St. Louis County - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 37
About This Presentation
Title:

St. Louis County

Description:

Solution Focused Journey to Family Dependency Treatment Court Next Steps Continued Mapping/Search for Detail With Families Continued Sharing of Maps with Families and ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:110
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 38
Provided by: signsofsa
Category:
Tags: county | louis

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: St. Louis County


1
St. Louis County
  • Solution Focused Journey to Family Dependency
    Treatment Court

2
Agenda
  • Introduction
  • Inquiry
  • Family Engagement - Tools
  • Organization Challenges
  • Community Forum
  • Family Dependency Treatment Court Drug Court
  • Video Drug Court Participant
  • Video Drug Court Team Member
  • Acknowledgements/References

3
Introductions
  • Mark Wilhelmson
  • Social Service Supervisor
  • St. Louis County Public Health Human Services
  • wilhelmsonm_at_co.st-louis.mn.us
  • Mark Snyder
  • Social Service Supervisor
  • St. Louis County Public Health Human Services
  • snyderm_at_co.st-louis.mn.us

4
Location
  • Map of U.S. /Minnesota/St. Louis County

DULUTH
5
Olympic Gold Medals
  • List of Countries and Medal Count
  • Miserable finish by Curling Team From Duluth ?

6
St. Louis County Golf Team
  • Team Mark Wilhemson, Mark Snyder, Tom Rendulich,
    Rick Benson, John Nachsheim, James Ellingson,
    Jenny Fick, Melissa Lehr
  • Andrew Turnell Honorary Team Member
  • Golf Cap

7
Child Safety
  • Be Gentle With The Young
  • Juvenal (55 AD-127 AD)
  • Children begin by loving their parents as they
    grow older they judge them sometimes they
    forgive them
  • Oscar Wilde (1854 1900)
  • Always be nice to children because they are the
    ones who will choose your rest home
  • Phyllis Diller (1917 - )

8
Change
  • We must become the change we want to
    see. Mahatma Ghandi (1869 1948)
  • A pessimist sees the difficulty in every
    opportunity an optimist sees the opportunity in
    every difficulty. Winston Churchill
  • There is nothing wrong with change if it is in
    the right direction. Winston Churchill

9
Inquiry - The Journey Begins
  • Collaboration with Key Actors
  • Focus on safety
  • Language Change
  • Solution Building
  • Exploration for details
  • Search for exceptions
  • Individuals

10
Tools
  • Elicit, Amplify, Reflect, Start Over
  • 3 Houses
  • 3 Columns
  • Safety Plans
  • Words and Pictures
  • Time Line
  • Maps

11
Three Houses Child Protection Risk Assessment
Process to use with Children and Young
People Created by Nicki Weld, Wellington NZ
House of Dreams
House of Worries
House of Good Things
On 3 separate pieces of paper draw with the
children their experience and vision of each
house. Use these drawings with the adults in
deepening the assessment and planning process.
More Info www.signsofsafety.net/Around_the_World.
html - New Zealand Child Youth and Family
12
  • 3 Columns

Rate the situation on a scale of 0-10, where 0
means things are so bad the family can no longer
care for the children and 10 means that
everything that needs to happen for the children
to be safe in the family is happening
13
  • Safety plan (blank)

14
(No Transcript)
15
(No Transcript)
16
TIME LINE
Safety plan developed w/ public health Nurse-
Autumn no longer wants SS involved Sept 25. 09
PH notifys Liana that she has not seen Autumn in
a few weeks- canceling appts possible drug
use Oct 23. 09
Liana and Susan begin working with Autumn and
Jacob- Destani to stay in hospital for 6 weeks
Liana receives reports that Autumn is dealing and
using meth- refused UA
1st report to IIU- Prenatal exposure- THC also
left AMA 29weeks preg June 28 09
Domestic between Jacob and Autumn- Charged w/
domestic assault Aug 29 .09
Admin review close case Feb 9.10
Oct 2009
Aug 2009
Sept 2009
Nov 2009
Dec 2009
Feb 2010
July 2009
June 2009
Mar 2010
Destani born Weighed 3 lbs 4 oz June 29 09
Destani discharged from hospital Autumn and Jacob
successfully completed all hospital
recommendations Aug 11.09
Jacob goes to NERCC on violation D.V. ADR-April
3, 2010
Concerns about Autumns ability to care for child-
police hold March 5 2010
Autumn admits to using THC 2x since last visit-
not going to 1st yesr- only met w/ PHN 2X Nov
23. 09
H.V. _at_ Autumns Patrick admits to meth relapse
states he is homicidal/ suicidal during
visit Dec 15, 09
17
(No Transcript)
18
Organizational Practice
  • Intake transfers to case management 1200 intakes
    in 2009
  • Pre-petition Screening 188 petitions for
    juvenile court

19
  • What is working, useful considered strengths?
  • SOS offers different ways to look at cases with a
    focus on safety with some discussion of absolute
    sobriety
  • SOS methods allow an opportunity to really
    develop a working relationship and find out what
    is going on in a family. SOS consult formats, 3
    houses help develop the relationship
  • SOS allows to focus on impact of danger and harm
    on children and to set measurable behavioral
    goals for parents both short and long term.
  • Mapping forces Social Workers to focus on real
    concerns regarding impacts on child safety and
    parents behavior and helps develop goals as well
    as getting detail
  • Stronger working relationships mean better
    outcomes for families
  • 3 column used with care givers helps set small
    goals which result in success and the goals are
    generated by the care givers
  • Mapping limits story telling about families and
    situations
  • Words and pictures has been helpful for children
  • Skillful questioning for detail allows a balance
    look at the family
  • Detail helps direct case rather than formula
    response like placing all pre-natally exposed
    children

20
  • What are the concerns, worries?
  • Judges, Guardian ad Litems acceptance of
    practices is a worry
  • Judges may be concerned that the Social Workers
    relationship with care givers is more important
    than the safety of children
  • SOS takes more time than workers have ie Words
    and Pics, 3 houses 3 columns
  • SOS as practiced may be too focused on short term
    goals than safety (strengths re concern
    demonstrated over time)
  • Coordination of the use of tools from intake to
    ongoing, families or children ask why are we
    doing this again, we already did that?
  • Case mapping is not a friendly process, too long,
    too structured, too much of a critique of the
    mappee, mapper, not as purposeful as it could be
  • There are not enough opportunities to learn SOS
  • Safety plans are a joke...parents bring unsafe
    people to the network, do they really provide for
    safety, do they rely too much on the child to
    keep themselves safe (safety objects, logs) do
    they create an opportunity for secrets between
    child and care giver? The issue of secrets with
    parents could be confusing and give the wrong
    message.
  • Varied use of SOS creates questions from the
    parents and children
  • Lets use plain language, not buzz words like
    appreciative inquiry
  • With words and pictures, parents get defensive re
    what the child will be told and negotiation is
    required

21
  • Next Steps
  •  Specialized training should continue such as W
    P DVD etc
  • Set up a library of resources
  • Training of the CP community, Judges, Foster
    Parents, GAL etc
  • Agency Conference as a training tool
  • Social Workers need materials for WP, etc.

22
  • Community Forum on Child Protection

23
Family Dependency Tx Court Purpose/Goal
  • National Model
  • Promote recovery through a coordinated response
    to participants dependent on alcohol and other
    drugs
  • Improve outcomes for alcohol and other drug
    addicted individuals in the courts through
    collaboration, thereby
  • Enhancing public safety, ensuring participant
    accountability, and reducing costs to society
    system

24
FDTC Team Members
  • Judge
  • Drug Court Coordinator
  • County Attorney
  • Public Defender
  • Guardian ad Litem
  • Public Social Services Social Worker
    Supervisor
  • Tribal Social Services Social Worker
  • Clinical Providers

25
FDTC - Participants
  • Currently open in Juvenile Court
  • Screened by the Family Drug Court Team
  • Volunteers to participate in good faith
  • Signs terms of participation

26
FDTC Process - Phases
  • ONE Assessment Detox Primary Treatment
    Random Urinalysis 12 weeks sobriety weekly
    court attendance
  • TWO Sobriety After care Relapse Prevention
    Random Urinalysis 12 weeks sobriety every other
    week court appearance
  • THREE Sobriety Cognitive Behavioral Skills
    Sober Parenting Random Urinalysis complete 52
    weeks ever third week court appearance

27
FDTC - Incentives
  • Praise/recognition by the Court
  • Gift certificates
  • Bus passes
  • Treatment medallions
  • Certificates of accomplishment
  • Clothing vouchers
  • Gas cards,
  • Respite care
  • Recognition of birthdays birthdays of children

28
Sanctions
  • Civil Contempt of Court reprimand community
    service - incarceration
  • Graduation from FDC requires 52 consecutive weeks
    of clean Urinalyses
  • Any positive Urinalysis or documented use back
    to phase one reporting
  • Any failure to call in for a Urinalysis, failure
    to report for a Urinalysis or failure to provide
    a Urinalysis will be deemed a positive and will
    result in sanctions.

29
  • St. Louis County Family Drug Court
  • Participant Date March 18, 2010
  • Danger/Harm/Worries History Mother using
    methamphetamines, methadone, pot, adderral
    connected to criminal element arrested for
    possession of Meth assaulted and abused by her
    partner Daughter exposed witnessed violence
    expressed fear of moms partner and concern for
    her mother. Mom re-engaged with violent partner
    phone calls visit at jail lied to drug court
    team jailed. Ticketed for shoplifting.
    Recently No concerns.
  • Safety/Strengths/Working Well Strong family
    support ties Regular contact and visits with
    parents honest discussion about relationships
    and addiction reconnected with daughters father
    their relationship appears amiable and
    supportive He has been providing primary care
    for his daughter at times. All reports indicate
    complete sobriety even in light of reconnection
    with ex-partner. Actively seeking employment.
    Engaged with daughter baking, crafts, trips to
    events, shopping in the community, valentines day
    party at school. Purchased a puppy for daughter
    teaching her to provide care. Daughter
    regular attendance in pre-school mom
    transports. Mom attending individual therapy -
    expresses anger, frustration, and some gratitude
    with team and family this is a change.
    Developing a stronger relationship with sober
    graduate of family Drug Court Completed a court
    ordered peer review. Advanced to Phase II.
    Safety Team Mother, Father, Brother, two sober
    friends, some Family Drug court team members,
    sponsor Plan Family 3x weekly check in w/mom
    daughter 2x weekly face-to-face contact by
    friends and sponsor weekly contact with SW
    Court - 2x monthly appearance ensure sobriety
    and primary care of daughter
  • Complicating Factors Moms father is seriously
    ill creates stress and anxiety. Struggles with
    establishing and maintaining safe boundaries with
    ex-partner does not recognized his negative
    impact on her family.
  • Next Steps1. Continue present efforts to work
    her recovery plan and care for daughter. 2.
    Find a job. 3. Continue individual therapy.
    4. Continue Cognitive-Behavioral group at Bethel.
    5. Continue Phase II. 6, Address shoplifting
    ticket.
  • Scale
  • How effective has FDTC been in helping you remain
    sober 0 drug court total waste of time 10
    absolutely critical to my sobriety? Ans 9 How
    come? Ans Having to face people on the team and
    UAs Wish I could take them after FDTC is over.
    How has the drug court process work for you 0
    not all all 10 fantastic Ans 3 How come
    confused about roles who does what, when and
    stuff like that new UA procedure is confusing
    dont know the rules some go to jail, others
    dont not always fair and I never know whats
    going to happen.
  • 0________________________________________________1
    0

30
  • St. Louis County Family Drug Court
  • Participant Date March 18, 2010
  • Danger/Harm/Worries History Son born six-eight
    weeks premature spent the first month in a
    neo-natal isolet wore a heart lung monitor
    diagnosed FASD due to moms alcohol and drug
    use. Son is presently developmentally delayed.
    Mom recovered but relapsed after 10 months of
    sobriety alcohol and methamphetamines Took son
    to the seedy hotel and bar while using
    placing him in danger again Recently The
    present worry/concern is potential relapse which
    would place son at risk.
  • Safety/Strengths/Working Well Present safety is
    provided through a close monitoring/supervision
    by the Drug Court Team Moms mother and extended
    family closely observe and would report in as
    flash Mom lives with her mother. Mom sober for
    six months and cooperating with recovery
    completed treatment and working on a recovery
    plan. Mom has followed through with action
    steps. Relationship with the social worker is
    more real honest, straightforward feels
    trusting and close. Completed a thorough
    sobriety plan. Cooperating in an individual
    therapy program/making progress. Has three sober
    friends and convenes a bi-monthly get together.
    Demonstrated responsibility cared for her
    disabled sister over the holidays bathed,
    toileted, fed, etc. while performing the same
    duties with Robert. Participated in family
    traditions. Offered an apartment by the housing
    authority turned it down it was one block from
    the seedy hotel and neighborhood where she used
    advocated for her self with the housing
    authority they agreed and didnt change her
    position on the waiting list. Identifies what
    she needs and does not need articulates clearly
    her wants expressed concerns about the sober
    parenting class.
  • Complicating Factors Poor poverty
    unemployed. Long history of alcohol and drug
    abuse Sons father Moms ex-partner is a
    career criminal and drug abuser. Housing issue
    a concern for some team members although living
    with her mother provides safety, security, family
    connectedness, and nurturance. Little
    transportation other than public bus. Lacks a
    sober network of friends. Low self-esteem and
    unresolved clinical issues. . Safety Team/Safety
    Plan Team Moms mother, aunt and uncle, two
    former foster parents, program at Bethel, cousin,
    father in Grand Rapids, Minn., sponsor Safety
    Plan Relatives/Kin report to social worker
    weekly regarding status personal face-to-face
    contact bi-monthly at minimum with son.
  • Next Steps1. Enlarge her sober network of
    friends 2. Remain in safe housing. 3. Seek
    employment. 4. Continue parent
    education/support
  • Scale
  • 0_________________________________________________
    ________________10
  • How helpful has drug court been in maintaining
    your sobriety 0 not at all 10 most helpful.
    Ans 8 how so? Ans having relationships with
    people who care. Who? Ans You just want me to
    say you but then said team members. What else?
    Ans Random UAs I dont want to disappoint
    people. Who? Ans Robert, my family and you. It
    got a little silly at this point.

31
  • SLC FDTC Drug Court Map

32
Drug Court Participant Video
33
Drug Court Team Member
34
Next Steps
  • Continued Mapping/Search for Detail With Families
  • Continued Sharing of Maps with Families and Team
  • Attach Maps and Safety Plans to Reports to
    Juvenile and Family Drug Court
  • Map Family Drug Court Process With Team Members
  • Combine Team Member Maps, Discuss at Retreat
  • Start Over

35
Special Thanks
  • Roxanne Esler Drug Court Social Worker
  • Catherine Ramm Drug Court Participant

36
Acknowledgements
  • Andrew Turnell
  • Rob Saywer Sue Lorbach, Olmsted County Staff
  • Dan Koisolek Michelle Sellinger Carver County
    Staff
  • Minnesota Department of Human Services
  • Dick Pingry Childrens Division, St. Louis
    County
  • Special Assistance Mary Ness, Jenny Fick James
    Ellingson

37
References
  • Ellingson, James Fick, Jenny Time Line
  • Lorbach, Sue Consultation Framework
  • Turnell, A. Edwards, S. (1999). Signs of
    Safety A Solution and Safety Oriented Approach
    to Child Protection Casework. New York Norton
    Company
  • Turnell, A. Essex, S. (2006). Working with
    Denied Child Abuse The Resolutions Approach.
    Berkshire, England Open University Press.
  • Weld, Nikki 3 Houses
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com