in civil, legal,
    and workplace environments
  • Fairness, transparency, and participation may be
    key

- Willmort Hocker
15
CRIP Framework
C
C
R
R
I
I
Party As goals/issues
Party Bs goals/issues
Often, conflicts are presented about a specific
topic or issue a content issue. However, there
are almost always underlying relational and
identity goals and many times these categories of
issues overlap.
- Willmort Hocker
16
Points To Ponder
  • Not all types of goals emerge in all disputes
  • Interests overlap, and differ in primacy
  • Identity and relational issues are drivers
    (they underlie content and process issues)
  • Parties often specialize in one type of goal
  • Goals may emerge in a different form
  • Identity issues are often best approached
    privately
  • Relational issues are often best discussed
    jointly
  • Finding common issues (CRIP) among parties can be
    effective in reaching agreements

17
Negotiation Interests vs Positions
  • Negotiation Discussions or problem solving
    between two or more parties where some form of
    interdependence exists. Thus, both parties
    believe they can accomplish their goals (or
    defend their goals or interests) to a higher
    degree than working independent of the other
    party or parties.

18
  • BATNA Best Alternative to a Negotiated
    Agreement (aka walk away, what will you do if
    no agreement is made).

19
  • Position A claim of what a party must have
    statement of what a party claims
  • Interests The reasons that underlie positions.
    The why behind the position.
  • Creating Value, Expanding the Pie including
    elements of a negotiation which help one or both
    sides gain more.
  • must be uncovered during the negotiation
  • valued differently by each party.
  • parties can increase their gains at minimal or no
    cost to the other party.

20
Increasing power or bargaining strength
  • Improve your BATNA (often best done before
    entering negotiations)
  • Define your Reservation Point (RP) (and dont
    forget it!)
  • Define your Target but remember your BATNA
  • Identify your interests
  • Identify your counterparts interests
  • Know your counterparts BATNA
  • Appeal to objective third party expertise

21
From Beyond Reason by Fisher and Shapiro
  • When emotions run high during a workplace
    conflict or negotiation consider these five core
    concerns that may underlie those emotions
  • Appreciation Are our thoughts feelings and
    actions devalued, or are they acknowledged as
    having merit?
  • Autonomy Is our freedom to make decisions
    impinged upon or is it respected?
  • Affiliation Are we treated as an adversary and
    kept at a difference, or are we treated as a
    colleague?
  • Status Is our standing treated as inferior to
    others, or is it given full recognition where
    deserved?
  • Role Are the many roles we play meaningless, or
    are they personally fulfilling?

22
(No Transcript)
23
Ombudsman (OM-buds-man )
  • Sweden 1809
  • Classic Ombuds model
  • Statutory/investigative role
  • Organizational Ombuds North America
  • Facilitative role, dispute resolution
    practitioner
  • Academia Corporate US
  • 34 increase in US higher education since 2004

24
Organizational Ombuds
  • IOA Standards of Practice and Code of Ethics
  • Guiding Principles
  • Informality
  • Neutrality
  • Confidentiality
  • Independence

25
Opening an Ombuds Office
  • Proposed by employee governance groups
  • Imposed / suggested as a result of prior
    controversy
  • Instituted by executive
  • Promoting Activities
  • Reaching the four corners
  • Organizational versus Classical Model
  • Communicating senior leadership endorsement

26
An Ombudsperson Does NOT
  • Make decisions, findings of fact, or determine
    the guilt or innocence of those accused of
    wrongdoing
  • Establish, change, or set aside policies or
    administrative decisions
  • Offer legal advice
  • Offer psychological counseling
  • Participate in grievances or other formal
    processes
  • Serve as an agent of notice for Auburn University
  • Serve as an advocate for any individual

27
An Ombudsperson Does
  • Actively listens to your questions and concerns
  • Offers information policies, procedures, and
    programs
  • Discuss your concerns and clarify issues
  • Help identify and evaluate a range of options
  • Gather information and offer referral

28
An Ombudsperson Does
  • Advise steps to resolve a problem informally
  • Facilitate communication indirectly
  • When given permission, serve as an impartial
    third party
  • Collaborative agreements through negotiation or
    mediation
  • Track perceived issues and trends
  • Make recommendations for review of policies or
    procedures to appropriate bodies

29
Contact Information
  • International Ombudsman Association (IOA)
  • http//www.ombudsassociation.org/
  • Jim Wohl, DVM, MPA
  • University Ombudsperson
  • Suite 005 Quad Center
  • Auburn University, AL 36849-5274
  • 334 844-7170
  • www.auburn.edu\ombuds
  • ombuds_at_auburn.edu

30
A parting task
  • Think of an important conflict youve had at work
    (or the last good fight you tried to mediate).
  • What conflict style did you (or another) utilize?
  • competing, avoiding, collaborating,
    accommodating, compromising?
  • Which of the 5 core concerns were underlying your
    (or anothers) emotions?
  • appreciation, autonomy, affiliation, status,
    role?

31
Interested? Try one of these
  • Getting to Yes Negotiating Agreement Without
    Giving In by Roger Fisher, William Ury, Bruce
    Patton. Penguin (Non-Classics) 2nd/Rep edition
    (December 1, 1991) (ISBN-10 0140157352)
  • Getting Past No by William Ury. Bantam Revised
    edition (January 1, 1993) (ISBN-10 0553371312 )
  • The Four Agreements A Practical Guide to
    Personal Freedom by Don Miguel Ruiz. Amber-Allen
    Publishing 1 edition (January 15, 2001)
    (ISBN-10 1878424505)
  • Breaking Robert's Rules The New Way to Run Your
    Meeting, Build Consensus, and Get Results by
    Lawrence E. Susskind, Jeffrey L. Cruikshank.
    Oxford University Press, USA (July 19, 2006)
    (ISBN-10 0195308360)
  • Beyond Reason Using Emotions as you Negotiate by
    Roger Fisher and Daniel Shapiro. Viking Adult
    (October 6, 2005) (ISBN-10 0670034509 )
  • Leading Leaders How to Manage Smart, Talented,
    Rich, and Powerful People by Jeswald W. Salacuse.
    AMACOM (November 3, 2005) (ISBN-10 0814408559)_

32
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com