Vocabulary Development - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 38
About This Presentation
Title:

Vocabulary Development

Description:

Vocabulary Development MSDE: Office of Reading First What Do I Already Know About Vocabulary Development? Key Learning Outcomes The participants will: define ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:2934
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 39
Provided by: msdeMaryl
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Vocabulary Development


1
Vocabulary Development
MSDE Office of Reading First
2
What Do I Already Know About Vocabulary
Development?
What is vocabulary?
Why is vocabulary development important?
How do you expand your own vocabulary?
How do you help your students expand their
vocabularies?
MSDE Office of Reading First
3
Key Learning Outcomes
  • The participants will
  • define vocabulary and its role in reading
    instruction
  • gain understanding of how scientifically based
    reading research has informed vocabulary
    instruction

MSDE Office of Reading First
3
4

What is Vocabulary? Vocabulary refers to the
words we must know to communicate effectively.
Receptive Expressive
(Armbruster, Lehr, Osborn, 2001)
MSDE Office of Reading First
  • 4

5
Receptive/Expressive Vocabulary
  • Receptive/listening vocabulary - body of word
    meanings recognized in context, either heard or
    read
  • Expressive vocabulary body of word meanings
    known well enough that they can be used
    appropriately when spoken or written
  • Receptive vocabulary - greater than our
    expressive vocabulary. We understand far more
    words than we use.

6
What Are the Four Types of Vocabulary?
Listening
Speaking
Reading
Writing
MSDE Office of Reading First
6
7
4 Types of Vocabulary
  • Listening vocabulary words we need to know to
    understand what we hear
  • Speaking vocabulary words we use when we speak
  • Reading vocabulary words we need to know to
    understand what we read
  • Writing vocabulary words we use in writing

8
Is Vocabulary Instruction Important?
  • Before you answer this, read the selection on
    the next slide and answer the questions.

9
A Fable by Mark Twain (an excerpt)
  • Once upon a time, an ____ who had ___ a small
    and very ___ ___ placed it so that he could see
    it in the ___. He said, This doubles the ___ and
    ___ of it, and it is twice as ___ as it was
    before.
  • The animals out in the woods heard of this ___,
    the ___, who was greatly admired by them because
    he was so ___, and so ___ and ___, and could ___
    them so much which they didnt know ___, and were
    not ___ about afterward. They were much ___ about
    this new piece of ___, and they asked ___, so as
    to get at a full ___ of it. They asked what a ___
    was, and the cat ___.

10
  • Who is the subject of the first paragraph?
  • What is the main idea of the second paragraph?
  • Was it difficult to comprehend this passage?
    Explain.
  • (Twenty percent of the words were omitted from
    the excerpt to simulate slow, effortful reading
    with 80 accuracy.)

Coyne, Kameenui, Chart, 2003
11
?
  • How Did You Do?
  • Do you think you would have understood the text
    better if you had been able to read all of the
    words correctly?
  • Of course you would have and so would our
    students!
  • Vocabulary development is an essential component
    of comprehension.

12
Vocabulary development is important to ensure
long-term impact on
Effective Comprehension
Oral Vocabulary
Text Comprehension
13
Data
  • Low socio-economic students enter school 2,000
  • words in their vocabulary and middle class
    students enter school with about 4,000. (Graves,
    Brunette and Slater, 1982)
  • The proficient elementary student learns about 7
    words
  • per day. (Beck and McKeown 1996)
  • 3. The typical third grader knows about 8,000
    words.
  • (Nagy, Anderson 1985)
  • 4. Teaching 400 words explicitly to elementary
    students per year will result in
    knowledge and comprehension improvements. (Beck,
    et al, 1982)

14
Data (continued)
  • 5. Middle class students know twice as many words
    as low socio-economic students. (Hart and Risley,
    2002)
  • 6. This gap is known as the Matthew Effect
  • in that students with richer vocabularies
  • continue to increase their oral language at a
    much greater rate consequently the rich get
    richer and the poor get poorer.
  • 7. A childs reading potential will be negatively
    affected if substantial vocabulary development
    does not begin at an
    early age.

15
Research Evidence
  • Vocabulary is learned implicitly
  • The results of the National Reading Panel Report
    tells us that children learn the meanings of
    words implicitly through everyday experiences
    with oral and written language.
  • Children learn word meanings implicitly in three
    ways
  • Interacting with others in
    daily oral language
  • Listening to adults or older
    children read to them
  • Reading extensively on their
    own
  • (National Reading Panel, 2000)

16
Oral Language Engagement
  • How do you engage children in conversation?
  • Evaluate 3 conversations in the next slide.
    Which one do you think was the most beneficial
    for the child?

MSDE Office of Reading First
16
17
MSDE Office of Reading First
18
Research Evidence
  • Vocabulary should be taught explicitly
  • Teach specific key words before reading
  • Promote active engagement
  • Use multiple methods exposures
  • Create word awareness
  • Use rich, varied context
  • Consider restructuring tasks
  • Employ technology
  • (NRP, 2000)

19
What Does Vocabulary Instruction Look Like?
  • Teaching key words before reading should reflect
    Beck, McKeown, and Kucans
  • 3-Tiered Model

20
3-Tiered Model of Introducing Text Vocabulary
  • TIER 1
  • Most basic words
  • Known words
  • (happy, baby, clock)
  • TIER 2
  • Taught directly
  • Critical to concept or text
  • Likely to be encountered many times
  • Difficult words, figurative language, idioms,
    multi-meaning words
  • (required, maintain)
  • TIER 3
  • Low frequency of use
  • Limited to specific domains
  • (peninsula, refinery)
  • (Beck McKeown, 1985)

21
3-Tiered Explanation
  • Tier 1 Basic words that need no instructional
    attention because their definitions are
    understood.
  • Tier 2 High frequency words encountered in many
    domains. These are the words a teacher would
    target to teach. Students understand the general
    concept of the words, but instruction builds
    specificity and precision in describing the
    concept.
  • Tier 3 Low frequency words needed for content
    areas. Teacher pronounces the words and gives
    definitions before reading.

22
  • The underlined words are consistent with the
    notion of Tier 2 words in that they are likely to
    appear frequently in a wide variety of texts.
    Would students be able to explain these words in
    their own words or have an inkling due to the
    context? If yes, these words again meet the
    criterion of Tier 2 words.

23
What Does Vocabulary Instruction Look Like?
  • Vocabulary development needs to include
    implicit and explicit teaching and learning
  • Engaging conversations that
  • include unfamiliar words
  • Reading to children daily from a variety of genre

24
What Does Instruction Look Like?
  • Active engagement in literacy-rich environments
  • Restructuring tasks (e.g., procedures, processes
    and materials)
  • Repeated/multiple exposures

EXPLICIT
MSDE Office of Reading First
24
25
What Does Vocabulary Instruction Look Like?
  • Vocabulary instruction should also include
    ongoing and purposeful instruction
  • Related to and integrated with curriculum content
  • Integrated as part of writing instruction
  • Incorporated in engaging games and activities

26

What Does Vocabulary Instruction Look Like?
  • Teaching Word Learning Strategies
  • How to use information about word parts (affixes,
    root words, compounds, etc.)
  • How to use context clues
  • How to make students word conscious
  • How to use references (dictionary, thesaurus,
    etc.)

(Nagy,2000)
27
What Does Vocabulary Instruction Look Like?
  • Use Effective Vocabulary Activities
  • Exploring the meaning of a word in context
  • Exploring multiple meanings
  • Word Sorts
  • Semantic Feature Analysis (SFA)
  • Exploring antonyms, synonyms
  • Kid-friendly definitions
  • Associations

(Moats, 2004)
28
Vocabulary Assessment
  • In Marylands Reading First Schools
  • the measure for vocabulary is
  • Word Use Fluency
  • in an instrument called
  • DIBELS

29
What is DIBELS?
  • Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early
  • Literacy Skills (DIBELS) are
  • brief measures of critical early reading skills
  • 3-5 tasks at each grade level
  • administered individually
  • results indicate students instructional needs

30
DIBELS
  • As a progress monitoring tool
  • As a screening tool

31
Screening Tool
  • Purpose designed as a first step to identify
    children who are likely to need additional
    instructional support
  • When September, January, and May
  • Who all students

32
Progress Monitoring Tool
  • Purpose to measure student growth toward a
    benchmark goal
  • When as needed
  • Who students receiving additional instructional
    support

33
Benchmark Goals and Timelines(No benchmark goals
established)
MSDE Office of Reading First
33
34
Summing Up Vocabulary
  • Encourage wide reading
  • Employ instructional read alouds
  • Engage students in daily interactions that
    promote using new vocabulary
  • Teach, model, and encourage the application of
    word-learning strategies
  • Teach students how to use dictionaries,
    thesauruses, and other reference materials
  • (Put Reading First, 2001)

35
Summing Up Vocabulary
  • Provide direct instruction in the meanings of
    words
  • Use multiple methods and exposures
  • Create an interest in language and words

36
Do You Want to Know More?
  • Armbruster, B., Lehr, F. Osborn, J. (2001). Put
    Reading first the Research Building Blocks for
    Teaching children to Read Kindergarten through
    Grade 3. Washington, DC National Institute for
    Literacy.
  • Bear, D.R., Invernizzi, M., Templeton, S.,
    Johnston, F. (2000). Words Their Way Word Study
    for Phonics, Vocabulary Spelling Instruction
    (2nd ed.). New Jersey Merrill.
  • Beck, I.L., McKeown, M.G. (1983). Learning
    Words Well-A Program to Enhance Vocabulary and
    Comprehension. The Reading Teacher, 36, 622-625.
  • Beck, I.L. McKeown, M.G. (2002). Bringing Words
    to Life Robust Vocabulary Instruction. New York
    Guildord Press.
  • Durkin, D. (1993). Teaching Them to Read. (6th
    edition) Boston, MA Allyn Bacon.

37
  • Farstrup, A., Samuels, S. (2002).
    Evidence-based Reading Instruction Putting the
    National Reading Panel Report into Practice.
    Newark, DE International Reading Association.
  • Good, R.H., Gruba, J., Kaminski, R.A. (2001.)
    Best Practices in Using Dynamic Indicators of
    Basic Early Literacy Skills (DIBELS) in an
    Outcomes-Driven Model. In A. Thomas 7 J. Grimes
    (Eds.), Best Practices in School Psychology IV
    (pp.679-700). Washington, DC National
    Association of School Psychologists.
  • Harris, T.L., Hodges, R.E. (Eds.). (1995). The
    Literacy Dictionary The Vocabulary of Reading
    and Writing. Newark, DE International Reading
    Association.
  • LINKS Project (2000). Vocabulary Development
    Participants Facilitators Manual. Olympia,
    WA Office of Superintendent of Public
    Instruction.
  • McKeown, M.G., Beck, I.L., Omanson, R.C.,
    Perfetti, C.A. (1983). The Effects of Long-Term
    Vocabulary Instruction on Reading Comprehension
    A Replication. Journal of Reading Behavior,
    15(1), 3-18.

38
  • Moats, L. (2004). LETRS Language Essentials for
    Teachers of Reading and Spelling, Modules 1-9.
    Longmont, CIO Sopris West.
  • Nagy, W., Scott, J. (2000). Vocabulary process.
    In M. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, P.D. Pearson, R.
    Barr (Eds.) Handbook of Reading Research (Vol.
    III, pp. 269-284). Nahway, NJ Lawrence Erbaum
    Associates, Inc.
  • National Reading Panel (2000). Teaching Children
    to Read An Evidenced-based Assessment of the
    Scientific Research Literature on reading and its
    Implications for reading Instruction Reports of
    the Subgroups. Washington, DC National Institute
    of Child Health and Human development.
  • Risley, Todd Hart, Betty. (2002). Meaningful
    Differences in the Everyday Experiences of Young
    American Children. Baltimore, MD Paul H. Brookes
    Publishing Company.
  • Shore, R. (19997). Rethinking the Brain New
    Insights into Early Development. New York
    Families and Work Institute.
  • Snow, C.E., Burns, S., Griffin, P. (Eds.).
    (1998). Preventing Reading Difficulties in Young
    Children. Washington, DC National Academy Press.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com