Aquatic Systems and their Catchments - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 18
About This Presentation
Title:

Aquatic Systems and their Catchments

Description:

The rate of respiration in a lake is positively correlated with the rate of ... Lake Tahoe (development) Crater Lake (atmospheric Deposition) WRT and Biota ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:54
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 19
Provided by: Office200134
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Aquatic Systems and their Catchments


1
Aquatic Systems and their Catchments
2
  • Small Catchments tend to have steeper slopes
  • Soils tend to be thin, therefore lower mineral
    inputs
  • Rapid runoff means detritus carried by streams
    has less time to decompose, therefore more
    decomposition occurs in the lake itself

Large Catchment, low slope
  • Slower runoff means more contact time with
    substrates
  • More processing of detritus in the stream

3
  • Maumee River Basin
  • Highest rates of soil loss occur at the outer
    edge of the catchment because this is where slope
    is greatest.

4
  • Vegetation in the catchment is important
  • Two adjacent catchments in Hubbard Brook
    Experimental Forest
  • One had all trees removed (dashed line)
  • One was untouched (solid line)
  • Immediately after cutting the trees, large
    amounts of N, K, and Ca were exported (lost from
    the soil and transported away via flowing
    streams)
  • Less vegetation to
  • retain moisture (and reduce streamflow)
  • Absorb nutrients (N,P,K)


5
  • Hydraulic Water Residence Time
  • Calculated as HWRT lake volume/annual
    outflow
  • But in reality, actual WRT can be very different
    from Hydraulic WRT. Why?

6
  • Relationship between WRT and Catchment AreaLake
    Area ratio
  • These two lakes have the same area and are in the
    same ecoregion, but they have different catchment
    areas.
  • Which lake has the greater CALA ratio?
  • Which lake would have a greater WRT?
  • What do you expect the relationship
  • to be between WRT and CALA?

7
Therefore, you can compare WRT of lakes within a
region using only topo maps But, there is a large
amount of scatter in this plot. What other
information would be helpful?
8
Knowing lake volume would help to improve
predictions of WRT, but even that is not enough
9
  • WRT and CALA
  • Lakes ranked in decreasing WRT
  • How does CALA change with
  • decreasing WRT?
  • What is the trend with Secchi depth?

10
WRT and Streams
WRT increases with Stream Order
Shorter WRT (hours)
Longer WRT (days)
11
WRT and Trophic State
  • Trophic State refers to the supply of nutrients
    (P,N) to a lake
  • Eutrophic well nourished, high supply of
    nutrients
  • Mesotrophic medium nourished
  • Oligotrophic poorly nourished low supply of
    nutrients (see Ch. 2)
  • The most important nutrient for primary producers
    in lakes is phosphorus, which usually enters
    lakes via tributary inflow.
  • Because P-loading is positively related to
    tributary inflow, and WRT is negatively related
    to tributary inflow (relative to volume), THEN
    P-loading should be negatively related to WRT

12
  • Therefore, the higher the WRT, the lower
    Phosphorus loading and the lower the trophic
    state.

13
  • If the supply of phosphorus is the main factor
    that determines rates of primary production, then
    what will the relationship look like between WRT
    and primary production?
  • The rate of respiration in a lake is positively
    correlated with the rate of primary production
    (everything that grows must eventually decompose
    respire). Therefore, what should the
    relationship between WRT and respiration look
    like?
  • Lakes with long WRT and low primary production
    tend to be very clear (high secchi depth)

14
  • Some of the lakes with the longest WRT and
    clearest water are becoming more productive
  • Lake Tahoe (development)
  • Crater Lake (atmospheric Deposition)

15
WRT and Biota
  • If Flushing Rate (1/WRT) is high, planktonic
    communities can be affected.
  • Macrozooplankton has higher growth rates than
    phytoplankton, therefore they will be more
    affected by rapid flushing (especially in the
    epilimnion).
  • Heavy rain events coupled with a thin epilimnion
    may cause wash-out, where most of a planktonic
    population is flushed from the system.

Weeks
Months
Days
Days
Calanoid copepod
Phytoplankton
rotifers
Daphnia
16
Retention of Dissolved Materials
  • How long a substance added to a lake remains in
    the lake depends on two factors
  • WRT
  • Whether the substance tends flush through the
    lake without interacting (conservative) or
    whether it tends to be used by organisms or
    adsorb to sediment particles (non-conservative)
  • Time to reach 90 of equilibrium is
  • T90 equil 2.3 WRT (1-R) R is retention
    coef

17
  • Example
  • If the annual input of road salt via Lake Erie
    tributaries were reduced by 50, the
    concentration of salt in Lake Erie would begin to
    drop and would reach a new stable point in about
  • 2.3 2.6 (1-0) 6 years
  • If the annual input of phosphorus via Lake Erie
    tributaries were reduced by 50, the
    concentration of P in Lake Erie would begin to
    drop and would reach a new stable point in about
  • 2.3 2.6 (1-0.7) 1.8 years

18
Sources and Sinks
  • Substances such as nutrients (P,N) and many
    contaminants have high retention coefficients,
    meaning the water flowing out of the lake is
    cleaner than the water flowing in. In this case
    the lake is a Sink (net storage).
  • In the case of contaminants such as PCBs, long
    after land and atmospheric sources are
    eliminated, lakes will continue to slowly flush
    out their stored contaminants. Lakes will have
    become sources.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com