Title: Visual Conditions in Veterans Followed at a VA Polytrauma Network Site
1Visual Conditions in Veterans Followed at a VA
Polytrauma Network Site
- Thomas R Stelmack, O.D.1,3,4, Theresa Firth,
O.D.2 - Dennise VanKoevering, M.A.2, Steve Rinne2, MA,
Barbara Hunt2, Ph.D., Joan A Stelmack, O.D.,
MPH2,3,4
1 Jesse Brown VAMC, 2 Hines VAH, 3 Illinois
College of Optometry 4 University of Illinois
2War
- Brain and eye injuries are well recognized
consequences of war. The etiology of these
injuries reflects the wounding patterns of the
war. - Over 1.5 million U.S. military personnel have
been deployed to Iraq or Afghanistan since
military operations were initiated in 2001. - Service members from Operation Enduring Freedom
(OEF) and Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF) have
survived injuries that would have been fatal in
previous wars because of speedy evacuation,
timely acute trauma care and improvements in
protective body armor.
3Blast injuries
- are the most common wound in the current
conflicts. - soldiers may be exposed to multiple blast waves
during deployment. - account for two thirds of army war zone
evacuations.
4Blast wave injuries occur from
- changes in atmospheric pressure (overpressures)
- collision with objects carried by the blast wave
- personnel set in motion hitting a stationary
object.
5Traumatic Brain Injury
- primary neuropathology of TBI diffuse axonal
injury caused by shearing forces that disrupt
axons and small vessels during sudden
deceleration - focal brain edema
- anoxia
- hematoma
Sandia Corp brain-model shear 1 msec red 30 blue
1 atmospheres
6TBI
- The news media has also reported a high incidence
of traumatic brain injury (TBI) caused by blasts
noting rates as high as 18 based on interviews
with military officials - The provision of medical care and rehabilitation
for those soldiers injured in the current
conflict is a major priority for the Department
of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Health
Administration (VHA). - VHA created an infrastructure referred to as the
Polytrauma System of Care to guide medical care
and rehabilitation of injured veterans and active
duty service members.
7VA System
- Polytrauma Rehabilitation Centers (PRCs)
- Regional Polytrauma Network Sites (PNS)
- Polytrauma Support Clinic Teams
(PSCTs)Polytrauma Points of Contact (PPOCs) - Mandates screening all OEF / OIF participants for
TBI.
8Polytrauma Rehabilitation Centers (PRCs)
provide acute inpatient medical and
rehabilitation care
- Minneapolis, MN
- Palo Alto, CA
- Richmond, VA
- Tampa, FL
- San Antonio, TX
9Regional Polytrauma Network Sites (PNS)
- post-acute sequelae of polytrauma
- interdisciplinary evaluation
- care coordination for inpatient and outpatient
rehabilitation - day programs
- transitional rehabilitation
21 Centers distributed nationwide
10Polytrauma Support Clinic Teams
(PSCTs)Polytrauma Points of Contact (PPOCs)
130 Nationwide
- support by managing those who are medically
stable - provide regular follow-up visits
- respond to new programs
- coordinate with the Polytrauma Network Sites
11(No Transcript)
12TBI mandated screening
- Exposure
- Blasts
- Wounds
- Falls
- MVA
- Amnesia
- LOC
- Symptoms
- Neurobehavioral inventory
13TBI mandated screening
- Exposure
- Symptoms
- Poor memory
- Balance / dizziness
- Photophobia
- Irritability
- HA
- In (hypo) somnia
- Neurobehavioral inventory
14TBI mandated screening
- Exposure
- Symptoms
- Neurobehavioral inventory
- 5 point scale
- Extent to which symptoms have disturbed them
since trauma
15TBI mandated screening
- Neurobehavioral inventory
- Feeling dizzy
- Loss of balance
- Poor coordination, clumsy
- Headaches
- Nausea
- Vision problems, blurring, trouble seeing
- Sensitivity to light
- Hearing difficulty
- Sensitivity to noise
- Numbness or tingling on parts of my body
- Changes in taste or smell
- Loss of appetite or increased appetite
- Poor concentration, cant pay attention, easily
distracted - Forgetfulness, cant remember things
- Difficulty making decisions
- Slowed thinking, difficulty getting organized,
cant finish things - Fatigue, loss of energy, getting tired easily
16Visual Function Polytrauma
- Goodrich et al from Palo Alto Polytrauma
Rehabilitation Center (Optometry Dec 04 Nov 06) - 50 records TBI
- 50 explosive devices (IED, RPG, mortars etc)
- 44 penetrating injuries
- 74 self reported visual complaints
- 14 legal blindness
- 10 visual impairment (20/63-20/100)
- gt2x prevalence visual sxs with blast injury
17Visual Function Polytrauma
- Lew et al from Palo Alto PRC (interdisciplinary
team consisting of psychology, physical and
rehabilitation medicine physicians,
neuropsychology, social worker, occupational and
physical therapy, speech-language therapy and
optometry screening Jul 06 - Feb 07) 62 records - Most had (near) normal VF / VA
- 75 visual sxs
- 59 photosensitivity
- 84 reading difficulty
- 70 reading difficulty post injury
18Visual Function Polytrauma
- Lew et al from Palo Alto PRC
- 70 oculomotor
- Binocular vision problems
- 46 convergence
- 25 pursuits / saccades (different neuro control)
- 21 accommodation
- 11 strabismus
- 5 fixational / strabismus
- Other
- 66 Visual disturbance
- 42 balance
- 40 dizziness (? Vertigo vs light headed)
19Methods
- A retrospective review of VA electronic medical
records was conducted to identify patients
flagged as POLYTRAUMA and those with a confirmed
diagnosis of TBI who were seen at the Hines PNS. - 103 patients with POLYTRAUMA seen in clinics from
October, 2005 March, 2008 - 88 patients with TBI seen in the TBI Clinic from
December, 2007 March, 2008. The level of TBI
was not routinely available in the electronic
medical record.
20Demographics
- Polytrauma
- 96 male
- 30 years mean age
- 85 OEF / OIF
- 77 injury in theatre
- 23 US or other countries
- 46 TBI
- TBI
- 92 male
- 31 years mean age
- 88 OEF / OIF injury in theatre
- 95 non penetrating
21Basic Visual assessment
- Polytrauma
- Mean visual acuity was .04 log MAR (Snellen
Equivalent 20/20) - bilateral no light perception (3)
- legally blind (4)
- visually impaired 1 (VA less than 20/63 to
20/100) - self-reported visual symptoms (76 )
- TBI
- mean .04 log MAR (20/20 Snellen Equivalent)
- legally blind (1)
- visually impaired (visual acuity less than 20/63
to 20/100) (0) - self-reported visual symptoms (67)
22Symptoms TBI
Symptoms of moderate or greater intensity on the
Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory Symptoms
reported on Polytrauma BROS screening Problems
reported in the electronic medical record
23TBI / Polytrauma receiving eye examinations
52 polytrauma 42 TBI eye exams by Optometry /
Ophthalmology
24Visual treatments Polytrauma or TBI
25Other conditions Hines patients
- TBI with
- diagnoses of
- PTSD (58)
- depression (26)
- depression PTSD (40)
- Polytrauma with diagnoses of
- TBI (46)
- PTSD (50)
- depression (32)
- depression PTSD (18)
26Center differences in severity
- Patients seen at the Palo Alto Polytrauma
Rehabilitation Center were more likely to have
vision loss from moderate to total blindness as a
result of visual acuity, visual field loss, and
or bilateral enucleation (38) compared to
patients at the Hines PNS (8 of patients with
TBI and 18 of patients with polytrauma). - Patients admitted to the PRCs are severely
injured and require acute care and rehabilitation
in a hospital setting.
27What weve learned What is needed
- Hines VA Hospital and the Palo Alto Health Care
System are both Polytrauma Network Sites. - A high percentage of patients self-reported
visual symptoms at both sites - 70 Hines TBI patients, 78 Hines polytrauma
patients - 75 Palo Alto patients
- Binocular vision screening
- Palo Alto indicated that oculomotor problems were
found in 70 of patients screened by optometry - Hines found these problems in 83 of patients
with TBI and 70 of patients with polytrauma who
received an eye examination. - These statistics emphasize the importance of
including vision screening and examinations
within the Polytrauma System of Care.
28What weve learned What is needed
- VHA does not have a national directive that
establishes a protocol for OIE/OEF eye
examinations - a VA directive establishing a protocol for eye
examinations, screenings and reporting is needed
to facilitate research on the incidence, natural
course of recovery and outcomes of brain injury
treatment in soldiers returning from the war - disciplines comprising the Polytrauma team,
vision screening procedures and eye examination
protocols vary making it difficult to combine or
compare data from different sites
29What weve learned What is needed
- A VA TBI workgroup was formed for optometrists to
share information and experiences working with
OEF/OIF veterans during regularly scheduled
conference calls.
30Reported Binocular Vision ProblemsVA vs non
military TBI
- Ciuffreda et al. reported in his retrospective
analysis of 160 patient records that 90 of
patients with TBI had oculomotor dysfunction - accommodative (56.3)
- vergence deficits (56.3)
- Kowal reported from a series of 161 closed head
injury patients - 16 had poor accommodation
- 14 convergence insufficiency
- 19 pseudomyopia
31Reading difficulty co-morbidities concentration
memory
- Palo Alto
- 84 self reported reading difficulty
- Hines
- 50 self reported reading difficulty (TBI) 25
(polytrauma) - exam 50 TBI 40 polytrauma had reading problems
Reading ability has concentration and memory
components. Despite unknown pre morbid
conditions, Hines TBI self reported 80 memory
76 concentration difficulty which is
consistent with known TBI data.
32Natural course success of treatment
- Civilian population
- 85 90 attention memory problems associated
with neural damage from mild TBI resolve within
weeks to months. - Remainder persist for year and are associated
with compensation / medical disability. - Military population
- Statistics may not apply given frequent
association with PTSD. - 43.9 OEF / OIF reporting LOC had TBI had sxs
sufficient for PTSD dx
33Natural course success of treatment
- AMA study (PTSD, depression etc) mental illness
- 19.1 OEF / OIF
- 11.3 Afghanistan
- Depression etc known to exacerbate attention
memory. - Natural vs. treated course will be difficult to
follow as many opt out of treatment for
convergence / accommodative disorders.
34VA benefits
- All OIF/ OEF veterans serving in the armed
forces, Reserves or National Guard are entitled
to 5 years of free care for most conditions
through the VA. - Veterans with service-related conditions must
file a claim to have their diagnoses
service-connected in order to obtain lifelong
medical care from the VA.
35References
- Warden D. Military TBI during the Iraq and
Afghanistan wars. J Head Trauma Rehabil
2006215398-402. - Hoge CW, McGurk D, Thomas JL, Cox AL, Engel CC,
Castro CA. Mild traumatic brain injury in U.S.
soldiers returning from Iraq. N Engl J Med
2008358453-463. - Warden DL, Ryan LM, Helmick KM, et al. war
neurotrauma The Defense and Veterans Brain
Injury Center (DVBIC) experience at Walter reed
Army Medical Center (WRAMC) abstract. J.
Neurotrauma. 200522910)1178. - Alexander MP. Mild traumatic brain injury
Pathophysiology, natural history and clinical
management. Neurology 199545(7)1253-1260. - Lew HL, Cifu DX, Sigford B, Scott S, Sayer N,
Jafee MS. Team approach to diagnosis and
management of traumatic brain injury. J Rehabil
Res Dev. 200744vii-xi. - Lew HL, Poole JH, Vanderploeg RD, Goodrich GL,
Dekelboum S, Guillory SB, Sigford B, Cifu DX.
Program Development and defining characteristics
of returning military in a VA Polytrauma Network
Site. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2007441027-1034. - Goodrich GL, Kirby J, Cockerham G, Ingalla SP,
Lew H L. Visual function in patients of a
Polytrauma Rehabilitation Center A descriptive
study. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2007 44(7)929-936. - Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Health
Administration. Screening and evaluation of
possible traumatic brain injury in Operation
Enduring Freedom (OED) and Operation Iraqi
Freedom (OIF) Veterans. VHA Directive 2007-013.
Washington, D.C. Department of Veterans Affairs,
April, 2007. - Ciuffreda KJ, Kapoor N, Rutner D, Suchoff IB, Han
ME, Craig S. Occurrence of oculomotor
dysfunctions in acquired brain injury A
retrospective analysis. Optometry
200778155-161. - Kowal L. Ophthalmic manifestations of head
injury. Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology
200720(1)35-40. - Dikmen S, Mc Lean A, Temkin N. et al.
Neuropsychological and psychosocial consequences
of minor head injury. J Neurol Neurosurg
Psychiatry 1992491227-1232. - Evans RW. The Post-concussive syndrome 130 years
of controversy. Semin Neurol 1994 1432-39. - Padula WV, Wu L, Vicci V, Thomas J, Nelson C,
Gottlieb D, Suter P, Politzer T, Benabib R.
Evaluating and treating visual dysfunction.
InZasler ND, Katz DI, Zafonte RD, Editors. Brain
injury medicine principles and practice. N.Y.,
N.Y. Demos 2006511-528. - Suchoff IB, Ciuffreda KJ, Kapoor N, Editors.
Visual vestibular consequences of acquired
brain injury. Santa Ana, CA OEP Foundation
20011-244. - Carroll LJ, Cassidy JD, Peloso PM. et al.
Prognosis for mild traumatic brain injury
results of the WHO Collaborating Centre Task
Force for mild traumatic grain injury. J Rehabil
Med 200443Suppl84-105. - National Center for Injury Prevention and
Control. Report to Congress on mild traumatic
brain injury in the United States steps to
prevent a serious public health problem. Atlanta
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2003. - Hoge, CW, Auchterlonie JL, Miliken CS. Mental
health problems, use of mental health services
and attrition from military service after
deployment to Iraq or Afghanistan.
JAMA.20062951023-1032. - Keram E. PTSD in Afghanistan and Iraq war
veterans. Sonoma Medicine.http//www.sonic.net/scp
/sm06/keram.html. accessed 8/15/08 - Grieger TA, Cozza SJ, Ursano RJ, Hoge C, Martinez
PE, Engel CC, Wain HJ. Posttraumatic stress
disorder and depression in battle-injured
soldiers. Am J Psychiatry 2006164 1777-1783.
36- Thank you
- To
- Those who have served to defend our freedom !!!!