Title: Cord Blood Transplantation Single or Double Cord ???
1Cord Blood TransplantationSingle or Double Cord
???
- Diana Worthington-White
- Cellular Therapies Lab
2Laboratory Processing as aScientific Discipline
- Began in mid 1980s
- Remove tumor cells from autologous bone marrow
- Management of blood type incompatibilities
- Washing
- Red cell depletion
- Results
- Increased number of eligible patients
- Increased number of diseases that could benefit
from transplant
3Processing Expands
- Only 30 of patients have an HLA-match
- Could use less-matched donors if certain cell
types (T-cells) could be reduced - Laboratory developed methods to selectively
deplete most T-cells while retaining stem cells - Processing labs now called graft engineering labs
4Donors, donors, donors
- Patients that could benefit from a transplant
based on disease status still could not receive
one - Why not ? Lack of donors
- Alternative sources
- Unrelated registries (e.g., National Marrow Donor
Program)
5An Alternative Cell Source
- CORD BLOOD
- Readily available
- Routinely discarded at childbirth
- Harvest the cord blood and freeze it for
transplant
6Collecting the Cord
7Collecting the Cord
8First Cord Blood Transplant
- 1988
- Child with Fanconis anemia complicated by severe
aplastic anemia - During pregnancy, mother carried sibling
unaffected by disease and HLA identical - Cord collected and frozen in liquid nitrogen
9First Cord Blood Transplant
- Patient received chemotherapy and radiation
- Cells were then thawed and infused
- No immediate side effects
- Complete hematologic reconstitution
- No chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD)
10Cord Blood A New Source
- Advantages
- Worldwide availability
- Cells not fully immunogenic ? less HLA matching
required - Increase donor pool
- Minorities
- Diversity
11Standardization
- Patient Selection
- Since cells less immunogenic, how much of a
mismatch could be tolerated (1 vs. 2 vs. 3) - Collection
- Kits now available for collection
- Maternal testing reduced units discarded for
infectious disease positivity, family history - Processing
- Cord blood cells fragile
- Less is better
12Big Things Come in Small Packages
13Published Reports
- Pediatric patients
- High probability of survival when
- 2 HLA antigen mismatch
- CD34 dose 1.7x105/kg recipient weight
- Neutrophil engraftment significantly slower but
catches up by day 45 - Low incidence of severe acute or chronic GVHD
- Comparable to HLA-mismatched bone marrow
transplantation - Barker et al, Blood, 2001
- Wagner et al., Blood, 2002
14Published Reports
- Pediatric patients
- Compared matched unrelated donor bone marrow to
cord blood - Takes 29 more days to identify and clear a donor
for an unrelated bone marrow than for cord blood - Faster availability is an advantage for patients
requiring urgent transplantation - Barker et al., Biol Blood Marrow Transpl, 2002
15Published Reports
- Adult patients
- Compared cord blood with mismatched unrelated
donor bone marrow - Mismatched unrelated bone marrow and mismatched
cord blood comparable in terms of graft failure
and overall mortality - No difference between 1 or 2 antigen mismatch for
cord blood - Chronic GVHD more common after cord blood
transplant - Patients tended to be younger and more likely to
have advanced leukemia (dose consideration) - Laughlin et al., N Engl J Med, 2004
16Early Conclusions
- Significant HLA mismatch is tolerable
- (4/6 or 5/6 cord blood comparable to 8/8 marrow)
- Graft-versus-host disease low despite the
mismatch - Graft-versus-leukemia effect increases with HLA
mismatch - Cell dose is critical for engraftment
- Cord Blood Transplant Study (COBLT), NHLBI,
Prospective multicenter study Joint retrospective
analysis by New York Blood Center and CIBMTR
17Limitations of Cord Blood Transplants in Adults
- Important factors
- HLA-mismatch (gt 2) ? transplant-related
mortality - Cell dose lt 2.5x107/kg
- Lower cell dose delayed engraftment, increased
graft failure - 4/6 match with larger dose better than 5/6 with
smaller dose - Factors not important
- Gender
- Ethnicity
- US/non-US cord blood center
18Overcoming Dose Limitations
- Clinically optimize peri-transplant therapy
- Improve collection volumes
- Ex vivo expansion of cord blood unit
- Copper chelation
- Hypomethylation
- Mesenchymal stem cells
- (No demonstrable effect so far)
- Infuse two partially-mismatched cord blood units
19Double Cord Questions
- Are the doses additive?
- What about the mismatch between the units?
- Will both survive to give mixed chimerism?
- What about GVHD?
- GVHD directed against recipient
- GVHD directed against each cord blood unit
20Published Study
- Median age 24 yrs
- Both cord blood units given intravenously
- Partially mismatched with recipient and between
units - ( 2 antigen mismatch with each other and with
recipient) - Median dose given 3.5x107 cells/kg
- Results
- All patients engrafted by day 23
- 24 had mixed chimerism at day 21
- 1 cord blood unit predominated in all patients at
d 100 - Conclusion
- Transplant with two partially-HLA matched units
safe and may overcome cell dose barrier - Barker et al., Blood, 2005
21Double Cord Transplants
- Most important factor for engraftment
- Total cell doses of both units combined
- Factors not important
- Disease status at transplant
- Conditioning regimen
- GVHD prophylaxis
- HLA disparity
- CD34 dose
- Gender
- Age
22Which cord unit wins?
- Factors not important
- Age
- Gender
- Order of infusion
- CD34 or CD3 dose
- ABO match
- HLA disparity
- Sex match
- Not known what determines the winning unit
23Double Cord Transplants in Adults
- 93 of adults now eligible for cord blood
transplants (compared with 30 using a single
unit if the threshold dose is 2.5x107/kg) - Engraftment is comparable to that in pediatric
patients - Reduction in relapse rate of leukemia patients
- Combined cell doses of both units most
significant factor in predicting engraftment
outcome - Higher rate of acute GVHD in younger patients
24New Strategies
- Extend double cord transplants using a
non-myeloablative conditioning regimen to those
not eligible for a myeloablative regimen - Early results indicate YES ? dependent on amount
of therapy in close time proximity to transplant - Transplant related mortality low in older
patients - Enhancing the speed of engraftment
- Intraosseous infusions
25Transplant Infusions
- Intravenous infusions inefficient cells travel
systemically until they reach the marrow space
(homing) - Significant loss of cells en route to marrow
- Overcome in bone marrow by infusion of large
numbers of cells - Small numbers of cells from a cord blood infusion
- Small volume and fixed dose
- Cord blood homes less effectively
26Intraosseous Infusions
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Can non-specific losses and homing to the BM
microenvironment be optimized?
27Current Studies
- Infuse one unit intraosseously followed by the
second (larger) unit infused intravenously - Few patients enrolled to date but all have
engrafted quickly with no procedural side effects - Early indications are that the extra CD34 cells
in the second unit are important
28Source of Cord Blood Units
- ARC Cord Blood Bank (Portland, OR)
- ARC/University of Minnesota
- Carolinas Cord Blood Center (Duke)
- LifeCord (Gainesville, FL)
- Michigan Community Blood Ctrs (Grand Rapids)
- New York Blood Center
- Puget Sound Blood Center (Seattle)
- St. Louis Cord Blood Center
- StemCyte (Arcadia, CA)
- Univ. Colorado Cord Blood Bank (Denver)
- Private cord blood banks (autologous/sibling)
29International Cord Blood Banks
- Cord Blood Bank of Barcelona
- Cord Blood Bank of Leuven (Belgium)
- French Greffe de Moelle (Bordeaux)
- London Cord Blood Bank
- StemCyte Taiwan
30Cost of Cord Blood Units
- Unrelated (public)
- US 18,540 to 33,641
- Foreign 26,450 to 43,865
- Private
- 1199 2195 plus annual fee of 99 125
- (range of 2007 fees for 10 private US cord
banks)
31Balancing Cost and Treatment
- Significant difference in cost to procure cord
blood unit(s) - Is cost balanced?
- Earlier engraftment ? earlier discharge
- Less GVHD
- Less risk of relapse
- Only option for transplant
32Need for Alternative Stem Cell Sources
- The chance of finding a donor is
- ?50 Caucasian
- ?35 Hispanic
- ?20 African American
- In 2003, 6 of all National Marrow Donor Program
(NMDP) facilitated transplants used cord blood - In 2007, that number increased to 37
33Future of Unrelated Cord Blood Transplants
- Cord blood has SURPASSED both bone marrow and
peripheral stem cells as the primary stem cell
transplant source in children in the U.S., Japan
and several European countries - Cord blood has SURPASSED bone marrow and
peripheral stem cells as the primary stem cell
transplant source in adults in Japan and is
growing rapidly worldwide
34Cord Blood Banking
- Expanding the use of cord blood will increase the
interest in private cord blood banking - Arguments against private banking are
- Autologous cord blood may include stem cells
predisposed to leukemia - The most common indication for transplant is
acute lymphocytic leukemia - While this is true for young children, there is
an increasing list of true and potential
indications
35Private Cord Blood Banking
VidaCord
36American Academy of Pediatrics
- Estimates that the chance of a child needing
their own stored cord blood range from 11000 to
1200,000 - Recommendations
- Cord blood donation should be discouraged when
cord blood is to be directed for later personal
or family use, as most conditions that might be
helped by cord blood already exist in the
infants cord blood - Cord blood banking for public use should be
encouraged - Private storage of cord blood as biological
insurance should be discouraged
37Stem Cell Act of 2005
- 78 million dollars earmarked to expand the
number of public cord blood units banked in the US
38Single or Double???
- Depends on
- Weight
- Disease
- Availability of cord blood unit
- Size of the cord blood unit