DOD Standardization Conference Parts Management Initiatives - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 41
About This Presentation
Title:

DOD Standardization Conference Parts Management Initiatives

Description:

DOD Standardization Conference Parts Management Initiatives Panel Defense Parts Management Portal Alex Melnikow Deputy Director, DMSMS Defense Standardization Program ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:51
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 42
Provided by: dspDlaMi
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: DOD Standardization Conference Parts Management Initiatives


1
DOD Standardization Conference Parts Management
Initiatives Panel
Defense Parts Management Portal
Alex Melnikow Deputy Director, DMSMS Defense
Standardization Program Office
Arlington, Virginia March 5, 2008
2
Parts Management
  • Parts management is a vital component of the
    acquisition and sustainment processes
  • Comprehensive parts management addresses the
    totality of parts-related organizations,
    processes, materiel, and management required for
    a weapon system throughout its life cycle

3
Parts Management is not Parts Control
  • Parts Control was defined by MIL-STD-965
  • Parts Management encompasses far more
  • Cancellation of MIL-STD-965 had profound effects
  • Positives
  • OEMs free from prescriptive requirements
  • Greater flexibility for creativity and
    innovation
  • Negatives
  • - Discipline of parts management largely
    disappeared
  • - Parts proliferation increased
  • - Obsolescence issues increased

4
Parts ManagementPart Selection
  • Selecting optimum parts for a system is a crucial
    element of the design phase of an acquisition
    program.
  • Collectively, parts are primary determinants of
    system reliability, maintainability,
    supportability, and availability
  • As well as of logistics readiness,
    interoperability, logistics footprint, and total
    ownership costs.
  • Proper parts selection requires consideration of
    myriad factors
  • Technical characteristics
  • Part reliability
  • Cost
  • Commonality
  • Performance
  • part and supplier quality
  • Qualification
  • Potential obsolescence
  • Standardization

5
Background
2004 DSPO Chartered the Parts Management
Reengineering Working Group (PMRWG) 2005 PMRWG
Issued Final Report
6
Recommendations
  • Restore parts management as an engineering
    discipline
  • Make parts management a policy and a contractual
    requirement
  • Develop tools that provide accurate, current
    information for parts management
  • Create a Defense Parts Management Portal

7
Implementation
  • 2006 Parts Management Reengineering
    Implementation Project Team Chartered
  • Implement Recommendations
  • Three Working Groups
  • 2007 Transition to Parts Standardization
    Management Committee (PSMC)
  • Sustain Expand

8
Issues
  • Parts management is difficult
  • Data in numerous, diverse information systems
  • Systems cannot communicate or exchange data
  • Some systems are old and difficult to use
  • Data are duplicative, incomplete, or inaccurate
  • Parts management is costly
  • Part and component selection
  • Cataloging / documentation
  • Logistics support / footprint management
  • DMSMS

9
Key Objectives
  • Improve parts management throughout DOD
  • Enable more efficient and effective parts
    management
  • Provide improved access to parts data and tools
  • Improve quality of parts data
  • Promote and support increased standardization
  • Improve communication and collaboration
  • Promote data sharing and parts-related research
  • Improve parts data integration - government and
    industry
  • Lower costs

10
DPMP Concept User Created Content
  • DPMP employs a different design approach from
    most government portals.
  • Resources accessed through the DPMP are
    user-created content
  • Approach has worked with considerable success in
    the private sector
  • Wikipedia
  • YouTube
  • Facebook

11
DPMP Concept Business Rules Govern Content
  • DPMP open to the general public
  • Business rules govern content
  • DPMP resides at GIDEP
  • Participating organizations must obtain a GIDEP
    account
  • Organizations granted administrative rights and
    control
  • Organizations manage a dedicated interface page
  • Content providers may limit access

12
DPMP ConceptPortal is a Navigation Tool
  • Single point of entry
  • Web accessible Information related to parts
    management
  • Easy navigation to
  • organizations with parts management-related roles
    or responsibilities
  • parts and components sources
  • tools, services
  • information resources
  • documents, policies, and templates

13
DPMP ConceptLean Design
  • Keep the technical content on server small
  • Complex resources or tools reside on content
    provider servers
  • GIDEP server portion largely navigation
  • External resources reached through bridge page

14
DPMP Concept Provide a Market Framework
  • The DPMP provides functional framework
  • logical navigation pathways
  • Tools
  • interface capabilities
  • Connects users with content providers
  • Users access resources via logical navigation
    structure
  • DPMP is marketplace for the parts management
    community
  • Content determined by what providers offer
    potential customers
  • Impact determined by degree resources offered are
    accessible, accurate, and useful

15
(No Transcript)
16
DPMP ConceptGeneral Features
  • Search the DPMP
  • About DPMP
  • Whats New
  • Calendar
  • Site Map
  • Feedback
  • Navigation Tracking

17
DPMP ConceptNavigation Options
  • Community Connection
  • Knowledge Sharing and Collaboration
  • Life-Cycle Parts Management
  • Tools and Services
  • Part and Component Sources
  • Part Information Repositories
  • Education and Training
  • Information Resources

18
Community Connections
  • Bring government and industry together in a
    shared portal.
  • Each participating organization is a navigation
    destination.
  • Menu structured by organizational type
  • Government
  • Industry OEMs and systems integrators
  • Industry Sub Tier suppliers
  • Part and component manufacturers
  • Part suppliers and distributors
  • Defense support contractors
  • Associations
  • International organizations
  • This navigation structure will help users quickly
    drill down to a desired destination in three or
    four menu choices (or mouse clicks) T

19
Navigation Architecture
Company Bridge Page
Destinations Within Company
20
Notional Bridge Page
Company Name
Company Logo
DPMP
  • Products
  • Nuts
  • Bolts
  • Fasteners
  • Points of Contact
  • Jane Doe jane_at_doe.com
  • John Oem john_at_oem.com
  • OEM/parts user group address
  • Profile
  • What we do
  • Parts Issues we face

Links back to Portal to be consistent with
Portal look, feel and navigation
  • Places
  • U.S. East Coast
  • U.S. West Coast
  • International
  • Policy on Parts
  • Parts Mission
  • Policy specifics
  • Policy POC
  • Programs
  • Parts Management
  • Intra-Organizational Parts Management efforts
  • Projects related to Parts Management
  • Initiative on Parts Management
  • Cross-Industry Project on Parts Management
  • Weapon System Parts Management Design
    Considerations
  • Papers and Pool of Records
  • White Paper Library
  • Other PM references

21
DPMP Bridge Page
  • Each destination organization owns its bridge
    page
  • Bridge page contains information about the
    organization
  • Connects users to points of contact, catalogs,
    tools, or other resources
  • Provides connectivity between buyers and
    suppliers
  • Organization determines what it will make
    available
  • Organization determines how the offering will be
    presented
  • Each bridge page opens in a separate window
  • Ensures users can easily return to the DPMP

22
Life-Cycle Parts Management
  • Disciplines (such as)
  • Systems engineering
  • Configuration management
  • Reliability engineering
  • Quality management
  • Standardization
  • Cataloging
  • For each discipline (useful resources)
  • Key organizations
  • Policies, procedures, and standards
  • Training
  • Tools
  • Best practices
  • Activities and tasks

23
Tools and Services
  • Example Tools
  • Weapon System Impact Tool
  • Generic Compound Analysis Tool
  • PinPoint
  • ASSIST
  • DMSMS and Obsolescence Tools
  • GIDEP
  • E-Mall
  • Federal Logistics Information System (FLIS)
  • No Cost or Fee for Service
  • No cost to user and for a fee or license
  • Accommodates revenue models of participating
    organizations

24
Tools Organized into CategoriesBased on What the
Tool Does
  • Part Selection
  • Cost Analysis
  • Performance Measurement
  • Reliability Analysis
  • Obsolescence Analysis
  • General Search Tools

25
Part and Component Sources
  • Find sources of parts and components based on
    FSG/FSC
  • Source list drawn from existing relational
    database
  • Each listed source name has hotlink to company
    bridge page or website

26
Knowledge Sharing and Collaboration
  • Communities of Practice
  • Team Collaboration Space
  • Best Practice Exchange
  • Data Exchange Resources
  • GIDEP
  • DMSMS Data Sharing
  • On-line Meeting Resources
  • Go-To Meeting

27
Approach
  • Rapid development launch
  • Employ spiral development
  • Evolve through customer-driven requirements
  • Integrate DMSMS
  • Use NATO / DLIS data exchange standard
  • Use COTS technologies

28
A Work in Progress
  • Portal will be shaped by its user community
  • Organizations not listed may ask to be listed
  • Organizations may ask their supply chain
    organizations to become involved
  • Navigation pathways and logic will evolve as
    users suggest improvements
  • Content providers must provide accessible,
    accurate, and useful information

29
Questions?
30
Backup SlidesPart Selection
31
Find a Part
32
Part Selection Capability - Purpose
  • Promote Use of Gov/Industry Preferred Parts
  • Enable Standard Queries (eOTD-Q) using Parametric
    Data (everyone can receive respond)
  • Enable Rapid Informed Part Selection
  • Increase Standardization and Commonality
  • Reduce Logistics Footprint
  • Lower Future DMSMS Events
  • Lower Cost and Increase Availability

33
Part Selection Capability
34
Parametric Search
35
Backup SlidesDMSMS
36
AIA - OSD Tiger Team
  • Working to develop a Plan of Action
  • Conceive pilot projects
  • Identify policy compliance problems
  • Propose policy recommendations
  • Devise a method to track progress
  • Lockheed Martin, Raytheon, Boeing, Northrop
    Grumman and Bell Helicopter have all made verbal
    commitments to support this approach
  • Expand Portal Team to include greater
    participation by Industry and Services

37
DMSMS Data Sharing Project
  • Bills Of Material
  • GIDEP
  • Case Resolution Data
  • GIDEP (SDW / ODR)
  • Production Discontinuance Notices
  • GIDEP
  • Preferred Parts Lists

Issues related to all of these are being worked
via the AIA - OSD Tiger Team
38
DOD DMSMS Organization
OSD Leadership DUSD / LMR ADUSD (LMR) /
SCI Director, DSPO
  • Membership
  • Voting Members
  • Air Force
  • Army
  • Navy
  • Marine Corps
  • DLA
  • OSD - DSPO
  • Advisory Members (7)
  • Associate Members (14)
  • Industry Liaison (9)
  • Academia (2)

Committee Structure Outreach Common Use
Tools Conference FMS Interoperability Training
39
System-Level DMSMS Management Working Group
  • DMSMS tools, databases and research are
    exclusively focused on managing the obsolescence
    of individual electronics parts, and in some
    cases groups of electronic parts
  • Increasing portion of the DMSMS management
    problem is at higher-levels of assembly, i.e.,
    the LRU-level and higher
  • For many organizations, the components that
    need DMSMS management are not individual
    electronic parts, but COTS items such as laptop
    computers, routers, switches, and a host of other
    hardware items composed of electronic,
    non-electronic, and software content
  • These organizations design, procure and support
    systems that never directly involve procuring or
    managing individual electronic parts (e.g.,
    chips)
  • While these organizations are using some of the
    same mitigation approaches to manage their DMSMS
    problems as the part-level obsolescence
    community, they also have unique DMSMS problems

Proposed
40
System-Level DMSMS Management Working Group
  • Issues to be addressed include, but are not
    limited to the following
  • COTS LRU obsolescence forecasting and mitigation
  • Correlation, or lack thereof, between individual
    electronic part obsolescence and COTS LRU
    obsolescence
  • Software obsolescence forecasting and mitigation
  • DMSMS co-sustainment of hardware and software
  • Roadmap and policy driven DMSMS management
    constraints
  • Constraint and schedule driven refresh planning

Proposed
41
System-Level DMSMS Management Working Group
  • Formation of a system-level DMSMS working group,
    and possible Aging Aircraft and DMSMS Conference
    sessions
  • Would facilitate the inclusion of organizations
    who are managing system-level obsolescence
    problems today, and have little connection to
    individual electronic part-level forecasting and
    part-level specific management solutions

Proposed
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com