Title: The Mad as a Hatter? Campaign for a Mercury-Free NIH Edwar
1The Mad as a Hatter?Campaign for a Mercury-Free
NIH
- Edward H. Rau
- Environmental Protection Branch
- Division of Safety, Office of Research Services
- National Institutes of Health
- Bethesda, MD 20892-5746
- U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
2Introduction to the National Institutes of Health
(NIH)
- The primary biomedical research agency of the
Federal government. - Campus at Bethesda, Maryland is the largest
biomedical research facility in the world and
includes - Clinical Center, a 350 bed research hospital,
- 4,500 laboratories
- 20,000 employees
- Fully permitted (MDE/EPA) and licensed (NRC)
treatment, storage and disposal facility for
hazardous, low level radioactive and mixed waste
on-site
3The NIH Mercury Reduction Program
4Historical BackgroundCase Histories Illustrate
Risk to Laboratory Workers and Spark Interest
- 1692. Sir Isaac Newton was an alchemist and
conducted many experiments with mercury. In this
year it is said that he went mad and left his
research. Forensic studies strongly suggest that
his symptoms and later death were caused by
mercury poisoning. - 1860s. Two fatal cases of poisoning associated
with dimethyl mercury. No autopsy findings
described.
5- 1974. Fatality following laboratory exposures to
methyl mercury - confirmed by autopsy findings. - 1997. A Dartmouth College scientist whose
specialty was the toxicology of heavy metals dies
of mercury poisoning. This resulted from an
exposure to a single drop of methyl mercury
penetrating her rubber gloves.
6Campaign Background
- In 1996 the NIH Clinical Center began an
initiative to eliminate all unnecessary uses of
mercury in medical devices and laboratory
chemicals. - In 2001 the Mad as a Hatter? campaign extended
the program to all NIH facilities in the U.S. - It now covers all uses of mercury including
non-medical applications ranging from
laboratories to electrical equipment.
7Voluntary Campaign Goals
- Eliminate unnecessary uses of mercury and
mercury-containing products at NIH facilities. - Use the mercury reduction campaign to increase
awareness of all employees in their role in
pollution prevention - Community outreach via informed employees at
health fairs etc. homes, schools etc. with - A mercury safety message focused on children
(Hatters Helpers).
8Why the Focus on Mercury P2?
- High Toxicity Via Multiple Routes
- Potential for Exposure Employees, Patients,
Public - Numerous Sources and Uses in Health Care, Labs
- Spill Prevention
- Liability and Disposal Cost Avoidance
- Growing Environmental Health Hazards
- Regional Pollution Prevention Priority
- P2 Feasibility - Alternatives Are Available
9Numerous Sources and Uses (See Website Listings)
- Intentional
- Thermometers
- Sphygmomanometers
- Thermostats
- Dental amalgams
- Medical devices
- Lab chemicals
- Preservatives
- Batteries, fluorescent lamps
- Unintended Contaminant
- (Not on MSDS)
- Bleach
- Soaps detergents
- Water treatment chemicals
- sodium hydroxide
- sulfuric acid
10Major Source -Laboratory ThermometersEach
Contains Several Grams of Mercury
11Spill PreventionA Most Important Driver
- Mercury spills were the most frequent Hazardous
Material (HAZMAT) emergency response incident at
NIH facilities. - Spills were causing significant downtime,
difficult to clean-up and required specialized
equipment and expertise. - Disposal of contaminated debris from spills was
expensive.
12Environmental Health Hazards-A Growing Global
Concern-
- Mercury is highly persistent, bioaccumulative and
toxic (PBT) in the environment. - 1 cause of fish consumption advisories over
2,000 bodies of water in 42 states affected. - Increasing body burdens CDC study.
- 60,000 children at risk via fetal exposure - NAS
- Potential adverse effects on birth outcomes-
- Learning disabilities
- May be associated with increasing incidence of
autism - Other neurological impairments
13Liability and Disposal Cost Avoidance
- Certain mercury waste streams carry high
regulatory liability - may not be treatable or
have no commercial outlets - Mercury-contaminated lab solvents
- Low level radioactive waste contaminated with
mercury - High liability associated with exposures,
diversion, theft, environmental releases
14Tightening Discharge Limits-Proactive Response-
- Discharge limits in wastewater and medical waste
incinerator emissions are likely to drop by
orders of magnitude - POTWs faced with ppb or ppt limits are beginning
to impose similar limits on facility discharges
at the source. - Compliance will be very difficult and costly
- Refer to MASCO study
15Campaign Methods
- Increase employee awareness of the uses of
mercury its hazards, alternatives and proper
disposal methods through a multi-media
information campaign. - Provide incentives for voluntary participation in
the campaign. - Enlist informed employees to help with community
and school outreach programs.
16Methods(Continued)
- Partner with similar efforts by other agencies,
non-governmental organizations and the private
sector. - Reduce availability and procurement of mercury
containing items by changing NIH Supply Catalog,
and engineering specifications.
17A Web-Based Campaign
- The Campaign website is the backbone of the
program, serving as a - Cost effective method to disseminate information
to a very large audience at all NIH facilities,
other biomedical facilities and the public - Mechanism to rapidly collect and acknowledge
volunteer pledges, mail out awards, publicize
events - Library of reference information and links to
related programs and partners
18A Wide Range of Other Publicity Approaches is Used
- NIH publications
- National and local press releases
- Presentations at special events - Earth Days,
Bring-Your-Child-to-Work-Day, Health Fairs,
Research Festivals etc. - E-mail notices to employees
- T-shirts, buttons, flyers, displays
- Thermometer exchanges
- Employee pledge program Hatters Pledge
19The NIH Hatters Pledge(On-line)
- Encourages voluntary participation by individuals
in labs, clinics other work areas - Participants pledge to survey their work area for
items containing mercury, to replace these with
mercury-free alternatives, and dispose of mercury
properly. - Pledges can also volunteer for school programs
etc. - Incentives - certificates, lab door stickers,
prizes and other recognition
20Campaign Results- Phase I
- Over 1,500 mercury containing devices in the
Clinical Center were replaced with non-mercury
alternatives -----without a single spill or
interruption in patient care. - Spill responses and costs associated with their
clean up have been virtually eliminated. - The Clinical Center is a now considered a
mercury-free facility. - The program received the Mercury in Flight
award from Health Care Without Harm, an
international coalition of over 300 health care
organizations.
21Campaign Results- Phase IIEarth Day 2001 to Date
- All NIH facilities in the U.S. are now
participating - Campaign extended to all functional areas labs,
shops, construction activities - Campaign website established by Division of
Safety continues to receive significant use - Thousands of additional mercury thermometers and
devices have been recycled and replaced -- in
drum lots - 2000 employees have submitted Hatters Pledges
22Phase II Results(Outreach Activities)
- Numerous presentations, community and school
outreach activities completed. - Several thousand children attended campaign
events and displays. - Partnership established with Maryland Department
of the Environment for statewide elimination
project in schools in progress - Non-NIH Federal facilities, and others joining or
partnering with the Campaign
23Phase II Results(Continued)
- 2002 - NIH receives Significant Achievement
Award for a Government Facility from Businesses
for the Bay, a regional pollution prevention
organization. - 2003 State recognition received The
Institutes campaign to eliminate the use of
mercury sets a high standard for environmental
outreach and education. - --Paris N. Glendening, Governor of Maryland
24Future Campaign Emphasis
- Encourage E-Cycling - Mercury in electronics
- Eliminate the Legacy Continue development and
testing of mercury decontamination protocols for
decommissioning of laboratories and clinical
facilities. - Prevention Advance Mercury Free as a
criterion for sustainable designs in new facility
construction and operation.
25Conclusions
- While still in progress, the mercury reduction
campaign at the NIH has already exceeded most of
its goals. - The success of this effort confirms that
voluntary campaigns focused on specific chemicals
can significantly reduce the potential for
pollution from biomedical laboratory facilities.
26- Additional campaign benefits include
- Significant reductions in potential exposure
hazards to employees and patients - High costs and liabilities associated with spills
have been greatly reduced - Very positive community relations.
27Join our Efforts!
- Visit, use, copy and contribute to our web site
- http//www.nih.gov/od/ors/ds/nomercury/
- Go on a virtual tour
- http//www.epa.gov/seahome/mercury/src/outmerc.htm
- Take some samples
- Promotional materials, mercury free thermometers
- Educational flyers for labs, kids and parents
- Pledge and partner with us
28For New RecruitsHatters Campaign Advice
- Rely on the Web The only way to reach large
audiences in an economical manner. - Dont Assume That audiences of any educational
level know that mercury is toxic that teachers
know what mercury is or that kids ever heard of
Alice in Wonderland. - HgP2 Does Pay Remind the budget office that the
cost of cleaning up a single spill may be less
than the total costs of running your entire
campaign for a year.
29AND MOST IMPORTANT OF ALL
30Make it Fun!
- Remember
- Gimmicks work
- Dress for success (Hats are particularly
important) - Avoid Overconfidence You are replaceable by a
dog from Minnesota
31Clancy, the Minnesota Pollution Control Agencys
Mercury-Detecting Dog in Action