Welcome to Forensic Science - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Welcome to Forensic Science

Description:

The term forensics is derived from the ... Major Developments in Forensic Science History 700s AD Chinese used fingerprints to establish identity of ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:181
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 32
Provided by: meinsterP
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Welcome to Forensic Science


1
Welcome to Forensic Science
  • Mrs. Cannon
  • Room 306
  • cannona_at_archbishopsplading.org

2
Warm-Up Question
  • What is forensic science?

3
What is forensic science?
  • The term forensics is derived from the Latin
    forensis meaning forum.
  • Forensic science is application of science to
    matters of criminal and civil laws that are
    enforced by police agencies in the criminal
    justice system.
  • Criminalistics is the examination of physical
    evidence. Can be used interchangeably with
    forensics.

4
History of the Development of Forensic
Science Due Date You will receive a
topic or scientist that somehow contributed to
the development of forensic science. You
are to research the topic and provide the
following information to the class. Create a
small poster that describes your event or person.
It should include A detailed summary of the
event or person describing their significance in
the development of forensic science. All work
should be typed in a font large enough to read or
neatly written Heading or Title at the top of
the poster The date when the event took place
under the heading. At least one picture, photo or
drawing.  Please reference your source(s) on the
back. Your name and period on the back.
5
  • In school, every period ends with a bell. Every
    sentence ends with a period. Every crime ends
    with a sentence.
  • Stephen Wright, comedian

6
Criminalistics vs Criminology
  • Criminalistics
  • the scientific examination of physical evidence
    for legal purposes.
  • Criminology
  • includes the psychological angle, studying the
    crime scene for motive, traits, and behavior that
    will help to interpret the evidence

7
Crime Lab
  • BASIC SERVICES
  • Evidence Collection Unit
  • Photography Unit
  • Evidence Storage

8
Crime LabOptional Services
  • ADDITIONAL SERVICES
  • Physical Science Unit
  • Trace Evidence
  • Firearms Identification
  • Document Examination
  • Fingerprint Examination
  • Toxicology Unit
  • Biology Unit
  • Autopsy
  • DNA Analysis
  • Serology
  • Polygraph Unit
  • Voiceprint Analysis Unit

9
Other Forensic Science Services
  • Forensic Pathology
  • Forensic Anthropology
  • Forensic Entomology
  • Forensic Psychiatry
  • Forensic Odontology
  • Forensic Engineering
  • Cybertechnology

10
Major Crime Laboratories
  • FBI
  • DEA
  • ATF
  • U.S. Postal Service
  • U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

11
Crime Lab History
  • First police crime lab in the world was
    established in France in 1910 by Edmond Locard
  • First police crime lab in the U.S. opened in 1923
    in Los Angeles
  • The Scientific Crime Detection Lab was founded in
    Evanston, Illinois in 1929
  • The first FBI crime lab opened in 1932

12
BIG IDEA!
  • The development of modern forensic science
    parallels general advancements in science,
    particularly physical and biological sciences.
  • What milestones in science do you think pushed
    forensics forward?

13
Major Developments in Forensic Science History
  • 700s ADChinese used fingerprints to establish
    identity of documents and clay sculptures
  • 1000Roman courts determined that bloody palm
    prints were used to frame a man in his brothers
    murder
  • 1149King Richard of England introduced the idea
    of the coroner to investigate questionable death
  • 1200sA murder in China is solved when flies were
    attracted to invisible blood residue on a sword
    of a man in the community
  • 1598Fidelus was first to practice forensic
    medicine in Italy
  • 1670Anton Van Leeuwenhoek constructed the first
    high-powered microscope
  • 1776Paul Revere identified the body of General
    Joseph Warren based on the false teeth he had
    made for him
  • 1784John Toms convicted of murder on basis of
    torn edge of wad of paper in pistol matching a
    piece of paper in his pocket

14
Major Developments in Forensic Science History
  • 1859Gustav Kirchhoff and Robert Bunsen developed
    the science of spectroscopy.
  • 1864Crime scene photography developed
  • 1879Alphonse Bertillon developed a system to
    identify people using particular body
    measurements
  • 1896Edward Henry developed first classification
    system for fingerprint identification
  • 1900Karl Landsteiner identified human blood
    groups
  • 1904Edmond Locard formulated his famous
    principle, Every contact leaves a trace.
  • 1922Francis Aston developed the mass
    spectrometer.
  • 1959James Watson and Francis Crick discover the
    DNA double helix
  • 1977AFIS developed by FBI, fully automated in
    1996
  • 1984Jeffreys developed and used first DNA tests
    to be applied to a criminal case

15
People of Historical Significance
  • Edmond Locard (1877-1966)
  • French professor
  • Considered the father of criminalistics
  • Built the worlds first forensic laboratory in
    France in 1910

16
BIG IDEA!
  • The basis for modern forensic science is the
  • Locard Exchange Principle
  • Whenever two objects come into contact with
    each other, traces of each are exchanged.
  • Every contact you make with another person,
    place or object results in an exchange of
    physical materials.

17
Locard Principle in Action
  • You have 2 children and a cat. You run out to
    take care of some errands that include stopping
    at a furniture store, the laundry, and the house
    of a friend who has one child and a dog. From a
    forensic standpoint, this sequence of events can
    provide a gold mine of information.
  • What traces of you are left behind at each
    stop?
  • What evidence of each stop do you take with you?

18
Crime Scene Team
  • A group of professional investigators, each
    trained in a variety of special disciplines.
  • Team Members
  • First Police Officer on the scene
  • Medics (if necessary)
  • Investigator(s)
  • Medical Examiner or Representative (if necessary)
  • Photographer and/or Field Evidence Technician
  • Lab Experts
  • pathologist serologist
  • DNA expert toxicologist
  • forensic odontologist forensic anthropologist
  • forensic psychologist forensic entomologist
  • firearm examiner bomb and arson expert
  • document and handwriting experts fingerprint
    expert

19
Scientific Method(as it pertains to
criminalistics)
  • Observe a problem or questioned evidence and
    collect objective data.
  • Consider a hypothesis or possible solution.
  • Examine, test, and then analyze the evidence.
  • Determine the significance of the evidence.
  • Formulate a theory based on evaluation of the
    significance of the evidence

20
Complex Reasoning Skills
  • Necessary to Work Through and Solve Crimes
  • Deductive and Inductive Reasoning
  • Classifying
  • Comparing and Contrasting
  • Problem Solving
  • Analyzing Perspectives
  • Constructing Support
  • Error Analysis

21
Laws that Pertain to the U.S. Criminal Justice
System
  • The U.S. Constitution
  • Statutory Law
  • Common Law or Case Law
  • Civil Law
  • Criminal Law
  • Equity Law
  • Administrative Law

22
The Bill of RightsGives individuals the right
  • To be presumed innocent until proven guilty
  • Not to be searched unreasonably
  • Not to be arrested without probable cause
  • Against unreasonable seizure of personal property
  • Against self-incrimination
  • To fair questioning by police
  • To protection from physical harm throughout the
    justice process
  • To an attorney
  • To trial by jury
  • To know any charges against oneself
  • To cross-examine prosecution witnesses
  • To speak and present witnesses
  • Not to be tried again for the same crime
  • Against cruel and unusual punishment
  • To due process
  • To a speedy trial
  • Against excessive bail
  • Against excessive fines
  • To be treated the same as others, regardless of
    race, gender, religious preference, country of
    origin, and other personal attributes

23
Miranda v Arizona
  • In 1963, Ernesto Miranda, a 23 year old mentally
    disturbed man, was accused of kidnapping and
    raping an 18-year-old woman in Phoenix, Arizona.
    He was brought in for questioning, and confessed
    to the crime. He was not told that he did not
    have to speak or that he could have a lawyer
    present. At trial, Miranda's lawyer tried to get
    the confession thrown out, but the motion was
    denied. The case went to the Supreme Court in
    1966. The Court ruled that the statements made to
    the police could not be used as evidence, since
    Mr. Miranda had not been advised of his rights.

24
Miranda Rights
  • The following is a minimal Miranda warning
  • You have the right to remain silent. Anything
    you say can and will be used against you in a
    court of law. You have the right to speak to an
    attorney, and to have an attorney present during
    any questioning. If you cannot afford a lawyer,
    one will be provided for you at the governments
    expense.

25
Types of Crimes
  • Infraction
  • Misdemeanor
  • Felony

26
Evidence
  • Anything that tends to prove or disprove
    something.

27
Admissibility of Evidence
  • Must be relevant
  • Relevance is made up of 2 components
  • Materiality- must have something to do with the
    case being tried
  • Ex. Previous activity unrelated to present case
  • Probativeness- must prove or disprove something
  • Must be competent
  • Non-Prejudicial
  • Ex. Cant be inflammatory, prior criminal
    activity
  • Constitutional constraints
  • Ex. Unreasonable search and seizure
  • Statutory constraints
  • Ex. Incriminating testimonial evidence
  • Hearsay
  • Ex. Statement made outside of court not under
    oath asserting the truth of the statement

28
Federal Rules of Evidence
  • Govern what evidence is admissible in court
  • Two legal decisions had the biggest impact on the
    field of forensic science.
  • Frye v. United States 1923
  • Daubert v. Merrill Dow 1993

29
Admissibility of Evidence
  • 1923 Frye v. United States
  • Scientific evidence is allowed into the courtroom
    if it is generally accepted by the relevant
    scientific community.
  • The Frye standard does not offer any guidance on
    reliability.
  • The evidence is presented in the trial and the
    jury decides if it can be used.
  • Known as general acceptance standard.
  • 1993 Daubert v. Dow
  • Admissibility is determined by
  • Whether the theory or technique can be tested
  • Whether the science has been offered for peer
    review
  • Whether the rate of error is acceptable
  • Whether the method at issue enjoys widespread
    acceptance.
  • Whether the opinion is relevant to the issue
  • The judge decides if the evidence can be entered
    into the trial.

30
Facets of Guilt
  • Try to prove
  • Meansperson had the ability to do the crime
  • Motiveperson had a reason to do the crime (not
    necessary to prove in a court of law)
  • Opportunityperson can be placed at the crime

31
  • If the Law has made you a witness, remain a man
    (woman) of science.
  • You have no victim to avenge, no guilty or
    innocent person to ruin or save.
  • You must bear testimony within the limits of
    science.
  • P.C.H.
    Brouardel
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com