STAT 6395 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 112
About This Presentation
Title:

STAT 6395

Description:

The study of the distribution and ... Queen Victoria. for the birth of. Prince Leopold and Princess Beatrice. Cholera: Acute Gastrointestinal Disease ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:55
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 113
Provided by: giovanni5
Category:
Tags: stat | prince | victoria

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: STAT 6395


1
Spring , 2008
  • STAT 6395
  • Special Topic in Statistics
  • Epidemiology

Filardo and Ng, 2008
2
(No Transcript)
3
I. Epidemiology
  • The study of the distribution and determinants of
    health-related states or events in specified
    populations and the translation of study results
    to control health problems

4
Distribution
  • Persons affected
  • Place
  • Time

Epidemiology The study of the distribution and
determinants of health-related states or events
in specified populations and the translation of
study results to control of health problems
5
Determinants
  • All the physical, biological, social, cultural,
    and behavioral factors that influence health

Epidemiology The study of the distribution and
determinants of health-related states or events
in specified populations and the translation of
study results to control of health problems
6
Health-related states or events
  • Diseases
  • Mortality (death)
  • Specific causes of death
  • Injuries
  • Disability
  • Health-related behaviors
  • Physiological measurements
  • Results of preventive regimens
  • Clinical outcomes
  • Provision and use of health services

Epidemiology The study of the distribution and
determinants of health-related states or events
in specified populations and the translation of
study results to control of health problems
7
Specified populations
  • Residents of a defined geographic area
  • Students who attend a specified school
  • Persons who belong to a specified organization
  • Workers at a specified workplace

Epidemiology The study of the distribution and
determinants of health-related states or events
in specified populations and the translation of
study results to control of health problems
8
Translation
  • Study Results

Scientific articles and presentations at meetings
Clinical guidelines
Prevention programs Quality of care improvement
programs Patient safety programs
Epidemiology The study of the distribution and
determinants of health-related states or events
in specified populations and the translation of
study results to control of health problems
9
Control
  • Operations or programs aimed at reducing the
    adverse impact of the disease on the community
  • Prevention
  • Cure
  • Management

Epidemiology The study of the distribution and
determinants of health-related states or events
in specified populations and the translation of
study results to control of health problems
10
Primary prevention
  • An action taken to prevent the development of a
    disease in a person who is well and does not have
    the disease in question

Operations or programs aimed at reducing the
adverse impact of the disease on the community
1) Prevention 2) Cure 3) Management
11
Secondary prevention (Cure and management)
  • The identification and treatment of people who
    have already developed a disease or precursors of
    the disease, through screening, at an early
    enough stage in the diseases natural history
    (early detection) such that intervention will be
    more effective than if the disease had been
    discovered later

Operations or programs aimed at reducing the
adverse impact of the disease on the community
1) Prevention 2) Cure 3) Management
12
II. Objectives of Epidemiology
  • To describe the extent of disease in the
    community
  • To identify risk factors (factors that influence
    a persons risk of acquiring a disease) for
    disease and the etiology or cause of disease
  • To study the natural history (course from onset
    to resolution) and prognosis of disease
  • To evaluate both existing and new preventive and
    therapeutic measures (including health care
    delivery)
  • To provide the foundation for developing public
    policy and regulatory decisions relating to
    environmental problems

13
bottom line, Epidemiology research requires a
multidisciplinary effort and statisticians play a
key role in
  • Hypothesis development
  • Study execution

14
Hypothesis development
  • Epidemiologists study the specific distribution
    and determinants of specific diseases
  • Development of hypotheses to test in an
    epidemiologic study requires in-depth knowledge
    of the disease and determinants under study
  • Medical and biological sciences
  • Social and behavioral sciences

Epidemiology Research ? hypothesis development
and study execution
15
Study execution
  • Statistics ------------gtBiostatistics
  • Medical and biological sciences
  • Social and behavioral sciences

Epidemiology Research ? hypothesis development
and study execution
16
Biostatistics
  • Separate chance observations from meaningful
    observations
  • Sampling
  • Sophisticated statistical analyses

Epidemiology Research ? Biostatistics, medical
and biological sciences, social and
behavioral sciences
17
Medical and biological sciences
  • Microbiology, e.g., to identify infectious
    agents
  • Clinical medicine and pathology, (e.g., to
    identify cases of disease)
  • Molecular biology, (e.g., to identify genotype of
    individuals)
  • Biochemistry, (e.g., to measure serum hormone
    levels)

Epidemiology Research ? Biostatistics, medical
and biological sciences, social and
behavioral sciences
18
Social and behavioral science
  • Design questionnaires for obtaining valid
    information
  • Design effective interventions for lifestyle
    changes

Epidemiology Research ? Biostatistics, medical
and biological sciences, social and
behavioral sciences
19
Epidemiology Sub-disciplines
  • Disease-specific subject matter
  • Exposure-specific subject matter
  • Health services research

20
Disease-specific subject matter
  • Infectious disease epidemiology
  • HIV/AIDS epidemiology
  • Malaria epidemiology
  • Chronic disease epidemiology
  • Cancer epidemiology
  • Cardiovascular epidemiology
  • Perinatal epidemiology
  • Neuroepidemiology
  • Psychiatric epidemiology

Epidemiology disciplines ? Disease-specific
subject matter, Exposure-specific subject
matter, Health services research
21
Determinant (exposure)-specific subject matter
  • Environmental epidemiology
  • Occupational epidemiology
  • Pyschosocial epidemiology
  • Genetic epidemiology
  • Nutritional epidemiology
  • Pharmacoepidemiology

Epidemiology disciplines ? Disease-specific
subject matter, Exposure-specific subject
matter, Health services research
22
Health services research
  • Operations research the study of the placement
    of health services in the community and the
    optimum utilization of such services
  • Program evaluation
  • Clinical epidemiology or outcomes research the
    study of illness outcomes in persons seen by
    providers of health care evaluation of medical
    treatments

Epidemiology disciplines ? Disease-specific
subject matter, Exposure-specific subject
matter, Health services research
23
Types of epidemiologic studies
  • Experimental
  • Observational (this course will focus on this
    second type of studies)

24
Experimental Studies
  • Studies in which conditions are under the control
    of the investigator(s).
  • The investigators assigns subjects to different
    study groups. The effect of the treatment is
    determined by comparing the outcome of interest
    in these groups.

Type of studies ? Experimental, Observational
25
Experimental studies (examples)
  • Randomized clinical trial (unit of study is the
    individual)
  • Community trial (unit of study is the community)

Type of studies ? Experimental, Observational
26
Observational studies
  • Studies in which the investigators does not
    control conditions, but rather observe nature
    taking its course by gathering information,
    recording, classifying, counting, and analyzing
    the collected data.
  • Exposure and disease outcomes would have occurred
    whether or not the studies have been performed
    because there were no a priori intervention(s)
    on the part of the investigators.

Type of studies ? Experimental, Observational
27
Observational studies (examples)
  • Descriptive
  • Analytic

Type of studies ? Experimental, Observational
28
Descriptive studies
  • Studies aimed at describing the distribution of
    disease or other health-related variables with
    respect to person (age, gender, race,
    socioeconomic status), place (census tract,
    county, state, country, urban/rural), and time
    (season, year)

Type of studies ? Experimental, Observational
(descriptive)
29
Descriptive studies
  • Often use routinely-collected data
  • Can define high-risk groups
  • Can be used for hypothesis generation, but
    generally not hypothesis testing

Type of studies ? Experimental, Observational
(descriptive)
30
Analytic studies
  • Test specific etiologic hypotheses
  • To generate new etiologic hypotheses
  • To suggest mechanisms of causation
  • To generate preventive hypotheses
  • To suggest or identify potential methods for
    disease prevention

In these studies, the epidemiologist observes the
relationship between an exposure and a disease or
other health outcome.
Type of studies ? Experimental, Observational
(analytic)
31
Definition Exposure
  • A potential causal agent or characteristic, such
    as infectious agent, behavior, dietary factor,
    medication, medical treatment, genetic makeup,
    environmental agent, or physiologic state (e.g.,
    serum level of a hormone or nutrient blood
    pressure).

An exposure may be harmful or beneficial
Type of studies ? Observational ? Analytic
32
Types of analytic studies
  • Cohort studies
  • Case-control studies

Type of studies ? Observational
33
Cohort studies
  • A study in which a group of persons exposed to a
    factor of interest and a group of persons not
    exposed are followed

and compared with respect to the incidence rate
of the disease or other condition of interest

Time
Type of studies ? Observational ? Cohort studies
34
Cohort studies (study schema)
Type of studies ? Observational ? Cohort studies
35
Case-Control studies
  • Studies in which a group of persons with a
    disease (cases) and a comparison group of persons
    without the disease (controls) are compared with
    respect to the history of past exposures to
    factors of interest


Present
Past
Type of studies ? Observational ? Case-Control
36
Case-Control studies (study schema)

Type of studies ? Observational ? Case-Control
37
(No Transcript)
38
Either descriptive or analytic studies
  • Cross-sectional studies
  • Ecologic studies


Type of studies ? Observational
39
Cross-sectional studies
  • Studies of the distribution of exposures and/or
    disease in a defined population at one given
    point in time


Type of studies ? Observational ? Cross-sectional
40
(No Transcript)
41
Ecologic studies
  • Studies of the association between exposures and
    disease in which the units of analysis are
    populations or groups of people, rather than
    individuals.
  • This involves the assessment of the correlation
    of exposure rates and disease rates among
    different groups or populations.
  • Causality, though???


Type of studies ? Observational ? Ecologic
42
Types of Epidemiologic studies

43
  • Example involving several types of study designs

Ecologic study results
Case-Control study results
Cohort study results
Randomized controlled trial results
44
Which type of study is the Gold Standard and/or
more common/feasible?
  • Experimental
  • Efficacy

Observational Effectiveness
controlled setting (difficult to reproduce in
real life)
real life setting
45
Focus of this course is on observational
Epidemiologic research (research regarding the
direct study of disease in human populations)
46
(No Transcript)
47
Some triumphs of observational Epidemiology
  • Smoking causes lung cancer
  • Identification of cardiovascular disease risk
    factors
  • Characterization of how HIV spreads through a
    population
  • Identification of occupational hazards (e.g.,
    asbestos)

48
Three Eras of Epidemiology
  • Sanitary (1800-1875)
  • Infectious disease (1875-1950)
  • Chronic disease (1950-present)

49
Sanitary Era (1800-1875)
  • Miasma theory of disease poisoning by foul
    emanations (miasma) from the soil, water, and
    air.
  • Created national vital statistics systems much
    valuable descriptive epidemiology
  • Demonstrated clustering of disease in slums and
    among the poor
  • Solutions sewage systems, drainage, clean water
    supplies, garbage collection, decent housing
  • Incorrect miasma theory, but solutions were a
    major contribution to public health

Lesson prevention doesnt necessarily require
understanding of cause
Sanitary, Infectious disease, Chronic disease
50
Infectious disease Era (1875-1950)
  • Germ theory single microscopic agents relate
    one-to-one to specific diseases
  • Epidemiology took a back seat to laboratory
    science, although in the1920s-30s, the germ
    theory was broadened to accommodate the
    interactive roles of host (immune and nutritional
    status), environment, and agent in infectious
    disease
  • Other epidemiologic contributions
  • Occupational exposures as causes of cancer
  • Specific vitamin deficiencies as causes of disease

Sanitary, Infectious disease, Chronic disease
51
Chronic Disease (Modern) Era
  • By end of World War II, infectious diseases were
    under control in the developed countries
    coronary heart disease and lung cancer were
    epidemic
  • Multifactor causation of chronic disease
  • Focus on identification and control of risk
    factors at the individual level
  • Black box approach emphasis on risk factor
    identification with only a secondary concern
    about mechanism or pathogenesis

Most of the methodology we will cover in this
course was developed during this Modern Era.
Sanitary, Infectious disease, Chronic disease
52
New Era(???)
  • Emerging infectious diseases (e.g., HIV)
  • Continued burden of infectious diseases in
    majority of world
  • Traditional chronic disease epidemiology has hit
    a wall in its ability to discover important new
    risk factors
  • Advances in molecular biology and genetics allow
    the study of pathogenesis and causality at the
    molecular and genetic levels using epidemiologic
    approaches
  • The need to be concerned with causal pathways at
    multiple levels, including the societal level, as
    opposed to an exclusive focus on risk factors at
    the individual level, has become apparent to many

Sanitary, Infectious disease, Chronic disease, ???
53
Levels of causality
  • Societal or population
  • Individual
  • Biochemical
  • Cellular
  • Molecular

54
What causes lung cancer?
  • Individual/societal Cigarette smoking (nicotine
    addiction)
  • Biochemical Specific chemicals in cigarette
    smoke that cause the mutations
  • Cellular Specific phenotypic changes in the
    cells that result in loss of growth control
  • Molecular Mutations in DNA

55
What causes AIDS?
  • Societal
  • Poverty
  • Prostitution
  • Individual/societal a. Multiple sexual partners
    b. Intravenous drug use
  • Biochemical
  • Cellular Infection -the HIV viruses
    progressively destroy lymphocytes (a types of
    white blood cells)
  • Molecular Mutations in DNA -the viral DNA is
    incorporated into the DNA of the infected
    lymphocyte

56
On the mode of communication of cholera
  • John Snow, M.D.
  • London, 1855

57
John Snow 1857
58
Why study Snow?
  • Appreciate those who came before us and paved the
    way
  • Brilliant piece of work lucid and thorough
  • Snows work on cholera illustrates a key
    epidemiologic principle

the most important information to have about any
communicable disease is its mode of communication
59
John Snow (1813-1858)
  • Physician
  • Pioneer in both epidemiology and anesthesiology
  • Experiments in administration of anesthesia
    himself may have contributed to his early death

60
Snow administered chloroform to Queen Victoria
for the birth of Prince Leopold and Princess
Beatrice
61
Cholera Acute Gastrointestinal Disease
  • Incubation period 12-72 hours
  • Sudden onset of severe vomiting
  • Followed shortly by voluminous, watery,
    non-bloody diarrhea, described as rice water
    stool (white and opalescent)
  • Abdominal cramps
  • Severe cases severe dehydration, circulatory
    collapse, renal failure (death may occur within a
    few hours of first symptoms)
  • Case fatality rate may range from 1-50,
    depending on strain of Vibrio cholerae and
    treatment

62
In 1817, four years after John Snows birth,
cholera emerged from the Indian subcontinent,
where it had existed for centuries, to spread
across the world.
63
Cholera Epidemics in Great Britain
  • 1831-32
  • 56,000 deaths
  • 1848-49
  • 125,000 deaths
  • 1853-54
  • Cholera returns to England

64
Cholera Apparently contradictory facts in 1854
  • Local spread with evidence of direct
    communication from person to person
  • Failure to spread to many in close contact with
    the sick
  • Cases occur without traceable relation to prior
    cases
  • Highest rates in low-lying areas and in filthy
    environments - Exceptions too numerous to
    be disregarded
  • Unpredictability of its spread around the world
    and its geographic distribution

65
Cholera Miasma Theory
  • Report of the London General Board of Health on
    cholera epidemic of 1848-49
  • it appears as if some organic matter, which
    constitutes the essence of the epidemic, when
    brought in contact with other organic matter
    proceeding from living bodies, or from
    decomposition, has the power of so changing the
    condition of the latter as to impress it with
    poisonous qualities of a peculiar kind similar to
    its own.

66
Cholera Elaborations of Miasma theory
  • Localizing influences
  • Predisposition
  • Spontaneous generation of cholera poison
  • Poison spread by diffusion through the
    atmosphere vs. poison attached itself to solid
    bodies
  • Poison communicated by an effluvium (contagion)
    given off by the sick

67
William Farr
68
Farrs elaboration of Miasma theory
  • Soil at low elevations, especially near the banks
    of the Thames River, contained much organic
    matter that produced deadly miasmata.
  • Miasmata diffused through the atmosphere in a
    cloud or mist
  • Concentration of miasmata would be greater at
    lower elevations than in higher elevations,
    accounting for the geographic distribution in the
    London epidemic of 1849.

Farrs theory did have some consistency with the
facts.
69
John Snows Germ Theory
  • Cholera caused by a germ cell, not yet identified
  • 2 main modes of transmission of germ cell, which
    was found in the evacuations of cholera
    victims 1. Drinking water contaminated with
    sewage 2. Contaminated food, bedding, or clothing

Snow was firmly convinced of his theory by start
of 1853-54 epidemic.
70
Snows ecologic observations prior to the 1853-54
epidemic
Cholera has never appeared except where there
has been ample opportunity for it to be conveyed
by human connections.
  • Epidemics of cholera followed major routes of
    commerce and warfare.
  • Cholera always appeared first at seaports, when
    extending to a new island or continent.

71
Snows observations from case histories
  • Cholera can be communicated from the sick to the
    healthy.
  • Persons attending those with cholera do not
    necessarily become afflicted.
  • Close contact with a cholera patient is not
    necessary to become afflicted.

Snows conclusion cholera is communicated
from person to person, but not through the air
72
When cholera returned to London in August 1853,
Snow had a definite hypothesis
cholera was spread by contaminated water.
73
Water supply of south districts of London
Lambeth Water Company
  • Until 1852, drew water from the Thames River in
    London, contaminated with Londons sewage
  • In 1852, moved intake 22 miles up river and far
    from the contaminated water

Southwark and Vauxhall Water Company
  • Continued to draw water from the contaminated
    Thames

74
(No Transcript)
75
Cholera Deaths in South Districts of London
76
Cholera deaths (per 100,000) in south districts
of London
  • District Water supply 1849
    1853
  • Bermondsey SV 1610
    150
  • St. Saviour SV, Lam 1530
    146
  • St. George SV, Lam 1640
    143
  • St. Olave SV 1810
    134
  • Rotherhithe SV, Kent 2050
    112
  • Newington SV, Lam 1440
    57
  • Wandsworth SV, others 1000
    51
  • Camberwell SV, Lam 970
    40
  • Lambeth Lam, SV
    1200 34
  • Notes 1. Lambeth was supplied mostly by
    Lambeth Water Co.
  • 2. Rotherhithe supplied partly by Kent
    in 1853

77
Cholera Deaths in south districts of London,
1853, sub-district analysis
  • Water Cholera Deaths/
  • Supply Population Deaths
    100,000
  • SV 167,654 192
    116
  • Lambeth 14,632 0
    0
  • Both 301,149 182
    60

How many cholera deaths would we expect in
sub-districts supplied by Lambeth if they had the
same death rate as those supplied by SV?
78
Cholera Deaths in south districts of London,
1853, sub-district analysis
  • Water Cholera Deaths/
  • Supply Population Deaths
    100,000
  • SV 167,654 192
    116
  • Lambeth 14,632 0
    0
  • Both 301,149 182
    60

Expected deaths for Lambeth (116/100,000)14,632
16
79
Additional Observations on Sub-districts
  • Among the sub-districts supplied by both
    companies, those supplied mainly by Lambeth had a
    low death rate, while those supplied mainly by
    SV had a high death rate.
  • Two sub-districts supplied only by SV also
    contained a number of pump-wells. These
    sub-districts had a low death rate.

80
By the return of cholera in July 1854, Snow
recognized the full significance of the
intermixing of the water supplies of the 2
companies
  • in the sub-districts supplied by both
    Companies, the mixing of the supply is of the
    most intimate kind A few houses are supplied by
    one Company and a few by the other, according to
    the decision of the owner or occupier at that
    time when the Water Companies were in active
    competition

81
By the return of cholera in July 1854, Snow
recognized the full significance of the
intermixing of the water supplies of the 2
companies
  • in many cases a single house has a supply
    different from that on either side. Each company
    supplies both rich and poor, both large houses
    and small there is no difference either in the
    condition or occupation of the persons receiving
    the water of the different Companies.

82
An Experiment on the Grandest Scale
  • no fewer than three hundred thousand people of
    both sexes, of every age and occupation, and of
    every rank and station, from gentlefolks down to
    the very poor, were divided into two groups
    without their choice

83
An Experiment on the Grandest Scale
  • one group being supplied with water containing
    the sewage of London,
  • the other group having water quite free from
    such impurity

84
What type of study John Snow conducted?

85
What type of study John Snow conducted?

86
Cohort Study
  • A study in which a group of persons exposed to a
    factor of interest and a group of persons not
    exposed are followed and compared with respect to
    the incidence rate of the disease or other
    condition of interest.
  • Exposed group persons using SV water supply
  • Comparison group persons using Lambeth water
    supply

Compared cholera mortality rates in the two groups
87
Calculation of mortality rates required
numerators and denominators
  • Mortality rate in exposed group
  • (Cholera deaths among persons supplied with SV
    water) / (Number of persons supplied with SV
    water)

Mortality rate in comparison group (Cholera
deaths among persons supplied with Lambeth water)
/ (Number of persons supplied with Lambeth water)
To determine numerators and denominators, Snow
needed a way to classify each death and every
person in the population by water supply
88
The Numerators
  • For each cholera death in the relevant districts,
    Snow obtained information on the water supply
  • The inquiry was necessarily attended with a good
    deal of trouble.
  • Chemical test problematic because SV water had
    40 times more NaCl than Lambeth

89
The Denominators
a return had been made to Parliament of the
entire number of houses supplied with water by
each of the Water Companies, but ... the number
of houses which they supplied in particular
districts was not stated
  • Therefore Snow had to include all the south
    districts of London in his study, not just the
    districts where the water supply was intermingled.

A daunting undertaking, so Snow obtained an
assistant (Mr. Whiting)
90
Cholera deaths in south London districts during
first 4 weeks of 1854 Epidemic, by water supply

  • Deaths/
  • Water Cholera
    10,000
  • Supply Deaths Houses Houses

  • SV 286 40,046
    71.4
  • Lambeth 14 26,107
    5.4

  • Relative risk 71.4/5.4 13.2
  • Thames 22
  • Pump-wells 4
  • Ditches 4
  • Unknown 4
  • London 277 287,345
    9.6
  • (-SV)
  • Note Houses, not persons, used in denominator

91
More data
as the epidemic advanced, the disproportion
between the number of cases in houses supplied by
the Southwark and Vauxhall Company and those
supplied by the Lambeth Company, became not quite
so great, although it continued very striking
  • Cholera likely was imported from Baltic Fleet to
    Thames River, which was initially the primary
    source of the epidemic
  • Later, cholera was also spread by other means,
    diluting the water company effect

92
Cholera deaths in south London districts during
first 7 weeks of 1854 Epidemic, by water supply

  • Deaths/
  • Water Cholera
    10,000
  • Supply Deaths Houses Houses

  • SV 1263 40,046
    315
  • Lambeth 98 26,107
    37

  • Relative risk 315/37 8.5
  • London 1422 256,423
    59
  • (-SV, Lambeth)

93
Cholera deaths in south London districts during
last 7 weeks of 1854 Epidemic, by water supply

  • Deaths/
  • Water Cholera
    10,000
  • Supply Deaths Houses Houses

  • SV 2353 40,046
    573
  • Lambeth 302 26,107
    115
  • Relative risk 573/115 5

94
Cholera deaths in south London districts during
the 1854 epidemic, by water supply

  • Water Cholera Deaths/
  • Supply Deaths Population 10,000
  • SV 4,093 266,516
    153
  • Lambeth 461 173,748
    26

  • Relative risk 153/26 5.9
  • London 10,367 2,362,236
    43
  • Note
  • populations supplied by water companies estimated
    by Registrar General.

95
Was the Use of Houses in the Denominators Valid?
  • Water
    Persons/
  • Supply Population Houses
    Household
  • SV 266,516 40,046
    6.7
  • Lambeth 173,748 26,107
    6.7
  • London 2,362,236 322,576
    7.3

96
Cholera Deaths in South Districts of London,
Sub-district Analysis, 1849 vs. 1854
  • Water Cholera Deaths
  • Supply 1849 1854
  • SV 2261 2458
  • Both 3905 2547
  • Lambeth 1644 89
  • Here we are back to ecologic analysis

97
Cholera Outbreak in the Golden Square Area of
London, 8/31 - 9/9, 1854. Within 250 yards of the
intersection of Cambridge and Broad Streets,
there were more than 500 fatal cases
98
Snow immediately suspected contamination of the
water of the much-used street pump on Broad
Street near Cambridge Street.
99
Snow mapped the places of residence of cholera
decedents from August 31 - September 2 in the
broader neighborhoodand found that 73 of 83
deaths had taken place within a short distance of
the pump.
100
(No Transcript)
101
Snow investigated the water source of the 73
decedents who lived near Broad Street pump
  • 61 -- drank water from the pump
  • 6 -- did not
  • 6 -- could get no information

102
10 Deaths in houses located nearer to another
street pump
  • 5 always used the Broad Street pump, as they
    preferred its water
  • 3 (children) went to school near the Broad Street
    pump

103
Handle of the pump was removed on September 8
  • Legend has it that the removal of the pump handle
    caused the end of the epidemic
  • Snow himself wondered whether removing the pump
    handle had a beneficial effect
  • Epidemic was already subsiding
  • Much of the population in the neighborhood had
    fled

it is impossible to decide whether the water
from the pump still contained the cholera poison
in an active state.
104
Snows investigation of Golden Square Outbreak
workhouse near Broad St.
  • Surrounded by houses in which deaths from cholera
    occurred
  • Only 5 deaths among 535 inmates
  • Workhouse had a pump-well on the premises
  • Also received water from the Grand Junction Water
    Works
  • Did not use Broad Street pump
  • Would have expected more than 100 deaths based on
    mortality in surrounding streets

105
Snows investigation of Golden Square Outbreak
Brewery on Broad St.
  • Located near the pump
  • More than 70 workers
  • None died of cholera
  • Workers drank malt liquor, not water
  • Deep well located in brewery
  • Workers never obtained water from Broad Street
    Pump

106
Snows recommendations for prevention of cholera
during an epidemic
  • Observe strictest cleanliness around the sick.
  • Wash linens of patients as soon as they are
    removed.
  • Boil water for drinking and preparing food
    (unless known to come from clean source).
  • Wash or heat to 212F all food.
  • Healthy should not live in same room as sick.
  • Pit-men should work 4 hour shifts, and not eat in
    mines.
  • Educate the people about communicability of
    cholera.

107
Snows recommendations for long-term prevention
of cholera
  • Effect good and perfect drainage.
  • Provide water supply free from contamination with
    contents of sewers, cesspools, house-drains, and
    refuse of people who navigate the rivers.
  • Provide model lodging-houses for the vagrant
    class and sufficient house room for the poor in
    general.
  • Teach habits of personal and domestic cleanliness
    among the people.
  • Screen persons arriving from infected places.

108
Medical establishment slow to catch on
  • 1855 report of Scientific Committee for
    Scientific Enquiries in Relation to the Cholera
    Epidemic of 1854 on the whole of evidence, it
    seems impossible to doubt that the influences,
    which determine in mass the geographical
    distribution of cholera in London, belong less to
    the water than to the air.
  • 1856 Report on the last two cholera epidemics of
    London as affected by the consumption of impure
    water under the specific influence which
    determines an epidemic period, fecalized
    drinking-water and fecalized air equally may
    breed and convey the poison.

109
Sanitary movement eventually succeeded in spite
of its incorrect miasma theory
  • Extensive improvements in several of Londons
    water supplies, including Southwark and Vauxhall,
    had already been ordered before the 1853-54
    epidemic.
  • In next London epidemic (1866), William Farr
    himself used epidemiology to show that the source
    of the epidemic was impure water from the East
    London Water Company.

110
What We Know Now?
  • Cholera caused by a bacterium (Vibrio cholerae
    discovered in 1883 by Robert Koch)
  • Small intestine is primary site of infection
  • Diarrhea caused by cholera toxin produced by
    Vibrio cholerae
  • Treatment intravenous or oral fluid and
    electrolytes, depending on severity of illness
  • Environmental reservoir for Vibrio cholerae in
    the sea, where it lives on zooplankton and
    shellfish

111
Vibrio Cholerae
112
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com