Gastric Resection: General Surgical and Anesthetic Considerations - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Gastric Resection: General Surgical and Anesthetic Considerations

Description:

Gastric Resection: General Surgical and Anesthetic Considerations Natalya Hasan, MD Gastric Resections Indicated for Gastric CA (Adenocarcinoma - 95% ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:375
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 27
Provided by: etherStan
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Gastric Resection: General Surgical and Anesthetic Considerations


1
Gastric Resection General Surgical and
Anesthetic Considerations
Natalya Hasan, MD
2
Gastric Resections
  • Indicated for Gastric CA (Adenocarcinoma - 95
    Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors, lymphomas,
    leiomyosarcomas, carcinoids, or sarcomas -5)
  • 21,000 diagnosed annually -gt 10,570 yearly
    mortality
  • 5-year survival 27 between 1995 and 2005 (vs.
    16 between 1975 and 1977)
  • Most cancers are diagnosed at an advanced stage

GIST
Gastric Adenocarcinoma
3
Who gets operated on?
  • For localized cancers
  • Resection adjuvant or perioperative
    chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy offers the best
    chance of survival
  • Abdominal exploration with curative intent is
    undertaken UNLESS
  • unequivocal evidence of disseminated disease
  • major vascular invasion
  • medical contraindications to surgery.

4
Surgical Considerations Pre-Op Eval
  • Pre-Op Eval is aimed at staging
  • Physical exam - specifically lymphadenopathy
    (e.g. Virchows node), abdominal and rectal exams
  • Computed tomography
  • Useful for identifying distal metastases,
    ascites, or carcinomatosis
  • Does not reliably assess the depth of tumor
    invasion of the stomach wall or regional nodal
    involvement
  • Often underestimate the extent of disease,
    principally because of radiographically
    undetectable metastases involving the liver and
    peritoneum

5
Intraoperative Evaluations Endoscopic Ultrasound
  • May provide more accurate staging evaluation of
    the tumor (T) and nodal (N) stage than CT and
    also allows for preoperative biopsies.
  • Identifies pts who will benefit from neoadjuvant
    therapy (i.e. chemo prior to surgical treatment)
  • Identifies tumors that may be amenable to
    endoscopic mucosal resection.

6
Intraoperative Evaluations Staging Laparoscopy
  • May identify radiographically occult metastases
  • Allows for direct visualization of the liver
    surface, peritoneum, and local lymph nodes, and
    permits biopsy of any suspicious lesions.
  • Identifies peritoneal metastases in up to 20 to
    30 of patients with a negative CT (e.g. those
    who would have been considered as candidates for
    resection)
  • Pts with positive peritoneal washings but without
    evidence of intraperitoneal metastases can
    undergo neoadjuvant therapy. Laparoscopy is
    repeated. If repeat peritoneal washings show
    negative cytology, pts can then be considered
    candidates for resection.

7
Approaches
  • Though some superficial cancers can be treated
    endoscopically, gastrectomy is the most widely
    used approach
  • Total gastrectomy - usually performed for lesions
    in the upper third (proximal) stomach
  • Distal subtotal gastrectomy - performed for
    tumors in the distal (lower two-thirds) of the
    stomach
  • Gastric resections are increasingly performed
    laparoscopically

8
Overview of Open Gastric Resection
9
Overview of Open Gastric Resections
  • Midline incision
  • Lateral segment of liver is retracted to
    patients right to expose the esophagogastric
    junction
  • Omentum is removed from the colon
  • Vessels to the stomach are individually ligated
    and divided
  • Short gastric vessels on the greater curvature
    are difficult to reach
  • Potential source of blood loss
  • Splenic injury may occur at this time if the
    capsule is torn during exposure to the short
    gastrics
  • Left gastric artery ligation can be another
    potential source of blood loss
  • Antrum and pylorus are resected in both total and
    partial gastrectomy
  • Lymph node dissection is typically performed

10
Roux en what?
  • After gastric resection, intestinal continuity is
    achieved
  • After total gastrectomy, a Roux limb of jejunum
    is brought up to the distal esophagus
  • After partial gastrectomy, a Roux limb or loop of
    jejunum is connected to the stomach
  • Anastomosis is handsewn or stapled

11
Mortality in the Paleolithic Era 100 Current
Mortality Total gastrectomy 2 Partial
gastrectomy 1
12
Anesthetic ConsiderationsPRE-OP
  • Respiratory Identify pts with co-occurring
    diseases, such as COPD or asthma. Smoking history
    should be obtained. Review imaging (most patients
    should have XRAY or CT as part of their staging
    workup).
  • Cardiovascular Most patients will be male and gt
    50 years old. Pre-op EKG is generally indicated.
    Pts with poor PO intake may be hypovolemic, and
    potentially more unstable intraoperatively.

Probably not the best candidate for surgery.
13
Anesthesia Pre-Op Continued
  • Heme Hypovolemia may mask anemia. CBC should be
    checked pre-operatively.
  • EBL is 100-500 for partial gastrectomy
  • 500 or more for total gastrectomy.
  • GI Some pts may have GERD, delayed gastric
    emptying, or food contents in the lower part of
    their esophagus. Pre-op eval should focus on PO
    intake, dysphagia, GERD, etc.

14
Anesthetic ConsiderationsINTRAOPERATIVE
  • Consider thoracic epidural prior to induction.
  • Induction RSI with cricoid pressure
    (controversial - please refer to the lecture
    slides dedicated to cricoid pressure)
  • Maintenance Standard. Ongoing muscle relaxation
    is often requested by the surgeons, especially if
    they are having difficulty (e.g. during exposure
    of the vessels or closing).
  • Fluids No consensus yet. However, running fluids
    in for the duration of the case is unequivocally
    undesirable. Please refer to slides on fluid
    management.
  • Emergence Anticipate extubation in most patients
    (except for those with underlying medical issues
    - e.g. COPD with FEV lt1L - or in pts who have
    received significant volumes of IV fluids and
    blood products intraoperatively)
  • Access 2 large IV
  • Monitoring Standard /- arterial line (in total
    gastrectomy or if indicated by pt history) /-
    CVP in pts with difficult access
  • Positioning Laparoscopic - supine, Transthoracic
    - lateral decubitus.

15
Anesthetic Considerations Complications
  • Make sure you are in communication with the
    surgeons during stapling.
  • It is quite undesirable to staple the NG/OG (or
    any foreign body for that matter) into the
    anastomosis or within the stomach closure.
  • Some surgeons are so fearful of this complication
    that theyll ask you many times if EVERYTHING has
    been removed from the mouth (OG/NG, temp probe,
    bite block).
  • Technically, its not okay to say yes (since
    hopefully your orotracheal tube is still in
    place). Preferably, youll state that Everything
    is out of the mouth except for the orotracheal
    tube after you have inspected the oral cavity
    with your eyes and fingers. Make sure you check
    behind the ETT - thats one of the temp probes
    favorite hiding places!

16
Speaking of Oro- and Naso-gastric Tubes
17
Why do we place a NGT?
Contrary to what the patient on the left would
make you think, a nasogastric tube is more than
just a little tube in your patients nose (even
the mannequin looks uncomfortable).
18
Besides the right-main stem intubation, what else
is wrong with this picture?
19
Oops! This can happen to you. Watch your tidal
volumes when you place the NGT (or temp probe).
If youre unsure, use a laryngoscope.
20
Complications of NGT
  • Epistaxis
  • Sinusitis
  • Nasal alar ulceration/necrosis
  • Gastritis
  • Perforation
  • Aspiration (by preventing lower esophageal
    sphincter from closing entirely)
  • Intracranial placement!

21
Nasogastric tubes A little history
  • Nasogastric tubes have been used for over 200
    years for decompression of the bowel. Until the
    last decade, prophylactic insertion had been
    considered the standard of care for
    intraabdominal operations with the intended goals
    of
  • gastric decompression
  • decreased nausea and vomiting
  • decreased distension
  • decreased pulmonary aspiration
  • and pneumonia
  • decreased wound separation and infection
  • decreased fascial dehiscence and hernia
  • earlier return of bowel function
  • earlier discharge from hospital.
  • Sounds great! But, a little evidence would be
    nice

22
Prophylactic nasogastric decompression after
abdominal surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev.
2007
  • Systematic review of 33 trials (5240 patients)
  • Patients randomly assigned to no nasogastric tube
    (early removal lt24 hours after surgery included
    in this group) vs. standard nasogastric tube
    placement (up until the return of bowel function)
  • No tube group
  • Earlier return of bowel function (plt0.00001), a
  • decrease in pulmonary complications (p0.09) and
    an
  • Insignificant trend toward increase in risk of
    wound infection (p0.22) and ventral hernia
    (0.09).
  • Decreased length of stay
  • Increased vomiting
  • Tube group
  • Less vomiting, but with increased patient
    discomfort
  • No adverse events specifically related to tube
    insertion
  • Shortcomings
  • Reviewers remark that the heterogeneity
    encountered in these analyses make rigorous
    conclusion difficult to draw for this outcome.
  • Laparoscopic abdominal surgeries excluded
  • .

23
Meta-analysis of the need for nasogastric or
nasojejunal decompression after gastrectomy for
gastric cancer.
  • Five randomized-controlled trials, 717 patients
  • Randomization to routine tube vs. no tube
  • Findings
  • Time to oral diet was significantly shorter in
    the latter group (though, on average, only a
    half-day sooner)
  • Time to flatus, anastomotic leakage, pulmonary
    complications, length of hospital stay, morbidity
    and mortality were similar in both groups.
  • Authors Conclusion Routine nasogastric or
    nasojejunal decompression is unnecessary after
    gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

24
Assessment of routine elimination of
postoperative nasogastric decompression after
Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.
  • Background Anastomotic disruption after surgical
    intervention is an infrequent complication, but
    may lead to severe morbidity and mortality when
    it occurs. Of the various gastric procedures, the
    Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) has one of the
    highest risks for anastomotic leakage.
    Consequently, a nasogastric tube (NGT) is
    frequently placed when these operations are
    performed.
  • Retrospective study 1067 patients, 56 had NGTs
    routinely placed
  • No difference in the rate of leaks between the 2
    groups
  • Also found no increase risk of other
    complications (though the study has questionable
    power)
  • Conclusions. Our findings suggest that routine
    placement of an NGT after RYGB is unnecessary.

25
Nasogastric Tubes Conclusions
  • Were no longer in the 1800s (or the 1900s for
    that matter)
  • Likely increase pulmonary complications
  • Do not speed the return of gastrointestinal
    function (and may actually delay the return of
    function)
  • Should be removed within 24 hours
    post-operatively. Per our Stanford surgeons, NGT
    is removed on POD 1 after gastrectomy. Exception
    is esophageal anastomsis (after total gastrectomy
    or Ivor Lewis) if swallow is functional, NGT is
    removed on POD 5.
  • Should not be left in during stapling - pay
    attention!!!

26
References
  • Huerta S, Arteaga JR, Sawicki MP, Liu CD,
    Livingston EH. Assessment of routine elimination
    of postoperative nasogastric decompression after
    Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surgery 2002
    132844-848.
  • Jaffe Richard and Stanley Samuels.
    Anesthesiologists manual of surgical procedures.
    Philadelphia Lippincott Williams and Williams,
    2004.
  • Mansfield, PF. Clinical features, diagnosis, and
    staging of gastric cancer. In UpToDate, Tanabe,
    KK (Ed), UpToDage, Waltham, MA, 2011.
  • Mansfield, PF. Invasive gastric cancer Surgery
    and prognosis. In UpToDate, Tanabe, KK (Ed),
    UpToDage, Waltham, MA, 2011.
  • Nelson R, Edwards S, Tse B. Prophylactic
    nasogastric decompression after abdominal
    surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Jul
    18(3)CD004929.
  • Yang Z, Zheng Q, Wang Z. Meta-analysis of the
    need for nasogastric or nasojejunal decompression
    after gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Br J Surg.
    2008 Jul95(7)809-16.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com