Cord Blood Transplantation Single or Double Cord ??? - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 38
About This Presentation
Title:

Cord Blood Transplantation Single or Double Cord ???

Description:

Cord Blood Transplantation Single or Double Cord ??? Diana Worthington-White Cellular Therapies Lab Cord Blood Banking Expanding the use of cord blood will increase ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:178
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 39
Provided by: tfcassoci7
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Cord Blood Transplantation Single or Double Cord ???


1
Cord Blood TransplantationSingle or Double Cord
???
  • Diana Worthington-White
  • Cellular Therapies Lab

2
Laboratory Processing as aScientific Discipline
  • Began in mid 1980s
  • Remove tumor cells from autologous bone marrow
  • Management of blood type incompatibilities
  • Washing
  • Red cell depletion
  • Results
  • Increased number of eligible patients
  • Increased number of diseases that could benefit
    from transplant

3
Processing Expands
  • Only 30 of patients have an HLA-match
  • Could use less-matched donors if certain cell
    types (T-cells) could be reduced
  • Laboratory developed methods to selectively
    deplete most T-cells while retaining stem cells
  • Processing labs now called graft engineering labs

4
Donors, donors, donors
  • Patients that could benefit from a transplant
    based on disease status still could not receive
    one
  • Why not ? Lack of donors
  • Alternative sources
  • Unrelated registries (e.g., National Marrow Donor
    Program)

5
An Alternative Cell Source
  • CORD BLOOD
  • Readily available
  • Routinely discarded at childbirth
  • Harvest the cord blood and freeze it for
    transplant

6
Collecting the Cord
7
Collecting the Cord
8
First Cord Blood Transplant
  • 1988
  • Child with Fanconis anemia complicated by severe
    aplastic anemia
  • During pregnancy, mother carried sibling
    unaffected by disease and HLA identical
  • Cord collected and frozen in liquid nitrogen

9
First Cord Blood Transplant
  • Patient received chemotherapy and radiation
  • Cells were then thawed and infused
  • No immediate side effects
  • Complete hematologic reconstitution
  • No chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD)

10
Cord Blood A New Source
  • Advantages
  • Worldwide availability
  • Cells not fully immunogenic ? less HLA matching
    required
  • Increase donor pool
  • Minorities
  • Diversity

11
Standardization
  • Patient Selection
  • Since cells less immunogenic, how much of a
    mismatch could be tolerated (1 vs. 2 vs. 3)
  • Collection
  • Kits now available for collection
  • Maternal testing reduced units discarded for
    infectious disease positivity, family history
  • Processing
  • Cord blood cells fragile
  • Less is better

12
Big Things Come in Small Packages
13
Published Reports
  • Pediatric patients
  • High probability of survival when
  • 2 HLA antigen mismatch
  • CD34 dose 1.7x105/kg recipient weight
  • Neutrophil engraftment significantly slower but
    catches up by day 45
  • Low incidence of severe acute or chronic GVHD
  • Comparable to HLA-mismatched bone marrow
    transplantation
  • Barker et al, Blood, 2001
  • Wagner et al., Blood, 2002

14
Published Reports
  • Pediatric patients
  • Compared matched unrelated donor bone marrow to
    cord blood
  • Takes 29 more days to identify and clear a donor
    for an unrelated bone marrow than for cord blood
  • Faster availability is an advantage for patients
    requiring urgent transplantation
  • Barker et al., Biol Blood Marrow Transpl, 2002

15
Published Reports
  • Adult patients
  • Compared cord blood with mismatched unrelated
    donor bone marrow
  • Mismatched unrelated bone marrow and mismatched
    cord blood comparable in terms of graft failure
    and overall mortality
  • No difference between 1 or 2 antigen mismatch for
    cord blood
  • Chronic GVHD more common after cord blood
    transplant
  • Patients tended to be younger and more likely to
    have advanced leukemia (dose consideration)
  • Laughlin et al., N Engl J Med, 2004

16
Early Conclusions
  • Significant HLA mismatch is tolerable
  • (4/6 or 5/6 cord blood comparable to 8/8 marrow)
  • Graft-versus-host disease low despite the
    mismatch
  • Graft-versus-leukemia effect increases with HLA
    mismatch
  • Cell dose is critical for engraftment
  • Cord Blood Transplant Study (COBLT), NHLBI,
    Prospective multicenter study Joint retrospective
    analysis by New York Blood Center and CIBMTR

17
Limitations of Cord Blood Transplants in Adults
  • Important factors
  • HLA-mismatch (gt 2) ? transplant-related
    mortality
  • Cell dose lt 2.5x107/kg
  • Lower cell dose delayed engraftment, increased
    graft failure
  • 4/6 match with larger dose better than 5/6 with
    smaller dose
  • Factors not important
  • Gender
  • Ethnicity
  • US/non-US cord blood center

18
Overcoming Dose Limitations
  • Clinically optimize peri-transplant therapy
  • Improve collection volumes
  • Ex vivo expansion of cord blood unit
  • Copper chelation
  • Hypomethylation
  • Mesenchymal stem cells
  • (No demonstrable effect so far)
  • Infuse two partially-mismatched cord blood units

19
Double Cord Questions
  • Are the doses additive?
  • What about the mismatch between the units?
  • Will both survive to give mixed chimerism?
  • What about GVHD?
  • GVHD directed against recipient
  • GVHD directed against each cord blood unit

20
Published Study
  • Median age 24 yrs
  • Both cord blood units given intravenously
  • Partially mismatched with recipient and between
    units
  • ( 2 antigen mismatch with each other and with
    recipient)
  • Median dose given 3.5x107 cells/kg
  • Results
  • All patients engrafted by day 23
  • 24 had mixed chimerism at day 21
  • 1 cord blood unit predominated in all patients at
    d 100
  • Conclusion
  • Transplant with two partially-HLA matched units
    safe and may overcome cell dose barrier
  • Barker et al., Blood, 2005

21
Double Cord Transplants
  • Most important factor for engraftment
  • Total cell doses of both units combined
  • Factors not important
  • Disease status at transplant
  • Conditioning regimen
  • GVHD prophylaxis
  • HLA disparity
  • CD34 dose
  • Gender
  • Age

22
Which cord unit wins?
  • Factors not important
  • Age
  • Gender
  • Order of infusion
  • CD34 or CD3 dose
  • ABO match
  • HLA disparity
  • Sex match
  • Not known what determines the winning unit

23
Double Cord Transplants in Adults
  • 93 of adults now eligible for cord blood
    transplants (compared with 30 using a single
    unit if the threshold dose is 2.5x107/kg)
  • Engraftment is comparable to that in pediatric
    patients
  • Reduction in relapse rate of leukemia patients
  • Combined cell doses of both units most
    significant factor in predicting engraftment
    outcome
  • Higher rate of acute GVHD in younger patients

24
New Strategies
  • Extend double cord transplants using a
    non-myeloablative conditioning regimen to those
    not eligible for a myeloablative regimen
  • Early results indicate YES ? dependent on amount
    of therapy in close time proximity to transplant
  • Transplant related mortality low in older
    patients
  • Enhancing the speed of engraftment
  • Intraosseous infusions

25
Transplant Infusions
  • Intravenous infusions inefficient cells travel
    systemically until they reach the marrow space
    (homing)
  • Significant loss of cells en route to marrow
  • Overcome in bone marrow by infusion of large
    numbers of cells
  • Small numbers of cells from a cord blood infusion
  • Small volume and fixed dose
  • Cord blood homes less effectively

26
Intraosseous Infusions
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Can non-specific losses and homing to the BM
microenvironment be optimized?
27
Current Studies
  • Infuse one unit intraosseously followed by the
    second (larger) unit infused intravenously
  • Few patients enrolled to date but all have
    engrafted quickly with no procedural side effects
  • Early indications are that the extra CD34 cells
    in the second unit are important

28
Source of Cord Blood Units
  • ARC Cord Blood Bank (Portland, OR)
  • ARC/University of Minnesota
  • Carolinas Cord Blood Center (Duke)
  • LifeCord (Gainesville, FL)
  • Michigan Community Blood Ctrs (Grand Rapids)
  • New York Blood Center
  • Puget Sound Blood Center (Seattle)
  • St. Louis Cord Blood Center
  • StemCyte (Arcadia, CA)
  • Univ. Colorado Cord Blood Bank (Denver)
  • Private cord blood banks (autologous/sibling)

29
International Cord Blood Banks
  • Cord Blood Bank of Barcelona
  • Cord Blood Bank of Leuven (Belgium)
  • French Greffe de Moelle (Bordeaux)
  • London Cord Blood Bank
  • StemCyte Taiwan

30
Cost of Cord Blood Units
  • Unrelated (public)
  • US 18,540 to 33,641
  • Foreign 26,450 to 43,865
  • Private
  • 1199 2195 plus annual fee of 99 125
  • (range of 2007 fees for 10 private US cord
    banks)

31
Balancing Cost and Treatment
  • Significant difference in cost to procure cord
    blood unit(s)
  • Is cost balanced?
  • Earlier engraftment ? earlier discharge
  • Less GVHD
  • Less risk of relapse
  • Only option for transplant

32
Need for Alternative Stem Cell Sources
  • The chance of finding a donor is
  • ?50 Caucasian
  • ?35 Hispanic
  • ?20 African American
  • In 2003, 6 of all National Marrow Donor Program
    (NMDP) facilitated transplants used cord blood
  • In 2007, that number increased to 37

33
Future of Unrelated Cord Blood Transplants
  • Cord blood has SURPASSED both bone marrow and
    peripheral stem cells as the primary stem cell
    transplant source in children in the U.S., Japan
    and several European countries
  • Cord blood has SURPASSED bone marrow and
    peripheral stem cells as the primary stem cell
    transplant source in adults in Japan and is
    growing rapidly worldwide

34
Cord Blood Banking
  • Expanding the use of cord blood will increase the
    interest in private cord blood banking
  • Arguments against private banking are
  • Autologous cord blood may include stem cells
    predisposed to leukemia
  • The most common indication for transplant is
    acute lymphocytic leukemia
  • While this is true for young children, there is
    an increasing list of true and potential
    indications

35
Private Cord Blood Banking
VidaCord
36
American Academy of Pediatrics
  • Estimates that the chance of a child needing
    their own stored cord blood range from 11000 to
    1200,000
  • Recommendations
  • Cord blood donation should be discouraged when
    cord blood is to be directed for later personal
    or family use, as most conditions that might be
    helped by cord blood already exist in the
    infants cord blood
  • Cord blood banking for public use should be
    encouraged
  • Private storage of cord blood as biological
    insurance should be discouraged

37
Stem Cell Act of 2005
  • 78 million dollars earmarked to expand the
    number of public cord blood units banked in the US

38
Single or Double???
  • Depends on
  • Weight
  • Disease
  • Availability of cord blood unit
  • Size of the cord blood unit
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com